Consolidated Data on the river Puyo and Piatua

Similar documents
Data Sheet. Macroinvertebrate Assessment. Part II: Water Quality Score. Part I: Color Dots. Color Code & Sensitivity Points. Type of Macroinvertebrate

Checklist (for turning in results)

Taxonomy. An Introduction to the Taxonomy and Ecology of EPT Families

Common Macroinvertebrates in the Clinton River Watershed

Water Quality and Habitat in Shingle Creek

Student Handout #2 Using Abiotic and Biotic Parameters to Monitor Water Quality: A Field Experiment

INDICATOR BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE SPECIES AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS

APPENDIX B THREE RIVERS SECOND NATURE RESULTS OF RAPID INVERTEBRATE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SAMPLING PHASE 2 APRIL 2002 A-19

A Survey of the Metrics Utilized to Determine Macroinvertebrate Indices in Eight Southeastern States

Macroinvertebrate Response to a Gradient of Hydrologic Connectivity within the Lower Mississippi River and Its Floodplain

Bioindicators of Water Quality Quick Reference Guide

Question # The question The answer Bugs to use Fact or ID sheets Magnify? needed needed Difficulty

Macroinvertebrate Fact Sheet

Impacts to Water Quality from Land Use or What is Pollution?

Aquatic Insects. Dayton Steelman Northwest Arkansas Master Naturalist

Chapter 5. Biological Monitoring

MISSOURI STREAM TEAM GUIDE TO AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES

[USP5655] [USP5650] [USP5653] [USP5649] [USP5654] [USP5648] 121 [USP5652] grazers 33. predator grazers 124 [USP5647]

Ephemeral Wetland Variety:

Water Snail Class Gastropoda

Excellent = SQI>48 Good = SQI Fair = SQI Poor = SQI<19

The Streamkeepers Handbook

Macroinvertabrate and Water Quality Survey of Smelt Brook

COLDWATER CONSERVATION CORPS. Advanced Monitoring Protocol. Macroinvertebrate Sampling And Assessment

Water Quality Activities. Agape Center for Environmental Education

Haw River Watch. A Citizen Water Quality Project of the Haw River Assembly. Damselflies, Coenagrionidae and Lestidae families.

Resource Partitioning and Life History Patterns Among Salmonids in the Estuarine Habitat Mosaic

2006 Photographic Atlas Aquatic Macroinvertebrates of Piasa Watershed Creeks and Ponds

4-H Short Course Insect ID Contest Study Program Prepared by Dr. Jack Baldwin Extension Entomologist

Teacher Field Activity Supplement and Insect Fact Sheet for Aquatic Insects Found in Mountain Streams and Their Adaptations

Aquatic invertebrate surveys of two ponds in Greenwoods Conservancy, one on and the other off the Volney-Marcy South Right of Way

The Uptake of Mercury and Relationship to Food Habits of Fish in the South River and South Fork Shenandoah River

SALMON RIVER WATERSHED RAPID BIOASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT 2008

KINGDOM ANIMALIA. 2 nd half.

Backyard STEM Project Area: Environmental Science

Kilkenny Central Access Scheme. Follow-up Aquatic Ecological Report

Aquatic invertebrates & stream ecology (Schlemon course March 2004)

Feeding Selectivity of the American Eel Anguilla rostrata (LeSueur) in the Upper Delaware River

A Stream In A Bucket An introduction to aquatic macroinvertebrates and other stream life.

Standards-Based Module (Lesson/Unit Plan) Cover Page. Title of Lesson/Unit: Aquatic Insects Found in Mountain Streams and Their Adaptations

Blackman River: Woodbury Dam proposal Aquatic environmental assessment

INCORPORATION OF STRESSED STREAM ANALYSIS INTO THE PROVIDENCE COLLEGE BIOLOGY CURRICULUM. Carol B. Crafts

Moses Lake Fishery Restoration Project

Pre-Treatment Assessment of Habitat and Biota. in the Knife River Mainstem, MN

Uptake of Mercury and Relationship to Food Habits of Selected Fish Species in the Shenandoah River Basin, Virginia

Campbell Slough. Franz Lake

Orange County Water Authority

RAPID BIOASSESSMENT IN WADEABLE STREAMS & RIVERS BY VOLUNTEER MONITORS

BIG Idea: Aquatic insects can provide information about water and ecosystem health, and how it changes over time.

Arthropoda. Phylum 5 SUBPHYLA: 1hylTrilobitmorpha 2hylCrustacea 3hylChelicerata 4 Myriapoda (Diplopoda & Chilopoda) 5 Hexapoda (Insecta)

The diversity of insects can only be described

Creek. These SWWFs also represent important stakeholders in the protection and management of Big Walnut Creek.

CORE CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS. Language Arts 1(12), 2(2,5) Science 3(1-3), 4(1,2), 5(1,4,6), 6(1,8) Arts 3(1,2), 5(1)

Escaped Rainbow Trout (Onchorhyncus mykiss) Management 2018 Operational Plan

Neal D. Mundahl a & Ashley M. Hunt a a Department of Biology and Southeastern Minnesota Water. Available online: 10 Oct 2011

Standards-Based Module (Lesson/Unit Plan) Cover Page. Title of Lesson/Unit: Introduction to Adult Insects and Their Adaptations

Modes of prey detec-on by predators

4 H Collection Contest Guidelines 2018 State Round Up. For help with pinning and spreading, visit Bexar Entomology channel.

Virginia Save Our Streams Eastern Biomonitoring Method for Muddy Bottom Streams

Current Status of Dreissena polymorpha and Biodiversity of Littoral Macroinvertebrates in Geneva Lake, Wisconsin

An inventory ofmeroplankton associated with Myriophyllum spicatum, focusing on Acentria ephemerella, in Otsego Lake, summer 1997

Acknowledgments Concept developed and compiled by: Enthusiastic support, editing and review: Special mention: Disclaimer

President s Remarks. Spring Loon & Turtle Lake Cottage Association

Establishment of sampling protocols and reporting mechanisms for collection and identification of new non-native species.

Lower St. Croix River. Select Small Tributary Streams: An Aquatic Biota Assessment, Ten Years Later. June 2014 FOR

Making the Most of Your Monitoring Using Macroinvertebrates

Stonefly. Gilled Snails

TABLE OF CONTENTS. ABSTRACT...i. List of Figures...ii. List of Appendices...ii INTRODUCTION...1 STUDY AREA...2 DISCUSSION...5. Acknowledgments...

The effects of long-reach channelization on habitat and invertebrate drift in some Iowa streams

Mismer. St. Martin s Duck

EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC FISHING ON THE INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF A NEW ZEALAND STREAM

Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi, Auckland 2016

Food Habits of Rainbow Trout Stocked in Argyle Lake, Illinois

Biological Monitoring

Macrobenthic invertebrate survey of Waneta and Lamoka Lakes, Schuyler County, New York, September, 1996.

Identifying British Insects and Arachnids

STREAM Girls field notebook

STREAM DRIFT. Much variation among taxa: Fraction of benthos drifting: Distance drifted? at any moment? over 24 hr period?

Aquatic Macroinvertebrate ID

Food Habits of Irondequoit Bay Fish

4-H ENTOMOLOGY PROJECT

DIET OF AMERICAN EEL (ANGUILLA ROSTRATA) ELVERS IN A HUDSON RIVER TRIBUTARY. A Final Report of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program. Leah M.

Trait characteristics determine pyrethroid sensitivity in non-standard test species of freshwater

EIGHTMILE RIVER RAPID BIOASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT

The Kansas School Naturalist

A Biotic and Hydrologic Assessment of Honeycut Springs

to publication unless permission is obtained in writing from the author.

LIFE CYCLE AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF CADDISFLIES (INSECTA:TRICHOPTERA) IN THE NAVASOTA RIVER, TEXAS.

A Survey of Freshwater Macroinvertebrates on Antigua, West Indies

LIFE IN FRESH WATERS

Rouge River Benthic Monitoring Program Spring 2013 Report

Aquatic Animal Diversity Background

Growth, Food Habits, and the Relative Effectiveness of Stocking Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) in South-Central South Dakota

A field evaluation of four strains of Salmo introduced into seven Montana waters

Course Programme 2017

Continued monitoring of fish community dynamics and abiotic factors influencing Moe Pond, summer 2006

What is an insect? An insect is an invertebrate (an animal with no spine) that has three pairs of legs and three

Aquatic Ecology. Hunting and Knoxville Creeks

Aquatic Insect Life Cycles

Hester-Dendy Sampling Method Leaf Bag Sampling Method D-Net Sampling Method

Transcription:

Consolidated Data on the river Puyo and Piatua Table. Total Macroinvertebrates and percentage in river Puyo and Piatua S.No Name River Puyo % River Piatua % Platyhelminthes-. planarian 23.78 8.6.2 Cestoda.7 2 Annelida 2. Oligochaeta 2.5 2.29 2.2 Hirudinea 37 2.87-3 Crustaceans 3. 3. Amphipoda 8.62 3.2 Isopoda 3.3 Decapoda 2.5 3.4 F.W.Prawn 3.23 4 Arachinida 4. Water mite/spider 5 Insecta 5. Coleoptera 28 9.96 59 8.58 5.. Larva-Water penny 8 28 5..2 Riffle Beetle Adult 5..2. Riffle Beetle larva 5..3 Diving Beetle 5.2 Mayflies Or- Ephemeroptera 5.3 Stoneflies-Or- Plecoptera 5.4 CaddisfliesOr Trichoptera 27 8 2 23 667 5.9 335 48.76 7.78 5 5.28 95 7.39 62 9.2 5.4. Egg cases of 39 26 Caddisfly 5.5 Odonata 38 3.3 9.3 5.5. Damselflies 3 7 5.5.2 Dragonflies 8 2 5.6 Megaloptera 26 2.2 2 2.9

5.7 Lepidopteraaquatic moths 5.8 Diptera- Chironomidae 88 6.84 5 7.42 5.9 Hemiptera 36 2.8 32 4.65 5.9. Gerridae 25 5.9.2 Notonectidae 5.9.3 Corixidae 5.9.4 Belostomatidae- Spherodema 25 7 6 Mollusca 6. Gastropoda 2.63 4.58 6.2 Pelecypoda.77 - Total-orders=5 285 Order=- 687 Table.2 Physico chemical characteristic of water in different stations of River Puyo S.No Stations Pindo Mirador Temperature C 2.4.72 ph 7.872.93 River Puyo Oxygen mg/.l 8.495.29 Conductivity mv 5.375 3.374 Oxygen saturation %.225.855 2 Picolina 3 University 4 Obrero 2.7.774 22.38.776 22.4.596 7.3.632 8.222.248 7.68.242 8.35.394 8.42.79 7.44.894 52.675 32.52 67.26 4.37 7.86 7.2 2.85 3.47 99.68 3.526 99.8 2.36 5 Union Base 2.433.378 7.56.54 8.3.338 54.66 8.86 2.33 4.25 6 Los Americas 7 Fatima 8 Santo Domingo 2.66.23 2.366.32 2.2 7.956.328 8.4.67 7.2 8.393.87 8.26.34 8.22 78.336 4.44 9.366 3.232 44 4.576.82 3.66.274 2.8

Table.3 Physico chemical characteristics of water in different stations of River Piatua S.No 2 Stations Piatua High Basin 3 Table.4 Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3 CIPCA Temperature C 2.95.64 24.5 4.383 22.3.6 ph 7.545.23 7.52.42 7.37.77 River Piatua Oxygen mg/.l 8.77.5 9.27.724 8.487.27 Conductivity 26.95 9.756 24.372 5.22 9.875 4.266 Oxygen saturation % 4.867.284 4.32.62 4.32.7 Solids and Coliform count in water in different stations of River Puyo S.No Stations Pindo Mirador 2 Picolina 3 University 4 Obrero 5 Union Base 6 Los Americas 7 Fatima 8 Santo Domingo Suspended solids mg/l.58.47.784.98.62.37.3.54.48.3.28..2..94 Soilds Settleable solids ml/l.25.5.675.427...9.73.33.57.65 494. Coliform count.ml.5ml.ml 85 8558.5 9358 6765.34 3425 295.3 366 254 325 6 33 39 464 923 48 828 272.5 494 274.9 557 563 266 448 465 99 3625 449 35 4 2 2675 548.89 685 978.86 34 2936.96 489 6783 242 3 32 8384 47 4242 24

Table. 5 Solids and coliform count in of water in different stations of River Piatua S.No 2 Stations Piatua High Basin 3 Table.6 Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3 CIPCA Solids Suspended solids mg/l.66.52.5.34.76.9 Setlleable solids ml/l... Coliform count.ml.5 ml. ml 756 224 2477 378 685 2 65 5766 7282 7678 43 5232 9925 98 633 732 578 867 Different metric index in different stations of River Puyo S.No Stations Pindo Mirador River Puyo BI EPT% EPT&C H Ev 4.494 7.96.869.362.73.868 22.98.75.489.268 2 Picolina 5.47.463 39.4 32.32.432.32.96.4.744.266 3 University 3.935.247 7.5 3.225.946.5.466.465.78.56 4 Obrero 4.63.23 6.966 24.36.862.69.953.96.577.54 5 Union Base 6 Los Americas 7 Fatima 8 Santo Domingo 4.74.24 3.593.527 3.583.3 5.83 56.879 36.925 69.5 6.74 74.2 3.775 3.58.683.59.93.9.94.52.622.47.924.52.23.568.579 2.72.684.364.74.4.846.78.9

Table.7 Different metric index in different stations of River Piatua S.No 2 Stations Piatua High Basin 3 Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3 CIPCA River Piatua BI EPT% EPT&C H Ev 76.37.92.352.736 3.429 5.25.73.22.88.463 3.775.867 3.4.58 63.4 29.734 73.34 6.745.939.22.85..4.39.32.39.99.49.783.99 Fig. % of Different orders of insects in river Puyo,78,5,63,77,7 2,87, planarian 2,8 2,2 Cestoda 6,84 3,3 9,96 Oligochaeta Hirudinea Crustaceans 7,39 Coleoptera Ephemeroptera 7,78 Plecoptera Trichoptera Odonata 5,9 Megaloptera Diptera-

Biotic index Fig.2 % of Different orders of Insects in river Piatua,58,6,29 2,9 planarian 4,65 8,58 7,42 Oligochaeta,3 Coleoptera Ephemeroptera 9,2 Plecoptera Trichoptera Odonata 5,28 48,76 Megaloptera Diptera- Hemiptera Gastropoda Fig.3 7 6 5 4 3 2 Biotic Index in different stations of River Puyo y = -,4x + 4,57 R² =, Series Different stations Fig.4

H' EPT & C Index EPT Index 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 EPT Index in different stations of river Puyo y = -,4547x + 65,72 R² =,478 Series Different stations Fig.5,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2, EPT&C Index in differnt station of river Puyo y =,6x +,7552 R² =,63 Series Different stations Fig.6 2,5 2,5,5 H'in different stations of river Puyo y =,6x +,939 R² =,53 Series Different stations

BI values Values of different metrics H max Fig.7,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2, H max in different stations of river Puyo y =,29x +,6438 R² =,269 Series different stations Fig.8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 consolidated metrics of River Puyo 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 y = -,4547x + 65,72 R² =,478 BI EPT EPT &C H' Hmax Different station Fig.9 3,9 3,8 3,7 3,6 3,5 3,4 3,3 3,2 BI in river Piatua y = -,4x + 3,563 R² =,45 Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3CIPCA Different stations in river Piatua

H' values EPT&C values EPT values Fig. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 EPT in river Piatua y = -,645x + 74,5 R² =,57 Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3CIPCA Different stations in river Piayua Fig.,96,94,92,9,88,86,84,82,8 EPT&C in river Piatua y = -,35x +,973 R² =,5576 Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3CIPCA Different stations in river Piatua Fig.2,45,4,35,3 H' in river Piatua y = -,6x +,3893 R² =,579,25 Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3CIPCA different station in river Piatua

values of different metrics Hmax values Fig.3,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2, Hmax in river Piatua y =,235x +,7623 R² =,69 Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3CIPCA Different station in river Piatua Fig.4 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 consolidated metric in river Piatua y = -6,7446x + 34,26 R² =,58 BI EPT EPT&C H' Hmax Different metric Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2 Cabin Piatua 3CIPCA

EPT in % EPT in % Fig.5 % of EPT in River Puyo 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 y = -33,75x + 99,68 R² =,7566 Ephemeroptera Plecoptera Trichoptera EPT Orders Fig.6 % of EPT in River Piatua 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 y = -27,9x + 87,7 R² =,8647 Ephemeroptera Plecoptera Trichoptera EPT Orders

Settleable solids im ml/l suspended solids in mg/l Fig.7,25,2,5 Suspended solids in different sampling stations of river Puyo y =,7x +,96 R² =,945,,5 Different stations Fig.8,2,8 Settleable soild in different stations y =,393x +,586 of river Puyo R² =,672,6,4,2 Different stations in river Puyo

settleable soild in ml/l suspended solids in mg/l Fig.9,2,8,6,4,2,,8,6,4,2 Suspended solid in different sampling stations of river Piatua y =,55x -,3 R² =,6429 Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2.Cabin Piatua 2,CIPCA Different stations in river Piatua Fig.2,2,8 Settleable solid in different sampling stations of river Piatua,6,4,2 y = R² = #N/A Piatua H.Basin Piatua 2.Cabin Piatua 2,CIPCA Different stations of river Piatua