STUDY ON THE USE OF THE C GROUP ELEMENTS JUMPSAND LEAPSAND D GROUP ELEMENTS BALANCE AND FLEXIBILITY IN THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS OF AEROBIC GYMNASTICS

Similar documents
Aerobics Gymnastics Difficulty Element Values AEROBIC GYMNASTICS CAN-GYM LIST OF ELEMENT VALUES Group A Dynamic Strength

AEROBIC GYMNASTICS Code of Points APPENDIX II Guide to Judging Execution and Difficulty

The AEROBIC Newsletter Nr 26

AEROBIC GYMNASTICS LEVEL 4-7 ROUTINES

CHOREO GRAPHY TOTAL 10 POINTS. Excellent. Very Good. Good. Satisfactory. Poor.

FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2013, 5(12): Research Article

2017 Handbook (updated 23 rd Jan 2017) AEROBIC GYMNASTICS HANDBOOK DIVISION REGULATIONS

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN THE EFFICIENY OF THE START TECHNIQUES IN THE ROMANIAN COMPETITIVE SWIMMING

ANALYSIS OF THE SERVE EFFICIENCY WITHIN OFFICIAL GAMES OF A1 DIVISION LEVEL

Journal of Sport and Kinetic Movement Vol. II, No. 31/2018 OPERATIVE SYNTHESES ON CHEERLEADING TRAINING

STUDY CONCERNING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HANDBALL GOALKEEPER AT THE 7 M THROWS

The AEROBIC Newsletter Nr 25

Gymnastics Australia. AER Australian Levels Program. Date. Change Level 5. Delete A236

OFSAA AEROBIC GYMNASTICS GENERAL INFORMATION

This tutorial will guide you in understanding the necessary rules and etiquettes of the sport.

Beginner judges course Acrobatic Gymnastics

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AESTHETIC GROUP GYMNASTICS COMPETITION RULES OF AESTHETIC GROUP GYMNASTICS

CODE OF POINTS RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS

Appendix 1 - Floor Difficulty Values

OPTIMIZING GAME PERFORMANCE OF JUNIOR MIDFIELD PLAYERS (17-18 YEARS OLD) BY DEVELOPING SPECIFIC FOOTBALL ENDURANCE

Aerobic Gymnastics THEORETICAL EXAMINATION QUESTIONS. Update on: Question: 186, 187, 298

FLOOR EXERCISE ~ Chapter 1 ~ Requirements

FIG Age Group Competitions

15 th Aerobic Gymnastics Interschool Competition Rules

1. Starting in a Submerged Back Pike Position with the legs perpendicular to the surface, a Barracuda Airborne Split is executed. [DD 2.

Faults Run up distance 25m maximum

THE REFEREEING IN BASKETBALL- TRENDS AND OPTIMIZATION STRATEGIES OF THE TRAINING AND PERFORMANCE OF REFEREES IN A DIVISION

Athletes Model Overview

Xcel Program Practice Quiz

Canadian Provincial Program Main Charts. July 22, 2014

Xcel Program Practice Quiz

Power TeamGym. The HUGS Power TeamGym program allows athletes with special needs the opportunity to compete in an official USA Gymnastics setting.

COMPETITION RULES OF AESTHETIC GROUP GYMNASTICS FOR CHILDREN

AEROBIC GYMNASTICS LEVEL 1 COACHES MANUAL (2016)

Ballet. Pointe. Mapping your Gotta Dance Path A Guide for Graduating Aqua Dancers. Ballet. Pointe

Gymnastics Australia RG Australian Levels Program Errata 4 January 2015

INTERNATIONAL DANCE FEDERATION TECHNICAL RULES

Notice of main changes to the National Competition Structure 2017

Women s Artistic Gymnastics

GYMNASTICS PACKET # 12

Efficacy of Static and Dynamic Distance Perception on Kumite Performance in Karate

TECHNICAL PACKAGE GYMNASTICS

THE EFFICIENCY STUDY OF THE FINAL ACTION AT A WOMAN BASKETBALL TEAM

Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PALARONG PAMBANSA San Jose, Antique Women s Artistic Gymnastics (WAG)

Colin Jackson's Hurdle Clearance Technique

INFLUENCE OF DANCE ELEMENTS ON BALANCE BEAM RESULTS

SCOTTISH GYMNASTICS WOMEN S ARTISTIC COMPULSORY LEVEL 5. Published March 2014

Gymnastics For All (General) Competition Rules Amended JUNE 2013

TESTING KINEMATIC AND ERGOMETER PARAMETERS FOR PERFORMING THE PHASE CONTACT - BEAT IMPULSE TO THE HIGH JUMP

COMPETITION RULES OF AESTHETIC GROUP GYMNASTICS

2013 Practice Test Level 7/8 (Lee Bjella if you see errors, or have suggestions. More judging helps at

SCOTTISH GYMNASTICS WOMEN S ARTISTIC COMPULSORY LEVEL 5. Published March 2014 Revised January 2016

TWIRL MANIA INTERNATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS Best Appearing BEST APPEARING. All patterns accepted with or without baton. COMMENTS

Xcel Self-Test for Judges

INTERNATIONAL DANCE FEDERATION TECHNICAL RULES

GENERAL GYMNASTICS CODE OF POINTS

FIG World Cup Competition ID International Youths Competition AG 12-14/ AG FIG Registered ID 6433 International Youths Competition AG 9-11

Girls Gymnastics Rules Examination

Gymnastics Australia RG Australian Levels Program Errata 5 June 2015

FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE

APPENDIX 2016 ACROBATIC GYMNASTICS JUNIOR OLYMPIC CODE OF POINTS

Artistic Swimming Rules

LONDON GYMNASTICS COMPULSORY LEVEL AGE 8 IN YEAR OF COMPETITION BORN 2007 Out of Age gymnasts Born 2006 and 2005

British Vets Artistic Gymnastics Code of Points. Entry Instructions

FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE. CODE OF POINTS ACROBATIC GYMNASTICS TABLES OF DIFFICULTY January 2017

TECHNICAL AND TACTICAL ASPECTS OF BLOCKED FOREHAND RETURN IN THE SINGLES MEN

GENERAL 1. Which is not part of the Start Value? a. No dismount deduction b. Special Requirements c. Beginning exercise before the signal d.

SGA WTP Competition Rules - Level 6/5/4/3

XCEL FAQs VAULT. All Divisions. Bronze. Silver

IFAGG COMPETITION RULES SHORT PROGRAM junior and senior categories

A Comparative Analysis of Motor Fitness Components among Sprinters, Throwers and Jumpers

FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE

Overall Impression: BELOW AVERAGE AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION ROMANIA NATIONAL COLLEGE OF THE ARTS REGINA MARIA CONSTANTA

Slovak Catholic Sokols. Gymnastics. Rules and Regulations. and. Qualifications

It is essential that all judges know beam and floor compulsory choreography for NLP 3-6

Trampoline & Tumbling T210 Annual Update

b. Individual Run Champions will be determined by the rank order of each run

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF SHOT PUT IN ELITE ATHLETES A CASE STUDY

USAIGC Rhythmic Gymnastics. Code of Points 2012~2013

2019 New Zealand Masters Games Gymsports Championships

ACROBATIC GYMNASTICS JO Code of Points Erratum October 4, 2018

APPENDIX A4 Element Recognition

WOMEN S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS. Canadian Provincial Program Main Charts Final Version

THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE GOALKEEPERS OF THE FRANCE NATIONAL TEAM IN WINNING THE INTERNATIONAL HANDBALL COMPETITIONS

COMPETITION RULEBOOK MAJORETTE DANCE 2017

RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS MANUAL

SOUTH EAST GYMNASTICS Floor & Vault Boys Skills - 1

SECTION IX GYMNASTICS HANDBOOK

Coaching the Hurdles

Basic Tryout Requirements By Level

2 STEP 7-10 draft proposal V2

London GfA Floor and Vault Competition 2018 Levels 1-6

Overall Impression: BELOW AVERAGE AVERAGE ABOVE AVERAGE

D SCORE + E SCORE = TOTAL SCORE SPECIAL OLYMPICS GAMES LEVEL 4 FLOOR EXERCISE - PANEL D ARTISTIC OPTIONAL JUDGING SHEET

By Mrs. Egle ABRUZZINI, President of Technical Committee of Rhythmic Gymnastics Urbino (ITA) / Moutier (SUI)

Gymnastics For All Performance Group Rules and Guidelines

PIROUETTE! THE RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS NEWSLETTER N 01 March, updated June and November Code of Points. Questions and Answers.

PIROUETTE! THE RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS NEWSLETTER N 01 March Code of Points. Questions and Answers

Transcription:

Science, Movement and Health, Vol. XIV, ISSUE 2, 2014 June 2014, 14 (2): 292-297 Original article STUDY ON THE USE OF THE C GROUP ELEMENTS JUMPSAND LEAPSAND D GROUP ELEMENTS BALANCE AND FLEXIBILITY IN THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS OF AEROBIC GYMNASTICS NICULESCU GEORGETA 1 Abstract Problem statement. Aerobic gymnastics is not only a type of physical training but also a top-level competitive sport which attracted many practitioners. As sports discipline has evolved rapidly through spectacular accessibility, being an attraction and challenge for the athletes who have completed their competitive activity in artistic gymnastics. The harmonious combination of specific resources (basic steps, difficulty elements) and nonspecific means (technical elements of acrobatic gymnastics,rhythmic gymnastics, classical and modern ballet) led to improvement to the level of mastery of the motor content of this sport considered scene sport. In the composition of exercises at all competition levels in aerobic gymnastics are used elements from all four difficulty groups: group A dynamic force, group B static force, group C jumps and leaps and group D balance and flexibility. Methods.The present paper aims to analyze quantitatively by comparing the used elements from the difficulty group C jumps and leaps and D- balance andflexibilityfrom the twelve editions of the World Championships of aerobic gymnastics. Note that the representative teams of Romania s aerobic gymnastics have participated at all editions in the world championships starting with the year 1995, Paris edition, and the last being in Sofia, year 2012, gaining valuable results, enshrining the gymnastics representative as a great force in this sportive discipline. The working hypothesis is that the elements from group C jumps and leaps have a large percentage in the composition of exercises used in competition levels compared with the elements from group D balance and flexibility. This is observed in all editions of the World Championships of aerobic gymnastics. The research method used was an ascertaining study based on video images. Results.The obtained results confirm the working hypothesis. The conclusions certify that at all competition levels: female individual, male individual, mixed pairs, trios and groups, the elements from the difficulty group C (jumps and leaps) have a higher percentage than the elements of the difficulty group D (balance and flexibility)in the World Championships of aerobic gymnastics. There is to be mentioned that this group C has the largest number of families of elements. Key words: aerobic gymnastics performance, difficulty elements,jumps, balance, flexibility. Introduction Aerobic gymnastics was developed at the International Federation of Gymnastics (IFG) starting with the year 1994 when in Paris were unified all the international federations, under only one regulation. At the beginning the contests were organized after different regulations of their own, initiated by diverse international federations: International Aerobic Federation (IAF), Aerobic Sports and Fitness International Federation ( ASFIF), American National Aerobics Commission ( ANAC). Thus at the I.F.G. Congress, in 1994 was decided that all the structures and competition existent systems should be unified in only one system, with an unique regulation and then to organize the first World Championship of Aerobic Gymnastics, in 1995. It was difficult to reunite a big number of competitors from Brazil (one million practitioners), Argentina, Australia, New Zeeland, 1 Faculty Of Physical Education And Sports Spiru Haret University, ROMANIA E-mail address: getanic52@yahoo.com Received 16.04.2014 / Accepted 27.05.2014 USA, Japan, Germany, Italy, Spain, which had their own regulations. Therefore at the first World championship that took place in Paris in 1995 had participated 34 countries and also Romania. Till now there had been 12 editions of the World Championships starting with the one from 1995. They have been organized annually until the year 2000, and starting with the 2002 edition they took place biennially. The contests were: female individual, male individual, mixed pairs, trio, till the 2000 competition. At the Klaipeda World Championship (2002) was introduced the group contest, and at the 2012 edition in Sofia (Bulgaria) two more were introduced: aerobic step and aerobic dance. The International Federation of Gymnastics decided to give medals to teams, at Nanjing, in 2006. Internationally Romania s aerobic gymnastics became a road opener and a model in defining the 292

concept of this new sportive discipline (Niculescu, 2000). Thus in female individual was won 1 gold medal, 3 silver medals, 3 bronze medals at all World Championships. The male individual won 3 silver medals and 3 bronze medals. In mixed pairs our gymnasts won the first place twice, the second place twice, the third place five times. The contest that brought us the biggest satisfactions was the trio where the fifth gold medals, the fourth silver medals and the fourth bronze medals made the Romanian trio the best in the world. Also the group contest brought the Romanian gymnasts three gold medals and one bronze medal. It must be mentioned the fact that in the team contest introduced in 2006, Romania won the first place. Methods In the performance gymnastics the elements are divided in four difficulty groups: Group A Dynamic strength, Group B Static strength, Group C Jumps and Group D Balance and mobility. This diversity of elements offers multiple possibilities of composition, the exercises having a balance between the aerobic movements ( combinations of up and down movements) and difficulty elements, and the arms and legs movements must be strong and well shaped by total use of space. All this ensures harmony and esthetics to the movements impressing the audience through interpretation, difficulty and dynamism in exercise execution. The base model of the exercise in aerobic gymnastics must contain combinations of basic steps specific to aerobics, passing and transitions among levels, difficulty elements whose number varied depending on the regulations of the Code of Points and of the contest. In the composition of exercises the number of the difficulty elements was permanently changed, initially being of 20, then dropping to 16, then to 12 and now is 10 (www.fig-gymnastics.com). Since 1994 till now the Code of Points was enriched with almost 200 elements from which half are of superior value. The group with the most substantial evolution regarding the new elements were: group A- dynamic strength, group B- static strength and group C jumps (www.fig-gymnastics.com). The biggest group is C group - jumps, that through volume, number of families, possibilities of execution, detachment, finalization ( standing,, ) it offers the most numerous and spectacular composition solutions. In all the contests the elements from the jumps group bring a touch of spectacle, especially in mixed teams, trio and groups, because are made synchronically. The optimal parameters of execution of each jump highlight driving qualities like: detention, mobility, balance, coordination, strength. Group C is the whole set of difficulties and ways of execution, starting from one leg ( Leap) or two legs ( jump), on the spot, in two steps with moose, with diverse shapes of free expression, landing on the floor, in, in, or in in one arm or on both arms, the jumps becoming means, forces of content, artistic and technical departing. In gymnastics the strength is found under different forms of manifestation: dynamic strength, static strength, explosive strength (Vieru, N., 1997) being considered basic driving quality, because any movement means muscular contraction, tightly correlated with others ( Potop, V., 2008). Jumps in aerobic performance gymnastics have 4 phases: preparation for impulse or moose, the impulse, the flight and landing. Thus the moose is specific by tightening the jumps with the basic steps or by executing 2 steps of walking or running. Jumps can also be made from standing without moose. The impulse is made from one leg or both, it must be full of energy, short, strong and must ensure an optimal height for flight as to execute different actions in the air ( leg scissors, detachments in, turns of the body around main axes, combined movements) and the landing can be finalized in: standing on one leg, standing, ( in hick, frontal prone). Depending on the body position in air there are vertical jumps, vertical to horizontal and horizontal. The D group elements are those that highlight articulations mobility of gymnasts, the aptitude to execute movements with the highest amplitude possible, actively and passively (Manno, R., 1996) and balance capacity that implies maintaining positions on a support floor as reduced as possible ( Macovei, S., 2007) and restoring it after the displacements and high amplitude solicitations. In the technical execution of elements and in maintaining the balance, the kinesthetic, vestibular and force aptitudes have a major role. The elements from the Code of Points have values from 0.1 to 1 point. In the composition of exercises, the coach introduces elements with higher values so as the gymnasts gain a big grade in difficulty and a good position in world championships and cups. Results Regarding the analyzed content, the paper aims to comparatively and quantitatively evaluate the entire content of C group difficulty elements ( jumps) and D group elements ( balance and mobility), in finalist gymnasts of all 12 World Championships organized till now. Also it will be presented the frequency of elements with 0.8, 0.9, 1 point value from the last two world championships in the fifth contests. The results obtained in C group of difficulty jumps (table 1.1) Table 1.1. Dynamics of the elements in category C- Jumps and leaps Round Year women s men s Mixed pairs Trio Group 1995 Paris 33,00% 34,75% 26,16% 26,60% 293

1996 Haga 35,50% 35,00% 27,00% 26,90% 1997 Perth 36,80% 38,20% 28,30% 28,10% 1998 Catania 37,50% 34,00% 29,27% 29,16% 1999 Hanovra 39,10% 35,40% 30,00% 27,70% 2000 Riesa 39,80% 37,10% 31,13% 29,36% 2002 Klaipeda 33,75% 33,89% 26,00% 24,66% 22.40% 2004 Sofia 26,60% 25,40% 25,50% 25.50% 26,22% 2006 Nanjin 25,90% 25,17% 24,79% 26,85% 26,30% 2008 Ulm 50,99% 47,91% 44,78% 46,87% 47,91% 2010 Rodez 48,75% 43,75% 51,04% 47,91% 47,91% 2012 Sofia 53,50% 47,50% 50,00% 51,04% 48,61% Analyzing the elements dynamics from this group in the content of the exercises presented in the contest finals from all 12 World Championships, being confirmed that there are big variations in using the elements from this group, caused by the modification of the Code of Points. Thus the biggest percentage of elements from group C was obtained in the individual women contest (53,50%) in the World Championships in 2012 in Sofia. The smallest percentage was obtained in group contest ( 22.40%) in Klaipeda in 2002. The results obtained in the D group of difficulty - balance and mobility (table 1.2) Table 1.2. Dynamics of the elements in category D Balance and flexibility Round Year women s men s Mixed pairs Trio Group 1995 Paris 30,48% 18,84% 26,16% 15,01% 1996 Haga 28,33% 20,00% 16,66% 20,00% 1997 Perth 26,67% 10,31% 12,76% 12,50% 1998 Catania 24,18% 18,76% 13,33% 26.31% 1999 Hanovra 25,00% 15,67% 14,28% 26,66% 2000 Riesa 18,66% 13,33% 15,34% 14,28% 2002 Klaipeda 24,70% 16,00% 20,30% 24,66% 20,83% 2004 Sofia 25,00% 25,00% 25,90% 25,50% 25,40% 2006 Nanjin 25,00% 16,66% 16,66% 14,80% 20,30% 2008 Ulm 17,70% 16,66% 18,74% 16,66% 17,70% 2010 Rodez 20,00% 21,25% 17,70% 15,62% 18,75% 2012 Sofia 17,50% 17,50% 18,75% 14,58% 15,27% Regarding the use of D group elements, the biggest percentage were obtained in female individual (30,48%) in the first World Championship in Paris, in 1995, and the smallest (10,31%) in 1997 in Perth in male individual. The frequency of elements from group C (jumps) and D (balance and mobility) had the value 0.8-1 in the World Championships in Rodez and Sofia women s individual (table 1.3) Table 1.3. Women s Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 7x Cossack jump C488 1/1 Turn cossack jump ½ turn to 0,8 1x C RODEZ C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 4x Split jump/leap C688 1/1 Turn jump switch to 0,8 1x Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 1x Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 7x C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 5x C600 1/1 Turn pike jump ½ twist to 1,0 1x Split jump/leap C688 1/1 Turn jump switch to 0,8 2x Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 1x D RODEZ D198 Free illusion to free vertical 0,8 2x D200 Free illusion to 1/1 turn free 1,0 2x vertical D218 Free double illusion to vertical 0,8 2x D SOFIA D219 Free double illusion to free 0,9 3x 294

vertical Discuss. Analyzing the two groups it can be observed the use of elements from the Straddle jump/ leap, Cossack jump., Split jump/leap, Scissors leap and illusion families used 7 times, the highest frequency at the C348 element, and the smallest frequency in the elements from the family Cossack jumps,, Split jump/leap and Scissors leap in both world championships. Elements of 1 point we see in this contest in the and elements. The frequency of elements from group C (jumps) and D (balance and mobility) had the value 0.8-1 in the World Championships in Rodez and Sofia men s individual (table 1.4) Table 1.4. Men s individual Air Turn C109 3/1 Air turn 0,9 2x C428 1/1Turn straddle jump to 0,8 2x Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 1x Cossack jump C478 1/1 Turn cossack jump 1/1 turn 0,8 2x C RODEZ C600 1/1 Turn pike jump ½ twist to 1.0 7x Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 7x Free Fall C150 Free fall 3/1 twist airborne 1.0 1x D RODEZ D SOFIA C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,9 1x Straddle jump/leap A230 Straddle cut ½ twist to wenson 0,8 1x Cossack jump C478 1/1 Turn cossack jump 1/1 turn 0,8 1x C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 2x C600 1/1 Turn pike jump ½ twist to 1.0 6x Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 7x D218 Free double illusion to vertical 0,8 4x D219 Free double illusion to free 0,9 2x vertical D218 Free double illusion to vertical 0,8 1x D219 Free double illusion to free 0,9 2x vertical In gymnasts competition the element C600, from the family, having the value of 1 point was used 7 times in the World Championship in Rodez and 6 times in the World Championship in Sofia. This can be explained by the fact that the male gymnasts have a bigger strength than female gymnasts. The element C150 from the family Free Fall having the value of 1 point was used only one time.the frequency of C and D group elements have the value 0.8-1 point in the world championships in Rodez and Sofia mixed pairs ( table 1.5) Table 1.5. Mixed pairs Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 6x C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 8x C RODEZ Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 4x Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 6x C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 7x C600 1/1 Turn pike jump ½ twist to 1.0 1x Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 2x D RODEZ - - - - D SOFIA D218 Free double illusion to vertical 0,8 2x 295

In mixed pairs (1f+1m) was introduced in the exercise only one element of maximum value because the gymnasts do not risk executing these elements. The highest frequency is found in family, the C598 element with the value of 0.8, used 8 times in the Rodez world championship and 7 times in the Sofia world championship.the frequency of C and D group elements have the value 0.8-1 point in the world championships in Rodez and Sofia- trio (table 1.6) Table 1.6. Trio Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 4x C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 8x C RODEZ Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 3x Straddle jump/leap C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 3x C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ twist to 0,8 5x C600 1/1 Turn pike jump ½ twist to 1.0 2x Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 turn 0,8 5x D RODEZ - - - - D SOFIA D218 Free double illusion to vertical 0,8 2x In the trio contest the Pike elements have the highest frequency in both world championships, used 8 and 5 times. The maximum value (1 point) was the element C600 used 2 times and also from the Pike family. In the Rodez world championship was not used any element of difficulty from D group (value 0.8-1 point). The frequency of C and D group elements have the value 0.8-1 point in the world championships in Rodez and Sofia- group (table 1.7) Straddle C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 4x jump/leap C RODEZ C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ 0,8 8x twist to Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 0,8 2x turn Straddle C348 1/1Turn straddle leap to 0,8 2x jump/leap C598 ½ Turn pike jump ½ 0,8 5x twist to C600 1/1 Turn pike jump ½ 1.0 1x twist to Scissors leap C828 Scissors leap ½ turn 1/1 0,8 3x turn D RODEZ - - - - D SOFIA - - - - Table 1.7.Grup In the group contest, the most spectacular, the elements of 1 point were introduced only one time and the one having 0.8 value were introduced 24 times. The highest value is found in the Pike family used 8 times in the Rodez world championship. The D group elements (value 0.8-1 point) are not found in any of the analyzed championships. Conclusions - analyzing the gymnasts exercises along the World Championships it can be confirmed that the elements from group C are found with a percentage of over 44% in the last three editions in all 5 contests. The highest percentage was found in the edition in Sofia at female individual (53,50%); - regarding the balance and mobility exercises from group D it can be observed the dropping tendency of using the elements of balance and mobility in the composition of exercises at all editions of world championships compared with the use of C group elements, because these need special qualities from the competitors; - in the female individual contest it can be observed a balanced use of 5 and 4 families of elements from group C, in the two editions studied in terms of use and values. From D group the female gymnasts have used elements only from family with values from 0.8, 0.9 to 1 point; - in the male individual contests are mostly used elements with maximum value of 1.0 from family, the gymnasts having a higher explosive strength; - in the composition of the exercises from mixed group pairs are used for 35 times elements with the value 0.8; 296

- the trio and group contests introduced in 2002 in the world championships are the most spectacular and the highest use have the elements with the value 0.8, because the timing has to be perfect. References Codurile de punctaj fig. www.fig-gymnastics Dragnea, A., Teodorescu-Mate S. 2002. Teoria sportului.editura FEST, Bucureşti Hahn, E., 1996. Antrenamentulsportiv la copii.scj nr. 104-105, Bucureşti Macovei, S., 2007., Manual de gimnasticăritmică.bucureşti: Editura Bren pp.107 Manno, R. 1996. Les bases de l entraînementsportif. SDP nr. 371-374. Bucureşti, 127, 142 Niculescu, G. 2008. Gimnasticaaerobică aprofundare.editurafundaţieiromânia de Mâine, Bucureşti, 11 Popescu, G., 2005. Impact aerobic.bucureşti.edituraelisavaros Potop, V. 2008.Gimnastica artistică feminină. Editura Bren, Bucureşt, 31 Pradet, M. 2000. Pregătirea fizică partea I. MTS- CCPS, Bucureşti Tudor,V. 1999. Capacităţilecondiţionale, coordinative şiintermediare-componente ale capacităţiimotrice. Editura RAI, Bucureşti Vieru, N. 1997.Manual de gimnastică sportive.bucurești: EdituraDriada, 40. 297