Western Pocono Chapter. Trout Unlimited. 67 West Butler Drive fc ^

Similar documents
Current Wild Trout Classification Overview and Listing Process

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Wild Virginia and Heartwood first raised this issue at the May 19, 2014 public meeting.

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Brook Trout in Massachusetts: A Troubled History, A Hopeful Future

Environmental Review and Permitting for Wild Trout

Robert Weber PA Fish and Boat Commission Fisheries Biologist Fish Management Division

IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA. Strategic Plan

Trout Buffer Variance

The Cove Run Brook Trout Restoration Project with the Northern Garrett High School AP Environmental Science Class,

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Susquehanna University and the PFBC Unassessed Waters Initiative in the Susquehanna Basin Jonathan M. Niles Mike Bilger

Rebirth of the Pigeon River: Song of the Morning Dam Removal Project

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Notice. Proposed Changes to List of Class A Wild Trout Waters September 2017

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Completed Project Report Form

Pennsylvania s Unassessed Waters Initiative ( )

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Unassessed Waters Initiative ( )

Restoring the Iconicc Lower Cache River

...A modern conservation solution. Mary Waclawski and Patrick Pham

Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program for Golf Courses. Place Alternating Slideshow Photo Here

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL The River Connects Us

Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan

Eastern Brook Trout: Status and Threats

EcoLogic Memorandum. TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07

INDEPENDENCE SEAPORT MUSEUM ACTIVITY PACKET

Salmon Biology Station

Three point plan to addressing land use and habitat loss impacts on Chesapeake Bay tidal fish and shellfish

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Impact of Climate Change on Bees in the Eastern Forest: Diversity and Adaptations of Organisms

Wisconsin s Citizen-Based Monitoring Partnership Program and Trout Unlimited Driftless Area Restoration Effort (TUDARE)

DECISION MEMO. Pursuant to 36 C.F.R (e), the following persons are exempted from this order:

2. BACKGROUND. The West Branch Susquehanna River watershed

Assessing Ecosystem Impacts from Road Stream Crossings through Community Involvement

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Importance of Un-named tributaries to Brook Trout populations. Dr. Jonathan M. Niles

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

Water Quality Standards Class A Stream Redesignations

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Searsville Dam Removal

2016 Brook Trout Survey Project Remote Ponds and Coastal Streams Volunteer Angler Survey Results Report to Public

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Restoration Project at Trout Run Nature Preserve

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE Received May 23, 2018 to August 31, 2018

At Home on the Elbow River. -Ours to share-

Beaver Valley Ranch Steamboat Springs, Colorado


California golden trout: can their warming streams handle cattle grazing and climate change?

REPORT TO THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES. Pursuant to an appointment made by the Honourable Frank S. Miller, Minister of Natural

1.Warm Springs Creek (Anaconda) Watershed Description and Land Use

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lanesboro Area Fisheries Office FAQ sheet

Quarterly Progress Meeting - May Brook Trout Outcome. Stephen Faulkner, USGS Brook Trout Action Team Lead

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Visitor Guidelines for WPC-owned Properties. Last revised 5/20/2010

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

What was the historic coaster fishery like?

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Title 58. Recreation Part II. Fish and Boat Commission Chapter 65 Special Fishing Regulations.

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

9-1 What Role Do Humans Play in the Premature Extinction of Species?

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

Subject: Scoping Comments Ochoco Summit OHV Trail Project

Importance of un-named tributary streams to Brook Trout populations. Dr. Jonathan M. Niles Dr. Dan Ressler

FACT SHEET I. LOCATION

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America on the Conservation of the Porcupine Caribou Herd

Trout Unlimited and the Kittatinny Ridge Coalition.

Tips for Using & Printing Spreadsheets

Western native Trout Status report

A DECADE OF PROGRESS FOR THE West Branch Susquehanna Restoration Initiative A. WOLFE

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

YEAR IN REVIEW: THE UPPER LLANO WATERSHED PROTECTION PLAN

IN THE MATTER OF. Ed Friedman, under the penalty of perjury, states as follows:

AOGA EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR. Endangered Species Act

Understanding Today s Environmental Issues and the Oregon Stewardship Guidelines. David Phipps GCSAA NW Field Staff

TWO FORKS RANCH A5 REAL ESTATE. 790 Acres. Smiths Fork - Lincoln County - Wyoming

WFC 10 Wildlife Ecology & Conservation Nov. 29, Restoration Ecology: Rivers & Streams. Lisa Thompson. UC Cooperative Extension

Rocky River. Important Bird Area

Advancing Fish Passage in the Menomonee River Watershed

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Wednesday, January 13, :21 AM Herring, Lydia; Schaeffer, Brad; Simcik, Robert; Cable, Chris; Riggs, Steve

First Nations Fish Habitat Program Discussion Workbook

Lake Chapman North Narrative

Unassessed Waters Initiative ( ) HOW CAN YOU HELP??

TRCP National Sportsmen s Survey Online/phone survey of 1,000 hunters and anglers throughout the United States

Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

UNIT 5B. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY

Fighting for Life in French Creek

MINNESOTA S LARGEST FISHING, HUNTING, AND OUTDOORS GROUPS URGE STATE LAWMAKERS TO TAKE ACTION BEFORE IT S TOO LATE

Example Applications

Key Findings from a Statewide Survey of Wyoming Voters October 2018 Lori Weigel

Klamath Lake Bull Trout

Transcription:

February 18,2013 Rosemary Chiavetta, Esq. Secretary Western Pocono Chapter Trout Unlimited 67 West Butler Drive fc Drums, PA 18222 3 m "TJ {"H <-o >> ro -< c? O Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission P.O. Box 3265 ft rn cn Harrisburg, Pa. 17105-3265 Dear Secretary Chiavetta, On behalf of the Western Pocono Chapter of Trout Unlimited we are writing to oppose the proposed PPL power line in the Thornhurst area known as the PPL Northeast/Reliabilty Project and express our support for the alternative Citizen's Route. As currently proposed the 230 kv PPL line would destroy hundreds of acres of pristine forest and wetlands and traverse at least ten exceptional value (EV) wild trout tributaries of the Lehigh River. At least one of these tributaries is classified as Class A Wild Trout Waters. We believe the Citizens's Route would be much less invasive to wildlife and trout habitat and also to private property. In previous letters to public officials (see attached) WPCTU presented in detail the many possible detrimental effects to trout in particular and the environment in general. These adverse impacts include but are not limited to:

THERMAL POLLUTION - Due to loss of tree canopy there could be an increase in water termperature. Brook Trout survive best at temperatures below 68 degrees Fahrenheit. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION - Removal of trees and shrubs may cause runoff and inhibit natural reproduction of trout and the aquatic insect life that sustains them. HERBICIDES - Use of chemicals to control streamside vegetation may also have negative impacts on trout and aquatic life. Although WPCTU recognizes PPL's need to provide low cost, efficient energy we feel the alternative Citizen's Route would meet PPL's goals and still maintain the integrity of this unique environment. The residents of the Poconos have long valued their environment and the quality of life it provides. They have always shared their natural resources with non-residents i.e. recreationists, sportsmen, fishermen etc. forming a unique cultural and economic relationship. WPCTU would like to express its support for property owners in the affected areas and urge the Public Utilities Commission to hold local hearings and consider the alternative Citizen's Route for the benefit of the people and environment of the Poconos. Thank you. Sincerely Yours, Georgstrlludzik President WPCTU Michael M. Gondell Conservation Committee Ray Youngblood Conservation Committee

TROUT UNLIMITED WESTERN POCONO CHAPTER P.O. Box 414 Albrightsville, PA 18210 fn _ rn o a Rosemary Chiavetta, Esq., Secretary Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission P.O.Box 3265 Harrisburg, PA 17105-3265 m_mm Dear Secretary Chiavetta, The Western Pocono Chapter of Trout Unlimited would like to take this opportunity to convey our concern about the distinct potential for environmental degradation resulting from the Pennsylvania Power and Light Company's construction of a 230 kilovolt power line in the northern Pocono region. We remain unconvinced of the need for this initiative, but if it must proceed then we would suggest an alternative route - one that would minimize adverse environmental impacts. As an organization dedicated to the preservation and improvement of water quality and trout populations, we are chiefly troubled by the fact that the proposed route for the line will traverse at least twelve identified wild trout streams of which ten are classified as exceptional value (EV) by the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. This is indeed a lofty classification; the highest afforded any waterway in the state. One of these streams is classified as Class A Wild Trout Water. At least two other streams in the Bear Creek sub-watershed, while not classified as EV, are well known as supporting natural reproduction of both native Brook Trout and Brown Trout. Degradation of these uniquely valuable resources could, and probably will, result if the line is established in its current location. The likely adverse impacts would include the following: THERMAL POLLUTION - It is well known that all species of trout have exacting temperature requirements. Brook Trout, which predominate in these streams, are especially vulnerable to elevated water temperatures. Brook trout populations are generally most successful in streams with water temperatures of less than 68 degrees fahrenheit. Closed canopy forest cover is the key to maintaining water temperatures acceptable to the survival of healthy brook trout populations. The project under consideration will involve removal of a 150ft.swath of canopy, resulting in an inevitable increase in water temperatures in these streams as well as the main Lehigh River, to which these are all tributaries. However slight this increase might be, it is likely to have a depressive effect on native trout populations The Lehigh River is already thermally borderline and any increase in temperature could adversely impact its habitability for trout. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION - Successful trout reproduction depends on the availability of a relatively clean stream bottom. By virtue of the activity involved in the construction of this line.

surface disturbance will increase the possibility of erosion. This in turn will contribute to sedimentation to the streams it crosses and aflfect the natural reproduction of trout. Habitat for aquatic macroinvertebrates, which are the principal food source for wild trout, will also be diminished. Further aggravating this condition is the fact that no matter howrigorouslyaccess is controlled the line will become a magnet for illegal off road activity thereby increasing the likelihood of erosion. CHEMICAL POLLUTION - PPL acknowledges that their maintenance plan includes routine application of herbicides. There is little doubt that these materials will leach into the streams cut across by the power lines. These compounds will enter the streams possibly causing adverse impacts on trout populations, aquatic macroinvertebrates, and terrestrial insects which are a secondary food source for trout. While Trout Unlimited's objectives are more or less confined to water quality issues, weepmrell to briefly mention some other more general impacts of this project. These would inciusrefsior?? habitat that is home to a number of uncommon and sensitive plant species and disruption of a large tract prized by many for its current pristine and trackless state. Owing chiefly to the unspoiled character of the vast tract ( some 90,000 acres of public land) that will be traversed by thc powerline, it is home to an impressive diversity of wildlife. The fragmentation attending construction of the powerline would surely degrade this superb habitat. Lastly, the project will deprive a large segment of the public of the kind of natural outdoor experience that is becoming increasingly elusive. We are grateful for the opportunity to present our viewpoint and hopeful that our thoughts on the matter will be considered in the decision making process. Sincerely Yo Paul Raubertas Ray Youngblood Mike Gondell President Conservation Committee Conservation Committee

Michael M Gondell 539 Harrison St Hazleton PA 18201 LEH ICH- VAU.EY-PA -ISO i : 10.32BE85 ii<i>t<l»i>il<>li'">'in»i>l>ilhii'l> l il l i""ipi< l >i i i' 1