Radiation Protection of the Emergency Workers Regaining Control over Radioactive Material Inside Destroyed Unit IV of the Chernobyl NPP

Similar documents
Regional Workshop on the International Basic Safety Standards. Session 10: Emergency Preparedness and Response

Radiological assessment and protection of first responders during a radiation emergency in EPC III and EPC IV

Regional Workshop on the International Basic Safety Standards. Session 1: Dose Limits and Dose Constraints

What should a radiation regulator do about NORM?

Safety Standards for Decommissioning Activities

Safety of Decommissioning: International Cooperation under the IAEA Coordination

Planned reference and intervention levels in Finland

Safety Analysis: Event Classification

Temporary Increase in the Emergency Exposure Dose Limit in Response to the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi NPP Accident December 3, 2014

Health & Safety Policy and Procedures Manual SECTION 38 RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM

Application of the Commission s Recommendations for the Protection of People in Emergency Exposure Situations. Table of contents

Regulatory Review of Safety Assessment for Decommissioning of Facilities Using Radioactive Material

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Review and Assessment of Engineering Factors

PART P CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR RESPONSE TO RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL EMERGENCIES

Case Studies in Existing Exposure Situations

Università di Pisa Facoltà di Ingegneria Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione. Emergency Planning.

Overview of the IAEA Activities on Occupational Radiation Protection

Nuclear safety Lecture 4. The accident of the TMI-2 (1979)

Justification and use of hand-held X-ray equipment

TITLE. Prepared by: 4.6 Basic Industrial First Aid

Mr. Teo Han Ping Head, Programme Management, Occupational Safety & Health Division, Ministry of Manpower

International Trends and Safety Perspectives in the Decommissioning of Facilities Using Radioactive Material

IFE Level 3 Diploma in Fire Science and Fire Safety

ERIC LAFFORGUE. The Atomic surfers from Fukushima

ALARA in Practice Reactor internal parts repair at the Temelín NPP

Nuclear Safety Regulation: Before and after Fukushima*

HEAT, COLD, SOLAR ULTRAVIOLET & INCLEMENT WEATHER

PART 4: IMPLEMENTATION

Emergency Procedures

The Regulatory Framework Improvement for Safe Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants in Korea

RISKAUDIT GRS - IRSN Safety assessment of the BELENE NPP

Guidance on the Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 (IRR99)

Considering the Meaning of Build Back Better from the experience of Catastrophe

Severe Accident Management Programmes for Nuclear Power Plants

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (CHAPTER 354A) WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH (CONFINED SPACES) REGULATIONS 2009

THE LOVIISA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING PLAN UPDATE Matti Kaisanlahti NKS-R Decommissioning Seminar, Halden, Norway, November 2013

African swine fever in domestic pigs and wild boar (ASF)

Bob Halstead Office of the Governor Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (CHAPTER 354A) WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH (CONFINED SPACES) REGULATIONS 2009

Competency type. positions. All workers (including contractors), higher degree students and volunteers

Refresher Licensed Asbestos Supervisor Training

Nuclear Human Resources Development Studies in Turkey

EUROPASS SUPPLEMENT TO THE DIPLOMA OF

Airborne Activity Sampling and Monitoring at Hinkley Point A Site. David Williams, Hinkley Point A Site

Overview of the ATC activities in the last twenty years 2014 ISOE Asian ALARA Symposium

Angela Nikolic. List of Legislation, Code of Practice, Australian Standards, Guidance Materials used to determine control measures

SAFETY REGULATORS' ADVICE ON THE SELECTION OF THE PROPULSION PLANT IN SUPPORT OF THE FUTURE DETERRENT REVIEW NOTE Issue 1.

Quarries National Joint Advisory Committee (QNJAC) Occupational Health. Information Sheet 7. October Whole Body Vibration

Nuclear and radiation safety: Guidance for emergency response

CONTRACTOR WHS HAZARD STANDARD HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS EXTERNAL USE ONLY

Confined Space Program

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment

OBJECTIVE 22: EMERGENCY WORKERS, EQUIPMENT, AND VEHICLES - MONITORING AND DECONTAMINATION

Local Rules: Ionising Radiation Regulations Working Instructions Staff MUST Follow

IAEA Regional Workshop Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Decommissioning of Research Reactors June Manila, Philippines

Bluetongue Disease (BT)

DESIGN OF REACTOR CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AND SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

ONR GUIDE DECOMMISSIONING. Nuclear Safety Technical Assessment Guide. NS-TAST-GD-026 Revision 4

SAFETY APPROACHES. The practical elimination approach of accident situations for water-cooled nuclear power reactors

SA121, SA122, SA123, SA128 and SA1219 Self-acting Temperature Control Systems (Dial Adjustment)

CONTRACTOR WHS HAZARD STANDARD CONFINED SPACE EXTERNAL USE ONLY

LENS Radiation Safety Manual

Public Works Update Safety Campaign. Second Quarter Report

III Code. TRACECA Maritime Safety and Security IMSAS workshop Kiev (Ukraine) III Code. Dr. Jens U. Schröder-Hinrichs

Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) Model First Responder Procedure for Transportation Accidents Involving Radiological Materials

TSS21 Sealed Thermostatic Steam Tracer Trap

Enhancing NPP Safety through an Effective Dependability Management

The purpose of this document is to establish the procedures for accident prevention and investigation at (Insert Company Name) jobsites.

Minimising the impact of aggressive solvents

Country report. Croatian bathing water quality in Croatia. May Photo: Peter Kristensen

Diving at Work Regulations List of Approved Classes of Medical Practitioners. dated

Control of Allergies to Laboratory Animals

Control of Vibration at Work

Work Equipment: LOCAL EXHAUST VENTILATION

Special Condition. 10 Minutes OEI Take-off Thrust at High Ambient Temperature rating

Evaluation and Demonstration of Safety of Decommissioning of

Occupational Radiation Protection

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Unit 3: Fire Service Operations and Incident Command International

Western University Unsealed Nuclear Substance Contamination Monitoring Record

Level 4 Certificate in Asbestos Removal for Contract Managers

Dismantling of Fuel Flask Group B

Lone and Hazardous Working Policy June 2010

in84061.txt at Page 1 of 6 2/25/00

Module: Permit to work System

Hazardous Materials Management Guidelines

Search and Rescue ESF 9

C167 Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988

The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC):

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday

LADDERS FIXED AND PORTABLE

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Determination of the Off-site Emergency Planning and Public Information Areas for the Wylfa Nuclear Licensed Site

Application of pipeline risk assessment to proposed developments in the vicinity of high pressure Natural Gas pipelines

SAS Quality Scorecard August 2011

Mine Dust Management Plan

New Licensed Asbestos Operative Training

Skin dose assessments for contaminated individuals using VARSKIN. Izzy Styles Sellafield Ltd

A CASE STUDY OF THE DNIEPER/PRIPYAT RIVER BASIN: CONSEQUENCES AND LESSONS OF THE MOST SEVERE HUMAN MADE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

Transcription:

International Conference on Global Emergency Preparedness and Response, Vienna, 19-23 October 2015 Radiation Protection of the Emergency Workers Regaining Control over Radioactive Material Inside Destroyed Unit IV of the Chernobyl NPP Vladimir Kutkov, NRC Kurchatov Institute, Russian Federation

Recovery of the Chernobyl NPP 1. To prevent development of catastrophic conditions on the ChNPP site. 2. To establish emergency management. 3. To regain control over the emergency situation on the site and in vicinity. 4. To re-establish the Defence-in-Depth of the ruined Unit IV and regain control over about 6.6E+20Bq of fission and activation products inside. 5. To return the Chernobyl NPP in operation. 2

Ruined Unit IV of ChNPP in May, 1986 3

Secured Unit IV in November, 1986 4

Phase 1 of the Recovery Operation 26-27 April 1986 (days D1-D2) Objective: To prevent development of catastrophic conditions and establish emergency management. Fire on roof of Unit IV and Joint Turbine hall was put out in5 hoursafter start of the accident; Units I-III in cold shutdown in 3-25 hours; The Governmental commission was established and deployed to city of Pripyat in 18 hours; About 50,000 citizens of city of Pripyat were evacuated 27 April, 39 hours. 5

Phase 2 of the Recovery Operation 28 April -22 May (days D3-D27) Objective:To regain control over the emergency situation on the site and in vicinity. About 100,000citizens were relocated from the ChNPP 30-km zone and other contaminated territories in Belarus and Ukraine on 2-6 May; Clean-up works on the site started; Strategyfor regaining control over radioactive material and returning the ChNPP into operation was issued on 22 May. 6

Milestones of Recovery Strategy (Decree of CCCPSU and the CMSU on 22 May 1986) Milestone PLANNED REACHED Repopulate the 30-km zone Dec. 1986 Revoked Secure the ruined Unit IV Sep. 1986 Nov. 1986 Decontaminate the ChNPP site Sep. 1986 Dec. 1987 Return the Unit I in operation July 1986 Oct. 1986 Return the Unit II in operation July 1986 Nov. 1986 Return the Unit III in operation Aug. 1986 Dec. 1987 Resume constructing Stage 3 Oct. 1986 Revoked 7

Phase 3 of the Recovery Operation 23 May 30 November (days D28-D219) Objective: To re-establishthe Defence-in-Depth of the ruined Unit IV and regain control over about 6.6E+20Bq of fission and activation products inside. 30 November 1986 Object Ukrytie securing the ruined Unit IV was commissioned; 1 October 1986 Unit I returned to operation, 5 November 1986 Unit II returned to operation, and 31 December 1987 Unit III returned to operation. 8

1986 Chernobyl emergency workers 9

1986 Chernobyl emergency workers (2) Cohort IDM Size, Mean dose, persons msv C1A Witnesses: Victims 134 3,400 C1B Witnesses: Recov. 2,000 550 C2 Early Military EmWrk 21,600 115 C3 Late Military EmWrk 61,762 204 C4 ChNPP staff 2,358 87 C5 ChNPP supporters 2,000 ND C6 Construction Work. 21,500 87.5 10

Chernobyl NPP site in April 1986 11

Witnesses of the Accident 12

Radiation Safety Provisions in Exposure Situations PLANNED Each planned exposure should be justified The doses of planned exposure situation should be kept As Low As Reasonably Achievable The sum of doses in a planned exposure situation should be kept below specified dose limits EMERGENCY Each protective action should be justified in context of protective strategy The protective strategy should be optimized The residual dose after implementation of protective strategy should be kept under specific reference levels 13

GSR Part 3 and GSR Part 7: Exposure of Emergency Workers In an emergency exposure situation, the relevant requirements for occupational exposure in planned exposure situationsshall be applied for emergency workers, in accordance with a graded approach. Response organizations and employers shall ensure that no emergency worker is subject to an exposure in an emergency in excess of 50 msvother than those whose perform exceptional tasks. 14

ChNPP Staff: «Normal Operations» 15

Works at the Roof of Unit III/IV K* max = 4 Gy/h K* min = 0.2 Gy/h Dose limitation for Emergency Workers H WB = 250 msv, including 200 msv in one operation 16

Conditions of Generic Optimization The radiation protection framework established in US-605 for protection of emergency workers (Cohort C6) was optimized under following conditions: The object Ukrytie shall be completed by 1 October 1986; The individual dose of emergency worker shall not exceed 250 msv; The collective dose of emergency workers should be minimised; Civil and military workforce is limited. 17

Chernobyl Construction Workers 18

1986 Civil Emergency Workers 19

Summary About 110,000 emergency workers were involved in 1986 in 216 days operation on regaining control over the radioactive material in destroyed Unit IV of the ChNPP. Average whole body dose equivalent of gammaradiation in 1986ChNPP emergency workers is 170 msv. 300 msv was exceeded in about 3,500 workers, 1000 msv was exceeded in about 500 workers. 20

Summary (2) Exposure of accident witnesses in Cohort C1 who worked at ChNPP site 26 April -1 May provides example of unrestricted exposure of emergency workers in emergency exposure situation. That exposure provides the lognormal distribution of individual does, which is expected. Exposure of ChNPP in Cohort C4 who worked at ChNPP site after 1 May provides example of regulated exposure of emergency workers in emergency exposure situation. That exposure provides the restricted lognormal distribution of individual does as expected. 21

Summary (3) Exposure of construction workers in Cohort C6 who built the object Ukrytie at ChNPP site 20 May 30 November to rebuilt Defence-in-Depth of ruined Unit IV and secure about 6.6E+20Bq of fission and activation products. That works were performed under the strict radiation control and exposure was optimised on the way specific for planned activities in emergency exposure situation. The optimization under limited resources provides the cut-off type of distribution, which should be taken into account in application of principle of optimization in emergency exposure situation. 22

Thank you for your attention! V.Kutkov@Yandex.Ru 23