Blackman River: Woodbury Dam proposal Aquatic environmental assessment

Similar documents
RIVER CONONISH INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Dr Kjersti Birkeland

Fish Survey Report and Stocking Advice for Loch Milton. (Loch a Mhuilinn), May 2011

Macroinvertebrate Response to a Gradient of Hydrologic Connectivity within the Lower Mississippi River and Its Floodplain

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California

Jason Blackburn, Paul Hvenegaard, Dave Jackson, Tyler Johns, Chad Judd, Scott Seward and Juanna Thompson

Water Quality and Habitat in Shingle Creek

Cornwell brook Cornwell Manor

ELECTRO-FISHING REPORT 2016 UPPER TWEED

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Checklist (for turning in results)

APPENDIX B THREE RIVERS SECOND NATURE RESULTS OF RAPID INVERTEBRATE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SAMPLING PHASE 2 APRIL 2002 A-19

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Amendment to a Biological Assessment/Evaluation completed for the Coon Creek Land Disposal completed December Grand Valley Ranger District

Fish population survey report

Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 23, 2018 By Trent Thomas Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

Brook Trout Life Cycle and Habitat

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

Final Bull Trout Genetics Monitoring Plan for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project. (FERC No. P-308) June 2017

Taxonomy. An Introduction to the Taxonomy and Ecology of EPT Families

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

DECEMBER 2003 Instream habitat assessment for the Waikanae River

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Consolidated Data on the river Puyo and Piatua

Warner Lakes Redband Trout

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

Chinook Salmon Spawning Study Russian River Fall 2005

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

Nechako white sturgeon are an Endangered Species

A COMPARATIVE ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF THREE STREAM FAUNAS IN THE AUCKLAND AREA. by J.A. McLean

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

PROJECT TO INSTALL LARGE WOOD HABITAT STRUCTURES IN THE CARMEL RIVER USING CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME GRANT FUNDS

SCIENCE & RESEARCH SERIES N0.15 FISHES OF THE TE ARAI RIVER. R. T. T. Stephens

B. Disturbance and preda7on in fish

NASCO Guidelines for the Protection, Restoration and Enhancement of Atlantic Salmon Habitat

B. Disturbance and preda7on in fish

ESA, Proposed Threatened ESA, Threatened New Mexico-WCA, Endangered

NORTH RIVER FISH KILL PRELIMINARY REPORT 2014 SUMMARY

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Kilkenny Central Access Scheme. Follow-up Aquatic Ecological Report

OKANAGAN RIVER RESTORATION INITIATIVE - FAQ

A Survey of the Metrics Utilized to Determine Macroinvertebrate Indices in Eight Southeastern States

Bioindicators of Water Quality Quick Reference Guide

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Fraser River. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Jon Ewert - Aquatic Biologist (Hot Sulphur Springs)

STREAM CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING. Prepared For. MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. Menzies Bay Division BOX 6000, Campbell River V9W 5E1.

FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Annual Report Fiscal Year 06: July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report

Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Scientific Name: Ameiurus melas Common Name: Black bullhead BISON No.:

Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health

Field survey of the fish populations of the lower Mohaka River

Know Your River Conwy Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Know Your River River Loughor Salmon and Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Field survey of the fish populations of the lower Ngaruroro River

Chapter 5. Biological Monitoring

Removal of natural obstructions to improve Atlantic Salmon and Brook Trout habitat in western NL. 26/02/2015 Version 2.0

The River Feale Catchment

Escaped Rainbow Trout (Onchorhyncus mykiss) Management 2018 Operational Plan

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Aquatic Insects. Dayton Steelman Northwest Arkansas Master Naturalist

Documented impacts of barriers and wetlands on salmonids and how to solve problems

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Know Your River - River Ogmore Salmon and Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Guidance Note. Hydropower Guidance Note: HGN 8 Fish Passage. When do you need to install a fish pass?

Study Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho - January 27, 2014 Presentation for Kootenai Valley Resource Initiative

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Improving post-stocking survival of hatchery reared threatened fish species

Alberta Conservation Association 2009/10 Project Summary Report. Project Name: North Saskatchewan and Ram Rivers Bull Trout Spawning Stock Assessment

STREAM Girls field notebook

MCCAW REACH RESTORATION

1.Warm Springs Creek (Anaconda) Watershed Description and Land Use

State of San Francisco Bay 2011 Appendix O Steelhead Trout Production as an Indicator of Watershed Health

My ref GLA/S&TC/Itchen 22 nd June 2018

INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR THE DOS PALMAS AREA

Haw River Watch. A Citizen Water Quality Project of the Haw River Assembly. Damselflies, Coenagrionidae and Lestidae families.

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Know Your River River Afan Salmon and Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Distribution. PFBC Northcentral Region Law Enforcement Office, Attention: WCO Kraynak, 1150 Spring Creek Road, Bellefonte, PA 16823

1.Mill Creek Watershed Summary Description and Land Use

Draft report on one day visit to Brampton Bryan, R. Teme

Goldfish control in the Vasse River: summary of the 2008 programme

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

[USP5655] [USP5650] [USP5653] [USP5649] [USP5654] [USP5648] 121 [USP5652] grazers 33. predator grazers 124 [USP5647]

Final Bull Trout Redd Monitoring Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project

INDICATOR BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE SPECIES AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS

Stony Creek Creel Census

Transcription:

Blackman River: Woodbury Dam proposal Aquatic environmental assessment Report to DPIWE Water Assessment and Planning August 2001 PE Davies, Freshwater Systems 1. Background A large dam structure is proposed for the Blackman River in the vicinity of Woodbury, whose primary role is provision of irrigation water supply, capturing winter-/spring flows. A substantial structure, 20 m in height of dam wall, is proposed and will flood some 1.25 km of river channel and 59 ha of cleared land at FSL. There will be 5400 ML storage at FSL, and the dam will deliver irrigation water in summer to some 10 12 farmers between Woodbury and the Macquarie river junction. Delivery will be jointly via downstream summer flows in the Blackman River from valved pipes, as well as via a raceway channel from the dam wall. The brief provided for this assessment was as follows: A longitudinal survey of fish fauna of the Blackman River is requested to be carried out from and including the dam immediately downstream on Mr Burbury's property up to the proposed ais of the dam. The survey is required to provide information on the likely impact of the dam on fish and to ascertain whether provision of fish passage may be required. Find out what species are there by intensive sampling to approimately 1km up and down the river. Target an array of habitats such as stream side and deep pools etc. What will be the effect of the dam and changed flow regimes on the presence of aquatic habitats? What will be the potential impact of the dam on fish and recreational fishing? In addition, a further request from DPIWE required assessment of environmental flow needs for the river downstream of the proposed dam.

This assessment focused on habitat, macroinvertebrates, fish and flows. Aquatic macroinvertebrates include a wide range of aquatic insects, crustaceans and molluscs. They form the basis of the food supply in streams for fish and platypus, and are often highly diverse and abundant. Many macroinvertebrate species are listed as rare or endangered under the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Conservation Act (1995), and macroinvertebrate communities are good indicators of the overall ecological condition of a river. Macroinvertebrates therefore are frequently the main focus of an aquatic environmental assessment. There are many native freshwater fish species of conservation significance in Tasmania, as well as a number of species which are of value as targets for recreational fishing. The approach taken was as follows, to: visit the site and inspect the general condition of the channel and riparian zones; conduct a survey of fish populations in Blackman River upstream and downstream of the proposed dam site, as well as within the footprint of the proposed storage. review eisting data and samples of macroinvertebrates within the relevant section of the Blackman River, and to conduct additional sampling were required. assess the presence of any aquatic species listed under the Threatened Species Protection Act (1995) using the above sample data as well as any available records on the GTSPOT database. evaluate the likely impacts of any changes in flow regime that might be instigated by the dam operations. make recommendations on the need for provision of fish passage and environmental flows. Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 2

2. Investigation Site condition The river channel within the vicinity of the proposed dam is relatively steep, armoured channel generally armoured with cobbles or small boulders, but with patches of eposed bedrock or hardpan which act as local hydraulic controls. The river consists of multiple channels, several of which are active at high flows. The overall channel form is quite mobile, with active meander cutting into soft sedimentary material, and point bar deposition of small boulders, cobbles and gravels. The channel appears to have emerged form a constrained and bedrock confined valley upstream onto a lower gradient plain. Upstream of the major control feature which defines the dam site, the channel forms a comple, branching ( anastamosing ) reach characterised by large-size sediment deposition superimposed on a Pleistocene fan landform. The river simplifies into one well defined channel as it approaches the dam site, with obvious point bar aggradation features with slow erosion on outer bend faces. As it progress further downstream, downstream of the Old Tier road, the channel anastamoses once again into a number of multiple but slightly less active channels than upstream of the dam site. Overall the channel is an actively mobile and eroding one with many sections of bank being actively degraded under high flows. These features are not generally dictated by poor riparian conditions, rather they are a result of natural flood-driven geomorphological processes. The riparian zone is degraded by a combination of vegetation clearing and stock access. However, etensive areas of riparian trees and overstorey remain, especially within the multiple channel reach upstream of the dam site. There is evidence of ongoing supply of woody debris to the channel within this reach. Elsewhere, where the channel is more constrained, much of the original vegetation has been cleared, and weed species prevail. In addition, there is localised bank degradation from stock access. All major floodplain areas have been cleared for pasture improvement and Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 3

grazing. These floodplain paddocks are characterised by the presence of frequent older flood channels, mostly inactive and grassed. Fish Four sites were electrofished in August 2001, by backpack electroshocker. All sites were fished once in an upstream direction, for a total of 20 min battery time, with active searching across all wetted channel habitats in order to provide a standardised catch per unit effort (CPUE). Additional data was sourced form the IFS from previous surveys conducted within the Blackman River catchment. Site locations and catches are shown in Table 1. Crayfish (Astacopsis franklinii) were observed in the 1993 survey, but were not evident at the sites sampled in 2001. This species is widespread and common. Two other fish species have been recorded from spot sampling in the Blackman River at in a pool at the Midlands Highway between 1995 and 1999 (Mawbey, IFS pers. comm.) - tench (Tinca tinca) and pigmy perch (Nannoperca fluviatilis). Overall, the fish community in the Blackman River is highly depauperate, with only five species recorded historically, and only two observed in the August 2001 survey. Three of these species are introduced brown trout (Salmo trutta), tench and redfin perch (Perca fluviatilis). The shortfin eel has a reduced and highly modified population within the overall South Esk catchment. The pigmy perch (Nannoperca fluviatilis) is a species generally resident within slower flowing, macrophyte dominated habitats on the margins of the major, lower gradient river channels in the South Esk basin. The absence of other native fish species within the South Esk drainage is believed to be in large part due to the presence of Trevallyn Dam, which poses a significant barrier to migration for the majority of native fish species which require access to coastal marine waters to complete their life-cycle. While eels are stocked into Lake Trevallyn upstream of the dam, the intensity of stocking is much smaller than the level of natural recruitment which would occur without the dam being present. As a Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 4

consequence, the fish communities of the upper South Esk and Macquarie tend to be species poor and dominated by non-migratory resident eotic fish such as brown trout, redfin perch and tench. The observations for the Blackman River are therefore not unusual. All trout observed in the August 2001 were adults between 25 and 35 cm fork length. No juveniles or young of the year were captured or observed. This low abundance of and age-structure of trout in the vicinity of the proposed dam site was somewhat surprising, as spawning habitat was readily available (in form of pockets or bar deposits of gravels), and there were suitable macroinvertebrate prey was present in relatively high abundance. It was apparent that the absence of fish had been sustained for some time, due to the presence of relatively large numbers of free-swimming baetid/caenid mayflies, hemipterans and diving beetles, particularly in pool-run habitats. These taa are normally either absent or greatly reduced in abundance in the presence of fish. Recruitment is obviously highly variable, since a reasonable number of 0+ trout were caught in the same reach in 1990 (Table 1). Table 1. Locations and fish catches from sites sampled in the Blackman River in 2001 and on all known previous occasions (IFS data). Site Downstream of Midlands Highway Downstream of Midlands Highway Upstream Midlands Highway of Downstream of Old Tier Rd Downstream of Old Tier Rd Grid ref 53750 533730 53500 533460 53450 533450 52850 533170 52850 533170 Date Species N/100m CPUE (N/20 min) 2/1990 Brown trout 1 - Redfin perch 19 Shortfin eel 1 9/1999 Brown trout Redfin perch Pygmy perch Shortfin eel 9/1999 Brown trout Redfin perch Pygmy perch Crayfish 3/1993 Brown trout 1 4 1 1 1 18 4 1 Shortfin eel Crayfish 2 6 2/1990 Brown trout 50 (13 0+) 4 - - - - Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 5

Downstream of Old Tier Road Proposed dam site Upstream of proposed dam site 52860 533200 52850 533150 52850 533140 8/2001 Brown trout Redfin perch 8/2001 Brown trout - 2 8/2001 Brown trout - 1 - - 1 1 Discussions with local property owners, as well as inspection of recent daily rainfall and flow records for the Blackman River catchment indicated that a sustained period of very low flows and even absence of surface flow had occurred during the autumn of 2001, and rainfall for February was etremely low (4.8 mm total at Cheam). Low flows during summer, causing dewatering and eposure of riffle-run beds combined with high temperatures and reduced dissolved oygen levels in pools, are probably responsible for the absence of fish and the absence of any apparent recruitment during the last 1-2 years. The presence of reasonably abundant populations of stoneflies and mayflies, of a size that indicated a sustained population over at least a 3 6 month period prior to sampling, however suggests that: some flow must have been sustained, probably within the loose cobble-boulder bed matri i.e. hyporheic flow; and that suitable water quality must have been sustained during low flows. Macroinvertebrates Macroinvertebrates were sampled semi-quantitatively by kick sampling of riffle and edge habitat within the river reach just upstream of the proposed dam wall. These samples were live-picked and analysed using the standardised AUSRIVAS rapid assessment protocol (RAP) methodology. Additional quantitative data was also collected using surber samplers, with 10 surber samples collected at each site, which were then pooled, preserved and sorted and identified to family level in the laboratory). Selected groups (caddis and snails) were further eamined to assess the presence of species listed under the TSPC Act. A summary of the macroinvertebrate fauna observed following semi-quantitative RAP (rapid assessment protocol) sampling and quantitative sampling conducted in 1998 Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 6

and 2001 is shown in Table 2. A total of 58 taa have been recorded from the Blackman River. Overall, the fauna of the Blackman River in the vicinity of the proposed dam was dominated by non-biting midges (family chironomidae), blackflies (family simuliidae) and stoneflies (family gripopterygidae). The composition of this fauna indicates high water quality in both spring and autumn. Quantitative sampling conducted in late 1999 in the vicinity of the Midlands Highway indicated a diverse fauna with 36 taa (including more than 40 aquatic insect or crustacean families), dominated by taa tolerant to nutrient-enriched and/or low flow conditions. AUSRIVAS analysis of the RAP macroinvertebrate data indicated that the community at Old Tier Road, immediately downstream of the proposed damsite, was equivalent to reference condition, i.e. not significantly impacted by land use in the catchment, with an O/E score of around 1.05 and 1.02 for riffle and edge habitats respectively (calculated using from combined season AUSRIVAS models). The fauna just upstream of Tunbridge was less diverse, with an O/E score of 0.75, placing it into the B or significantly impacted category, i.e. with 25% of the epected number of macroinvertebrate families missing. This suggests that land/water use practices between Old Tier Road and Tunbridge are having a significantly negative impact on the instream fauna. The faunal composition and diversity of the macroinvertebrate fauna in the vicinity of Tunbridge, suggests that the Blackman River in this location is probably affected by mild nutrient enrichment, possibly compounded by the effects of reduced summer flows. This is particularly apparent for the fauna in edge habitats which has a distinctly different composition to that in riffle habitats, and contains many taa characteristic of sustained low flows. Overall, the fauna of the Blackman River in the vicinity of the proposed dam appears to be diverse and in a healthy condition, but with indications of deteriorating condition downstream. Samples derived from RAP and quantitative (surber) sampling in 1999 and 2001 were re-eamined and searched for the presence of species listed under the Threatened Species Act (1995). No species had been initially identified as candidates from known distributional information in the PWS GTSPOT database, however, animals in these Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 7

samples from key Trichopteran and molluscan families were also eamined in detail to assess the presence of listed species. No listed species were found. Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 8

Table 2. Macroinvertebrate taa recorded from RAP and surber samples of riffle and edge habitats, Blackman River. = taon present, = most abundant taa. bridge = Midlands Highway bridge. Site: Woodbury Dam U/s bridge D/s bridge U/s&D/s bridge Old Tier Rd Date: 1/8/01 1/8/01 1/8/01 1/8/01 9/10/98 Method: RAP RAP RAP Surber RAP Habitat: Riffle Riffle Riffle Riffle Edge Data source: FS FS FS FS DPIWE Cnidaria Hydrozoa Nematoda Mollusca Bivalvia Sphaeriidae Gastropoda Hydrobiidae 49 3 Planorbidae 1 7 Ancylidae Amphibolidae Annelida Hirudinea Oligochaeta 1 14 Arachnida Hydracarina 14 4 Crustacea Amphipoda Paramelitidae 1 Ceinidae 24 45 Eusiridae 23 61 Phreatoicidae Ostracoda Copepoda Decapoda Hymenosomatidae Insecta Plecoptera Gripopterygidae 31 1 2 Eusthenidae 1 Notonemouridae Ephemeroptera Leptophlebiidae Oniscigastridae Caenidae 4 Baetidae 1 1 43 Hemiptera Coriidae Naucoridae Notonectidae Veliidae Gerridae Odonata Oygastridae Coenagrionidae Gomphidae Corduliidae Diptera Chironominae 1 10 2 Orthocladiinae 12 10 21 Podonominae 33 Diamesinae 20 Tanypodinae 8 1 Simuliidae 18 16 Tipulidae 1 Empididae Culicidae Unid. pupae 9 Trichoptera Ecnomidae Glossosomatidae Helicopsychidae Hydrobiosidae 10 4 1 Hydropsychidae Hydroptilidae 16 Leptoceridae 21 7 Philorheithridae Tasimiidae Polycentropidae Philopotamidae Coleoptera Adult Elmidae 1 Larvae Elmidae 2 Scirtidae Dytiscidae 1 1 Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 9

Threatened species Overall there was no evidence that any listed threatened species occurs within the studied section of the Blackman River. No rare or threatened species are listed form the catchment under the TSP Act, nor any rare or threatened species recorded on the GTSPOT database or cited in the PWS Threatened Fauna Handbook. Sampling for fish and macroinvertebrates also failed to reveal the presence of any listed threatened species. Aquatic conservation values The biological conservation value of this section of the Blackman River is low to moderate. The geomorphological features of this section of the channel are of scientific interest, but there is no system in place to assess the geo-conservation value of the features observed. 3. Discussion and Conclusions The aquatic fauna of the Blackman River in the vicinity of the proposed Woodbury dam has a macroinvertebrate community of moderate diversity and abundance, and a fish community that is severely low in both abundance and diversity. The channel is highly active, driven by the combination of winter floods and highly mobile bed and bank materials, with some evidence of localised bank damage due to stock access and removal of riparian vegetation. The Blackman River further downstream, in the vicinity of Tunbridge has a more diverse and abundant macroinvertebrate and fish fauna, the former dominated by pollution-tolerant forms and the latte dominated by eotic species (especially redfin perch). This section of the river appears to be negatively impacted by landuse, possibly enhanced by low summer flows. Riparian vegetation and bank stability has been affected by landuse and stock access. There is no compelling case for the provision of fish passage facilities at the proposed dam, due to the lack of a viable fish community. This may change if fish populations Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 10

increase as a result of enhanced summer baseflows during delivery of irrigation water downstream of the proposed dam, but at present the case of a what would be a substantial fish passage structure is weak. Recreational fishing in the middle and upper Blackman River is limited (IFS unpub. data). The proposed dam is unlikely to significantly affect the fishing resource, other than to enhance summer baseflows, and hence possibly reduce summer fish mortality caused by very low flows. The degree to which the proposed dam will provide an additional fishing resource will depend on the final storage regime level, which is anticipated to fluctuate substantially, as well as the management of the fish population through stocking, since spawning and recruitment opportunities appear limited or variable at best. A flow of 0.12 cumec (10.4 ML/day) is proposed to be released from the dam via two 375 mm pipes to supply irrigation flows through the river channel to downstream users. A single 600mm pipe with valve will also available to deliver large flows downstream when necessary. Major floods will bypass the dam. The 0.12 cumec flow will constitute a significant environmental flow for the Blackman downstream of Woodbury, as this flow will significantly ameliorate periods of etremely low or zero flows which are known to occur naturally in this reach during summer. Mean daily flows have not been recorded for the Blackman river with any reliability, but could be simulated for the river at Tunbridge for the period 1991-1996 (by Hydro Tasmania). The modelled flow sequence is shown in Figure 1, and is characterised by prolonged periods of zero flow with occasional, aseasonal large floods. Zero flows occur 27% of the time (mainly in January-March. A flow of 0.12 cumec is eceeded only 13% of the time, thus flows are lower than this 87% of the time (see eceedance curve in Figure 2). A 0.12 cumec irrigation release therefore represents a substantial increase in summer baseflows. Provision of this good quality summer irrigation flow downstream of the dam is likely to cause a shift in the composition of the macroinvertebrate community in the middle reaches of the Blackman River toward a more abundant, clean water fauna. However, this will depend on the quality of any irrigation return flows to the river (supplied to Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 11

users via the pipe/headrace), as well as the nature of any future changes in landuse. It is also likely to lead to a greater abundance of fish and macrophytes, due to the reduced mortality from low flow events and the presence of more sustained aquatic habitat downstream of the dam during spring-summer. 35 30 25 Q (cumec) 20 15 10 5 0 1-Jan-1991 1-Jan-1992 31-Dec-1992 31-Dec-1993 31-Dec-1994 31-Dec-1995 Figure 1. Modelled flow regimes for the Blackman River between 1991 and 1996. 0.25 0.2 Q (cumec) 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 Percent time eceeded Figure 2. Eceedance curve for mean daily flows simulated for the Blackman River (1991-1996 period of record). Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 12

The total annual water yield could be simulated for the period 1971 1996 (by Hydro Tasmania), and is shown as a time series in Figure 3, compared to total proposed storage volume for the dam, and as an eceedance curve in Figure 4. Under the proposed dam operation, total storage capacity will be substantially eceeded for 12 out of the 26 years of record, i.e. in 46% of years the river downstream of the dam will still eperience at least one large flow or flood event, in addition to the 0.12 cumec irrigation baseflow release. Overall then, the river will eperience prolonged periods of higher baseflows during the irrigation season than occurs naturally. In almost half the years, the river will also eperience one or more flood flows as the storage capacity is eceeded. It is presumed that flows between downstream irrigation releases and flood events would be zero. This has the potential to lead to have a substantial negative impact on the more abundant aquatic community, which will have become adjusted to the higher baseflows sustained during the irrigation season, including occasional fish kills. It is therefore recommended that a minimum flow of ca 0.025 cumec (2.16 ML/day) be sustained at the Old Tier Road bridge during those periods between irrigation releases, in order to sustain the aquatic biological community. This represents a maimum commitment of some 395 ML of storage (7% of the total storage at FSL) in any year to maintaining an environmental flow downstream of the dam between irrigation releases (assuming delivery for a maimum of 6 months in any year). Following the analysis of storage volumes shown in Figure 4, this storage is eceeded 99% of the time, and should have only a minor impact on security of supply. Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 13

Annual Yield for Blackman River @ Tunbridge 30000 25000 Coal River Storage Yield (ML/annum) 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Figure 3. Time Series of annual yield at Blackman River at Tunbridge. Duration Curve of Blackman River @ Tunbridge Yield 30000 25000 ML/annum 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage of time eceeded Figure 4. Eceedance curve of annual yield for Blackman River at Tunbridge Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 14

4. Recommendations The following recommendations are made: that a fish passage structure should not be required for the proposed dam; that a minimum environmental flow of ca 0.025 cumec be maintained at the Old Tier Road bridge by release from the dam between periods of irrigation release and flood flows, in order to sustain the future aquatic biological community of the river channel. that active steps be taken to ensure that any irrigation return flows to the Blackman River are of a quality that will not have a negative impact on the river biota. Freshwater Systems Aug 2001 15