Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

Similar documents
Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania:

2017 WA STATE 4-H FAIR CALENDAR OF EVENTS

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

2018 WA STATE 4-H FAIR CALENDAR OF EVENTS

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

Growth in Moscow: A Study of Modest Population Growth and Rising Economic Prosperity*

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

The Economic Impacts of THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS

Resident Outdoor Recreation for Fremont County, WY July 1999

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

The 2017 Economic Contributions of Outdoor Recreation in Colorado A regional and county-level analysis

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF SPORTFISHING IN ALASKA

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

SPORTING HERITAGE. Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

The Economic Contributions of Outdoor Recreation in Colorado: A regional and county-level analysis

Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact January 2007

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

Marine Recreational and Commercial Industries and Activities in Lee and Charlotte Counties: Economic Consequences and Impacts

WILDLIFE WATCHING U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS*

Recreational Fishing License Sales in Florida:

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

A study prepared for: Presented by:

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado July 2009

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015

Table of contents. Florida ranks as the second highest state (after California) in the number of people participating in wildlife-viewing recreation.

Economic Impact of the Recreational Fisheries on Local County Economies in California s National Marine Sanctuaries 2010, 2011 and 2012

Lower Fryingpan River and Ruedi Reservoir Economic Impact Study

CANNABIS IN KITTITAS COUNTY WA Obie O Brien

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH HUNTING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST. Joni S. Charles, PhD. Contracted through the. River Systems Institute

The University of Georgia

The Economic Impact of Recreational Tarpon Fishing in the Caloosahatchee River and Charlotte Harbor Region of Florida

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

Economic Benefits of Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey

ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES HUNTING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado. Executive Summary Season. A joint cooperation report

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing in the Proposed GRNMS Research Area Updated April,

Transportation 2040 Update: Travel Trends. Transportation Policy Board June 9, 2016

Big Blue Adventure Event Analysis UTC Tourism Center October 2016

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests

IMPACTS OF A REDUCTION IN FISH PRODUCTION FROM SERVICE TROUT MITIGATION HATCHERIES IN THE SOUTHEAST

Economic Impact of the Michigan Equine Industry, 2006

Ohio Sea Grant ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LAKE ERIE ON NORTHERN OHIO. Ohio State University Sea Grant Program. AGI HDlOl. no.604. c.6

Surfrider s Recreational Use Survey and Marine Spatial Planning in Washington State. Gus Gates- WA Policy Manager

HUNTING IN AMERICA. An Economic Force for Conservation 2018 EDITION

VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE APALACHICOLA BAY MARINE ECONOMY

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

Bicycle Travel in Oregon

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM HORSES

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

Key Findings from a Statewide Survey of Wyoming Voters October 2018 Lori Weigel

Montana's Outfitting Industry Economic Contribution and Industry-Client Analysis

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Market Size and Economic Impact of the Sporting Firearms and Ammunition Industry in America

The Economic Importance of Recreational River Use to the City of Calgary

ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MIDDLE FORK OF THE SALMON FLOATER SPENDING ON LOCAL ECONOMIES

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries

Economic Impact of the Recreational Marine Industry Broward, Miami-Dade, and Palm Beach Counties, Florida

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Kennebec & Moose River Valley

Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge

Economic Contributions of the Yellowstone River to Park County, Montana

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

Public Land Management: Issues & Implications

The 2010 Economic Contribution of Tourism to the Meadowlands Liberty Region

New Sportfishing Data and Industry Trends

The Greater Sage-Grouse:

Hunting, Fishing, and Recreational Activities

Life Jacket Loaner Survey of Washington State October, 2005

The Economic Contributions of Hunting- Related Tourism in Eastern and Southern Africa

Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy. Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau

Drowning News Clipping Summary Jan-Sept 2010

Recreation. Participation. Topline Report

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Agency Overview. Appropriations Subcommittee on Natural and Economic Resources February 22, 2011

SHOOTING IN AMERICA. An Economic Force for Conservation 2018 EDITION

Conserving Lands and Prosperity: Cody, Wyo., a Case Study

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

AMERICAN SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION SPORTFISHING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

Residential Jurisdistions of Attendees 1998 Breeders Cup Races in Louisville


Appendix H Recreation and Tourism (Chapter 8) Contents. List of Tables

HIGH YIELD ANGLERS IN RTO13: A SITUATION ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Florida s Circumnavigational Saltwater Paddling Trail (CT)

Go Fish Education Center

FURBEARER TRAPPING SEASONS AND RULES

Transcription:

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington For: Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association By: Southwick Associates Released June 2015 PO Box 6435 Fernandina Beach, FL32035 Tel (904) 277-9765 www.southwickassociates.com

Summary Angler spending and economic impacts were estimated for Washington statewide and for each of seven management regions defined by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. In 2011, anglers spent a total of $1,186.3 million on trip-related and equipment purchases in Washington. Overall, approximately 65.2% of boating-related outdoor recreation occurs on public lands in Washington. 1 After accounting for differences in fishing activity across the seven regions in Washington, an estimated $773.9 million of the angler spending is estimated to be related to fishing that takes place on public lands. Including the statewide economic multiplier effects, this spending supports 10,575 jobs and $407.9 million of income statewide. Additionally, the total economic activity supported by fishing on public lands results in $78.0 million in state and local taxes and $98.0 million in federal taxes. The breakdown for each region is shown in the summary table below. Summary: Estimated fishing-related economic impacts on public lands in Washington by resident and nonresident anglers, 2011. Retail Sales Economic Output Labor Income State & Local Taxes Federal Taxes Jobs Eastern $154.1 $254.2 $81.2 $15.5 $19.5 2,106 North Central $240.2 $396.1 $126.6 $24.2 $30.4 3,283 South Central $47.6 $78.5 $25.1 $4.8 $6.0 651 North Puget $132.6 $218.7 $69.9 $13.4 $16.8 1,812 Sound Southwest $74.7 $123.2 $39.4 $7.5 $9.5 1,021 Coastal $124.6 $205.4 $65.6 $12.6 $15.8 1,702 Statewide Total $773.9 $1,276.2 $407.9 $78.0 $98.0 10,575 1 Outdoor Industry Association. 2012 Survey of Outdoor Recreation. 1

Public Lands in the Washington Regions Angler spending and economic impacts were estimated for Washington statewide and for each of seven regions recognized by the State of Washington. Figure 1 shows the location of each of these regions and Table 1 details the county assignments to the regions. Figure 1. Washington regions 2

Table 1. County assignments to regions Coastal North Puget Sound North Central Clallam Island Adams Grays Harbor King Chelan Jefferson San Juan Douglas Kitsap Skagit Grant Mason Snohomish Okanogan Pacific Whatcom Pierce Eastern Thurston South Central Asotin Southwest Benton Columbia Clark Franklin Ferry Cowlitz Kittitas Garfield Klickitat Yakima Lincoln Lewis Pend Oreille Skamania Spokane Wahkiakum Stevens Walla Walla Whitman The percentage of public and private land in each region was estimated using geospatial data from Washington s Department of Forestry. The layer identified land ownership for public entities such as a Federal, State, Local & Tribal governments as well as private entities such as homeowners and forest management companies. Figure 2 overlays the geographic distribution of the regions and the land ownership layer. Table 2 presents the estimated distribution of private versus public land ownership within each region. 3

Source: Washington Department of Forestry. Figure 2. Washington land ownership types and regions Table 2. Estimated distribution of public and private lands, by region. Land Ownership Regions % Private % Public Total Coastal 51.2% 48.8% 100.0% Eastern 66.2% 33.8% 100.0% North Central 44.9% 55.1% 100.0% North Puget Sound 39.8% 60.2% 100.0% South Central 37.8% 62.2% 100.0% Southwest 58.8% 41.2% 100.0% Statewide Total 50.9% 49.1% 100.0% 4

Angler Expenditures and Impacts Statewide Based on data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, anglers in Washington spent $1,186.2 million in 2011 on trip-related purchases and expenditures for fishing and related equipment (Table 3). Table 3. Fishing-related expenditures in Washington by resident and nonresident anglers, 2011. Economic Impact Category Impact Amount Trip-related Food and lodging $160,994,288 Transportation $170,218,577 Other trip expenses $207,822,514 Fishing rods, reels and tackle $214,677,466 Other fishing-related equipment $432,563,051 Total $1,186,275,897 As a result of the economic multiplier effect, the $1,186.2 million of fishing expenditures in Washington produced additional rounds of economic activity throughout the state s economy. These indirect expenditures, combined with the initial direct fishing purchases, produced a total of $1.9 billion in economic output statewide. This output supported 16,211 jobs with a total labor income of $625.2 million. This output also produced $119.6 million of state/local tax revenue and $150.3 million of federal tax revenue (Table 4). Table 4. Fishing-related economic impacts in Washington by resident and nonresident anglers, 2011. Economic Impact Category Impact Amount Retail Sales $1,186,275,897 Economic Output $1,956,335,653 Labor Income $625,222,636 State & Local Taxes $119,631,627 Federal Taxes $150,271,880 Jobs 16,211 5

Angler Expenditures and Impacts by Region The $680.6 million of statewide fishing expenditures and associated economic impacts were allocated to each of the six regions based on where the fishing occurred (to allocate trip-related spending) and where fishing-related retail spending takes place in Washington (to allocate equipment spending). The proportions of direct fishing expenditures that occur on public lands by region were then estimated by weighting the regional spending allocations by the percentage of public land area in each region (Table 2), and then applying an adjustment factor (65.2%) based on the estimate of water-based recreation (primarily boating) that occurs on public lands in Washington. 2 The resulting allocations by region are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Distribution of fishing expenditures by region Travel- Generated Expenditures (millions) Equipment Expenditures (millions) Percent of State Expenditures on Public Lands Travel Regions Eastern $70.0 $84.1 13.0% North Central $109.2 $131.1 20.2% South Central $21.6 $26.0 4.0% North Puget Sound $60.3 $72.4 11.2% Southwest $34.0 $40.8 6.3% Coastal $56.6 $68.0 10.5% Statewide Total $351.6 $422.2 65.2% Expenditures and economic impacts at the regional level were estimated by applying the regional allocations to the statewide estimates (Table 6). Table 6. Estimated fishing-related economic impacts on all lands in Washington regions by resident and nonresident anglers, 2011. Retail Sales Economic Output Labor Income State & Local Taxes Federal Taxes Jobs Eastern $236.3 $389.7 $124.5 $23.8 $29.9 3,229 North Central $368.2 $607.3 $194.1 $37.1 $46.6 5,032 South Central $73.0 $120.3 $38.5 $7.4 $9.2 997 North Puget Sound $203.3 $335.3 $107.2 $20.5 $25.8 2,778 Southwest $114.5 $188.9 $60.4 $11.6 $14.5 1,565 Coastal $190.9 $314.9 $100.6 $19.3 $24.2 2,609 Statewide Total $1,186.3 $1,956.3 $625.2 $119.6 $150.3 16,211 2 Outdoor Industry Association. 2012 Survey of Outdoor Recreation. 6

Public land spending and impacts by region were estimated by applying the public land allocation (Table 5) to the statewide estimates. The spending and impacts estimated for each region are shown in Table 7. Table 7. Fishing-related economic impacts on public lands in Washington regions by resident and nonresident anglers, 2011. State & Retail Sales Economic Output Labor Income Local Taxes Federal Taxes Jobs Eastern $154.1 $254.2 $81.2 $15.5 $19.5 2,106 North Central $240.2 $396.1 $126.6 $24.2 $30.4 3,283 South Central $47.6 $78.5 $25.1 $4.8 $6.0 651 North Puget Sound $132.6 $218.7 $69.9 $13.4 $16.8 1,812 Southwest $74.7 $123.2 $39.4 $7.5 $9.5 1,021 Coastal $124.6 $205.4 $65.6 $12.6 $15.8 1,702 Statewide Total $773.9 $1,276.2 $407.9 $78.0 $98.0 10,575 7

Lake Chelan National Recreation Area A Case Study The economic returns from public land investments for conservation and recreation are further highlighted by examining the economic returns from recreational activity in a specific case. With participation from Land and Water Conservation Fund, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area (NRA) encompasses 61,958 acres including the northern end of Lake Chelan, the surrounding area of the Stehekin Valley and part of the Stehekin River. There are no roads connecting Lake Chelan NRA to the outside. Access to the recreation area and the small town of Stehekin within its borders is by float plane, ferry or hiking trails. The Lake Chelan National Recreation Area (NRA) offers exceptional nature-based recreational opportunities. Activities within the park include fishing, hunting, hiking, camping, wildlife viewing, horseback riding, mountain climbing, cross-country skiing, and boating. In addition to their enjoyment of the outdoors, recent studies have highlighted the economic contributions that recreation participants have as a result of their spending during recreational trips and for equipment that they use to engage in outdoor recreation (e.g., boats, bicycles, coolers, clothing). In recent years, approximately 40,000 visitors have made their way into the area. In 2013, the National Park Service recorded 27,544 day visitors, 5,620 overnight visitors who stayed at a lodge in the park, and 4,151 campers who spent a night at one of the park s many backcountry campsites. While the Park Service maintains detailed records of visitor numbers, less is known about the outdoor recreation activities of these visitors while in the park or the amount of money that they spend as part of their trip. To estimate the economic contributions of Lake Chelan NRA visitors, we utilized estimates of participation in various outdoor recreation activities and associated spending from a survey of outdoor recreation in the northwest that was part of a larger national study. Table 8 provides a summary of the types of recreation and average expenditures made by people who participate in outdoor activities of the type that that take place in the Lake Chelan NRA. The estimates are based on the typical distribution of outdoor activities in this area and average spending per visitor-day. Using average spending profiles for each activity and taking into account that not all visitors spend alike, it is estimated that the 37,314 visitors to Lake Chelan NRA in 2013 spent approximately $4.8 million during their trip to the area (Table 8). This figure does not take into account the spending that is associated with equipment used for outdoor recreation. Because most recreation equipment has uses well beyond one trip, it is not reasonable to associate equipment spending to a single visit to a specific area. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that people who engage in these activities spend an estimated $3.2 million each year on their respective outdoor recreation equipment. Some portion of that spending could reasonably be attributed to activity in Lake Chelan NRA. 8

Table 8. Average participation rates and expenditures for expected recreation activity at Lake Chelan NRA. Activity Visitors Spending Day Hiking 5,870 $429,470 Backpacking 3,518 $257,381 Horseback Riding 786 $57,525 Kayaking 644 $54,136 Rafting 1,999 $168,058 Canoeing 1,324 $111,328 Swimming 4,346 $365,356 Fishing 4,500 $288,515 Wildlife Viewing 4,556 $452,309 Overnight camping/lodging 9,771 $2,586,310 Total 37,314 $4,770,387 Source: Southwick Associates, based on survey data collected for the Outdoor Industry Association. These visitors and their trip-related spending generate economic activity that has real benefits to the Washington economy beyond the local area. Table 10 shows that the total visitor spending of $4.8 million directly supports 47 jobs and $1.4 million of income. Those jobs and incomes produce $343,700 of state and local tax revenues and $333,200 of federal tax revenues. The visitor spending, however, has additional impacts as it ripples across the statewide economy. An input-output model of the Washington economy was used to estimate the multiplier effect of the visitor spending. The model shows that the $4.4 million of spending results $7.3 million of total economic activity in Washington including 70 jobs that provide nearly $2.5 million of income. Additionally, the total tax impact includes $495,000 of state and local revenues and $586,000 of federal tax revenues. 9

Table 10. Estimated annual economic contributions of recreation activity at Lake Chelan NRA* Direct Spending Multiplier Effect Total Impacts Sales $4,770,387 $2,544,536 $7,314,923 Employment 47 23 70 Wages $1,404,901 $1,045,380 $2,450,281 State & Local Taxes $343,755 $151,494 $495,249 Federal Taxes $333,276 $253,002 $586,278 Source: Southwick Associates, based on survey data collected for the Outdoor Industry Association and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. 10

References Washington Department of Forestry, Public Ownership GIS layer. 2005. Available: http://www.washington.gov/odf/pages/gis/gisdata.aspx. Accessed: 10/24/13. Southwick Associates, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Economic Assessment Tool (NEAT) for the estimation of Conservation-Related Recreation and Economic Impacts, 2013. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife- Associated Recreation. 11