middle deschutes progress in restoration

Similar documents
Water in the Deschutes Who needs it?

PROTECTING LAND & RESTORING RIVERS FOR SALMON & STEELHEAD

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Preliminary System Improvement Plan

Deschutes River Conservancy Strategic Plan Executive Summary

Deschutes Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. Working Group Meeting December 14, 2017 Redmond, Oregon

Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #

annual report deschutes watershed

STEELHEAD SURVEYS IN OMAK CREEK

Southern Oregon Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Searsville Dam Removal

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

Warner Lakes Redband Trout

The. Plain Facts. What s happening on the Deschutes River

Whychus Creek. Students, Streams & Stewardship UPPER DESCHUTES WATERSHED COUNCIL.

Catlow Valley Redband Trout

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

January 4, Addresses water quality within the Council program.

Maryland Chapter Trout Unlimited Brook Trout Conservation Effort

Deschutes Bull Trout

Klamath Lake Bull Trout

DOLORES RIVER NATIVE FISH HABITAT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ALTERNATIVES TO WILD AND SCENIC DESIGNATION

Rebirth of the Pigeon River: Song of the Morning Dam Removal Project

2012 Bring Back the Natives Awarded Projects

Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon February 8, By Greg A.

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Concurrent Sessions C: Prioritization - Oregon Fish Passage Priority List - A Statewide Barrier Prioritization Effort

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ROGUE FISH DISTRICT REPORT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Western native Trout Status report

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Eulachon: State of the Science and Science to Policy Forum

Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California

Columbia Basin Water Transaction Program. FY13 RM&E Habitat Monitoring Report. BPA Project #

Alberta Conservation Association 2017/18 Project Summary Report

September 4, Update on Columbia basin Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Planning

PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT AREA. FAHCE Fish Habitat Restoration Plan EIR

Oregon Coast Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Restoring the Kootenai: A Tribal Approach to Restoration of a Large River in Idaho

Ecology of Columbia River redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in high desert streams

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

Throughout the Pacific Northwest, salmon and steelhead have been listed under the Endangered Species Act because their existence is either threatened

2004 ANNUAL REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS

2 nd Steelhead Summit. October 27 & 28, 2016 in San Luis Obispo, CA

Project Name: Distribution and Abundance of the Migratory Bull Trout Population in the Castle River Drainage (Year 4 of 4)

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

California Steelhead: Management, Monitoring and Recovery Efforts

P.O. Box 65 Hancock, Michigan USA fax

PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - Lewis River Aquatic Fund

Statement of Dr. Jack Williams Senior Scientist, Trout Unlimited. Before the

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

Update on Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force

1.Mill Creek Watershed Summary Description and Land Use

Climate Warming Rates of Salmon and Trout Rivers in the West

Dear Friends and Supporters,

Malheur Lakes Redband Trout

Redd Dewatering and Juvenile Salmonid Stranding in the Lower Feather River,

April 17, Re: Broad Interest in Clarifying Deductibility of a Water Right Donation.

Final Bull Trout Redd Monitoring Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

OVERVIEW OF MID-COLUMBIA FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

COA-F17-F-1343 YEAR END REPORT

Attachment 6. Public Correspondence. Public correspondence received as of July 2, 2008

MCCAW REACH RESTORATION

Removal of natural obstructions to improve Atlantic Salmon and Brook Trout habitat in western NL. 26/02/2015 Version 2.0

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

Salmon Biology Station

Anglers Notice Review

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON

Annual Report for Fiscal Year and Future Plans for the Tillamook Bay Watershed Council

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

State of San Francisco Bay 2011 Appendix O Steelhead Trout Production as an Indicator of Watershed Health

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Draft Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan

Hot Topics: Endangered Species Act. Presented by Kirk Maag, Stoel Rives LLP October 2016

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

SECTION 2 HYDROLOGY AND FLOW REGIMES

Chapter 9 Fish and Fish Habitat Redband Trout (photo credit: unknown)

Follow this and additional works at:

Management and Control of Asian Carps in the United States. Greg Conover Asian Carp Working Group, Chair USFWS, Carterville FRO

SONAR ESTIMATION OF ADULT STEELHEAD: VARIOUS METHODS TO ACCOUNT FOR KELTS IN DETERMINING TOTAL ESCAPEMENT

Steelhead Sport Fishing Regulations Proposals Vancouver Island Region for April 1, 2007

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.

Attachment 1. Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND

1.Warm Springs Creek (Anaconda) Watershed Description and Land Use

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

Transcription:

middle deschutes progress in restoration

Acknowledgements prepared by: Upper Deschutes Watershed Council Deschutes River Conservancy Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife DESIGN & PRODUCTION FUNDED by: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board The information presented in this publication is based on the following technical reports available at www.upperdeschuteswatershedcouncil.org: 2013 Middle Deschutes Fisheries Monitoring Report: Fish Distribution and Abundance in the Middle Deschutes River (ODFW 2014) 2013 Middle Deschutes Fisheries Monitoring Report: Redband Trout Movement in the Middle Deschutes River (ODFW 2014) Middle Deschutes River Instream Flow Restoration and Temperature Response 2001-2013 (UDWC 2014) Restoration and monitoring activities discussed in this report have been funded by: Avion Water Company Bonneville Environmental Foundation Bonneville Power Administration Bureau of Reclamation Deschutes Brewery Meyer Memorial Trust National Fish and Wildlife Foundation s Columbia Basin Water Transactions Program Oregon Community Foundation s North Rim Fund Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board 2 middle deschutes: progress in restoration

Introduction T he Deschutes River wells out of the volcanic high Cascades as cold, clean water, flowing 225 miles to the Columbia River. For millennia, salmon and steelhead traveled from the ocean up to Big Falls, a natural barrier to fish passage, to spawn and rear in the Deschutes and its tributaries. Upstream of Big Falls to the headwaters, redband trout and other native fish flourished in place of steelhead. With European settlement, the constant flow of the Deschutes River was harnessed for agriculture and other uses, changing the character of the river. Since the early 1900 s, the Deschutes River has served as the primary source of irrigation water for most of the irrigated agriculture in Central Oregon, including farmland near Bend, Redmond, Terrebonne and Madras. Most of the irrigation diversions are located near Bend, where summer irrigation withdrawals historically diverted up to 95% of the stream flow in the Deschutes River. As a result, the 40- mile reach of the Deschutes River located between the City of Bend and Lake Billy Chinook, known as the Middle Deschutes, typically flowed at approximately 30 cubic feet per second (cfs) during most of the summer, resulting in elevated water temperatures and degraded habitat conditions for beleaguered native fish populations. Beginning in 1999, the Deschutes River Conservancy (DRC), local irrigation districts and other partners began ambitious stream flow restoration efforts using a variety of innovative water conservation, acquisition and leasing approaches. This collaboration, sustained over more than a decade, has permanently restored more than 80 cfs of water to the Middle Deschutes. In addition, annual water leasing has increased summer stream flow by up to an additional 50 cfs each summer. Alongside stream flow restoration efforts, restoration partners have carefully tracked the accompanying changes in the physical and biological characteristics of the river. The Upper Deschutes Watershed Council (UDWC) has worked closely with state agencies and others to monitor water temperature in the Middle Deschutes. This monitoring has allowed restoration partners to begin to describe the relationship between stream flow and water temperature at critical locations along the Middle Deschutes. In 2012, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife launched a five-year study of the fish populations of the Middle Deschutes. New fish population data is improving our understanding of the status of native and non-native fish assemblages in the Middle Deschutes, which areas are supporting the greatest number of fish, and how characteristics of stream habitat may be influencing habitat selection by trout. This information will allow fisheries managers, irrigation districts and restoration partners to develop stream flow restoration projects that will provide the greatest ecological benefit to fish and the river ecosystem. This report provides an overview of the current state of stream flow, water quality, and the Middle Deschutes fish community as of 2013. The purpose of this report is to provide a condensed overview of what these attributes say about the health of the Middle Deschutes while summarizing local efforts to restore a healthy river ecosystem. All of the information presented here has been distilled from a series of technical reports prepared by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, available at www.upperdeschuteswatershedcouncil.org. introduction 3

MIDDLE DESCHUTES Restoration & Monitoring Activities s ince 1999, the DRC and basin stakeholders have worked together in a collaborative effort to restore stream flow and improve water quality. As DRC and restoration partners have restored more and more flow to the Deschutes River, new possibilities for the river have emerged. Flows previously unimaginable during the irrigation season, and temperatures low enough to support salmon and trout rearing and migration, are starting to look achievable. With flow restoration and the potential for stream temperatures to improve, fish biologists long concerned with the effects of elevated temperatures on resident fish populations have an added incentive to study how fish are using habitat in relation to differences in temperature. Temperature data provide precise information about how temperature conditions are changing and inform flow restoration strategies, which in turn improve habitat when and where fish need it. The relationships and trust established over years of working together improve the ability of basin restoration partners to accomplish goals that maximize benefits to the river, while continuing to support important cultural values like agriculture and irrigation. These actions are occurring in concert to revitalize a thriving river community. The restoration and monitoring efforts in the Middle Deschutes would not be possible without significant, long-term investments from key funders, partners and collaborators, all of whom share a common interest in restoring stream flow to support a healthy river. Working Together Successful restoration work in the Middle Deschutes requires that many local, state and federal partners and funders come together for a common cause. Primary restoration partners in the Middle Deschutes include: Central Oregon Irrigation District Crook County Improvement District No. 1 (Lone Pine) Deschutes River Conservancy North Unit Irrigation District Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Water Resources Swalley Irrigation District Tumalo Irrigation District Upper Deschutes Watershed Council 4 middle deschutes: progress in restoration

Steelhead Falls MIDDLE DESCHUTES Restoration & Monitoring Activities Whychus Creek Lower Bridge Road Big Falls SISTERS FISH MONITORING Cool water (18 C/64 F) is critical to the ability of fish to perform basic physiological functions, and elevated stream temperatures like those characterizing the Middle Deschutes are known to affect fish numbers, movement, and habitat selection. Fish monitoring data from the Middle Deschutes River is allowing fish biologists to develop a better understanding of the health of fish populations, which reaches of the river fish are using most, and how fish are selecting habitat in relation to stream temperature and cold water inputs from springs and creeks, including Tumalo Creek. REDMOND TEMPERATURE MONITORING Temperature monitoring by UDWC aims to answer the following questions: How do temperatures change as flows in the Middle Deschutes increase? How do flows from Tumalo Creek affect stream temperature in the Deschutes? A robust dataset representing more than a decade of temperature and flow records is showing reductions in water temperature commensurate with improvements in stream flow, with lower stream temperatures that exceed the 18 C state standard less often. Analyses of Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek stream flow and temperature suggest that prioritizing stream flow restoration in Tumalo Creek will result in lower temperatures at equivalent cumulative flows. Tumalo Creek Tumalo Diversion Dam Deschutes River Deschutes River North Canal Dam BEND STREAM FLOW RESTORATION Like many of the rivers and streams of the arid west, the Deschutes River has played a significant role in providing irrigation water to farms and local communities over the last century. During the summer months, stream flow in the Middle Deschutes downstream of Bend can consequently drop to very low levels. Stream flow restoration efforts, most of which are concentrated at North Canal Dam in the City of Bend, have resulted in approximately 80 cubic feet per second (cfs) of water being restored to the creek during the hot summer months, with up to 50 additional cfs left instream through water leasing. Stream flow restoration in Tumalo Creek at the Tumalo Dam has restored up to 20 cfs. Increased instream flow from both waterways provides the foundation for cooler, cleaner water and healthier fish populations. restoration & monitoring activities 5

Stream Flow f ish habitat, water temperature and many other critical aspects of river health are closely linked to stream flow. With sufficient water in the Middle Deschutes, the water remains cool. The river is wider, providing access to more food, habitat, and shade from streamside riparian vegetation. Pools provide deep cover for hiding fish. When stream flow is depleted, however, water temperatures steadily rise and less habitat is available, creating conditions that are inhospitable for fish. Riparian vegetation may be dewatered and lost over years of consistently low flows, and the entire aquatic ecosystem can suffer from the cascading effects of significantly diminished flows. In the Middle Deschutes, stream flow is an excellent indicator of restoration progress because flows are critically important for water quality, habitat, fish spawning and rearing, and many other ecological functions. In addition, stream flow can be readily measured over time to track long-term progress. requested water right would allocate 250 cfs at North Canal Dam, and 32 cfs in Tumalo Creek at the Tumalo Irrigation District diversion, but would only provide for these flows after all senior water rights had been served. Into the 1990 s, irrigation season flows hovered around 30 cfs. Irrigation diversions began on the Deschutes near Bend as early as 1890. By the 1920 s almost the entire flow of the Deschutes had been appropriated for irrigation. During irrigation season, from March to November, stream flows were variable and inconsistent. As of 1950, as little as 15-20 cfs of the 1,250 cfs average natural flow was spilled over North Canal Dam. In 1990 the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife applied for instream water rights for the Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek to increase flows to support fish populations hit hard by decades of poor flow conditions. The With the launch of stream flow restoration efforts by Deschutes River Conservancy in 1996, summer stream flows started to increase. Within a decade, over 100 cfs were protected instream in the Deschutes; by 2013 that number had climbed to 124 cfs, won through tremendous efforts and sustained collaboration on the part of irrigation districts, state agencies, and restoration partners. In Tumalo Creek, 20 cfs have been protected, and July flows now average 23 cfs. Higher flows have allowed restoration partners to better understand how flow restoration influences temperatures in the Deschutes. 6 middle deschutes: progress in restoration

Stream flow restoration at North Canal Dam leaves more water in the Deschutes, increasing habitat and contributing to cooler temperatures downstream. 250 225 Deschutes River & Tumalo Creek Stream Flow Measured at North Canal Dam & below Tumalo Irrigation Diversion (2001-2013) Median July Stream Flow (cfs) 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Deschutes River at North Canal Dam Tumalo Creek below Tumalo Irrigation Diversion Although stream flow varies with climate and weather patterns between years, stream flow restoration has resulted in an increasing trend in July flow over the last decade. stream flow 7

Stream Temperature T he Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek spring from the high Cascades AS an abundance of cold, clean water ideal for redband and steelhead trout. Tumalo Creek cascades down from the Three Sisters Wilderness, flowing freely with no impoundments and minimal diversion, until a couple miles above the confluence with the Deschutes. The creek remains cold up to the point of diversion at River Mile 2.8, where the majority of the flow is diverted for irrigation. The water remaining below the diversion warms quickly, more so when flows are lower. The Deschutes, unlike Tumalo, flows only a few miles from its headwaters before filling two consecutive reservoirs, Crane Prairie and Wickiup. Water stored during the winter is heated by summer temperatures. Flows released for irrigation from the reservoirs are cooled by tributaries upstream of Bend, but warm up again on the way downstream. While redband trout are very hardy fish, they require relatively cool water. The State of Oregon has identified 18 C / 64 F as a maximum temperature standard to protect these fish. By the time the Deschutes River reaches Bend, stream temperatures are often already 18 C / 64 F or warmer. Thirty-two miles downstream at Lower Bridge Road, temperatures in the creek can reach or exceed 24 C / 75 F, conditions that are lethal for fish and are well above the state identified limit. The relationship between water temperature and stream flow has been very well documented over years of study. Restoring flow on the Deschutes in Bend reduces the rate at which the water heats up as it flows downstream, and restoring flow in Tumalo Creek delivers cold water that actively reduces Deschutes temperatures. With consistent increases in summer flows since 2001, July temperatures at Lower Bridge Road have shown a marked reduction, but temperatures still exceed the 18 C / 64 F standard in low water years. (e.g. 2013) New analyses show that restoring flow in Tumalo Creek can achieve a greater cooling effect than restoring the same amount of flow in the Deschutes. This information suggests a new approach to stream flow restoration that prioritizes increasing flows in Tumalo Creek. The continued progress in flow restoration is an important trend that will ultimately bring valuable benefits for the water temperature in the Middle Deschutes River. Temperature ( F / C) F C 82 28 79 26 75 24 72 22 68 20 64 18 61 16 57 14 54 12 24 Lethally hot for fish July Water Temperature Middle Deschutes River at Lower Bridge (2001-2013).................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Cool enough for fish 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 8 middle deschutes: progress in restoration

With sufficient flow, Tumalo Creek adds cold water to the Deschutes downstream of Bend. Stream Temperature At the Deschutes River-Tumalo Creek Confluence What makes trout happy? 24ºC 75ºF 20ºC 68ºF 18ºC 64ºF 14ºC 57ºF Lethally hot Getting warmer Cool enough Nice & chilly 50 cfs D ESCHUTES R I V E R 2001 2013 Both the Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek were 21ºC 70ºF 6 cfs T U M A LO C R E E K 129 cfs D E S C H UTES RIVER Both the Deschutes River and Tumalo Creek were 19ºC 66ºF 12 cfs T U M A LO C R E E K 129 cfs D ESCHUTES 19ºC 66ºF R IVER POTENTIAL FUTURE SCENARIO C R E E K T U M A LO 14ºC 57ºF 54 cfs 21ºC 70ºF Although streamflow increased, temperature did not significantly decrease. 19ºC 66ºF 18ºC 64ºF Not all flow is created equal. Modernizing irrigation systems will allow more cold Tumalo Creek water to flow into the Deschutes River. STREAM TEMPERATURE 9

Fish Populations t he concerted efforts of restoration partners on the Middle Deschutes River aim to restore flow and water quality conditions that ultimately will support thriving native fish populations. But until recently, while changes in stream flow and temperature had been closely tracked alongside stream flow restoration, no information existed to evaluate how fish might be responding to changes in flow and temperature. The most recent data available on Middle Deschutes fish populations were from coarse-scale, qualitative surveys conducted in the 1980 s. Fish Populations in the Middle Deschutes River (2013) Brown Trout (17%) Mottled Sculpin (1%) PHOTO BRIAN HUDSPETH Redband Trout (13%) Mountain Whitefish (69%) Mountain whitefish, a native species in the same family as salmon and trout, accounted for over 2/3 of fish captured in the Middle Deschutes as of 2013. Native redband and non-native brown trout together accounted for not quite a third of total captures. These two species have similar life histories and may have been similarly affected by the changes in stream flow and temperature that accompanied the advent of irrigation in the Upper Deschutes subbasin. 10 middle deschutes: progress in restoration

In 2012 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, in partnership with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and the Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, launched a five-year monitoring study to obtain new information about fish populations in the Middle Deschutes and to begin to describe how fish are using habitat in relation to temperature and flow conditions. Fish monitoring is showing that mountain whitefish, a native species in the same family as trout, is the dominant species in the Middle Deschutes, making up 70% of the fish recorded. Redband and brown trout were recorded in approximately equal numbers, each representing about 15% of the total fish count. Very few large redband, and relatively few small redband or brown trout, were observed, in contrast to slightly higher numbers of medium-size redband, raising questions about what factors may be limiting large and small size classes for the two species, respectively. Two years of sampling and data analysis have allowed biologists to improve sampling techniques and the quality of the resulting data, which increases the amount of confidence restoration partners can put in what we are learning about fish populations. Over the short term, fish data will show how native redband and introduced brown trout populations are faring, and in which reaches of the Middle Deschutes they are most abundant. Tracking fish outfitted with radio transmitters will show how widely individual fish range. Comparison of fish abundance (how many), distribution (where) and movement in relation to temperature and stream flow will provide information about where along the river temperature and flow conditions are best for fish and allow restoration partners to prioritize stream flow restoration actions accordingly. Over the long term, with sustained gains in stream flow and corresponding reductions in stream temperature, biologists may be able to show a connection between changes in stream conditions and healthier native fish populations. FISH POPULATIONS 11

PHOTO BRIAN HUDSPETH To learn more about the restoration and monitoring discussed in this report: upper deschutes watershed council VISIT www.restorethedeschutes.org write PO Box 1812 Bend, OR 97709 call 541 382 6103 deschutes river conservancy VISIT www.deschutesriver.org write 700 NW Hill St. Bend, OR 97701 call 541 382 4077