PEDESTRIAN FENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30

Similar documents
October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Construction Specifications Manual

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Appendix C. Bicycle Route Signage

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Roadway Design Manual

General Design Factors

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

OBJECTIVE: Improve safety by designing all bicycle facilities to the latest AASHTO bicycle guidelines and 2009 MUTCD Standards.

Washington St. Corridor Study

700 Multi-Modal Considerations

Geometric Design Tables

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

4. TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Roadway Design Manual

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

PART 9. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work.

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

Page 1B-6 Added the following definition; AUXILIARY LANE See LANE

Developed by: The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) 15 Riverside Parkway, Suite 100 Fredericksburg, VA

SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Oregon Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Adopted July 2005 by OAR

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR BICYCLE FACILITIES

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Vehicular turning and path of travel with a proposed curb bulb on the southwest corner of Mount Diablo Boulevard and Dewing Avenue.

Chapter 4 On-Road Bikeways

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

ATTACHMENT NO. 18 GMI-C. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

01. VICINITY OF GREENBRAE POC: EXISTING CONDITIONS

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Attachment No. 17 GMI No. 1. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 405 LIMB MANAGEMENT

UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Section 9A.07 Meaning of Standard, Guidance, Option, and Support

Staff Report Text Amendment Case #: TA

SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Driveway Design Criteria

REVISION 2 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. Ginger Quinn & Paul Kelley April 11, 2018

Designing with the Railroad

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Americans with Disabilities Act and Curb Ramps

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

Field guide for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way Edition

2017 Temporary traffic control guidelines for pedestrians. v.2

CHAPTER 2F. TOLL ROAD SIGNS. Table 2F-1. Toll Road Sign and Plaque Minimum Sizes

Traffic Management Guidelines for Structure Rehabilitation Projects

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

2003 Edition Page 6F-1

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

6. TITLE: Amendments to the Larimer County Land Use Code and the Larimer County Road Manual

APPENDIX B1. CROSS-REFERENCE GUIDE TO THE OHIO REVISED CODE

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Access Management Regulations and Standards

APPENDIX A SECTION A-1-GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Technical Memorandum. Shoulder Width Standards for State Highways. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction. Purpose

Auckland Transport Code of Practice 2013

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

City Snapshot September 27, 2018

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

Page 2D-10 Added the following language at the end of the paragraph under REFINING HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT ; See Chapter 2A, Section 2A-6.

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

OVERVIEW OF CIRCULATION

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

ENGINEERING STANDARD FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROADS AND STREETS ORIGINAL EDITION MAR. 1996

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

Chapter 3.9 Timbercrest Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. November 2008

(This page left intentionally blank)

Traffic Control Devices

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30 FILE NO. TITLE DATE TABLE OF CONTENTS AND INTRODUCTION 30.TOC-1 Table of Contents Chapter 30... 18May2016 30.00-1 Introduction Chapter 30... 18May2016 APPLICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION 30.01-1 General Information... 18May2016 FENCING DETAILS AND FENCE OPENINGS 30.02-1 Fencing Details... 18May2016 30.02-2 Fencing Openings... 18May2016 LIMITS OF FENCING 30.03-1 Limits of Fencing... 16Jan2014 * Indicates 11 x 17 sheet; all others are 8½ x 11. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30 FILE NO. 30.TOC-1

INTRODUCTION It is the intent of this chapter to establish the guidelines, procedures and practices of the Structure and Bridge Division for the use of fencing (pedestrian) on overpass structures. Other sources of information are also provided along with cross references to other Parts of this manual to assist in the use of fencing (pedestrian) and preparation of plans. The practices and specific requirements contained in this chapter have been established based on the Structure and Bridge Division s experience, industry standards and recommendations. Sources of information utilitized in the development of this chapter are as follows: AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, Section 10.5.1 Protective Screening at Overpasses. A Guide for Protective Screening of Overpass Structures, prepared by the Force or Roadside Safety of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design, November 1990. (Note: The material in this guide was in all likelihood adopted by the first reference.). Damage and injury may be caused by objects thrown, dropped or discharged from an overpass structure. While there are no absolute warrants as to what types of fencing/screening should be installed, there is a general desire to preserve the clean lines of the structure while at the same time providing adequate protection but also within economical constraints. Standard sheets and cell libraries dealing with the details in this chapter can be found in Part 3 - Current Details of this manual. It is expected that the users of this chapter will adhere to the practices and requirements stated herein. Several major changes and/or additions to the past office practice (Part 2) are as follows: 1. Maximum opening clarified. 2. Alternate Detail (top-mounted) fence detail for F-shape parapet removed. NOTE: Due to various restrictions on placing files in this manual onto the Internet, portions of the drawings shown do not necessarily reflect the correct line weights, line types, fonts, arrowheads, etc. Wherever discrepancies occur, the written text shall take precedence over any of the drawn views. INTRODUCTION - CHAPTER 30 FILE NO. 30.00-1

APPLICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICATIONS: Pedestrian fence shall be used for the following applications as protective screening: On overpass pedestrian bridges. On overpass structures in areas used by pedestrians or bicyclists. Included are structures with sidewalk(s), sidewalk space, bikeways, multi-use paths, etc. On overpass structures over freeways (Interstate) if the overpass provides pedestrian access (sidewalk, bikeway, etc.). For overpass structures over other type of road classifications, fencing shall be considered on a case by case basis. On overpass structures near (within 500 feet) a school, playground or where it would be expected that the overpass would frequently be used by children not accompanied by adults. On overpass structures where private property is subject to damage, such as buildings, power stations, parks, etc. On overpass structures where local regulations, laws or ordinances require pedestrian fencing. Use of pedestrian fence on overpass structures over the mainline interstate and ramps, except the cases described above, shall be approved by the State Structure and Bridge Engineer. For all other applications over primary and secondary roadways, pedestrian fence shall not be used unless approved by the District Structure and Bridge Engineer. DOCUMENTATION: Pedestrian fence requirements shall be discussed at the project scoping meeting and decisions to not use protective screening/fencing shall be adequately documented in the bridge project file (correspondence file), especially for railroad overpass where the VDOT Rail Section shall be consulted for the pedestrian fence requirements. The documentation shall be in the form of a Design Waiver approved by the District Structure and Bridge Engineer. Overpass denotes a grade separation where the subject highway passes over an intersecting highway or railroad (from AASHTO Transportation Glossary, 4 th Edition 2009). APPLICATIONS AND DOCUMENTATION GENERAL INFORMATION FILE NO. 30.01-1

FENCING DETAILS: Fencing details may be found in Part 3 of this manual, standard BPF-series. Vertical fencing shall be used for traffic barriers (parapets, rails, etc.) immediately adjacent to vehicular traffic. Vertical fencing with a curved top may be used in areas adjacent to sidewalks, bikeways, etc. when there is minimal likelihood of the fencing being damaged by trucks, etc. VERTICAL FENCING VERTICAL FENCING WITH CURVED TOP FENCING DETAILS AND FENCE OPENINGS FENCE DETAILS SHEET 1 of 2 FILE NO. 30.02-1

FENCE OPENINGS: All VDOT fencing standards illustrated on File No. 30.02-1 utilize chain link fabric. In accordance with AASHTO LRFD specifications Article 13.8.1, mesh size in chain link or metal fabric fence should have openings no larger than 2. Chain link mesh size shall not exceed 2 by 2. Decorative fencing may be considered for specific applications, but the metal fabric mesh opening area shall not exceed 3 square inches (e.g., 3 x 1, 4 x 0.75, etc.). Decorative fencing with openings larger than those indicated above are not sufficient for protective screening and considered decorative railing. Decorative railing may be used where protective screening is not required. Decorative railing shall not exceed the clear opening between elements required in Section 13 of the AASHTO LRFD specifications. Decorative railing may also be used where screening is required with chain link or metal fabric behind the railing. FENCING DETAILS AND FENCE OPENINGS FENCE OPENINGS SHEET 2 of 2 FILE NO. 30.02-2

LIMITS OF FENCING: Pedestrian fence shall be provided the full length of the overpass structure for the following applications: Pedestrian bridges Both sides of overpass structures within 500 feet of schools, playgrounds, etc. Overpass structures used by pedestrians and bicyclists: On side(s) having sidewalk, sidewalk space, bikeway, multi-use path, etc. Overpass structures where local regulations, law or ordinances require pedestrian fencing. Pedestrian fence shall be provided partial length of the overpass structure for the following applications: Overpass structures over freeways (Interstates): The lesser of the full length of the bridge or the distance between outside edge of the freeway s shoulders plus 100 feet on either side of the edge of the shoulder. Overpass structures where private property is subject to damage, such as buildings, power stations, parks, etc.: The lesser of the full length of the bridge or the length across the property plus 100 feet on either side of the property. Overpass structures over railroad facilities: The lesser of the full length of the bridge or the length of the area covering the right-of-way limits of the railroad plus 100 feet on either side of the right-of-way limits. Aesthetics, in conjunction with financial restraints, shall be considered in determining whether an overpass structure shall have fencing the full or partial length. LIMITS OF FENCING DATE: 16Jan2014 FILE NO. 30.03-1