Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses

Similar documents
The Hazards of Snap-back Initial learnings from a serious incident of mooring line failure

GUIDELINES ON SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR HOT WORK AND ENTRY INTO ENCLOSED SPACES

Survival Craft. A Seafarers Guide. Oil Companies International Marine Forum

RIGID RISERS FOR TANKER FPSOs

GUIDELINES FOR SURVEY OF OIL FLOATING STORAGE VESSELS FIXED AT ANCHORAGE

QUALIFICATION OF MULTI-COMPOSITE HOSES FOR STS LNG TRANSFER

17J Third Edition, January 2008 Specification for Unbonded Flexible Pipe

MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF SUBMARINE CABLE ARMOUR

TERMAP S.A. Terminales Marítimas Patagónicas Sociedad Anónima

ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF PIPELINE BUCKLES

LNG TANDEM OFFLOADING A KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGY TO MAKE LNG PRODUCTION OFFSHORE HAPPEN

LNG Marine Loading Arms and Manifold Draining, Purging and Disconnection Procedure

Safety Critical Equipment and Spare Parts Guidance (First edition 2018)

Ship Security Hull Vulnerability Study (First edition 2019)

Corrugated Hose Loop Calculations

Seaflex marine hoses are designed with the help of computer-aided analysis, manufactured by a highly skilled workforce in state-of-the-art

OVERVIEW LOADING & DISCHARGE HOSES FOR OFFSHORE MOORINGS

Internal riser inspections on FPSO storage & production facilities

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE USE OF LONG LENGTH AND SPLICED HOSES

An Ocean of Possibility

The Impact of Composites on Future Deepwater Riser Configurations

Dynamic analyses of tankers moored at berth

FEA case Study: Rubber expansion joint for piping systems

RESOLUTION MEPC.288(71) (adopted on 7 July 2017) 2017 GUIDELINES FOR BALLAST WATER EXCHANGE (G6)

Time-domain Nonlinear Coupled Analyses Covering Typical Mooring and Riser Configurations for FPSOs

Engineering: Measurement Technology Pressure/Level (SCQF level 6)

Flexible hoses - Non-metallic materials

IACS History File + TB

PLEM CONTROL SYSTEMS

INFLUENCE OF VOLCANIC ASH ON FATIGUE LIFE OF STEEL WIRE ROPES

PLEM CONTROL SYSTEMS

Taiwan Bicycle Industry Standard

Guide to Purchasing High Modulus Synthetic Fibre Mooring Lines

High Temperature Resistant Rope

USA (Bartlett, IL) Division

ORE Open Research Exeter

A hose layline contains important information for specifying the replacement assembly: manufacturer, hose trade name, working pressure and hose ID.

SAFETY OF NAVIGATION OPERATING ANOMALIES IDENTIFIED WITHIN ECDIS

Subsea Wellhead and Conductor Fatigue

III Code. TRACECA Maritime Safety and Security IMSAS workshop Kiev (Ukraine) III Code. Dr. Jens U. Schröder-Hinrichs

Determining the deformation and strength characteristics of soil by the plate loading test

PRESSURE SYSTEMS POLICY

Unmanned Ships and their International Regulation

Offshore Stabilization Pontoon for a heavy lift vessel Concept design & workability

Guide for Evaluating Your Hose Assembly Supplier

SHEAR PERFORMANCE OF RC FOOTING BEAMS BY CAP-TIE SYSTEM USING WELDED STIRRUPS

End stops for mobile cranes & crawler cranes. verope Special Wire Ropes

Figure 1 FSM 250 roof anchor system

A NEW GOLF-SWING ROBOT MODEL UTILIZING SHAFT ELASTICITY

INTEGRITY, SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY IN LNG TRANSFER IMPACT OF EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN AND RELEASE OPERATIONS

Technical Information

Operations. On The Use of Safety Moorings in DP Operations

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 9 Fatigue. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D.

A Code of Practice. The Marina Operations Manual. for the Design and Construction of Marinas and Yacht Harbours. in conjunction with.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESSURE TEST METHODS USED DURING CYLINDER MANUFACTURE

Dynamic Positioning: Method for Disaster Prevention and Risk Management

An Investigation of a Safety Level in Terms of. Excessive Acceleration in Rough Seas

Application of pipeline risk assessment to proposed developments in the vicinity of high pressure Natural Gas pipelines

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS)

Trine Risøy, Bergen,

Irrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.

Ridwan Hossain Graduate Student Memorial University of Newfoundland

Results and conclusions of a floating Lidar offshore test

Modeling of Hydraulic Hose Paths

SEALINE. hoses. SEALINE hoses Catalogue TRELLEBORG FLUID HANDLING SOLUTIONS

APPENDIX D. Assessment of Ship Impact Frequencies

Offshore engineering science

Fall Protection. ANSI-What is it, Why is it important? Craig Firl. March 5 th, Company Private

P-04 Stainless Steel Corrugated Hoses and Metal Bellows Expansion Joints

ANNEX 5 RESOLUTION MEPC.127(53) Adopted on 22 July 2005 GUIDELINES FOR BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (G4)

Managing Dynamic Positioning (DP) Operations

The WindFloat Project. Hamburg, September 2016

Learn more at

ANNEX 2 RESOLUTION MEPC.124(53) Adopted on 22 July 2005 GUIDELINES FOR BALLAST WATER EXCHANGE (G6) THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE,

SLOP RECEPTION AND PROCESSING FACILITIES

THE USE OF SPIN FIN PILES IN MASSACHUSETTS

OFFSHORE LNG LOADING PROBLEM SOLVED

Stress evaluation of a bicycle crank arm connection using BEM

Other Si min/max. Cr min/max. 0.4/ / / / Bal.

An Urgent Bulletin from CSA Group

Donaghys Winch Ropes. Handling & Installation Guide

The Benefits Of Composite Materials In Deepwater Riser Applications. 26 th March 2015 Hassan Saleh Senior Engineer 2H Offshore Engineering Ltd

Loughborough University Travel Planning

Global Buckling Design for Flexible Flowlines

Subj: USE OF DYNAMIC POSITIONING (DP) BY OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS (OSVs) FOR OIL AND HAZMAT TRANSFERS

SUPPLY OF ISOLATION AND APPLIANCE VALVES PTS - APPLIANCE BALL VALVE

Tapered Roller Bearings in X-life quality Customer Information. Business Unit TRB Schweinfurt, 2013

Guidelines on the marine assessment of F(P)SOs

Safe hydraulics for hydroforming presses. more finished product to be created from less raw material.

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )

Horizontal Directional Drilling and Impact Moling

RAMSTM. 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs

B31.3 Piping Checklist and Rules of Thumb March 1, 2008 Program Version Paulin Research Group s

Advanced Applications in Naval Architecture Beyond the Prescriptions in Class Society Rules

FAQ MOTS (Momac-Offshore-Transfer-System):

Equivalent arrangements accepted under the 1974 SOLAS Convention and the 1966 Load Lines Convention. Notification by the Government of France

SUP 15 Health & Safety Management Pressure Systems. Unified procedures for use within NHS Scotland

A New Thermoplastic Composite Riser for Deepwater Application

Guidance on Enclosed Space Entry and Rescue

Transcription:

a Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses An Update to the Guide to Manufacturing and Purchasing Hoses for Offshore Moorings (GMPHOM 2009), section 3.4.10.3 (First edition 2019)

Issued by the Oil Companies International Marine Forum 29 Queen Anne s Gate London SW1H 9BU United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)20 7654 1200 Email: enquiries@ocimf.org www.ocimf.org First edition 2019 Oil Companies International Marine Forum The Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) is a voluntary association of oil companies having an interest in the shipment and terminalling of crude oil and oil products. OCIMF is organised to represent its membership before, and consult with, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and other government bodies on matters relating to the shipment and terminalling of crude oil and oil products, including marine pollution and safety. Terms of Use While the advice given in this information paper ( Paper ) has been developed using the best information currently available, it is intended purely as guidance to be used at the user s own risk. No responsibility is accepted by the Oil Companies International Marine Forum ( OCIMF ), the membership of OCIMF or by any person, firm, corporation or organisation (who or which has been in any way concerned with the furnishing of information or data, the compilation or any translation, publishing or supply of the Paper) for the accuracy of any information or advice given in the Paper or any omission from the Paper or for any consequence whatsoever resulting directly or indirectly from compliance with, or adoption of or reliance on guidance contained in the Paper even if caused by a failure to exercise reasonable care.

iii Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses Contents Purpose and scope iv 1 Background 1 2 Torsional stiffness in offshore hoses 2 3 Problems with the GMPHOM 2009 test requirements 3 3.1 Offshore hose length and diameter 3 3.2 Offshore hose design and structure 3 3.3 Offshore hose dynamic torsion load test mode 4 4 Update to GMPHOM 2009, section 3.4.10.3 5

iv Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses Purpose and scope This information paper provides an update to section 3.4.10.3: Dynamic Test Torsion Load of OCIMF s Guide to Manufacturing and Purchasing Hoses for Offshore Moorings (GMPHOM 2009) and explains the reason for the update. Replacement text for section 3.4.10.3 is provided in section four.

1 Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses 1 Background The fifth edition of the Guide to Manufacturing and Purchasing Hoses for Offshore Moorings (GMPHOM 2009) introduced several performance requirements regarding hose construction, acceptance tests, inspection procedures and technical requirements for prototype hose approval. In 2016, OCIMF was asked to reassess the dynamic torsion load test requirements in section 3.4.10.3 of GMPHOM 2009. Some members and hose manufacturers reported that the test requirements could potentially disqualify hoses that had proven to be reliable in service. An OCIMF working group was set up to reassess the dynamic torsion test load requirements and consider whether they needed to be updated. The working group concluded that the test requirements should be updated and clarified to cater for stiffer hoses. As part of the technical requirements for prototype hose approval, a prototype offshore hose must pass the following dynamic tests: Bending load (section 3.4.10.1). Tensile load (section 3.4.10.2). Torsion load (section 3.4.10.3).

2 Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses 2 Torsional stiffness in offshore hoses Offshore hoses (floating, submarine and reeling) experience twist (sometimes called torsional displacement) when in service, which is induced by either wave or buoy motions or a combination of both. The degree of twist in the hose varies depending on local environmental conditions and hose system design, as well as the hose s diameter, construction and other physical properties. The load needed to generate a twist depends on the torsional stiffness of the hose, which is dependent on the hose diameter and cross-section construction. The torsional stiffness of a 12 inch hose is always less than that of a 24 inch hose. The load required to twist a 12 inch hose is less than that required to twist a 24 inch hose to the same deflection. A hose with higher torsional stiffness will twist less than a hose with lower torsional stiffness.

3 Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses 3 Problems with the GMPHOM 2009 test requirements The dynamic torsion load test in GMPHOM 2009 does not take into consideration the large differences in torsional stiffness of hoses from different manufacturers that have different hose constructions. Torsionally flexible hose designs can withstand the two degrees/metre dynamic torsion load test requirement, but torsionally stiff hose designs may only withstand a one degree/metre dynamic torsion load test requirement. A twist value of two degrees/metre was used in the GMPHOM 2009 dynamic torsion load test. 3.1 Offshore hose length and diameter The GMPHOM 2009 dynamic torsion load test uses a two degree/metre twist value requirement for both the 300mm and 600mm diameter prototype test hose. The dynamic bending and tensile tests have different load requirements for each diameter. The maximum shear stress generated during the application of torsion is a growing function of hose radius (diameter) and decreasing function of hose length. This is also demonstrated by analytic models, i.e. Hook s Law and Young s Modulus. The two degree/metre twist value in GMPHOM 2009 takes the linear dependency between shear stress and hose length into consideration, but not the linear dependency with the hose radius because the twist value is fixed regardless of the hose diameter. 3.2 Offshore hose design and structure Offshore hoses with different stiffness properties respond to metocean forces and motions in different ways. As an example, when an offshore floating hose system is subjected to a wave train, the resulting loads and deformation are a function of the stiffness properties of the offshore hoses. The GMPHOM 2009 dynamic torsion load test requirements do not account for the differences in mechanical properties between various offshore hose constructions. A torque of up to 8 10 times more may be required to induce the GMPHOM 2009 twist value on torsionally stiff hose constructions compared to other torsionally flexible hose constructions. Figure 3.1: Torsionally flexible construction (left) and torsionally stiff construction (right)

4 Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses Table 3.1 shows a qualitative comparison of torsional stiffness between two generic offshore hose constructions. 150 Hose with low torsional stiffness construction Hose with high torsional stiffness construction 125 100 75 50 25-125 -100-75 -50-25 0 25 50 75 100 125-25 -50-75 -100-125 -150 Table 3.1: Qualitative comparison of torsional stiffness for different hose constructions 3.3 Offshore hose dynamic torsion load test mode The dynamic torsion load test in GMPHOM 2009 does not define a load/torque and requires the prototype hose to be twisted both clockwise and anti-clockwise, regardless of the torque applied. The dynamic torsion load test should be conducted with the hose in displacement mode.

5 Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses 4 Update to GMPHOM 2009, section 3.4.10.3 The following text replaces section 3.4.10.3 of GMPHOM 2009. ---START OF SECTION 3.4.10.3--- 3.4.10.3 Torsion Load When undertaking the test, a torque should be applied to the hose to induce a twist of one or two degrees/metre in both the clockwise and anti-clockwise directions. Hose manufacturers should determine the actual twist value to be applied to the prototype hose after considering the design and construction of the hose, its diameter and torsional stiffness. Dynamic analysis may help purchasers and manufacturers better understand the actual degree of twist to be expected in service for a specific hose construction at a specific terminal under design conditions. If dynamic analysis determines that higher twist values can be expected than were qualified during prototype approval, then the purchaser may request additional qualification tests. Conduct the dynamic torsion load test with the hose in displacement mode. Bore (mm) Number of Cycles Frequency Torsion 600 mm 25,000 min 1 cycle/min ± 1 2 deg/metre 300 mm 25,000 min 1 cycle/min ± 1 2 deg/metre Table 11: Dynamic Test Torsion Load The Prototype Certificate, as required by Section 3.3: Prototype Document Package, should also indicate which twist value (one or two degrees/metre) has been applied to meet the dynamic torsion load prototype test. The specific twist value (one or two degrees/metre) should also be indicated in each hose technical drawing prepared by the hose manufacturer. ---END OF SECTION 3.4.10.3---

6 Dynamic Torsion Load Tests for Offshore Hoses 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 13 24 26 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Overview of the study 3 Major findings 4 Recommendations 5 Summary Annex 1 Study of tanker hose cranes at offshore terminals Annex 2 Water depth effects Annex 3 Motions, accelerations Annex 4 Nature of offshore rigid and floating hose loads Annex 5 Existing design guidelines A voice for safety Oil Companies International Marine Forum 29 Queen Anne s Gate London SW1H 9BU United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7654 1200 E enquiries@ocimf.org ocimf.org