Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

Similar documents
Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Cates Lake, Scott County, Minnesota

MEMORANDUM Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District

Chateaugay Lakes Milfoil Control Program

BIG MARINE LAKE, WASHINGTON COUNTY: 2017 AQUATIC VEGETATION REPORT

Aquatic Plants of the Three Lakes

REQUEST FOR BID FOR DIVER ASSISTED SUCTION HARVESTING

DRAFT AMENDMENT 1. Introduction

2015 Starry Stonewort Inspection and Assessment Report: Lake Koronis, Stearns County MNDNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources

GRASS CARP SPAWNING IN LAKE ERIE TRIBUTARIES: WHEN AND WHERE?

2015 Macrophyte Survey Results

Shallow Lake Management Strategies. Steve McComas Blue Water Science Shallow Lakes Forum April 2014

Eurasian Water-milfoil Bed Mapping Survey Red Lake (WBIC: ) Douglas County, Wisconsin

MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc.

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

Assessing the Risk of AIS in Waters with no Public Boat Access Hennepin County 2018

Fish Survey of Goose Lake (ID # ), Ramsey County, Minnesota in 2012

Mud Bay SLELO-PRISM Water Chestnut & Hydrilla Surveillance 2012

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Osoyoos Lake Aquatic Plant Mapping

Aquatic Plant Surveys in Donner Lake State Park, California: Report to California State Parks. Final Draft

Dexter Marsh Wildlife Management Area and Muskellunge Creek: Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Assessment

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Aquatic Vegetation of Bass Lake

LAKE PLEASANT Steuben County 2006 Fish Management Report. Larry A. Koza Assistant Fisheries Biologist

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

Big Fish Lake Association Marcellus, MI 49067

Aquatic Plant Management and Importance to Sport Fisheries

Waubee Lake Kosciusko County Fish Management Report 2006

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Eurasian water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) SCUBA Dive Monitoring Survey Sand Bar Lake WBIC: Bayfield County, Wisconsin

Inventory # Perch Lake

LAKE JESUP VEGETATION MAPPING: AN INTER-AGENCY COLLABORATION. Lakshmi Sankaran, GISP Public Works Department, Seminole County

MINNESOTA FRESHWATER MUSSEL SURVEY AND RELOCATION PROTOCOL

Fisheries Survey of Saratoga Lake

Ray D. Valley* and Melissa T. Drake. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries and Wildlife 1200 Warner Road St.

Water-level change effects on northern pike spawning and nursery habitat and reproductive success in Rainy Lake and Namakan Reservoir, Minnesota

KICKAPOO LAKE Shakamak State Park Sullivan, Greene, and Clay Counties 2009 Fish Management Report. David S. Kittaka Fisheries Biologist

Lake information report

BEAVER DAM LAKE Kosciusko County 2005 Fish Management Report. Angela C. Benson Assistant Biologist

Fish Community and Aquatic Ecosystem Responses to the Cessation of Eurasian Watermilfoil Chemical Treatment on Lake Ellwood, Wisconsin

Onondaga Lake Fishery: 2011 Fact Sheet

Lake LeAnn 2018 Fish Survey

Kerr Lake Vegetation Survey. October November Report submitted by NC State University. Background

PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING AN AQUATIC PLANT PROBLEM 1

2014 Threatened and Endangered Fish Survey of. East Loon Lake and West Loon Lake. Lake County, Illinois

DOW# West Twin Lake

Glen Echo Lake Weed Biomass Study

Pond Management. Dan Lekie Agriculture & Natural Resource Agent K-State Research & Extension Johnson County

Delaware Estuary Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern Summary of ANS Survey, Summer 2002 Kirstin Wakefield, DEP & Ann Faulds, PA Sea Grant

ATTACHMENT F. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Marsh Lake Ecosystem Restoration Project

LITTLE WHITE OAK Knox County 2006 Fish Management Report. Debbie King Assistant Fisheries Biologist

RLAA 2018 Annual Meeting Minutes May 1, 2018

Northwest Montana Lakes Volunteer Monitoring Network 2015 Program Summary 5.7 SMALL LAKES. (Surface Area <100 Acres)

AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES EARLY DETECTORS A HOW-TO GUIDE

CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM

Management of Hybrid Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibericum x spicatum) using Diver Assisted Suction Harvesting

NEW OAKLAND CITY LAKE Gibson County 2007 Fish Management Report. Michelle L. Weinman Assistant Fisheries Biologist

2016 Field Survey Oneida Lake / Three Mile Bay WMA SLELO-PRISM Early Detection Surveillance

Fisheries Survey of White Rapids Flowage, Marinette County Wisconsin during Waterbody Identification Code

LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Lake Havasu Aquatic Plant Monitoring 2011 Interim Report

A SURVEY OF THE PRETTY LAKE FISH COMMUNITY, LARGEMOUTH BASS AND WALLEYE POPULATIONS AND FISH HARVEST LaGrange County 2010

A Guide to Selected Invasive Non-native Aquatic Species in Massachusetts

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

Aquatic Invasive Species Program 2016 Final Report

Summary of Diver Assisted Suction Harvesting Efforts. Lake Ellwood Florence County, WI

During the mid-to-late 1980s

Aquatic Invasive Plant Surveys in the BLM Medford District During 2012

Summary of and Initial Response to public comments on MN Department of Natural Resources proposal to manage new waters for Muskellunge

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

Waupaca Chain O' Lakes Anonymous Stakeholder Survey Surveys Distributed: 804 Surveys Returned: 432 Response Rate: 54% Chain Property

FACT SHEET MCGREGOR LAKE RESTORATION HABITAT PROJECT POOL 10, UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

The Relationship of Bluegill Population Dynamics and Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Minnesota Lakes 1

Fish Assesment of Lake Nokomis (ID # ), Hennepin County, Minnesota in 2008

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

REEL FACTS. Regulations. Limblines Fishing with limblines and set hooks is prohibited at Lake Washington.

Distribution and Abundance of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay: A Scientific Summary

Lake information report

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

Leech Lake Update 5/20/2009 Walker Area Fisheries Office State Hwy. 371 NW Walker, MN

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

Table 1. Physical Characteristics of Your Lake.

RICHMOND POND MANAGEMENT PLAN

Oregon Spotted Frogs 101. Deanna Lynch U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Preventing Aquatic Invasive Species

SUMMARY REPORT FOR LAKE ST. MALO FISHERIES ASSESSMENT. Prepared for the St. Malo and District Wildlife Association

Fish Survey of Parkers Lake (ID # ), City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, Minnesota in 2013

Name of Applicant Phone Number # Mailing Address. City State Zip

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

Morphology and Function of the Champlain Canal relative to AIS Transfer: Past, Present and Future. J. Ellen Marsden University of Vermont

UNIVERSITY OF. ILL»hOlS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN NATURAL HIST. SURVEY

Healthy lakes add value to our communities. They provide a place to relax and recreate,

MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Aquatic Plant Growths in Lake Couchiching

Trapnet Fish Surveys for Sweeney Lake ( ) and Twin Lake ( ), Hennepin County, September 17-19, 2013

Introduction: JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Ebert Lake 8 Lime Lake - 13

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis. Central Region

Flowering Rush An Invasive Aquatic Macrophyte Infesting the Columbia River Basin

Transcription:

Campers on Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota, 2015 Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota [Plant Survey Conducted August 24, 2015] Prepared for: Prior Lake/Spring Lake Watershed District Prepared by: Steve McComas Jo Stuckert Blue Water Science March 2016

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota Summary Pike Lake (MnDNR ID #70-0076) is a 43 acre lake located in Scott County, Minnesota. One aquatic plant point-intercept survey was conducted in Pike Lake by Blue Water Science in 2015. The aquatic plant community was sampled on August 24, 2015 to characterize conditions of native aquatic plants and to look for the non-native Eurasian watermilfoil that was first observed in one area in August of 2012. Pike Lake plant survey results indicated a relatively low diversity of submerged aquatic plants with five species of submerged plants found in the survey. The submerged plants observed on August 24, 2015 were coontail, elodea, flatstem, curlyleaf pondweed, and Eurasian watermilfoil. Three native species as well as two non-native plants, curlyleaf pondweed and Eurasian watermilfoil, were present in the August survey (Figure S1). The native plant coverage for August 24, 2015 is shown in Figure S-1. Eurasian watermilfoil was the dominant aquatic plant. Figure S-1. Submerged native aquatic plant coverage for Pike Lake on August 24, 2015 (left) and non-native Eurasian watermilfoil along with curlyleaf that was observed at one site (Site 2)(right). Key: Green = light growth, yellow = moderate growth, and red = heavy growth. -i-

Aquatic Plant Point-Intercept Survey for Pike Lake, Scott County, Minnesota Pike Lake, Scott County (ID: 70-0076) Size: 43 acres (MnDNR) Maximum depth: 9 ft (MnDNR) Introduction One aquatic plant point-intercept survey was conducted on 43 acre Pike Lake, located in Scott County, on August 24, 2015. The objective of the survey was to characterize the aquatic plant community. Methods An aquatic plant point-intercept survey of Pike Lake was conducted by Blue Water Science. A total 74 points were sampled and points were spaced 50 meters apart on a grid that covered the lake (Figure 1). At each sample point, a sampling rake was lowered into the water and a plant sample was taken. The plant species were recorded and the density of each species was assigned. Densities were based on the coverage on the teeth of the rake. Density ratings ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being sparse and 5 being heavy growth. Figure 1. Sample grid map for the aquatic plant survey conducted on Pike Lake. Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 1

Results - Aquatic Plant Survey on August 24, 2015 Results of the summer aquatic plant survey conducted on August 24, 2015 found that three natives submerged plant species and two non-native plant species were present and restricted to water depths of 5 feet or less in Pike Lake (Table 1). Coverage of the native plants species found in the August survey are shown in Figure 2. Native plants were found around the perimeter of the basin of Pike Lake. Eurasian watermilfoil was the dominant aquatic plant and was found at 20 sites (Table 1). Table 1. Pike Lake aquatic plant occurrence and density for the August 24, 2015 survey based on 74 sites. Density ratings are 1-5 with 1 being low and 5 being most dense. Coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) Elodea (Elodea canadensis) Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) Curlyleaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) Flat stemmed pondweed (P. zosteriformis) All Stations (n=74) Occur Average Density 15 2.1 7 1.6 20 1.8 1 1.0 8 1.1 Figure 2. [left] Native submerged aquatic plant coverage for Pike Lake on August 24, 2015 Key: Green squares = light growth, yellow squares = moderate growth, and red squares = heavy growth. [right] Coontail was the dominant plant in Pike Lake in 2015. Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 2

Eurasian watermilfoil has expanded in distribution since the initial discovery at a single site in August of 2012 (Figure 3). It was the most common plant in Pike Lake in 2015. Figure 3. [top] Eurasian milfoil distribution and abundance on August 24, 2015. [bottom] Eurasian milfoil growing to the lake surface on August 24, 2015. Key: Green shading = light growth, yellow shading = moderate growth, and red shading = heavy growth. Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 3

Table 2. Occurrence and density of submerged plants by sites in Pike Lake on August 24, 2015. Site Depth (ft) Duckweed Coontail 1 2 1 3 4 2 3 4 1 1 3 4 1 4 4 3 3 5 4 4 1 No plants 6 5 1 7 5 1 8 5 1 9 4 1 10 5 1 11 3 1 12 4 1 1 13 5 1 14 5 1 15 5 1 16 3 1 3 2 17 5 1 18 1 19 1 20 5 1 21 6 1 22 4 1 3 23 5 1 24 6 1 25 5 1 26 4 1 27 3 1 1 28 land 1 29 1 30 1 31 1 32 3 1 1 33 2 1 2 34 5 1 35 5 1 36 5 1 37 1 38 5 1 39 1 40 1 41 1 42 7 1 43 4 2 2 44 4 2 2 2 45 3 4 3 46 6 1 47 1 48 1 49 1 50 6 1 51 4 1 52 4 3 3 53 5 1 54 1 55 1 56 1 57 6 1 58 7 1 59 1 60 1 61 6 1 Site Depth (ft) CLP Elodea EWM Flatstem Duckweed Coontail CLP Elodea EWM Flatstem 62 2 1 No plants 63 7 1 64 5 1 65 4 2 1 66 7 1 67 2 1 68 7 1 69 7 1 70 5 1 71 7 1 72 7 1 73 1 1 74 3 2 Total -- 1 15 1 7 20 1 48 Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 4

Plants Sampled in 2015 Figure 4. Plant distribution and abundance, August 24, 2015. Top left: Coontail; Top right: Elodea; Bottom left: Eurasian milfoil; Bottom right: Plant coverage. Key: Green = light growth, yellow = moderate growth, red = heavy growth, and black = no growth. Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 5

Comparison of 2012, 2013, and 2015 Summer Surveys Aquatic plant surveys were conducted in the late summer of 2012, 2013, and 2015. Coontail has been a common plant in the three surveys but Eurasian watermilfoil was the most abundant plant in 2015. In the summer plant surveys, submerged aquatic plants are not found deeper than 5 feet of water depth due to low light penetration and elevated algae growth. In 2015 it was observed that Eurasian watermilfoil had expanded it s range and was growing throughout Pike lake. Initially, Eurasian milfoil was found only at one spot in the west basin in 2012 but results from 2015 indicate Eurasian milfoil has expanded it s range and now is growing is shallow water of Pike lake. Table 3. The percent occurrence of aquatic plants for Pike Lake in 2012, 2013 and 2015. Percent occurrence is calculated based on the number of times a plant species occurs at a sampling station divided into the total number of stations for the survey. For example, if milfoil was found in 25 out of 50 stations, its percent occurrence would be 50%. August 6, 2012 % Occurrence (74 sites) September 7, 2013 % Occurrence (74 sites) August 24, 2015 % Occurrence (74 sites) Duckweed (Lemna sp) 0 3 1 Coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) 9 23 20 Elodea (Elodea canadensis) 1 0 9 Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) 0* 0 27 Northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) 1 1 0 Flat-stemmed Pondweed (Potamogeton zosteriformis) Sago pondweed (Stuckenia pectinata) 1 11 0 *EWM first observed in 2012 but not on an official sample site. General Findings of This Study Shoreline areas are mostly natural, emergent plants remain healthy and offer good wildlife habitat. Coontail was the dominant native plant in the lake in the summer aquatic plant surveys of 2012 and 2013. Eurasian watermilfoil was the dominant plant in 2015 and Eurasian milfoil s range appears to be increasing. The reasons for low plant abundance continues to be a combination of low light penetration and the impact of bottom feeding fish such as carp and other rough fish An increase in submerged plants probably will not occur unless the roughfish population in Pike Lake is reduced. Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 6

APPENDIX Eurasian Watermilfoil Was Collected from a Site North of Point 37 in Pike Lake in 2012 Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 7

Eurasian watermilfoil collected in Pike Lake on August 6, 2012. Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 8

Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 9

Aquatic Plant Survey Summaries from 2013. Early season survey (June 13, 2013) found curlyleaf to be the most abundance plant. Cattails (Typha sp) Duckweed (Lemna sp) Coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) Northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum) Curlyleaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) Stringy pondweed (P. sp) Sago pondweed (Stuckenia pectinata) June 13, 2013 % Occurrence (74 sites) September 7, 2013 % Occurrence (74 sites) Changes from June to September (+/-) 1 1 0 0 3 + 5 23 + 0 1 + 38 0-4 0-16 11 - Pike Lake Aquatic Plant Surveys, 2015 10