Is Tiger Woods Loss Averse? Persistent Bias in the Face of Experience, Competition, and High Stakes. Devin G. Pope and Maurice E.

Similar documents
Is Tiger Woods Loss Averse? Persistent Bias in the Face of Experience, Competition, and High Stakes*

Contingent Valuation Methods

Rank and Performance in Dynamic Tournaments: Evidence from the PGA Tour

A decision maker subjectively assigned the following probabilities to the four outcomes of an experiment: P(E 1) =.10, P(E 2) =.

Kelsey Schroeder and Roberto Argüello June 3, 2016 MCS 100 Final Project Paper Predicting the Winner of The Masters Abstract This paper presents a

IDENTIFYING SUBJECTIVE VALUE IN WOMEN S COLLEGE GOLF RECRUITING REGARDLESS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS. Victoria Allred

DOE Golfer Experiment

Reference Points, Prospect Theory and Momentum on the PGA Tour

Handicap Differential = (Adjusted Gross Score - USGA Course Rating) x 113 / USGA Slope Rating

QED. Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No Correcting for bias in hot hand analysis: Analyzing performance streaks in youth golf

Golf Genius Software

BASKETBALL PREDICTION ANALYSIS OF MARCH MADNESS GAMES CHRIS TSENG YIBO WANG

THE IMPACT OF PRESSURE ON PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE PGA TOUR. Daniel C. Hickman a and Neil E. Metz b. August 2014

Games of Golf Formats. Two Gal Gal Best Ball. 2-Gal Modified Scotch. 2-Gal Odd & Even

MIT Sloan School of Management

GOLF : Site : Golf de La Salette (Marseille) y Golf de la Sainte Baume (Nans-les-Pins)

RULES OF OUR GAMES EACH GOLFER IS ASSIGNED TO A FOURSOME. EACH GOLFER PLAYS HIS OWN BALL. THE NET 1, 2 OR 3 BEST BALL SCORE FOR EACH HOLE IS RECORDED

Economic Value of Celebrity Endorsements:

How to Catch a Tiger: Understanding Putting Performance on the PGA TOUR

Returns to Skill in Professional Golf: A Quantile Regression Approach

Navigate to the golf data folder and make it your working directory. Load the data by typing

2018 CASUAL FRIDAY SCHEDULE. Crossings Cup Information

The Project The project involved developing a simulation model that determines outcome probabilities in professional golf tournaments.

DANFORTH SENIOR MEN'S GOLF LEAGUE RULES OF PLAY 2018 Membership Eligibility: Age 55 and older

Summary of SAGA Handicap Manual

Team League Overview. League Officials Caleb Runci Assistant Manager Jason Donati General Manager -

Summary of SAGA Handicap Manual

The Fundamentals of Putting

The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars: A. Reexamination of the Evidence 1

TOURNAMENT OF THE DAY

Are the Official World Golf Rankings Biased?

GameDay Golf League Rule Book A league of their own.

this tough hole. Bail out left and you re in the hazard; bail out right and you ll have a tricky shot from high above.

Tigermetrics. Roland Minton

The Effects of Altitude on Soccer Match Outcomes

a) List and define all assumptions for multiple OLS regression. These are all listed in section 6.5

BIRD WATCHER S DELIGHT Count one point for net birdies, two points for net eagles, and three points for net double eagles.

2018 Pequot Men's Golf Association (PMGA)

When Falling Just Short is a Good Thing: the Effect of Past Performance on Improvement.

THE USGA HANDICAP SYSTEM. Reference Guide

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

Web Inquiry Shot Detail Export

2017 Pequot Men's Golf Association (PMGA)

Chapter 1 Test B. 4. What are two advantages of using simulation techniques instead of actual situations?

Blissful Meadows 2017 Women s Golf League

High School Rules of Golf Quiz Created by the Iowa Golf Association (Answers and explanations are at the end of the Quiz.)

Driv e accu racy. Green s in regul ation

Is there a gender difference in the ability of dealing with failures? Evidence from professional golf tournaments a

Improving your Putting with the F.P.A

Men s Club Club Dues. By joining the Sunday Men s Club you re agreeing to all club rules & policies!

Has the NFL s Rooney Rule Efforts Leveled the Field for African American Head Coach Candidates?

TOUR HANDICAP POLICIES

PALM DESERT RESORT MEN'S GOLF CLUB. STANDING RULES (Revised in March 2016) TABLE OF CONTENTS

HHLGA DESCRIPTIONS OF GAMES

Northbridge Golf Club Course Notes

TOUR HANDICAP POLICIES

Golf Rules and Terminology

8010 West Sahara, Suite 160 Las Vegas, Nevada

Player A Gross Score. Course Handicap Net Score. After subtracting course handicaps, Player B wins

Summary Chart: Proposed Changes in Definitions and Key Terms in the New Rules of Golf for 2019

Assessing Golfer Performance on the PGA TOUR

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

Game Format 4 Game Scoring 4 Age Flights 4 Course Set-Up 5 Substitutions 5 Qualifying 6

The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Michael Sinkinson Web Appendix

Using PGA Tour Results to Illustrate the Effects of Selection Bias

What s different about P2 grips?

Gizachew Tiruneh, Ph. D., Department of Political Science, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, Arkansas

2018 Pequot Men's Senior League

Regression to the Mean at The Masters Golf Tournament A comparative analysis of regression to the mean on the PGA tour and at the Masters Tournament

Bogey League Rules Season

An Investigation into Golf Ball Speed at Hole Entry

Puerto Rico Golf Association. Introducing GOLF

Darrell Klassen Inner Circle

Palm Valley Senior Men s Golf. Association Goodyear, Arizona 85395

Associate Members are generally not eligible to participate in peak season tournaments or in the Club Championship.

The Economics of Golf: An Investigation of the Returns to Skill of PGA Tour Golfers

Department of Economics Working Paper

The region s most welcoming club Designed by legendary golf architects Best facilities on the Seacoast Relax and enjoy our Pub & Grill

POWER VS. PRECISION: HOW HAVE THE DETERMINANTS OF PGA TOUR GOLFERS PERFORMANCE-BASED EARNINGS EVOLVED SINCE THE 1990 S? Michael F.

The MACC Handicap System

Chapter 12 Practice Test

Hole 10 Par m 405m 350m 340m

Lecture 5. Optimisation. Regularisation

What Causes the Favorite-Longshot Bias? Further Evidence from Tennis

Wirrina Score Card & Course Layout

Rory, if we can get some comments on just a phenomenal week.

March Madness Basketball Tournament

2019 Portland Golf Course Men s Club Handbook

Gender, Skill, and Earnings PGA vs. LPGA

TAPPS Golf Test. T F 5. The terms apron and fringe refer to the grass area bordering a putting surface.

FAIRWAY HILLS SENIOR GOLFERS Event Schedule 2018

THE PERFECT CHIP CENTER PAGE STRAP HERE. Proven Ways to Shoot Your Best Scores Ever! Powered by the Top 100 Teachers in America

Distancei = BrandAi + 2 BrandBi + 3 BrandCi + i

Sanuk Sabai Social Golfers Club Rules

Putting Basics. If You Can Putt You Can Score. Written by: Randy Sparks Purestrike Golf Academy Destin, Florida

PGA Tour Scores as a Gaussian Random Variable

DAVE SENKO: Paul, victory No. 5 in a playoff here, how special is that? This is, I believe, the fourth straight year you've won at least one event.

ALL DISTANCE ARCS MEASURED FROM BACK OF WHITE TEE. 100 yards to front edge of green of the green

The Science of Golf. Test Lab Toolkit The Score: Handicap. Facilitator Guide Grades 6-8

DAVE SENKO: And then you birdied three of the next four holes, No. 13, the par 3.

Transcription:

Is Tiger Woods Loss Averse? Persistent Bias in the Face of Experience, Competition, and High Stakes Devin G. Pope and Maurice E. Schweitzer Web Appendix Appendix Figure 1 replicates Figure 2 of the paper by illustrating the probability of putt success from different distances, but only uses data from the matched par and birdie putts in Column (8) of Table 4. Due to the smaller sample size, we round the distance of the par and birdie putts to the nearest tens digit in order to eliminate excessive noise. The pattern of results depicted in Figure 3 is very similar to the pattern of results depicted in Figure 2 with the complete dataset. We can also show the similarity between our matching estimates and our parametric results by running regressions using our matched sample. In this Appendix Table 1, we use only the matched pairs in Column (8) of Table 4 in a regression model that includes the specifications we use in Tables 2 and 3. In Column (1), we report results using the matched sample in a Logit regression. The Logit estimation allows the birdie coefficient to vary with distance, and we expect results from the matched sample to be nearly identical to the results we obtain with the entire sample. In fact, we find that the birdie coefficient from the matched sample (-.023) is slightly larger than the coefficient from the entire sample (-.020). Columns (2)-(5) in the Appendix Table replicate Columns (1)-(4) in Table 3 using OLS. The average distance of the putts in the matched sample is smaller, and as a result, the effect sizes are slightly smaller, but the same pattern emerges. Previous putts on the green matter, but birdie putts are consistently less accurate than par putts even when we account for player fixed effects and hole fixed effects.

Web Appendix Table 2 provides the coefficient and standard errors for the Logit regressions by hole difficulty. We use the coefficients from this Table in the paper (Figure 5) to demonstrate evidence of Koszegi-Rabin reference point adaptation.

Fraction of Putts Made Appendix Figure 1. This figure depicts the fraction of successful par and birdie putts by distance to the hole (in inches). The sample includes par and birdie putts attempted in the PGA TOUR that were matched to each other (with 24 inches being the maximum distance between matched putts). All putt distances are rounded to the tens digit due to small sample sizes at each inch mark. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 40 80 120 160 200 Distance to Hole (Inches) Putt for Birdie Putt for Par

Appendix Table 1. The Effect of Different Shot Values on Putt Success - Robustness Checks From Matched Sample Logit (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Putt for Birdie -.023** -.028** -.028** -.016** -.018 (.001) (.001) (.001) (.001) (.003) Putt Distance: 7th-Order Polynomial X X X X X Player Fixed Effects X X X Previous-Putts-on-Green Effects X X Tournament-Round-Hole Effects Dependent Variable Equals 1 if Putt was Made OLS R-Squared 0.429 0.424 0.425 0.426 0.452 Observations 473,083 473,083 473,083 473,083 473,083 Notes. This table reports estimates and robust standard errors for the differential success rate of putts of different shot values (par, birdie, etc.) using marginal effects from a Logit (Column (1)) and OLS (Columns (2)- (5)). These results use only the par and birdie putts that were matched within 24 inches of each other using our matching algorithm. Increasingly precise controls are included in each column including: player fixed effects, dummy variables for the number of putts previously attempted on the green by the golfer and the other golfer in a player's group, and fixed effects for each hole in a given round and tournament. * p <.05; ** p <.01 X

Appendix Table 2. Testing for Changes in Reference Points Dependent Variable Equals 1 if Putt was Made Logit Estimation Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Putt for Eagle -.050** -.064** -.068** -.098** -.147** (.002) (.007) (.016) (.030) (.055) Putt for Birdie -.034** -.031** -.029** -.028** -.023** (.001) (.001) (.001) (.001) (.001) Putt for Bogey -.017**.003.012**.014**.020** (.003) (.002) (.002) (.002) (.002) Putt for Double Bogey -.010 -.023**.003 -.004.003 (.006) (.005) (.005) (.004) (.002) Putt Distance: 7th-Order Polynomial X X X X X Psuedo R-Squared 0.513 0.548 0.564 0.567 0.563 Observations 505,610 542,053 467,929 504,796 504,773 Notes. This table reports marginal effects and robust standard errors for the differential success rate of putts of different shot values (par, birdie, etc.) using Logit. We report Logit results by quintile according to the difficulty of the hole. For example, quintile one represents putts attempted on the easiest holes (players often scored better than par); quintile 5 represents putts attempted on the most difficult holes (players often scored worse than par). * p <.05; ** p <.01