Annual Report

Similar documents
Major Proposed Rule Changes for Hunting and FWC- Managed Areas

This presentation covers the major proposed rule changes related to hunting and FWCmanaged public areas. Full summaries of all proposed rule changes,

Quota Spring Turkey Application Worksheet

Florida Waterfowl Permit Program Annual Report

2016 Volunteer Program Annual Report

Quota General Gun Application Worksheet

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Quota Archery Application Worksheet

PROPOSED RULEMAKING GAME COMMISSION

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

[FWS R4 R 2015 N236]; [FXRS S3 167 FF04R02000] Theodore Roosevelt and Holt Collier National Wildlife Refuges, Mississippi Final

2015 Florida Black Bear Hunt Summary Report

NOTICE: This publication is available at:

The North American Waterfowl Management Plan: Incorporating the New Goal

ARKANSAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION STRATEGIC SQUIRREL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Agency Overview. Appropriations Subcommittee on Natural and Economic Resources February 22, 2011

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

SENATE BILL 163 Creates the Advisory Council on Nevada Wildlife Conservation and Education. (BDR )

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

A. PURPOSE B. BACKGROUND

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

Public Consultation Document

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

FWC DEER HARVEST SURVEY: FINAL REPORT

DRAFT RULE Specific Regulations for Wildlife Management Areas North Central Region Agenda Item 12A December 13, 2018

Deer Management Unit 255

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

2007 South Carolina. South Carolina department of natural resources. Submitted by Charles Ruth; Project Supervisor

CELEBRATE FLORIDA PANTHER WEEK IN NAPLES

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Prepared By: Environmental Preservation Committee REVISED: 3/29/05. Please see last section for Summary of Amendments

Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Wallops Island National Wildlife

Integrated Pest Management Program Final Report

Full Spectrum Deer Management Services

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan

Fisheries Management Plan Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Key Findings from a Statewide Survey of Wyoming Voters October 2018 Lori Weigel

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

The Berggren Plan Nebraska s Plan to Improve Pheasant Hunting. John Laux, NGPC RWBJV Informational Seminar February 2, 2017

A pheasant researcher notebook:

RESULTS OF THE TRAPPING SEASON

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Fisheries Management Plan

Endangered Species on Ranches. Nebraska Grazing Conference August 14 15, 2012

Natural Resource Enterprises: Enhancing Conservation and Income on Private Lands in Mississippi

2008 Florida Alligator Hunting Survey Report

Authors: Luiz Barbieri and Martha Bademan

RANCHING Wildlife. Texas White-Tailed Deer 2017 Hunting Forecast

Deer Management Unit 349

Strategic Plan. Oregon Department Of Fish And Wildlife

Introduction.

2005 Arkansas Nongame Wildlife Conservation Survey

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

County of Orange Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks. Strategic Plan. HBP Strategic Plan Workshop 1.

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

RESULTS OF THE TRAPPING SEASON

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Resume Jason W. Jamison, PTR, USPTA (602)

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

Central Hills Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G9 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. Sand Plain Big Woods Goal Block

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

Deer Management Unit 152

SP-472 AUGUST Feral Hog Population Growth, Density and Harvest in Texas

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE DRH30245-LL-86B (02/16) Short Title: Outdoor Heritage Act. (Public)

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

ECONOMIC VALUE OF OUTFITTED TRIPS TO CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

Python Management in South Florida

March 14, Public Opinion Survey Results: Restoration of Wild Bison in Montana

Early History, Prehistory

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR MANAGEMENT IN NEIGHBORING STATES

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Endangered Species Act Application in New York State What s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver

Silencing The Uproar

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

Cariboo-Chilcotin (Region 5) Mule Deer: Frequently Asked Questions

Deer Management Unit 252

Florida panther conservation challenges. Darrell Land, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

Transcription:

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Florida Wild Turkey Permit 2017-18 Annual Report Florida Wild Turkey Permit Section 379.354(8)(b)(i), Florida Statutes, establishes the fee for an annual Florida turkey permit for a resident or nonresident to take wild turkeys within the state or its coastal waters to be $10 for residents and $125 for nonresidents. Revenue generated from the sale of wild turkey permits or that pro rata portion of any license that includes turkey hunting privileges provided for in this subparagraph shall be used for conservation, research, and management of wild turkeys to promote the cultural heritage of hunting. Furthermore, the Commission shall prepare an annual report documenting the use of funds generated and shall submit the report to the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the President of the Senate no later than September 1 of each year. 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 3. Revenues and Program Expenditures 4. Program Activities Management Projects Wild Turkey Population Restoration Data Collection, Management, and Analysis Technical Assistance Research and Development 5. Program Direction and Needs

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 2 Executive Summary This report documents the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) use of Wild Turkey Permit funds during Fiscal Year (FY) 2017-18. Permit fund revenues and expenditures totaled $925,400 and $656,543, respectively. Program activities encompassed management projects; wild turkey population restoration; data collection, management, and analysis; technical assistance; and research and development. Funding for 39 management projects on 27 conservation areas and four regional focal areas was cost-shared with the Florida Chapter of the National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF) and the Florida Forest Service (FFS) for a total funding amount of $463,809. When considering other co-operator dollars and in-kind services, the total wild turkey cost-share program resulted in $1,911,528. During the summer and fall of 2017, staff used a mail survey of hunters to estimate the 2017 spring turkey season harvest at 22,307. The survey also determined that an estimated 5,412 youth hunters participated in the special Youth Turkey Season. FWC staff concluded studies exploring the impacts of extended shooting hours during spring turkey seasons on public wildlife management areas, research activities associated with nesting behaviors of female wild turkeys, and continued research investigating male turkey mortality during the hunting season. United States Forest Service, NWTF, FFS, and FWC continue to co-operatively fund a contracted wild turkey biologist position, which currently runs through September 2019. In addition, FWC s Wild Turkey Management Program (WTMP) hired an OPS assistant coordinator at the end of FY 2016-17 to help accomplish program objectives. Over the last year, WTMP staff and the co-operative wild turkey biologist provided technical assistance to various organizations, private citizens, and the media, including site visits to 22 publicly held properties.

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 3 Introduction The public has a strong interest in wild turkey management and hunting. The Osceola subspecies, which occurs only in peninsular Florida, often draws particular interest. Because the wild turkey occupies a wide variety of habitat on private and public lands in all of Florida s 67 counties, it requires a comprehensive program that involves management, restoration, technical assistance, data analysis, and research. The Wild Turkey Management Program coordinates these activities with other Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) programs, other state and federal agencies, conservation groups, private landowners, and the public. FWC uses revenues primarily from the sale of turkey permits to accomplish this work. Established in 1986, section 379.354(8)(b), Florida Statutes, requires all individuals hunting wild turkeys in Florida to purchase and possess a turkey permit, in addition to their hunting license, unless exempt from license requirements. The fee for the turkey permit is $10 for residents and $125 for non-residents. The law stipulates that revenue generated from the sale of wild turkey permits, or that pro rata portion of any license that includes turkey hunting privileges, shall be used for the conservation, research, and management of wild turkeys or to promote the cultural heritage of hunting. FWC is authorized to expend up to 10% of permit revenues to promote hunting and sport fishing activities with an emphasis on youth participation (s. 379.354(8), F.S.). Pursuant to requirements in section 379.354(8), Florida Statutes, this report documents the revenues and expenditures associated with the turkey permit fund for FY 2017-18 and summarizes activities conducted by FWC through the use of these funds. Turkey Permit Revenues and Program Expenditures During FY 2017-18, 16,460 one-year resident turkey permits ($10 each), 171 five-year resident turkey permits ($50 each) and 3,001 one-year non-resident turkey permits ($125 each) were sold. The revenues from these permit sales, plus those derived from the sale of other licenses that include turkey hunting privileges (e.g., annual sportsman s license, gold sportsman s license), totaled $925,400. A portion of these revenues, $30,762, was set aside to promote youth hunting programs in Florida (e.g., Beau Turner Youth Conservation Center in Jefferson County, Florida Youth Hunting Program, Ocala Youth Conservation Camp, etc.). Total expenditures for conservation, research, and management were $656,543. Program Activities The Wild Turkey Management Program (WTMP) is charged with coordinating wild turkey management and research activities across the state and providing a statewide approach to conservation and management of Florida s wild turkey population. The goal, developed as part of the 10-year Strategic Plan for Wild Turkey Management (2008 2018) (http://myfwc.com/media/460317/turkey_strategicplan.pdf), is to Ensure healthy and sustainable wild turkey populations throughout the state while providing and promoting compatible uses of the resource. Such a broad program requires involvement of WTMP and other Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff in activities generally encompassed

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 4 within five categories: management projects; wild turkey population restoration; data collection, management, and analysis; technical assistance; and research and development. Management Projects With continuing changes in the quality and quantity of wild turkey habitat in different locations throughout Florida, habitat management efforts continue to be vital to FWC's objective of maintaining turkey distributions across the state. Management funded by turkey permit revenue has primarily focused on the state's 5.8 million-acre wildlife management area (WMA) system because of the management opportunities it presents, the recreational public use of these lands, and their associated funding needs. Management activities, such as mowing, prescribed burning, wildlife plantings, natural timberlands restoration, exotic species control, and the creation of wildlife openings have enhanced habitat on these areas for wild turkeys and many other wildlife species. During FY 2017-18, $463,809 was provided for 39 management projects on 27 conservation areas and four regional focal areas (see exhibit 1). Historically, much of this management has been accomplished through a cost-share program with the Florida Chapter of National Wild Turkey Federation. In this regard, in FY 2017-18, the Florida Chapter donated $77,630 to cost-share these management activities through their Super Fund program. In addition, the Florida Chapter received a grant from DUKE Energy for FY 2017-18 that was used to fund an additional $40,000 worth of management projects. In FY 2015-16, the Florida Forest Service (FFS) joined as a funding partner to enable the program to serve more projects. This fiscal year, FFS contributed $44,493 in funding. FWC provided $301,686 of turkey permit funds as cost-share funding. In many cases, FWC or co-operating agencies provided equipment, personnel, or other funding for these projects. These matching contributions had a total value of $1,447,719, resulting in a total wild turkey cost-share program value of $1,911,528. These projects provide substantial benefits for wild turkeys and other wildlife at a considerable cost savings relative to their overall value. Exhibit 1 In FY 2017-18 the Wild Turkey Cost-Share Program Helped Fund $1.9 Million in Wildlife Management Area Projects FWC/FFS/NWTF Cost-share Funding Other Co-operator Funding Location Project Description Apalachicola NF Prescribed Burning $20,000 $112,416 Apalachicola NF Wildlife Openings (ROW) $3,750 $6,890 Belmore SF Wildlife Openings $999 $307 Big Cypress NP Prescribed Burning $20,000 $40,000 Blackwater River SF Sand Pine Removal $20,815 $28,033 Blackwater River SF Herbiciding $14,927 $20,000 Blackwater River SF Herbiciding $15,575 $5,000 Blackwater River SF--Hutton Unit Upland Restoration $20,567 $11,500 Blackwater SF Wildlife Openings $505 $6,061 Camp Blanding WMA Prescribed Burning/Aerial Ignition Spheres $9,996 $5,000 Camp Blanding WMA Wildlife Openings $1,501 $975 Central Florida SWGs WRI Central Florida Burn Team $20,000 $156,803 Choctawhatchee River WMA Prescribed Burning $10,432 $67,042 Choctawhatchee River WMA Prescribed Burning $11,200 $62,000 Dupuis WMA Cabbage Palm Reduction $20,000 $25,760 Etoniah Creek SF LLP Est. and Site Prep $20,457 $42,082 Four Creeks SF Wildlife Openings $2,800 $4,822 Goethe SF Herbiciding $24,640 $5,000 Green Swamp (East) WMA Roller Chopping $17,187 $15,200

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 5 Green Swamp West WMA Mowing $3,989 $5,000 Gulf Coastal Plain Ecosystem Partnership Ecosystem Support Team $20,000 $444,000 Joe Budd WMA Heavy Brush Mowing (Mulching) $19,860 $4,500 John Bethea SF Wildlife Openings $1,374 $1,274 JW Corbett WMA Wildlife Openings $6,377 $9,500 KICCO WMA Herbiciding (Exotic Vegetation Control) $36,225 $30,750 Lake Woodruff NWR Wildlife Openings $1,652 $1,000 Newnan's Lake SF Wildlife Openings $850 $0 Northeast Florida SWGs WRI NE Florida Burn Team $20,000 $225,474 Osceola WMA Wildlife Openings $6,991 $1,000 Point Washington SF Sand Pine/Hardwood Removal $5,661 $3,810 Raiford WMA Heavy Brush Mowing $15,000 $15,000 Raiford WMA Prescribed Burning $5,894 $1,500 Tates Hell SF Wildlife Openings $4,750 $12,000 Tiger Bay SF Mowing/Roller Chopping $4,711 $13,520 Tiger Bay SF Wildlife Openings Est. $6,624 $5,000 TNC Lands Prescribed Burning $20,000 $25,000 Twin Rivers SF Herbiciding $7,500 $2,500 Upper Hillsborough WMA Heavy Brush Mowing (Mulching) $20,000 $28,000 Wakulla SF Wildlife Openings $1,000 $4,000 TOTAL $463,809 $1,447,719 GRAND TOTAL $1,911,528 Note: The Wild Turkey Cost-Share Program is a partnership between the FWC, Florida Forest Service, and National Wild Turkey Federation. Acronyms: NF = National Forest, NP = National Preserve, NWR = National Wildlife Refuge, SF = State Forest, SP = State Park, WMA = Wildlife Management Area Wild Turkey Population Restoration Widespread efforts to restore wild turkey populations in all suitable areas of Florida were completed in 1970; however, WTMP continues to monitor the statewide population to determine if smaller-scale maintenance and restoration efforts are warranted. For example, from 1998 to 2006 three separate restoration projects helped restore turkeys to Holmes County, Everglades National Park and Guana River WMA. One way WTMP continues to monitor turkey populations is through a statewide distribution survey conducted every 10 years. This survey of natural resource personnel (wildlife biologists, wildlife officers, and other knowledgeable individuals) was conducted initially in 2001 and repeated in 2011. Results from the 2011 survey (available at: http://www.myfwc.com/hunting/by-species/turkey/distribution/) confirmed the presence of turkeys in all 67 Florida counties. In conjunction with the survey, FWC staff developed a habitat suitability model to help identify areas of potentially suitable turkey habitat where turkey populations are lacking. Currently, no restoration needs have been identified. Data Collection, Management, and Analysis One role of WTMP is to monitor statewide turkey population trends. This is accomplished, in part, by conducting an annual post-season mail survey of spring turkey hunters. Through this process, a random sample of licensed turkey hunters is surveyed to generate statewide estimates of turkey harvest, hunter effort, and hunter satisfaction. For the 2017 spring turkey season, survey forms were mailed in the summer and fall of 2017 to 17,500 licensed turkey hunters (16% of total), including two follow-up mailings to those who did not respond to previous mailings. A total of 3,725 responses were received (21% response rate). Based on survey responses, an estimated 35,122 hunters pursued turkeys during the 2017 spring season. Exhibit 2 summarizes the harvest estimates derived from the survey between 1988 and 2017, which indicates a gradual decline in total harvest since 2008, with a slight increasing trend since 2015. The 2018 spring

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 6 turkey season mail survey was mailed to 18,000 license holders (15% of licensed turkey hunters) during May 2018; the third and final mailing is scheduled to occur in September 2018. Exhibit 2 Survey Harvest Estimates Indicate a Gradual Decline in Total Wild Turkey Harvest Beginning in 2008, With a Slight Increase Since 2015 Year Estimated Harvest 95% Confidence Limits 1988 15,774 12,249-19,298 1989 17,245 15,518-18,972 1990 16,173 14,463-17,883 1991 15,675 11,647-19,701 1992 10,897 9,786-12,007 1993 12,569 10,938-14,201 1994 14,237 12,487-15,988 1995 1 - - 1996 15,067 13,624-16,510 1997 19,358 18,185-20,531 1998 23,419 21,546-25,291 1999 21,613 19,687-23,538 2000 2 15,446 14,749-16,144 2001 14,214 13,571-14,856 2002 15,495 14,814-16,176 2003 15,509 14,752-16,265 2004 17,241 16,529-17,953 2005 3 25,057 23,521-26,593 2006 21,507 20,366-22,648 2007 24,353 23,391-25,315 2008 27,296 25,930-28,662 2009 25,859 24,705-27,014 2010 23,821 22,578-25,065 2011 23,006 21,827-24,185 2012 21,005 19,873-22,136 2013 20,471 19,173-21,770 2014 20,374 18,588-22,159 2015 21,248 19,511-22,984 2016 20,748 19,312 22,185 2017 22,307 20,725 23,888 2018 4 - - Note: This table displays the spring turkey season harvest estimates and upper and lower values from mail surveys from 1988 to 2017 with 95% confidence limits. The true harvest is within these numbers with 95% certainty. 1 A mail survey was not conducted. 2 The survey instrument was substantially changed; thus, the harvest estimate is not readily comparable to previous years. 3 The survey was conducted through Florida State University using scan forms that resulted in data interpretation errors; the results may not be comparable to other years. 4 Data are not yet available. During the 2017 mail survey, WTMP also inquired about the level of participation during the statewide youth spring turkey hunt. Based on survey responses, 6.0% of eligible turkey hunters supervised a child during the special 2-day hunt, providing the opportunity for as many as 5,412 youth hunters to participate.

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 7 WTMP also collects and summarizes harvest data from WMAs with check stations. These data are used to determine area-specific hunter success rates. Harvest data and hunter success rates can, in some instances, be useful as an indicator of the status of an area s wild turkey population and/or the quality of its turkey hunting opportunities. Exhibit 3 presents the hunter success rates for the 2018 Special-Opportunity Turkey Hunts. Exhibit 3 Hunter Success Rates for the 2018 Special-Opportunity Turkey Hunts Wildlife Management Area Harvest Hunter Hunter Pressure Success Dexter/Mary Farms WMA 14 108 7.7 Fisheating Creek WMA 11 66 6.0 Ft. Drum WMA 5 17 3.4 Green Swamp West WMA 29 218 7.5 Homosassa WMA 7 21 3.0 Lake Panasoffkee WMA 3 54 18.0 Triple N Ranch WMA 20 58 2.9 Overall 89 542 6.1 1 Source: Data collected by FWC s Wild Turkey Management Program. 1 This number represents the total combined pressure divided by total combined harvest for all listed Wildlife Management Areas. For the past three years (2015-2017), FWC has conducted a pilot study to evaluate all-day spring turkey hunting on FWC s public WMAs. This was done in response to an online poll that indicated strong support among turkey hunters for expanding the shooting hours on WMAs to match those on private land, where hunting may continue until sunset. Generally, shooting hours on WMAs end at 1:00 pm. However, it was unclear what impact an expansion of spring season shooting hours would have on the turkey resource, hunting pressure, and other management concerns. Therefore, in order to determine these impacts, data on hunter participation rates and activity patterns, turkey gobbling behavior, harvest and time of harvest, and hunter experiences, observations, and satisfaction were collected at 16 treatment WMAs where shooting hours were extended and 14 control areas. After evaluating the data following three years of data collection (a control year in 2015, plus two treatment years), staff have no reason to suspect all-day spring turkey hunting will have a significant negative effect on turkey populations, hunters or other WMA users. FWC staff detected no difference in harvest metrics (e.g., total harvest, man-days per turkey harvested, etc.), number of birds observed on the areas, or in gobbling frequency between treatment and control areas. Despite the online poll results, hunters were not greatly drawn to the added hunting opportunity afforded by all-day hunting. Generally, FWC staff found that on pilot areas only about one-third as many hunters used the afternoon hunting opportunity as compared to the morning period, although there was considerable variation in hunter turn-out between individual WMAs. FWC staff also found all-day hunting did not improve or diminish hunter satisfaction. However, it does offer the opportunity for some individuals to participate more than they may otherwise be able to. For instance, this type of opportunity is important for individuals who cannot take time off from work and must work mornings, as well as youth who otherwise are limited by school attendance to basically weekend hunting. Based on these findings, FWC is proposing that shooting hours during spring turkey season on WMAs be extended to sunset (the same as on private land) as a general WMA regulation except where justifiable reasons (e.g., major disruption to primary land use purposes, concern for any additional pressure on already declining turkey populations, significant added burden on staff and co-operators to administer hunts) would warrant maintaining the current 1:00 pm closure.

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 8 Technical Assistance WTMP, other FWC personnel, and a co-operative wild turkey biologist are often called upon to provide information to other agencies, various organizations, private landowners, the media, and the general public concerning wild turkeys. Such assistance covers a wide range of topics including questions on wild turkey history and management, survey techniques, nuisance and crop depredation complaints, hunting information and opportunities, data collection, and research issues. Agency Assistance FWC and other state agency personnel frequently request assistance from WTMP concerning turkey population surveys, turkey management on WMAs and other public hunting lands, and development of funding proposals for habitat management projects. During FY 2017-18, WTMP and the co-operative wild turkey biologist visited 22 WMAs, state forests, national forests, and national wildlife refuges to provide input on wild turkey management or hunting regulations, or to discuss funding opportunities for management projects. WTMP also continued to work co-operatively with the Northwest Florida Water Management District to maintain wildlife openings on the Choctawhatchee River WMA in Holmes County, providing positive public relations and improving turkey habitat. Public Outreach The public frequently requests information on turkey hunting and management. FWC usually handles such requests by phone, e-mail, or regular mail service to distribute appropriate information. Sometimes requests are best addressed through personal contact and on-site visits. This fiscal year, the WTMP made multiple site visits to discuss methods to deter nuisance wild turkeys in a Longwood, FL residential neighborhood which resulted in residents better understanding how to appropriately interact with wild turkeys. FWC also provided information to the public through various news releases, magazine articles, brochures, social media posts, videos, and media contacts both internally and through media outlets provided by the National Wild Turkey Federation (NWTF). WTMP and the wild turkey co-operative biologist gave presentations, staffed displays, and interacted with attendees at numerous workshops, expos, and speaking engagements during FY 2017-18. The following is a sample of some of the events attended: Prescribed Fire for Wildlife Course at J.W. Corbett WMA (Palm Beach County); 75th Anniversary of the WMA System celebration at Tosohatchee WMA (Orange County); film interview with the University of Florida IFAS Pie Center in regards to the 2015 Hunter Opinion Survey; Wild Turkey presentation to Boy Scouts of America at Camp Shands (Alachua County); and an FWC Prescribed Burn Association Partnership Meeting (Alachua County). In addition, staff and the co-operative biologist attended a North Florida National Wildlife Refuges Co-operators meeting; met with representatives of several other state agencies (including the Florida Forest Service, Northwest Florida Water Management District, South Florida Water Management District, Southwest Florida Water Management District, St. John s Water Management District, and Suwannee River Water Management District), federal agencies (including the United States Forest Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service) and private institutions, other non-governmental organizations (including Tall Timbers Research Station and Land Conservancy, Florida Wildflower Society, The Nature Conservancy, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Gulf Coastal Plain Ecosystem Partnership, West Florida Electric Co-operative), as well as attended multiple local NWTF chapter events. FWC works closely with the NWTF throughout the year. A 2007 Memorandum of Understanding between FWC, the NWTF, and the Florida Chapter of NWTF provides support to continue the many mutually beneficial interests and activities of each party. The WTMP Coordinator currently serves on the Technical Committee of NWTF and serves as Technical Advisor to the Florida Chapter of NWTF s Board of Directors. Some of the related activities in which FWC participated during this fiscal year included two board meetings

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 9 of the Florida Chapter of NWTF, the Florida Chapter of NWTF s Super Fund committee meeting, the NWTF Technical Committee meeting, a statewide Chapter Volunteer Recognition Banquet, and the 5th annual Florida Chapter of NWTF s Osceola Invitational Spring Turkey Hunt Challenge (as official scorer of the event). WTMP administers a wild turkey registry program, which awards certificates to hunters harvesting an outstanding gobbler (male turkey). Depending on the area where the turkey was harvested, either an Osceola (Florida) subspecies or the Eastern subspecies Outstanding Gobbler certificate is awarded for gobblers meeting minimum standards (at least an 11-inch beard and 1 ¼-inch spurs). A certificate is also awarded for youth hunters who harvest their first gobbler, in an effort to encourage these young hunters to continue hunting as they get older. Since the inception of this recognition program in 2001, 616 Outstanding Osceola, 177 Outstanding Eastern, and 474 First Gobbler certificates have been awarded. During FY 2017-18, seven of the 14 First Gobbler certificates awarded went to youth harvesting their first turkey during the Youth Turkey Hunt Weekend. Research and Development During FY 2017-18, WTMP completed its involvement on a multi-faceted research project being conducted in coordination with FWC s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Upland Game Bird Program, Tall Timbers Research Station, and the University of Florida. This project researched the use of GPS transmitters to better understand nesting behavior, both prior to and during incubation. During the study, researchers monitored female wild turkeys through the breeding and nesting period, gathering data on survival, movements, nesting attempts, incubation activity and brood survival. To aid in documenting incubation attendance and recess behavior of nesting hens, researchers placed ibuttons (tiny temperature-logging devices) in nest bowls either prior to onset of incubation or during an incubation recess. Data stored on these devices informed researchers when hens were sitting on the nest and when they were away foraging, finding a drink, etc. Currently, staff are reviewing the final report for this project. Some of the main take-aways thus far are that females that take more recesses during incubation negatively impact the survival of their nests, and that GPS data are beneficial in defining breeding season chronology. During FY 2016-17, FWC staff initiated a project to document harvest rates of wild turkey gobblers under various regulatory frameworks that result in different levels of harvest pressure. The goal is to determine how hunting pressure and the abundance of wild turkeys is related to harvest rates and how behavior and survival of wild turkeys may vary in relation to these factors. During this past winter, staff trapped 49 gobblers (35 adult, 14 juvenile) on properties east of Gainesville, Florida and fit them with VHF-style radio transmitters for monitoring throughout the spring season. During the spring hunting season, monitoring for mortality events and to obtain location estimates occurred daily. Mortality events were investigated to determine the cause (harvest or other cause). Because birds can move between study sites and thus be exposed to differing regulatory frameworks, at least one location per day was obtained for each male to determine in which study area they were located to assess the level of hunting pressure each individual was subjected to. The 49 birds in FY 2017-18, combined with 30 additional birds from FY 2016-17 and 18 from FY 2015-16, have so far resulted in 97 unique survival histories. Preliminary estimates based on the knownfates of these 97 male turkeys monitored during the spring season (March-April) from 2016 to 2018 indicate that harvest has represented 64% of mortality events for adult gobblers and only 4% for juvenile gobblers. The spring season harvest rate of adult gobblers on low pressure hunting areas was 14% compared to a season harvest rate of 38% in high pressure hunting areas. To estimate turkey abundance on each of the study sites, staff established an un-baited trail-camera trapping array on each of the two study sites (30 cameras on a 700m x 700m grid per site). During trapping activities, all turkeys captured were uniquely marked with aluminum, rivet-style colored leg bands. Data from photographs of the uniquely identifiable

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 10 color-banded wild turkeys will be analyzed with spatial-recapture models, which use information on visits to multiple camera traps by individual birds to estimate population sizes across a camera trap grid. In addition to the central Florida study sites, FWC staff initiated a pilot study on two South Florida properties (Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and Picayune Strand State Forest) to determine the efficacy of expanding the harvest pressure and breeding chronology research into the South region. Staff captured 16 gobblers (15 adult males, one juvenile male) and fit them with VHF-style radio transmitters for monitoring throughout the spring season, as well as 13 hens (9 adult females, 4 juvenile females), 3 of which were fitted with GPS-style radio transmitters to monitor reproductive behavior throughout the spring. High water levels and anecdotal reports of low recruitment during 2017 appeared to negatively impact wild turkey populations in this region and staff are reevaluating the feasibility of expanding this project for the upcoming fiscal year. Program Direction To further expand wild turkey management efforts throughout Florida, in 2006, a co-operative wild turkey biologist position was established through a partnership contract among the FWC, United States Forest Service, and NWTF. This partnership agreement was renewed several times over the years, most recently in the spring of 2015. Unfortunately, through restructuring of personnel within NWTF s organization, FWC lost this co-operative position at the beginning of FY 2015-16. However, due to the success of the initial co-operative position, in 2008, a second partnership contract was initiated between FWC, the Florida Forest Service, and NWTF for another co-operative wild turkey biologist to further promote and achieve the mission of WTMP. This contract was renewed in FY 2012-13 and again in FY 2016-17 to run through September 2019. This second position the only one that remains now was initially established, in part, to promote habitat and forest restoration work on state forests. With requisite restructuring of work priorities due to the loss of the first co-operative biologist position, this second biologist position now assists with projects on national forests as well. NWTF has served as the employer for these positions and provides the necessary funding to complete work on the ground; however, the multiple partners coordinate closely on the development of an annual work plan and provide specific oversight for accomplishment of defined activities during Steering Committee meetings held bi-annually. WTMP works to incorporate priority items identified in Florida s 10-year Strategic Plan for Wild Turkey Management into the annual work plan for the remaining co-operative position. Foremost, this position is used to promote improved turkey habitat management on public and private lands, through involvement with various workshops and by working with individual land managers on specific restoration projects. This past year, the co-operative wild turkey biologist visited 17 WMAs and attended several partnership meetings to provide habitat management recommendations and restoration project guidance. Another area in which the co-operative biologist has been directed to focus is promotion of the hunting heritage, especially among youth and young hunters, to help grow the number of active hunters. This fiscal year, the co-operative biologist attended the FWC R3 Summit in St. Petersburg, Florida focused on Recruitment, Retention, and Reactivation efforts, as well as the St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife Heritage and Outdoor Festival. Because of the loss of the first co-operative biologist position, WTMP hired an OPS assistant coordinator in June 2017 to more fully accomplish the mission of WTMP and tasks identified in the strategic plan. This position assists the WTMP Coordinator with implementation of the statewide wild turkey management program and continuing review of emerging information and concepts on wild turkey life history and management to facilitate addressing management issues in a timely manner. This past year, the assistant coordinator visited 14 WMAs to discuss ongoing cost-share projects with managers, presented on prescribed fire management practices that benefit wild turkeys at the annual Prescribed Fire for Wildlife Class hosted at J.W. Corbett WMA, as well as assisted with research trapping efforts in central and south Florida.

F W C W i l d T u r k e y P e r m i t A n n u a l R e p o r t P a g e 11 FWC maintains a Wild Turkey Standing Team composed of WTMP staff, FWC staff from across the agency, and associate members from NWTF. This team provides input and assistance to ongoing program activities and emerging issues, and specific tasks are assigned as appropriate. The team s ongoing efforts are primarily guided by the priority tasks and the implementation schedule outlined in the 10-year Strategic Plan for Wild Turkey Management (2008-2018). The team spent the past year revising the 10-year strategic plan and are nearing completion. The plan should be submitted to agency leadership in FY 2018-19 for final review and approval. The goal of the Strategic Plan for Wild Turkey Management is to Ensure healthy and sustainable wild turkey populations throughout the state while providing and promoting compatible uses of the resource. All of the efforts discussed in this report are undertaken to work toward achieving that goal. WTMP will continue to provide excellent customer service, increase positive contacts with conservation organizations, develop additional partnerships, and provide quality hunting areas, all of which benefit wild turkeys and the citizens of the State of Florida.