Pocket Guide to Wildlife-Friendly Ranching

Similar documents
COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE WILDLIFE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS & GUIDELINES SOUTHEAST REGIONAL SERVICE CENTER, COLORADO

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Stakeholder Activity

Wildlife Introduction

Conservation Planning in Vermont

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

The Greater Sage-Grouse:

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

H. R To provide for the protection of the last remaining herd of wild and genetically pure American buffalo. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ESRM 350 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation

H. R. To provide for the protection of the last remaining herd of wild and genetically pure American Buffalo. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A BILL

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

DESCRIBE THE HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS THAT AFFECT WILDLIFE SPECIES NATURAL RESOURCE I FISHERY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 5.

Attention, taxpayers. There's a

SELF-GUIDED LEARNING EXPEDITION LIFE SCIENCE. Name GRADE LEVEL: 4 5 TEACHER GUIDE

Non-Lethal Deterrents Grant Application Additional Site Form

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

[NPS-IMR-GRSA-24169; PPWONRADE2, PMP00EI05.YP0000] Ungulate Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Great

Living World Review #2

Splitting seasons into multiple, shorter ones is preferable to long, crowded seasons.

RESOURCE BOOKLET N10/4/ENVSO/SP2/ENG/TZ0/XX/T ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS AND SOCIETIES PAPER 2. Wednesday 3 November 2010 (morning) 2 hours

SECTION 41 Table of Contents

Ranchers create ponds, wetlands in Owyhee County in partnership with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Bison: National Treasure or Pernicious Vector?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Phillip Island Nature Park an example of sustainable ecotourism

The National Wildlife Refuge System. The National Wildlife Refuge System

FWCP External Projects Delivered by Stakeholders and First Nations

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

A Western Landowners Guide

JULY 2017 SUMMARY BULLETS

Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 (wildlife guidelines)

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

The Lake Creek Ranch. Located in the foothills of the Owl Creek Mountains in western Hot Springs County, Wyoming

Early History, Prehistory

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

MT Fish, Wildlife and Parks Wildlife Division, Attn: Public Comment WOLF SEASON POB Helena, MT

2015 Wisconsin Envirothon KEY Wildlife Exam

FINAL REDUCTION REPORT NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK HERD

Endangered Species on Ranches. Nebraska Grazing Conference August 14 15, 2012

Paul Schullery. for beetles, flies, and many other small animals, the elk is a village waiting to happen.

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Nevada Department of Wildlife Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2018

Vertebrate Pest Management for Grapes

San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CO; Availability of Record of

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Livestock Losses. From Department of Agriculture report 2010 (report also available on this website)

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

San Gabriel River Ranch 240 ACRES FOR SALE IN WILLIAMSON COUNTY

ALBERTA FISH & GAME ASSOCIATION 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING PASSED RESOLUTIONS FEBRUARY 21, 2015

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

WORST AND BEST. Prairie Dogs Bring Out the. in Wildlife Stewardship RON KLATASKE

Conservation Worksheet III

YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, UNITED STATES

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

2018 New Hampshire Envirothon: Fish and Wildlife Test. 1. barred owl 13. Canada lynx. 2. bobolink 14. porcupine. 3. spring peeper 15.

Draft Wild Horse Management Plan

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Wild About Elephants Day

STATUS OF WILDLIFE POPULATIONS, FALL 2008

PRESERVING AN ICON FOR MILLENNIA, AMERICAN BISON HERDS ROAMED THE GREAT PLAINS BY THE MILLIONS UNTIL OVERHUNTING DROVE THEM NEARLY TO EXTINCTION.

COOKE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

CHAPTER 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES -- PART B

BRIEFING on IBERIAN LYNX (Lynx pardinus) MANAGEMENT PLAN AT DOÑANA NATIONAL PARK

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Utah. North Stansbury Mountains Wilderness Study Area Site-Specific Monitoring Guide

The. Established. Roger Jacobs (406) Bryan Anderson (406)

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

placed on the market.

1. What is the National Wildlife Refuge System? 2. Who started the National Wildlife Refuge System? When?

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Grade 6/7 Prairie Conservation Forum Videoconference. Teacher s Package

Wildlife Issues With Oil and Gas Exploration. Peter D. McKone, CWB Senior Project Director

Jeffrey Cole, Wildlife Manager Fish and Wildlife Dispatch

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

Transition: Wild Horse & Burro Management

Minnesota TREK MINNESOTA TRAIL SELF-GUIDED TOUR 6TH - 8TH GRADE. Minnesota Trek 6 8th grades 1

Petty Ranch 1,660+/- Acres Shackelford & Haskell County, Texas $2,647,700 ($1,595/acre)

Materials Blackline Masters - "I Am" and "Survival Factors" (pages 7 & 8) Tape Six toothpicks for each student Learning Outcomes

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

Discovery Safari Field Guide

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

project 1 [ti] Name Address Club .'_ D.St.SS" A?G.I R.3? '!UJ.SS at: B 1MILDLIFE

Wildlife Hazard Mitigation Policy, Plan and Procedure. May

2014 Oregon Hunting Survey: An effort to better understand the choices Oregon hunters make regarding ammunition

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

Trapping on Public Lands: National Wildlife Refuges

Twin Canyons Ranch 3,019+/- Acres Throckmorton County, Texas $4,211,505 ($1,395/acre)

Coyote Canis latrans

Policy Statement. Page 2 of 5

QUAIL CSI USING A SCENT STATION

Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Transcription:

Pocket Guide to Wildlife-Friendly Ranching

If the wildlife aren t doing well, the cows aren t either. John Stewart, Wild Sky rancher SUPPORTING WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY RANCHING Interested in becoming a Wild Sky Rancher? Laura Huggins, Wild Sky (406) 585-4600 Kyran Kunkel, Lead Scientist (406) 548-1579 Walker Milhoan, Ranchlogs (406) 579-2088 www.wildskybeef.org

Wild Sky s all-natural, 100 percent grass-fed beef is available at markets and restaurants nationwide. Wild Sky is an endeavor of American Prairie Reserve, an organization building a wildlife area that ultimately will be 50% larger than Yellowstone National Park and enjoyed by people around the world. Why Wild Sky? Wild Sky offers so much opportunity. Michelle Fo, Wild Sky rancher Conservation and ranching are often viewed as opposing forces. We are changing that dynamic through Wild Sky. Wild Sky s mission is to support wildlife-friendly ranching through the sale of premium beef. This business conserves wildlife and contributes to economic activity in Montana s Northern Great Plains. About the Beef When I tried Wild Sky, I knew I had in front of me an incredible product grass-fed, without the grassy taste so tender that it s hard to believe it s not corn-fed. Chef Kostas

Wild Sky offers consumers a great tasting, grass-fed steak free of hormones and antibiotics. We collaborate with a network of like-minded ranchers, primarily in the upper mid-west, to raise cattle according to the strict standards of Wild Sky (see separate cattle standards guide). The result is a healthy and eceptionally good-tasting option for you, your friends, and your family to enjoy. What is Wildlife-friendly Ranching? Wildlife fits right in with ranching. It s co-eistence. It s a reminder that we re a small part of the bigger world. Tuffy Helgeson, Wild Sky rancher Cattle ranching is a major industry in the Northern Great Plains. The Wild Sky team believes effective conservation strategies promote the health of both people and nature. This requires creating opportunities for landowners to benefit economically from wildlife. Wild Sky promotes wildlife-friendly ranching by returning a portion of its profit to participating ranchers who raise cattle to a set of specific conservation standards. The following wildlife-friendly ranching protocols cover a number of areas relating to conservation, from the preservation of native prairie to the protection of prairie dogs.

Meet a Few Wild Sky Ranchers The Stewart Family Wild Sky rancher John Stewart says that paying attention to the health of the grass and soil helps him and his wife, Kirsty, run a profitable ranch. Kirsty chimes in, He takes better care of the cattle and the land than himself! This same level of attention to detail helps John and Kirsty care for the animals that roam their land by ensuring the land is healthy enough to support them, whether they re cows, pronghorn or sharptail. The Stewarts have proven that they are good stewards of the land. It made good financial sense, according to John, for them to sign on with Wild Sky. Being part of Wild Sky means engaging in and being compensated for wildlife-friendly ranching practices. Some eamples include not tilling and tolerating prairie dogs. The Fo Family Believing that American Prairie Reserve and the agricultural heritage of the Northern Great Plains landscape can be shared and can thrive through a positive collaboration, Stephen, Michelle and their children signed on as Wild Sky ranchers. The family already has installed wildlife-friendly fencing around their F Diamond X Ranch, allowing pronghorn and other wildlife to move freely across their property.

Wild Sky offers so much opportunity, especially to younger ranchers who are willing to think outside the bo, Michelle notes all while upholding their ancestors deep appreciation for the land and wildlife. How Does it Work? Wild Sky promotes small-scale ranching and large-scale conservation. Laura Huggins, American Prairie Reserve American Prairie Reserve uses a grasslands health assessment tool called the Freese Scale to evaluate how land management decisions impact ecological conditions. The scale is a framework that helps land managers evaluate properties and track progress toward creating a healthy prairie ecosystem. The Freese Scale for ranching includes seven different ecological processes such as hydrology and vegetation, each of which are given a 0-7 rating. Every year, Reserve staff and a third-party evaluator score land units according to the scale. It is important to note that these are basic guidelines that will be adapted to each ranch. Wild Sky ranchers also receive a detailed document, updated annually, eplaining how we measure and score the protocols. Participating Wild Sky ranchers are paid more as they move up the scale.

7 These guidelines provide a scoring system, on a scale of 0 to 7, for the following management categories: 1. No Tilling (soil and vegetation management) 2. Herbivore Abundance (deer, elk, pronghorn, prairie dog) 3. Natural Hydrology 4. Landscape Connection (wildlife-friendly fencing) 5. Carnivore Compatible (predators present) 6. Species of Concern (sage grouse, swift fo, burrowing owl, etc.) 7. Ranch Size

G1 score Native/restored prairie as % of total livestock prod. acres % native/restored prairie in conservation easement Conditions 0 <80 <30 Conditions required to qualify for any level of score 1 80-85 30-40 include: No cultivation of native prairie; no irrigation of prairie land; no mechanical, chemical or fertilizer 2 40-50 treatments to alter native species composition and 3 85-90 50-60 productivity (but can be used to control invasives); no 4 60-70 harvesting or cutting of prairie ecept for eplicit and agreed to management purposes; rigorous program of 5 90-95 70-80 control of invasive plants in place. 6 80-90 7 95-100 90-100 Result (weight) No Tilling (Soil & Vegetation Management) Goal: To restore and maintain native vegetation and the natural soil and other physical conditions that support it. (1) (2) Ave. weighted score =

G2 score Deer Elk Pronghorn Bighorn Bison Acres of Prairie Dog colonies Conditions 0 <50 If species is not in vicinity of and 1 50-200 unlikely to frequent the property or habitat is not suitable, no score 2 200-500 is given for that species and it 3 500-1K is ecluded from calculating the 4 1K-2K average score. 5 2K-5K Additional conditions below 6 >5K 7 >5K Result (weight) Herbivore Abundance Goal: To epand and maintain populations of herbivorous mammals. (1) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) Ave. weighted score =

No tolerance Infequent hazing, no damage hunts No hazing or damage hunts Non-contiguous Contiguous Number days of animal use Additional conditions Bison must be managed for conservation purposes. Wildlife-friendly fence design score of 5 or greater required or score of 3 or greater for deer, elk, pronghorn and bighorn sheep. Well-placed open gates/passageways required for score of 3 or greater for bison. No shooting or poisoning or other control methods used on prairie dogs anywhere on property. Livestock stocking rate must be adjusted to accommodate forage use by native herbivores.

G3 Score Check dams/ miles of stream Wetlands restored (acres) % of riparian Acres restored acres ecluded wet meadows from grazing from hayfields Miles of stream restored Riparian Condition Conditions 0 >0.6 0 0 0 0 poor Restored wetlands and streams 1 0.5.6 >0 >10 >0 >0 must be officially recognized by federal, state or tribal agency or 2 0.4.5 >10 >25 >10 >1 fair qualified independent third party. 3 0.3.4 >20 >40 >20 >5 4 0.2.3 >40 >55 >40 >10 good 5 0.1.2 >60 >70 >60 >15 6 0.1 >80 >85 >80 >20 ecellent 7 0 >100 >100 >100 >25 Result (weight) Natural Hydrology Goal: To restore wetlands and streams. (1) (2) (2) Ave. weighted score =

G4 Score Fence density* Wildlife-friendly fence Ranch infrastructure Landscape Connection Goal: To reduce fragmentation. Cultivated or otherwise altered land Road density Other Conditions 0 >2 None Numerous buildings, windmills, etc. 1 1.5-2 Cultivated land, etensively fragmented 2 1-1.5 Modest amount 0.5-1 3 0.5-1 All structures concentrated in one place 4 Modest fragmentation by cultivation 5 0.1-0.5 Substantial 0.1-0.5 6 7 0 All interior & perimeter fencing = WFFD Result (weight) No structures No fragmentation by cultivation >1 Etensive Moderate Scores may be lowered if structures or cultivated land have direct and significant negative effects on sensitive species, habitats or key ecological processes. <0.1 None Ave. weighted score =

The goal is to minimize the number and etent of novel or artificial features such as fences, windmills, power lines, poles, buildings, and planted windbreaks that cause breaks or gaps in native prairie. These breaks can impede the movement of and injure/kill wildlife, deter nesting grassland birds, and increase the hunting effectiveness of natural (and eotic) predators by providing unnatural perches and nesting/den sites for them. Road density includes only non-government roads that are regularly maintained (gravel or hard top), not two-tracks. *Fence density equals total length of interior fence plus ½ length of perimeter fence divided by total area of ranch. Wildlife-Friendly Fence Design 45 inches tall Barbed or Smooth 18-20 inches above ground Fence diagram

G5 Score Carnivore Compatible Goal: To allow predators to regularly use the property without habituating them to livestock depredation. Cougar Coyote, bobcat, badger, otters, mink, weasels Wolf Bear Conditions 0 Scores 1 7 requirements: Nonlethal deterrents (e.g., human 1 presence, guard dogs, herding methods, scare devices and, for 2 small enclosed areas, electric fence/fladry) may be used to keep 3 predators away from immediate vicinity of livestock, but not from 4 property. 5 6 7 Result (weight) Additional conditions below (2) (1) (3) (2) Ave. weighted score =

No tolerance Tolerated, but unlikely to be present Ranch in range but not in known territory Photos/sign of use Ranch overlaps resident territory Hibernation &/or denning with young present Conditions continued Livestock depredation must be reported and confirmed within 24 hrs. Non-lethal deterrents must be tried first to deter further depredation, including while predator is in proimity of, testing or chasing livestock. If while at least one non-lethal deterrent is in regular use, four qualifying incidents of depredation have occurred within 6 months, lethal measures or translocation of problem animal(s) may be used with prior approval. Shooting or other lethal measures okay if predator caught in act of biting or killing livestock or guard animals if no baiting or other attractant was used, if reasonable means were taken to preserve evidence (including the carcass) and if reported within 24 hours. Conditions apply to etent allowed by state and federal laws.

G6 Score Sage grouse Swift fo Raptor nesting 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Result (weight) Species of Concern Goal: To accomodate management of endangered, threatened and other species of concern. Remove perch poles Moderate grazing No/light grazing in riparian areas Reduce disturbance near lek No harvest Increasing lek & brood counts No conservation measures taken Conduct survey No trapping of predators Photos of foes Ranch overlaps resident fo territory Release translocated foes on your ranch Any SOC (not already covered) Evidence of active use by 1-3 species Evidence of active use by 4 or more Burrowing owl Owl home range on ranch Etraordinary conservation measures taken Conditions See below. ( # of nests) Ave. weighted score =

Conditions: Priority for species listed as endangered, threatened or candidates under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Birds of conservation concern under U.S. Migratory Bird Management Act or as species of concern by MTFWP (or other state agency as appropriate) may deserve special attention as well. APR priority species pronghorn, sage grouse, bobcat, prairie dog, ferret, deer, cougar, elk. Montana species of concern - swift fo, prairie dog, sage grouse, golden eagle, burrowing owl, ferruginous hawk, peregrine falcon, mountain plover, loggerhead shrike, long bill curlew, white pelican, select identifiable breeding birds, great blue heron, American bittern, white-faced ibis, sharp-tailed grouse. Montana species in need of monitoring - porcupine, short ear owl, screech owls, jackrabbit, badger, river otter. Federally listed species black-footed ferret, mountain plover, piping plover, grizzly bear.

G7 Score Number of properties with contiguous acres Contiguous acres enrolled Conditions 0 0 <1 Properties with contiguous acres of enrolled prairie 1 1 1-10 may be in any configuration as long as the enrolled land of each property abuts the enrolled land of at 2 2 10-20 least one other property. 3 3 20-40 4 4 40-60 5 5 60-80 6 6 80-100 7 7 >100 Result (weight) Ranch Size Goal: To encourage management at large geographic scales. Ave. weighted score =

Final Score Calculation 1 - No Tilling 1 2 - Herbivore Abundance 3 3 - Natural Hydrology 2 4 - Landscape Connection 2 5 - Carnivore Compatible 3 6 - Species of Concern 3 7 - Ranch Size 3 Result (weight) Score Weight Score weight Notes

Notes

wildskybeef.org