THE FISHERY IN KENNEBEC LAKE Prepared by: Cam McCauley Landscape Planning Biologist Peterborough District, i t Kingston 613-531-57055705
Questions 1. How many walleye and age structure now? 2. Status of walleye habitat, food, fishing pressure? 3. How to get/keep a sustainable population/fishery? 4. How do current walleye numbers compare with what could be produced? Possible causes?
If we decide to stock some walleye: 1. What happens to stocked fingerlings or adults? 2. Are many dumped into one location? 3. How do we address the genetics & disease? 4. What effect does stocking have on resident fish? 5. Has stocking worked elsewhere in Central or North Frontenac? 6. Can stocking change fishing pressure?
Some other questions 1. How many baitfish licences are there on this lake? 2. How many and what species are coming out? 3. Can this affect other fish in the lake? 4. What do we know about species that originally inhabited Kennebec Lake? 5. Were walleye here originally or brought to the lake from elsewhere?
What do we historically know about the lake? 1 st recorded stocking episode occurred in 1917, 15,000 fingerling smallmouth bass In 1927, 1 st recorded stocking of walleye and lake trout regular stocking episodes of smallmouth bass and walleye throughout 30 s, early 40 s and early-mid 50 s Lake trout tried again in 1953 Since then two episodes of smallmouth bass stocking in 1971 & 1972
1971 & 1979 Lake Surveys- fish species
Fish species continued
Gill net comparisons 1971 Lake survey multifilament gill net 13 nets set overnight in July 2001 Fall Walleye Index Netting (FWIN), monofilament gill net, standard 14 nets set overnight in fall (Sept-October)
Kennebec Lake gill net catch comparisons 1971 & 2001 160 140 120 1971 (13 nets) 2001 (14 nets) 146145 fish no. 100 80 60 40 20 0 64 62 35 38 26 26 22 21 13 6 8 0 walleye pike Smbass perch herring sucker burbot
Kennebec Lake gill net catch per net comparisons 1971 & 2001 35 3.5 3 1971 2001 3.2 per net catch 25 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.3 06 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.8 0.2 0 walleye pike smbass perch sucker burbot
How does Kennebec compare with other area lakes? 12 11 FWIN 10 8 6 4 2 0 4 1.9 4.4 4.6 4.4 4 3 3 2 0.5 walleyee catch per net Ken ennebec Beaver Big Clear Bobs Buck Con onsecon Hors rseshoe Sharbot Wolfe Kingston South
Kennebec Lake trap netting - 1971 Six trap nets set in July-August 1971 Six-foot trap nets set overnight, tied off to shore Samples near shore fish community, comparable to standard Nearshore Community Index Netting (NSCIN) currently carried out
Kennebec trap net catch - 1971 140 133 25 120 100 no. of fish catch/net 22.1 20 catch total 80 60 15 10 catch per net 40 20 0 29 4.8 22 15 3.4 8 2.5 10 1 1.3 1.7 016 0.16 walleye pike lmbass smbass rockbass sunfish bullhead 5 0
2001 Fall Walleye Index Netting age structure from 26 walleye no. fish 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 mean age=3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 age
2001 Kennebec FWIN walleye size structure no. fish 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 mean total length - 45 cm 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 fork length (cm)
Other Kennebec Walleye Findings Age-at-50% maturity is 3, on average, one year less than other Kingston and southern Ontario Lakes Growth index is 200 mm/yr, on average, 50 mm/yr more than other Kingston and southern Ontario Lakes
Other fish species FWIN findings Mean age Smallmouth Northern bass pike Lake herring (63 fish) (6 fish) (145 fish) Age-4 Age-3 Age-6 Mean total length 27 cm 42 cm 27 cm 10.5 in 16.5 in 10.5 in
Kennebec Lake fishing pressure? No historical creel surveys on file 2007 Community Fisheries & Wildlife Involvement Program (CFWIP) grant for boat counts on Kennebec Voluntary creel forms handed out
2007 Kennebec CFWIP Boat Counts Participants Many thanks to the following participants: Bernie & Noreen Dertinger Terry Kennedy Doug Smith Greg Morris Jack & Dianne Nicolson John, Calvin & Charlotte Duchene S. Tucker David Praskey Aileen & Gray Merriam Peter & Gloria Smiley Ron Henry Bill Van Vug
2007 Kennebec CFWIP Boat Counts Boat counts done at least three times for each strata (season, daytype, period) 28 boat counts between May 12 Sept 3 An average 1 hour count sampled across entire day (6 am to 9 pm), weekdays and weekends, entire lake On average, 3 boats fishing per count (0 to 9 boats) One more boat, on average, in summer One more boat, on average, on weekends
Boat counts daily variation May12-June22 combined weekend weekday no o. boats 10 8 6 4 2 0 8 6 7 9 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 time no. boats 10 8 6 4 2 0 combined weekend weekday June 23-Sept 3 8 6 7 9 12 14 17 18 19 20 time of day
2007 Kennebec Fishing Effort 12000 May12-Sep3 May12-Jun22 Jun22-Sep3 11127 10000 angler hours 8000 6000 4000 3623 7504 2000 0 weekend weekday all week
What are anglers fishing for? Seven parties completed voluntary creel forms: Total effort of 344 angler hours Fished an average of 2.5 hours per trip Number of interviews ie per stratum: Daytype/period May12-June22 June23-Sept3 WE/AM 3 10 WE/PM WD/AM WD/PM Total days fished 4 4 1 18 2 27 12 57
What did participant catch and harvest? 600 6 553 5.4 catch harvest hrs/fish 500 5 fish no. 400 300 200 100 0 275 2.2 163 1.7 98 54 28 3 3 3 13 0.3 walleye pike smbass lmbass sunfish 4 3 2 1 0 hours to catch 1 fish
How do current walleye numbers compare with what could be produced? Newest science suggests the following lake characteristics are what dictate sustainable walleye yields: Lake size (546 ha) Total dissolved solids (47 mg/l, 1971 data) Mean depth (7.9 m) Maximum depth (27 m) Secchi disc depth (2.3 m, 1971 data) Growing Degree Days >5degC (1890) Predicted sustainable walleye yield is 1.3 kg/ha/yr or 710 kg/yr (estimated t 1000 fish per year @07k 0.7 kg/fish) Looks like Kennebec Lake is not yielding what it could
Possible reason(s)? Lack of suitable spawning habitat or access to suitable habitat? Access to existing, enhancement opportunities Zebra mussels changing water clarity? Walleye are light-sensitive Are they here yet? Food? Gill nets not capturing many yellow perch Other pan fish present
2007 Kennebec Lake CFWIP Potential Walleye Spawning Habitat Beaver Creek bridge crossing Historically observed here, beaver dam issues blocking access some years (picture) Crooked Creek and creek at top end of Cox s Lake Excellent spawning areas, beaver dam issues blocking access some years 2 shoreline/island l points with good exposure at east end of lake Rock could be added to enhance these sites 1 walleye observed off small islands at west end of lake Walleye have been observed in narrows to Salmon R.
Potential Walleye Shoal Assessment continued Section of north shore in western basin (pictures) Have big rock, potential ti to add some Off point of small island adjacent to Salmon R. outlet t (picture) Some rock present, enhancement possible
Potential Shoal Enhancement Opportunities
Potential Shoal Enhancement Opportunities
Baitfish harvesting Kennebec Township has three bait fish licences Tend to harvest bait fish from small streams and small lakes Not likely that any harvesting is occurring from Kennebec Lake
MNR Southern Region viable reasons for walleye stocking always most efficient to work with resident population 1. Introduction stocking Not currently present in a lake 2. Put-Grow-Take stocking Walleye recruitment is not regular enough to produce a sustainable fishery, stocking artificially replaces recruitment 3. Rehabilitation stocking Have prepared a stocking plan that includes benchmarks, remedial actions to enhance walleye habitat and commitments to monitor successes/failures
Things to consider before stocking 1. What happens to stocked fingerlings or adults? Cannibalism, competition i for food, depends d on the lake, no guarantees 2. Are many dumped into one location? Better practise is to stock them at numerous locations throughout the lake 3. How do we address genetics & disease? Egg collection from nearby lakes not in Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia (VHS) infection zone Implanting on enhanced sites with Kennebec eggs collect eggs from numerous females, milt from numerous males
3. What effect does stocking have on resident fish? There will be competition for same food supply but would follow stocking density guidelines (100-150150 fingerlings per hectare) stock every 3 rd year 4. Has stocking walleye worked elsewhere in Central or North Frontenac? Anecdotal information that it has in some lakes but not in others (St. Andrew Lakes) Netting last summer indicates it hasn t worked in Fourteen Island Lake
5. Can stocking change fishing pressure? YES, likely number one impact for any stocking into a lake with public access
Conclusions Some potential for walleye spawning habitat enhancement CFWIP grant Last walleye assessment done in 2001, would be good to update CFWIP grant Updated trap netting will provide updated insight into rest of fish community (bass, northern pike, pan fish) CFWIP Kennebec Lake Association would continue to need help from it s membership for future fisheries work These would all go a long way toward creating a stocking plan if this option is to be considered