TEAM: ROAD: SECTION: K K Nagar Walkability Survey 19 th June 2013

Similar documents
WALKABILITY SURVEY IN ASIAN CITIES

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

CURB EXTENSIONS BULB OUTS DPS 201 NECKDOWNS

CURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

WALKABILITY SURVEYS IN ASIAN CITIES

Frome Street Bicycle Route

guide to a phased approach TRIPP

Supporting Safer Cities. ENHANCING LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY a safety analysis of the RK Ashram Marg Metro Station

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

Street Design Guidelines for Greater Mumbai

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS), Mini Version

All Season Age Friendly Pedestrian Safety and Walkability Checklist *

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

Re-Engineering Transport Designs for Safe and Universal Accessibility. Dr. Sewa Ram School of Planning and Architecture New Delhi

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

PART A: IDENTIFICATION/LOCATION

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

Manila-Quezon City. My City Initiative Delhi. A Safety Analysis. a project by World Vision India

Improving Public Spaces in Chennai

GENERAL. 1. Description

Standards vs. Guidelines. Public Right-of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)

LEA BRIDGE ROAD - A STREET FOR EVERYONE Public consultation document

Modifiers to LWS, if any

Streets for walking & cycling. Designing for safety, accessibility, and comfort in African cities

Neighbourhood Walkability Checklist How walkable is your community?

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

Signs. signs, signals and road markings. in this chapter

SPACES INSTRUMENT: OBSERVERS MANUAL

Portland Peninsula Sidewalk and Ramp Inventory

Fill in the rating for each section. Total up the ratings to see how your neighbourhood scores overall for walkability.

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Active Transportation Audit

Safe Routes to School: Munroe Elementary Walk Audit Report. Image: Drexel, Barrell & Co.

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Report on Walkability Survey and Workshop for ZIP Code Hosted by the Oklahoma City-County Health Department April 13, 2013

5. PLASTIRA STREET Case Study Area and Character Sections. Marina. Case Study Area. Character Sections. National Report of Greece

ADA Training Standard Plans

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

How walk, bike, and transit friendly is your neighbourhood?

WALKABILITY CHECKLIST How walkable is your community?

CITY OF PAPILLION, NEBRASKA

BEST PRACTICES FOR ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORT. C G B (Kit) Mitchell

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Figure 5-1 Complete Street Zones. Roadside. May include frontage, pedestrian throughway, furnishings and curbside areas.

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

Transportation Planning Division

Controlled. Semi-Controlled PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Walking Audit Supporting Information

OLDER PEOPLE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FOR LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES. Christopher G B (Kit) Mitchell

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Liveable Neighbourhoods Design Code and Policy

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

Memo. Introduction. Memphis STP Pedestrian Sidewalk Project

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

Cluster 5/Module 2 (C5/M2): Pedestrians and Transit Oriented Development (TOD)

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

A case study on walkability by GWI method to estimate the pedestrian walkability in Dilshad Garden: New Delhi

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Road Markings. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Classification 2

5 Circulation & Parking

WALKscope Data Challenge Tip Sheet

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 306 DRAINAGE PIPE WORK DESCRIPTION 4

West Broad Street Traffic Study

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

-Lexington Mayor, Jim Gray

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Victoria Park Master Plan

Sandyford Cycle Route (Kilgobbin / Drummartin Link Road)

PUBLIC REALM MASTER PLAN

Low Carbon Mobility Plan For Indian Cities


Streets. Safe for Pedestrians 20% 2nd 5,000. Are We People-Friendly?

Speed Control & Limits

COMMUNITY MEETING #1 Summary

Section 4: Inventory Methodology and Findings

Equitable Road Space : Case study Vikas Marg, New Delhi

SHAHJAHANABAD SAFETY AUDIT REPORT

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

1. TRANSFORM CITY ROAD WEST INTO A GREAT CENTRAL city street

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

York Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan

03 Roads, Car Parks and Civil Works

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

INTERSECTIONS AT GRADE INTERSECTIONS

ITE Wayfinding Workshop, Oct , 2004

Transcription:

K K Nagar Walkability Survey 19 th June 2013 TEAM: ROAD: SECTION: Length of surveyor s foot in cms. (any one): (this surveyor will measure distances required in Table II and points 2.c and 4.a in Table III) Height of surveyor (any one): (this surveyor will answer 6.d in Table III)

K K Nagar Walkability Survey 19 th June 2013 WALKABILITY RUBRIC: 1. Pedestrian & vehicular conflict: 2. Footpaths: Walking paths do not exist but are required 3. Safety & security: Environment feels very dangerous pedestrians are highly susceptible to crime 4. Obstructions: Pedestrian infrastructure is completely blocked by permanent obstructions 5. Motorist behaviour: High disrespect to pedestrians by traffic Walking paths do not exist and are not required Environment feels dangerous pedestrians are at some risk of crime Pedestrians are significantly inconvenienced. Effective width <1m Disrespect to pedestrians from traffic and pedestrians rarely get priority traffic) Walking paths exist but are not continuous along a single stretch between intersections and they are narrow in width Difficult to ascertain perceived degree of security for pedestrians Pedestrian traffic is mildly inconvenienced. Effective width < or = 1m Motorists sometimes yield to pedestrians Parameter Rank 0 Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 4 Walking impossible Walking possible with a Walking possible but with Walking possible but with significant conflict with high risk of accidents great inconvenience some inconvenience heavy and fast moving (Walking paths do not (Walking paths are either (Walking paths are vehicles exist OR are too narrow too narrow OR comfortable for the most (Walking paths do not or obstructed, forcing one obstructed, forcing one to part, but at times one is exist) to use the road that has use the road that has forced to use the road fast moving traffic) jammed, slow moving that has some slowmoving traffic) Continuous walking paths exist but are narrow in width Environment feels secure pedestrians at minimal crime risk Obstacle presents minor inconvenience. Effective width > 1m Motorists usually obey traffic laws and sometimes yield to pedestrians Walking is comfortable there is no vehicular conflict (Walking paths provide a comfortable walking experience OR it is a pedestrian only street) Continuous walking paths of comfortable width and adequate amenities exist OR it is a pedestrian only street Environment feels very secure pedestrians at virtually no risk of crime There are no obstructions Motorists obey traffic laws and almost always yield to pedestrians

SAFETY & SECURITY: Using arrows extending from the buildings in the image, for each building mark LU (use abbreviations below) / Location of building line (a,b,c,or d) / Compound wall (yes or no) / Height of compound wall (a, b or c): MU mixed use (combination of land For this street, rank using attached uses in a single building) table: Point #3 Rank: Res Residential a. Along the street Com Commercial / Office b. Along the footpath Location of building line Off Office c. Setback from the footpath Pk Park / Play ground d. Setback from the street Vac Vacant Is there a compound wall? Rel Religious a. Below waist Sch School / Col College Height of compound wall b. Between waist and neck Hos Hospital c. Above neck Ins Other institutional

OBSTRUCTIONS: Mark the obstructions as points on the map. From these points, extend arrows out and label each one referring to the Key below. Measure distance of each from the property line using your foot steps. (Example: EP/5) Permanent Obstruction Temporary Obstruction Key Element Key Element Key Element Key Element EP Electricity pole WC Public toilet M Manhole TG Garbage dump T Transformer BS Bus stop G Garbage bin TD Debris dump EB Electricity box En Property entrance C Encroachment TV Vendor Tel Telephone box V Vendor O Other TC Encroachment For this street, rank using attached table: Point #4 Rank: SB Speed bump / traffic calmer mark this in the middle of the road where it is located

TREES, LIGHTS & PARKING: Mark trees, lights and parking with a point. Extend an arrow from the point and use the key below to describe each point. Also measure distance of each from the property line using your foot steps. (Example for trees: T/5/SH/6.5) (Example for street lights: SL/3/W/7) (Example for parking: P/RP/a,b,d/b) Tree T Height of tree (in terms of floors of a building) Shade SH Shade NSH Distance Street Light SL Height of light (in terms of floors of a building) Works W Doesn t Work DW Distance Parking on road RP Parking on footpath FP a. Cycles b. Two wheelers Parking P Type of vehicle parked (choose all that apply) c. Auto rickshaws d. Cars e. Others f. ne a. Perpendicular to the side Direction of parking (choose applicable) b. At an angle to the side c. Parallel to the side

TABLE 1. Pedestrian & 1.a Rank using attached table: Point # 1 Rank: vehicular a. On footpath b. Off footpath 1.b Where do people walk? (tick all that apply) conflict: c. Side of road d. Anywhere 2.a Rank using attached table: Point # 2 Rank: 2.b Is there a footpath? 2.c Footpath width foot prints 2.d Footpath curb height cms. a. Concrete b. Granite 2.e Footpath material (tick appropriate) 2. Footpaths: c. Paver blocks d. Anti skid tiles 2.f Condition of footpath (tick appropriate) a. Poor b. Average c. Good d. Excellent 2.g Footpath continuity (tick appropriate) a. Continuous b. Interrupted by property entrances c. Discontinuous 3.a Is the footpath clean? 3. Maintenance 3.b Do people urinate along the side? and cleanliness: In the absence of footpaths, is the side of the 3.c road clean? 4.a Width of road (from compound wall to compound wall) (address varying widths) foot prints 4.b Is there a median dividing the road? 4. The road: Within the length of road, is there a break in 4.c the median? 4.d Is there a crossing area / zebra crossing within the length of the road? a. Trees b. Street lighting 5. Amenities: 5.a Amenities on the footpath (tick all that apply) c. Dust bins d. Toilets e. Seating f. ne 6. Disability 6.a Is the footpath usable by disabled people? infrastructure: 6.b 7. Motorist behaviour: 8. Bus stops: 9. Drainage: Type of disability infrastructure (tick all that apply) 7.a Rank using attached table: Point # 5 Rank: a. Ramps at the end of footpaths b. Tactile paving 8.a Is there a bus stop present? 8.b Name of the bus stop 8.c Does the bus stop have a shelter? 8.d At what height is the bus stop from the road? cms. 8.e Is there seating at the bus stop? 8.f Does the bus stop obstruct pedestrian movement? 9.a Are there storm water drains between the footpath and the road? 9.b In the absence of footpaths, are there storm water drains on the side of the road?

INTERSECTION: 1 Signalised 2 Police presence 3 Median refuge Intersections: 4 Traffic calmers 5 Crossing distance foot prints 6 Number of pedestrians crossing per minute 7 Number of arms at the intersection INTERSECTION: 1 SIgnalised 2 Police presence 3 Median refuge Intersections: 4 Traffic calmers 5 Crossing distance foot prints 6 Number of pedestrians crossing per minute 7 Number of arms at the intersection INTERSECTION: 1 SIgnalised 2 Police presence 3 Median refuge Intersections: 4 Traffic calmers 5 Crossing distance foot prints 6 Number of pedestrians crossing per minute 7 Number of arms at the intersection