Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010

Similar documents
Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010

GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

Wildlife Middle East News VOLUME 2 ISSUE 4 MARCH 2008 ISSN WHERE ARE WE IN TERMS OF ARABIAN ORYX CONSERVATION?

GLOBAL RE-INTRODUCTION PERSPECTIVES

Introduction. M. Zafar-ul Islam, Khairi Ismail, Ahmed Boug

Catastrophic die-off of globally threatened Arabian Oryx and Sand Gazelle in the fenced protected area of the arid central Saudi Arabia

Biodiversity Conservation at Al Ain Zoo

Western gorilla re-introduction to the Batéké Plateau region of Congo and Gabon

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Bison Conservation in Canada

Ecology and Environmental Impact of Javan Rusa Deer (Cervus timorensis russa) in the Royal National Park

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

New Mexico Supercomputing Challenge

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

A. Interim Report Form For Research Projects Funded through the National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan (NSTIP)

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN.

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

First wild Sumatran rhino in Borneo captured for breeding campaign

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

The Arabian Leopard Panthera pardus nimr conservation breeding programme

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Captive Breeding and Reintroductions

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

What you need for population management: A recently updated/current studbook database Knowledge of institutions wants and needs

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Biology B / Sanderson!

Hartmann s Mountain Zebra Updated: May 2, 2018

Overview Life history Distribution Management

Chapter 14. Wildlife, Fisheries and Endangered Species. What are we Saving? Traditional Single-Species Wildlife Management

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

RETURN OF THE SCIMITAR- HORNED ORYX TO CHAD. John Newby Sahara Conservation Fund

Status of Hirola in Ishaqbini Community Conservancy. J. King, A. Wandera, M. I. Sheikh, Y. H. Muhumed & I. Craig

2000 AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FREE-RESPONSE QUESTIONS

Sustaining Wild Species

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUMMARY OF COUGAR POPULATION MODEL AND EFFECTS OF LETHAL CONTROL

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

LUTREOLA - Recovery of Mustela lutreola in Estonia : captive and island populations LIFE00 NAT/EE/007081

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

Colorado West Slope Mule Deer Strategy Public Engagement Report

Dallas Safari Club Auction of a Permit to Hunt a Namibian Black Rhino

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou

Roger Williams Park Zoo Rhode Island Zoological Society. Committed to Conservation Education / Research

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

Saiga: Spirit of the Steppe. You can do things every day to be a hero for saiga! by San Diego Zoo Global. Created for the Saiga Conservation Alliance

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Short briefing Abjatta shall Lakes national parks

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

Deer Management Unit 152

A Level Threatened. Species Trail. Answers

Republic of Malawi. Country Profile. Giraffe Conservation Status Report. Sub- region: Southern Africa

Inshore wrasse pot fishery What are the issues?

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT APPLICATION MACKENZIE BISON POPULATION MONITORING

NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT FOR THE SAIGA ANTELOPE MOU AND ACTION PLAN

The reason for the existence of zoos is almost undoubtedly recreation.

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. October 1, 2017

Florida panther conservation challenges. Darrell Land, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission

SOCIOECONOMIC AND PEDIGREE FACTORS AFFECTING THE ASININA DE MIRANDA DONKEY BREED VIABILITY

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

APPLICATION FOR CITES REGISTRATION OF A CAPTIVE BREEDING OPERATION

a) Case Study: North American Bison/Wood Buffalo b) Species Diversity/Richness

Building System Dynamics Models

The Rufford Foundation Final Report

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM

Alberta Conservation Association 2018/19 Project Summary Report. Project Name: Upland Gamebird Studies Upland Gamebird Productivity Surveys

ATTACHMENT F. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Marsh Lake Ecosystem Restoration Project

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

Early History, Prehistory

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

2016 Conservation Stamp, Esther Semple. Dr. Brian Riddell, Pacific Salmon Foundation, Vancouver, B.C. Contacts:

Deer Management Unit 252

A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL MORTALITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF YELLOWFIN TUNA IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Livestock Losses. From Department of Agriculture report 2010 (report also available on this website)

The European rabbit: Past, Present and Future of the species in the Iberian Peninsula

A Forest Without Elephants: Can We Save One of Earth s Iconic Species?

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; ; ABC Code: C6] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reinstatement of the Regulation that

Transcription:

Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2010 Additional case-studies from around the globe Edited by Pritpal S. Soorae IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group (RSG)

Over 20 years of re-introducing the Arabian oryx in fenced and free-range protected areas of Saudi Arabia M. Zafar-ul Islam 1 & 2, Ahmed Boug 1,2, Khairi Ismail 1,2, Ernest R. Robinson 1,3&5 & Yousef bin Saleh al Hafedh 1,4 1 - Saudi Wildlife Commission (SWC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (mzafarul.islam@gmail.com) 2 - National Wildlife Research Center, PO Box 1086, Taif, Saudi Arabia 3 - King Khalid Wildlife Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 4 - King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 5 - Zoological Society of London, UK Introduction The Arabian oryx or Al Maha in Arabic (Endangered & CITES App. I), is the smallest member of Oryx genus which is native to desert and steppe areas of the Arabian Peninsula and was declared extinct in the wild in 1972 in Oman. In Saudi Arabia the oryx the re-introduction program was started in 1989 by the Saudi Wildlife Commission. Concurrent conservation programs for the protection of large areas within the former range of the Arabian oryx, and the captive breeding of oryx at the NWRC in Taif have together enabled the restoration of the species in the Kingdom. The first re-introduction took place in Mahazat as-sayd Protected Area (2,244 km 2 ) which was completely fenced in 1989 to prevent access by poachers and livestock. The founder herd was as diverse as possible and comprised animals from national and overseas collections as well as the NWRC herd. The second release site is 'Uruq Bani Ma'arid (UBM) (12,600 km 2 ) situated on the western edge of the Empty Quarter. A total of 82 oryx (with almost equal sex ratio) have been released since 1990 to 2009 in Mahazat and since 1995 a total of 174 oryx (79 males:95 females) have been translocated. One hundred and forty-six originated from the NWRC captive breeding while 28 came from the Mahazat. Collared Arabian oryx in Mahazat M. Z. Islam 269

Goals Goal 1: To re-establish wild and self-sustaining populations of Arabian oryx in Saudi Arabia. Goal 2: To develop breeding techniques in semi-captive herds so as to allow the production of fit individuals. Goal 3: Studying the most suitable habitats and establish protected areas in which vegetation can recover. Goal 4: Managing the re-introduction of the herds in the protected areas. Goal 5: Re-introducing in suitable habitats, oryx from the World Herd, in order to improve their genetic variability. Goal 6: Studying the ecology and biology of the oryx in protected areas. Success indicators Indicator 1: The captive-breeding program at NWRC has achieved its expected goals. Indicator 2: The captive herd at NWRC is maintained for re-introduction programs for other protected areas. Indicator 3: The re-introduction of Arabian oryx in Mahazat as-sayd for more than 20 years which now has a significant self sustaining population is considered to be a success. Indicator 4: After 14 years of re-introduction in UBM is also considered as successful as that also has a free-ranging population. Indicator 5: A website dedicated to Arabian oryx is hosted by the NWRC (www.arabian-oryx.gov.sa). Project summary Released animals were marked with suitable tags for identification and some fitted with radio collars to enable them to be relocated after release. The postrelease progress of oryx has been carefully monitored and the information gained from early releases utilized in planning subsequent attempts where appropriate. We studied the behavioral ecology and reproductive physiology of the animals and as populations increased and animals dispersed into many small groups it become increasingly difficult to account for all the oryx each day. Monitoring of reintroduced populations is a key factor to evaluate the success of re-introductions and to implement management policies. Population in Mahazat: The animals have been monitored since the beginning and population growth is monitored each year since 1988 to 2008. The numbers of animals present (including additional releases described above) since 1988 to 2008 are 9, 19, 31, 42, 89, 128,170, 221, 285, 355, 409, 415, 413, 469, 523, 547, 529, 605, 613, 550 and 324 respectively. Population declines resulting from food shortages or poor habitat are characterized by an increase in mortality among younger animals and a similar mortality pattern was observed both in Arabian oryx and Reem gazelles in Mahazat (Islam et al., 2007). There was a sharp decline in the oryx population of Mahazat in recent years during the summer months or in drought like situations. The rainfall in 1999, 2001, 2007 and 2008 were 4.27 mm, 11.45 mm, 0.01 mm, and 5.60 mm respectively, which has not 270

been sufficient for the vegetation (grasses and trees) to regenerate. From 1998 to 2008, the number of dead oryx was 30, 34, 26, 35, 20, 37, 36, 12, 46, 71, and 159. In 2008 the skulls were mainly from previous years collected in 2008. Most of the dead animals were adults and also a few calves. Arabian oryx move long distances in search of food and the Mahazat fence prevents its movement especially during the stressful period when the food availability is extremely low. It is noticeable that many animals die near the fence. Rangers monitoring Arabian oryx in Mahazat B. Pambour, NWRC Active management plans of the ungulate populations in the Mahazat As-Sayd Protected Area were developed in 2008 and a previous plan was also discussed by the experts including ecologists, biologists, botanists, vets, sociologists and policy and decision makers to minimize periodic large-scale mortalities in the Reserve (Islam & Knutson, 2008). To deal with this situation, it was recommended that as many oryx and sand gazelle be removed from the protected area as possible. There is currently not enough vegetation to support the population and additional deaths appear imminent unless preventative action is taken. Because translocation or other means of removal were not readily available, supplemental feeding and watering is deemed as necessary to reduce the likelihood of mass mortalities. Population in UBM: Uruq Bani Ma arid Protected Area is one of the places, where free-ranging oryx population exist. The population of oryx in UBM in December 2008 was estimated as 200 animals by a survey using four fixed transect lines by vehicles and aircraft. Post release monitoring: Due to aridity of their environments, oryx in the wild usually survive at low densities and therefore estimates of population size have a low accuracy, owing to the small number of individuals encountered during surveys in both the re-introduction sites. We used two methods of population size estimation in Mahazat, i.e., cumulated births and deaths recorded by field workers supplemented by transect counts on 14 lines by cars and aircraft. These monitoring efforts allow us to cross-check convergent indications, and to carry out surveys four times/year. In Uruq, we do intensive post-release population monitoring and also transects by vehicle and aircraft on four pre-defined transect lines twice a year to improve the monitoring efficacy for these large desert antelopes. A computer model was developed to evaluate the probability of 271

extinction (frequency with which 100 initial population fall to zero within 100 years) of the predator-free Mahazat oryx population under various management options (Treydte et al., 2001). The probability of extinction was high when no management was applied to the population, probability of extinction varied between 0.3 and 0.92 according to combination of assumptions, whereas removing all oryx above 70% of carrying capacity provided the lowest probability of extinction, and the lowest population size variation whatever was the combination of assumptions (Mesochina, et al., 2003 & Islam et al., 2007). It is extremely important that the management of species is to be developed for the long-term solution of oryx in fenced protected area (Mahazat) and at the same time in unfenced or free-ranging re-introduction site (UBM). Major difficulties faced No suitable habitat was available during the initial stages of re-introduction and fencing and protecting re-introduction sites was not possible. High mortality rates of adults as well as juveniles during summer in the fenced area of Mahazat as-sayd is a serious issue and evidence that wild-born oryx are also in a poor condition during this period. A species management plan was available, especially for the fenced reintroduction site (Mahazat), but implementation was difficult. No study on the genetic diversity of oryx in the released sites has been done in recent years. Major lessons learnt When wide-ranging species are confined to restricted areas, even if such areas are large, it is essential that an effective population management plan is in place BEFORE any re-introduction is carried out and that the plan is properly implemented. If this is not done, large-scale mortalities will occur. Prior to any transplantation, range conditions in the release area have to be improved and the area protected from livestock exploitation. Once pasture conditions show adequate signs of improvement and the site is adequately protected, re-introduction of the animals can be contemplated. The time of release should coincide with suitable vegetation conditions. Keeping the animals in pre-release enclosures within the re-introduction site to get them acclimatized to the natural environment and provide minimal amount of food and water. Regulate tourism in re-introduction areas as this can lead to increased habitat degradation. Strict law enforcement to minimize poaching of Arabian oryx. A public-awareness program had been started to inform citizens of the biological and historic significance of the Arabian oryx in the society. 272

Success of project Mahazat as-sayd Protected Area: Highly Successful Successful Partially Successful Failure Uruq Bani Ma arid Protected Area (unfenced): Highly Successful Successful Partially Successful Failure Reason(s) for success/failure: The Arabian oryx was considered extinct in the wild by 1972 (Henderson, 1974) from the Arabian Peninsula, now have self sustaining population in Saudi Arabia through the captive-breeding and re-introduction programs. Acknowledgement We want to extend our thanks and gratitude to HH Prince Bandar bin Saud Bin Mohammed Al Saud (Secretary General, SWC) for his leadership, generosity and continuous support towards the research and conservation work by the NWRC in the Kingdom. We want to acknowledge colleagues at NWRC. References Henderson, D. S. 1974. Were they the last Arabian Oryx? Oryx 12: 347-350. Islam, M. Z. & Knutson, C. 2008. A plan to reduce the risk of mass mortalities of reintroduced animals in the Mahazat as-sayd Protected Area in Saudi Arabia. National Wildlife Research Center, Taif, Saudi Arabia. Mesochina, P., Bedin, E. & Ostrowski, S. 2003. Reintroducing antelopes into arid areas: lessons learnt from the oryx in Saudi Arabia. CR Biologies 326: S158- S165. Treydte, A. C., Williams, J. B., Bedin, E., Ostrowski, S., Seddon, P. J., Marschall, E. A., Waite, T. A. & Ismail, K. 2001. In search of the optimal management strategy for Arabian oryx, Animal Conservation 4: 239-249. 273