MINNESOTA GROUSE AND HARES, John Erb, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group DNR, Grand Rapids, MN 55744

Similar documents
Observations of Wolf and Deer During the Moose Survey

Observations of Wolf and Deer during the 2015 Moose Survey

Fall Wild Turkey Population Survey, 2010

Western Great Lakes Region FAN UPDATE

Deer Management Unit 152

2008 Public Stumpage Price Review and Price Indexes

The ruffed grouse population cycle. defying the best attempts of wildlife biologists to understand it. rn y grou.<c trnil rum fo< mib on public lmd,

Monitoring Population Trends of White-tailed Deer in Minnesota Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Observations of Deer and Wolves during the 2017 Moose Survey

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

2009 SMALL GAME HUNTER MAIL SURVEY

Observations of Wolves and Deer during the 2016 Moose Survey

SMALL GAME 2016 /2017 NEW HAMPSHIRE SUMMARY REPORT NEW HAMPSHIRE FISH AND GAME DEPARTMENT. huntnh.com

What is the distance from Minneapolis to Duluth, computed via trunk highways? 155 miles (1 point) see chart at top of map

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Vehicle Miles of Travel Trends in Minnesota:

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Beaver Trapping Questionnaire By Brian Dhuey and John Olson

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Western Great Lakes Region FAN UPDATE

2009 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

Beaver Trapping Questionnaire By Brian Dhuey and John Olson

Hydrologic Conditions Report

2007 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

Hydrologic Conditions Report

Hydrologic Conditions Report

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

Minnesota Grouse News 2012

Deer Management Unit 252

Hydrologic Conditions Report

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

GYPSY MOTH (LYMANTRIA DISPAR) TRAPPING & TREATMENTS IN MINNESOTA 2012 UPDATE

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

2010 BIG GAME AND FURBEARER HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC RESERVATION AND CEDED TERRITORIES

2014 Public Stumpage Price Review and Price Indices

White-tailed Deer: A Review of the 2010 Provincially Coordinated Hunting Regulation

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

MINNESOTA WOLF POPULATION UPDATE John Erb, Carolin Humpal, and Barry Sampson, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Hydrologic Conditions Report

Minnesota Waterfowl Migration and Hunting Report 10 October 2013

2016 Minnesota Public Stumpage Price Review and Price Indices

Proposed Upland Game Bird Regulations

Key Findings from a Statewide Survey of Wyoming Voters October 2018 Lori Weigel

2015 WILDLIFE HARVEST RECORD FOR THE FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA

Land Use Change on Non-Federal Land in Oregon and Washington

Ruffed Grouse Conservation Plan Executive Report

Hydrologic Conditions Report

2013 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2012

The 2005 Waterfowl Hunting Season in Minnesota: A Study of Hunters Opinions and Activities. White-winged scoter. Final Report

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2017, 2012

2007 South Carolina. South Carolina department of natural resources. Submitted by Charles Ruth; Project Supervisor

Winnebago System Walleye Report. Adam Nickel, Winnebago System Gamefish Biologist, August 2018

2014 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

2018 MINNESOTA PRAIRIE-CHICKEN HARVEST SURVEY

Deer Management Unit 249

2015 Forest Grouse Parts Collection Summary

I Region I Area I DOW Number / County I DOW Lake Name I Acreage I

DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

Frog and Toad Survey, 2000 By Brian Dhuey, and Bob Hay

2017 Minnesota August Roadside Survey

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

John Erb, Carolin Humpal, and Barry Sampson, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Lake Winnibigoshish Fisheries Information Newsletter

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Hydrologic Conditions Report

STATUS OF WILDLIFE POPULATIONS, FALL 2008

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

THIEF LAKE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA NEWSLETTER

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

REVISOR CKM/JC RD4489

Marrett Grund, Farmland Wildlife Populations and Research Group

Black Seabass Length Frequencies and Condition of Released Fish from At-Sea Headboat Observer Surveys, 2004 to 2010.

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2013, 2012

Report to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) by the Moose Advisory Committee

2012 Minnesota Wolf Season Report

DMU 005 Antrim County Deer Management Unit

The Qamanirjuaq Caribou Herd An Arctic Enigma by Leslie Wakelyn

JUVENILE GENETIC EVALUATION AND SELECTION FOR DAIRY GOATS

Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

What DNA tells us about Walleye (& other fish) in the Great Lakes

Preliminary survival estimates for the passage of spring-migrating juvenile salmonids through Snake and Columbia River dams and reservoirs, 2018

Deer Management Unit 255

STATUS OF MINNESOTA BLACK BEARS, 2016, 2012

Hydrologic Conditions Report

Department of Natural Resources

Hydrologic Conditions Report

Miles Falck Wildlife Biologist Jonathan Gilbert Wildlife Section Leader and Nick McCann Wildlife Biologist

Department of Natural Resources. Adopted Expedited Emergency Game and Fish Rules: WATERFOWL SEASON 6240

021 Deer Management Unit

Hydrologic Conditions Report

Transcription:

MINNESOTA GROUSE AND HARES, John Erb, Forest Wildlife Populations and Research Group DNR, Grand Rapids, MN 557 RUFFED GROUSE. Minnesota s 55 th annual ruffed grouse drumming survey was conducted during spring,. A total of 5 routes were completed. In addition to the Division of Wildlife, this year s survey cooperators include Tamarac and Agassiz National Wildlife Refuges, Chippewa and Superior National Forests, Cass and Beltrami County Land Departments, Blandin Paper Company, 85 Authority, Fond du Lac, Red Lake, Grand Portage, and White Earth Reservations, Vermillion College, and numerous private individuals. Overall listening conditions were reported as excellent, good, and fair on 55%, 9%, and 6% of the routes, respectively. Somewhat unexpectedly, drumming indices did not increase in any of the northern grouse zones (Fig. ; Fig. ). Counts declined 8% in the Northwest (. drums/stop) and 7% in the Northeast ( d/s), while counts remained stable in the North-Central (.9 d/s) and Central Hardwood (.8 d/s) zones. Counts increased by 7% in the Southeast (.7 d/s). Statewide, drumming indices declined % to.8 d/s. While confidence intervals aren t currently computed, it s not likely that any of the changes were statistically significant. But it remains unclear whether the lack of apparent increase in northern zones is real, or a result of sampling variability. Overall, winter weather conditions did not appear detrimental to ruffed grouse, and historic patterns, though variable, suggest we should have begun the increase in the grouse cycle. It is possible that the inclement spring weather may have simply delayed or reduced drumming intensity in many areas. This uncertainty highlights the fact that the survey is most valuable as a long-term trend indicator - year-to-year changes should be interpreted cautiously. Regardless, we remain at or near the low point of the grouse cycle in northern Minnesota. SHARP-TAILED GROUSE. Male sharptails were counted on leks during spring by the DNR Wildlife Division, Rice Lake and Agassiz National Wildlife Refuges, and numerous volunteers. A total of 68 males were counted ( in the Northwest, 766 in the East-Central) in. Statewide, a % increase was observed in the total number of males counted on 76 comparable (i.e., counted in both and ) leks. For the 6 leks surveyed in, 65% were occupied (up 7% from ), with an average of.6 males per occupied lek (up 6% from ). In the East-Central Range, total numbers of males on comparable leks increased 5% (Fig. ). Occupied leks averaged 8. males (Fig. ), up 8% from last year, with 66% of the surveyed leks being occupied (up 8% from ). The total number of males on comparable leks in the Northwest Range increased % (Fig. ) from. Occupied leks averaged.6 males (Fig. ), up % from and the highest recorded in recent history. Sixtyfour percent of the 6 surveyed leks were occupied (up 5% from ) in the Northwest. Comparison of trends in sharp-tailed and ruffed grouse indices over the past 8 years is shown in Fig.. SNOWSHOE HARES. A total of hares were observed on grouse drumming routes this spring. The majority (7%) of the hares were observed in the Northeast grouse zone, while the remaining % were observed in the North-Central zone. The spring hare index of. hares observed per km is a 7% decrease from. A separate hare index computed from the - mid-winter furbearer track survey increased % from the - mid-winter survey (Fig. 5). While we remain near a peak, a cyclic decline in hare numbers may be starting, or can be expected soon. Sincere thanks if you participated in these spring surveys. JE

CH NW Down 8% @. d/s Stable @.8 d/s NC Stable @.9 d/s NE Down 7% @ d/s SE Up 7% @.7 d/s Fig.. Changes in regional ruffed grouse drumming indices, to.

Statewide Ruffed Grouse Drumming Indices 99-99 95 959 96 969 97 979 98 989 99 999 Northwest Ruffed Grouse Drumming, 955-.5 955 96 969 976 98 99 997 North-Central Ruffed Grouse Drumming, 99-.5 99 95 959 96 969 97 979 98 989 99 999 Northeast Ruffed Grouse Drumming, 955-.8.6...8.6.. 955 96 969 976 98 99 997 Central Hardwoods Ruffed Grouse Drumming, 955-.5 955 96 969 976 98 99 997 Southeast Ruffed Grouse Drumming, 96-.5 96 96 968 97 976 98 98 988 99 996 Figure. Minnesota s historic statewide and regional ruffed grouse drumming indices.

NW Up % EC Up 5% Fig.. Regional changes in the number of sharptail males counted on comparable leks, to. Sharptail and Ruffed Grouse Indices, 986- Northwest Sharptails East-Central Sharptails Statewide Drums Sharptail Males / Lek 8 6 986 988 99 99 99 996 998 Fig.. Ruffed and sharp-tailed grouse survey indices, 986-.

Snowshoe Hare Index Comparison 97- Hares Seen / km in Spring Spring Index Winter Index 5 5 8 6 5 5 97 979 98 989 99 999 Winter Index Figure 5. Snowshoe hare indices based on ) hares seen on grouse drumming routes in spring (97-) and ) hare tracks observed on winter furbearer surveys (99-).