17 January 2018, page 1 of 21 52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City Website: www.sws.org.ph Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465 Fax: 920-2181 Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey: Net satisfaction rating of the Duterte National Administration rises to record-high Excellent +70 Excellent in Mindanao and NCR; Very ood in Balance Luzon and Visayas Very ood on 5, ood on 11, and Moderate on 2 subjects Net rating improves on 7 subjects, declines on 1 subject, steady on others Social Weather Stations The Fourth Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey, done on December 8-16, 2017, found 79% of adult Filipinos satisfied, 12% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 9% dissatisfied with the general performance of the current National Administration, for a new record-high net satisfaction rating of +70 (% satisfied minus % dissatisfied), classified by SWS as excellent [Chart 1; Table 1]. This is a 12-point rise, and up by one grade, from the very good +58 (71% satisfied, 13% dissatisfied) in September 2017. This surpassed the previous record of very good +66 achieved in June 2013 (Noynoy Aquino Administration), and in September 2016 and March 2017 (Duterte Administration). Excellent in Mindanao and NCR; Very ood in Balance Luzon and Visayas The 12-point gain in the Duterte Administration s general net satisfaction rating between September to December 2017 was due to new record-high net satisfaction scores achieved in Mindanao, NCR, and Balance Luzon, combined with a steady score in the Visayas. The National Administration s net rating stayed excellent in Mindanao, at a new record-high +87 in December 2017, up by 13 points from +74 in September 2017. This surpassed the previous Mindanao record of +81 in September 2016 [Chart 2; Table 2]. It rose by one grade from very good to excellent in NCR, at a new record-high +71 in December, up by 20 points from +51 in September. This surpassed the previous NCR record of +67 in June 2017. It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, at a new record-high +67 in December, up by 15 points from +52 in September. This surpassed the previous Balance Luzon record of +63 in June 2017. It stayed very good in the Visayas, at +57 in December, similar to the net rating in September. pr20180117 - with National Admin Overall and on Issues (media release).docx
17 January 2018, page 2 of 21 Excellent in class D; Very ood in classes E and ABC The National Administration s net satisfaction rating rose by one grade from very good to excellent in class D or the masa, at a new record-high +71 in December, 11 points higher than +60 in September. This surpassed the previous class D record of +68 in September 2016 [Chart 3; Table 3]. It rose by one grade from good to very good in class E, at +66 in December, 20 points higher than +46 in September. It stayed very good in classes ABC, at +62 in December, 2 points higher than +60 in September. Double-digit increases in the National Administration s net satisfaction rating occurred among men, among the 35 year olds and above, and among non-elementary school graduates, elementary school graduates, and college graduates [Table 4]. The SWS terminology for net satisfaction ratings is as follows: +70 and above, excellent ; to +69, very good ; to +49, good ; to +29, moderate, +9 to 9, neutral ; 10 to 29, poor ; 30 to 49, bad ; 50 to 69, very bad ; 70 and below, execrable. Very ood on 5, ood on 11, and Moderate on 2 subjects Out of 18 specific performance subjects rated, the net satisfaction ratings of the Duterte administration were very good on 5 subjects, good on 11 subjects, and moderate on 2 subjects. SWS calls this its overnance Report Card [Tables 5 and 6]. The net rating of the National Administration was very good on: Fighting terrorism (+67), Helping the poor (+66), Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges (+59), Foreign relations (+55), and Providing jobs () [Charts 4 to 8]. It was good on: Reconciling with Muslim rebels (+48), Telling the truth to the people (+47), Defending the country's territorial rights (+46), Protecting human rights (+45), Reconciling with communist rebels (+43), Fighting crimes (+43), Eradicating graft and corruption (+42), Ensuring an efficient public transportation system (+42), Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry (+33), Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK (), and Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil prices () [Charts 9 to 19]. It was moderate on: Fighting inflation (+24) and Resolving the traffic problem (+23) [Charts 20 and 21]. National Administration s net rating improves on 7 subjects, declines on 1, steady on others The December 2017 survey found the National Administration s net rating improved on 7 specific subjects, declined on 1 specific subject, and steady on others, compared to when they were last surveyed.
17 January 2018, page 3 of 21 The National Administration s net rating rose to very good on three specific subjects: The very good +67 on Fighting terrorism was 20 points above the good +47 in September 2017. The very good +59 on Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges was 19 points above the good +40 in December 2000. The very good +55 on Foreign relations was 15 points above the good +40 in September 2017. It stayed very good on two specific subjects. The very good +66 on Helping the poor hardly changed from the very good +67 in September 2017. The very good on Providing jobs was identical to the net figure in September 2017. The National Administration s net rating improved to good on four specific subjects. The good +47 on Telling the truth to the people was 32 points above the moderate +15 in March 2015. The good +33 on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry was 4 points above the moderate +29 in September 2017. The good on Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK was 8 points above the moderate +22 in September 2017. The good on Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil prices was 25 points higher than the neutral +5 in September 2015. It stayed good on six specific subjects. The good +48 on Reconciling with Muslim rebels was 10 points above the good +38 in September 2017. The good +45 on Protecting human rights hardly changed from the good +46 in September 2017. The good +43 on Reconciling with communist rebels was 8 points above the good +35 in September 2017. The good +43 on Fighting crimes was 13 points above the good in September 2017. The good +42 on Eradicating graft and corruption was 7 points higher than the good +35 in September 2017. The good +42 was 6 points below the good +48 in December 2016. However, it declined to good +46 on Defending the country's territorial rights, 6 points below the very good +52 in September 2017. The National Administration s net rating stayed moderate on two specific subjects.
17 January 2018, page 4 of 21 The moderate +24 on Fighting inflation hardly changed from the moderate +21 in September 2017. The moderate +23 on Resolving the traffic problem was 1 point higher than the moderate +22 in September 2017. Survey background The December 2017 Social Weather Survey was conducted from December 8-16, 2017 using faceto-face interviews of 1,200 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 each in Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±3% for national percentages, and ±6% each for Metro Manila, Balance Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao). The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population projections for 2017 to obtain the national estimates. The Social Weather Survey items on public satisfaction with the general performance of the National Administration, and its performance on specific subjects, are non-commissioned. These items were included on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service. The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects. The general rating is repeated every quarter, whereas only a core of the specific subject-ratings are repeated. Subjects are included or excluded depending on their contemporary salience. The survey question on public satisfaction with the overall performance of the national administration is as follows: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? Kayo po ba ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUN NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, o LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? [On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED?] For the specific subjects, the survey questions are as follows: AANO PO KAYO NASISIYAHAN O HINDI NASISIYAHAN SA PAMAMALAKAD N KASALUKUYAN ADMINISTRASYON NASYONAL TUNKOL SA (PRORAMS OR ACTIVITIES)? MASASABI BA NINYON KAYO AY LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUN NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? PAKISAOT PO AN MA ITO SA PAMAMAITAN N PALALAAY N BAWAT KARD SA NAAANKOP NA LUAR SA
17 January 2018, page 5 of 21 RATIN BOARD NA ITO. (SHUFFLE CARD) [How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration s performance in (programs or activities)? Would you say that you are VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the appropriate box on this rating board. (SHUFFLE CARD)] 1. PALABAN SA TERORISMO (Fighting terrorism) 2. PAKIKIPA-UNAYAN SA MA REBELDEN MUSLIM UPAN AN MA ITO AY MABALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with Muslim rebels) 3. PAKIKIPA-UNAYAN SA MA REBELDEN KOMUNISTA UPAN AN MA ITO AY MABALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with communist rebels) 4. PATUTULON SA MA MAHIHIRAP (Helping the poor) 5. PALALABAN SA PATAAS N PRESYO (Fighting inflation) 6. PANINIURO NA WALAN PAMILYAN KAILANMAN AY MAUUTOM AT WALAN MAKAIN (Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat) 7. PABIBIAY N HANAPBUHAY (Providing jobs) 8. PARESOLBA N PROBLEMA SA TRAFFIC (Resolving the traffic problem) 9. PAKIKIPA-UNAYAN SA IBAN BANSA (Foreign relations) 10. PAPUPUKSA N KATIWALIAN AT PANUNURAKOT SA OBYERNO (Eradicating graft and corruption in government) 11. PANINIURO NA HINDI NASASAMANTALA AN MA KUMPANYAN NABEBENTA N LANIS SA PRESYO NITO (Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil prices) 12. PATATANOL SA KARAPATAN N BANSA SA TERITORYON DAAT NITO (Defending the country's rights to its territorial seas) 13. PANINIURON MAAYOS AN SISTEMA N PAMPUBLIKON TRANSPORTASYON (Ensuring an efficient public transportation system) 14. PAPAPAAWA AT PASASAAYOS N MA KALSADA, TULAY AT IBA PAN IMPRASTRUKTURA (Building and maintenance of public works like roads and bridges) 15. PASASABI N KATOTOHANAN SA MA TAO (Telling the truth to the people) 16. PALALABAN SA MA KRIMEN BUMIBIKTIMA SA ORDINARYON MAMAMAYAN TULAD N PAPATAY, HOLDAP, PANANAKAW, PANANAKIT NA PISIKAL, ATBP. (Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical violence, etc.) 17. PALUTAS N PROBLEMA N EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINS O EJK (Solving the problem of Extrajudicial Killings or EJK) 18. PATATANOL SA KARAPATAN PANTAO (Protection of human rights)
17 January 2018, page 6 of 21 SWS terminology for Net Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; to +69, "very good"; to +49, "good"; to +29, "moderate", +9 to 9, "neutral"; 10 to 29, "poor"; 30 to 49, "bad"; 50 to 69, "very bad"; 70 and below, "execrable"]. A single-digit net satisfaction is considered not significantly different from zero. SWS considers the movement from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade". SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by ianne Sheena S. Sabio. #
17 January 2018, page 7 of 21 Chart 1 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +70 +70 E -50 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Table 1 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES C. AQUINO FEB 89 +23 SEP 89 +14 APR 90 +17 NOV 90 JUL 91-1 NOV 91 + 1 FEB 92-2 APR 92-5 RAMOS SEP 92 +32 DEC 92 APR 93 +24 JUL 93 +31 SEP 93 +14 DEC 93 +24 APR 94 +15 AU 94 +14 NOV 94 +16 DEC 94 +17 MAR 95 JUN 95 + 6 OCT 95-18 DEC 95-3 APR 96 0 JUN 96 +11 RAMOS (cont.) SEP 96 DEC 96-1 APR 97 +28 JUN 97 +31 SEP 97 + 5 DEC 97 +20 FEB 98 + 8 MAR 98 + 9 ESTRADA SEP 98 +19 NOV 98 +36 MAR 99 +34 JUN 99 +28 OCT 99 + 2 DEC 99-8 MAR 00 + 6 JUL 00 +24 SEP 00 DEC 00 + 2 ARROYO MAR 01 +27 JUL 01 +12 SEP 01 + 8 NOV 01 +27 MAR 02 +12 ARROYO (cont.) MAY 02 0 SEP 02 +15 NOV 02 +13 MAR 03-3 JUN 03 +23 SEP 03-6 NOV 03 +3 MAR 04 +14 AU 04 +15 DEC 04 + 3 MAR 05-6 MAY 05-13 AU 05-11 DEC 05-15 MAR 06-15 JUN 06 + 2 SEP 06-3 NOV 06-2 FEB 07-3 SEP 07 + 9 DEC 07-11 MAR 08-19 JUN 08-21 SEP 08-4 DEC 08-1 FEB 09-19 ARROYO (cont.) JUN 09-11 SEP 09-20 DEC 09-22 MAR 10-45 B. AQUINO SEP 10 +64 NOV 10 +64 MAR 11 +46 JUN 11 +45 SEP 11 +56 DEC 11 +56 MAR 12 +46 MAY 12 +44 AU 12 +62 DEC 12 +57 MAR 13 +53 JUN 13 +66 SEP 13 +56 DEC 13 +51 MAR 14 +45 JUN 14 +29 SEP 14 +35 DEC 14 +34 MAR 15 +19 JUN 15 +31 B. AQUINO (cont.) SEP 15 +37 DEC 15 +39 APR 16 +35 JUN 16 DUTERTE SEP 16 +66 DEC 16 +61 MAR 17 +66 JUN 17 +64 SEP 17 +58 DEC 17 +70 Ignores Don t Know and Refused responses. Q: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUN NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN
17 January 2018, page 8 of 21 Chart 2-50 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +90 MIN: +87 +70 NCR: +71 BAL LUZ: +67 VIS: +57 1989 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Table 2 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 1 of 2) NCR LUZ VIS MIN C. AQUINO FEB 89-2 +22 +28 +37 SEP 89 + 7 + 2 +25 +31 APR 90-4 +24 +18 +15 NOV 90-42 -12 + 3 + 3 JUL 91-28 - 4 +14 + 5 NOV 91-23 0 +13 + 4 FEB 92-18 - 4 + 3 + 7 APR 92-13 - 2-2 - 8 RAMOS SEP 92 +35 +34 +23 +34 DEC 92 +12 +34 +31 +35 APR 93 + 5 +31 +18 +26 JUL 93 0 +34 +28 +46 SEP 93 0 +15 +16 +22 DEC 93 +15 +12 +29 APR 94 +13 +19 + 4 +19 AU 94 + 9 +15 +16 NOV 94 + 4 +24 +16 DEC 94 + 8 +19 +19 +14 MAR 95-17 +19-2 +20 JUN 95-4 +14-5 + 9 OCT 95-22 -22-18 - 9 DEC 95-19 - 3 0 + 7 APR 96-15 + 2-9 +13 RAMOS (cont.) JUN 96-9 +17 +13 +11 SEP 96 + 4 +16 + 1 DEC 96 + 7 + 1-12 + 3 APR 97 +31 +35 +15 +24 JUN 97 +23 +34 +32 SEP 97 + 5 +16-24 +11 DEC 97 +19 +24 + 5 +29 ESTRADA SEP 98 +19 +22 +15 +17 NOV 98 +33 +41 +20 +42 MAR 99 +34 +38 +18 +40 JUN 99 +23 +35 +15 OCT 99 + 9 + 4 + 7 DEC 99-14 - 9-19 + 4 MAR 00 + 2 + 8-4 +16 JUL 00 +25-3 +36 SEP 00 + 7 +12-1 +20 DEC 00-14 0-11 +31 ARROYO MAR 01 +25 +25 JUL 01 +3 + 4 +18 +26 SEP 01-7 + 2 +19 +19 NOV 01 +7 +27 +32 +35 *Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN ARROYO (cont.) MAR 02-6 + 7 +29 +17 MAY 02-3 - 5-2 +16 SEP 02-3 +18 + 4 +28 NOV 02-13 + 5 +23 +34 MAR 03-6 - 3 + 3-6 JUN 03 +23 +22 +35 +13 SEP 03-4 -11 + 2-6 NOV 03-15 -7 +19 +18 MAR 04-6 +13 +27 +18 AU 04-5 + 7 +39 +22 DEC 04-11 -5 +17 +16 MAR 05-22 -20 +25 + 5 MAY 05-43 -23-4 +17 AU 05-25 +8-18 DEC 05-27 -11-9 -21 MAR 06-33 - 8-7 -24 JUN 06-35 + 4 +19 + 6 SEP 06 +29-3 + 5 + 3 NOV 06-2 + 5-1 FEB 07-20 - 6-2 +12 SEP 07 + 8 +17 +16 DEC 07-24 -9-9 MAR 08-32 -20-8 -17 JUN 08-27 -16-26 -23 SEP 08-14 -5-4 +4
17 January 2018, page 9 of 21 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 2 of 2) NCR LUZ VIS MIN ARROYO (cont.) DEC 08-20 -1 +12 +1 FEB 09-29 -16-21 -18 JUN 09-19 -12-12 -2 SEP 09-22 -21-21 -15 DEC 09-33 -18-23 -20 MAR 10-57 -45-39 -44 B. AQUINO SEP 10 +68 +66 +60 +61 NOV 10 +49 +69 +59 +67 MAR 11 +42 +51 +47 JUN 11 +48 +37 +47 +57 SEP 11 +44 +59 +51 +63 DEC 11 +64 +52 +58 +56 MAR 12 +46 +39 +49 +55 MAY 12 +41 +45 +29 +58 AU 12 +56 +65 +64 +59 DEC 12 +47 +54 +66 +63 MAR 13 +43 +54 +45 +63 JUN 13 +53 +68 +76 +63 SEP 13 +45 +59 +60 +53 DEC 13 +52 +51 +64 MAR 14 +37 +41 +45 +56 JUN 14 +16 +26 +41 +34 NCR LUZ VIS MIN B. AQUINO (cont.) SEP 14 +36 +24 +45 +46 DEC 14 +21 +35 +31 +43 MAR 15 +21 +8 +34 +26 JUN 15 +18 +29 +43 +34 SEP 15 +24 +44 +34 +34 DEC 15 +36 +35 +52 +36 APR 16 +17 +58 +33 JUN 16 +32 +45 +62 +60 DUTERTE SEP 16 +66 +60 +62 +81 DEC 16 +53 +56 +58 +78 MAR 17 +62 +60 +67 +79 JUN 17 +67 +63 +56 +72 SEP 17 +51 +52 +57 +74 DEC 17 +71 +67 +57 +87 *Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Chart 3 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMIN., by ECONOMIC CLASS, FEB 1989 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +90 D: +71 +70 E: +66 ABC: +62-50 1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 10 of 21 Table 3 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 1 of 2) ABC D E C. AQUINO FEB 89 +25 +17 +38 SEP 89-5 +14 +22 APR 90 +26 +16 +15 NOV 90-47 - 7 + 1 JUL 91-27 - 2 NOV 91-25 + 1 FEB 92-25 0 + 2 APR 92-21 - 4 + 2 RAMOS SEP 92 +26 +42 +36 DEC 92 +20 +29 +42 APR 93 +17 +22 +33 JUL 93 + 3 +33 +39 SEP 93 + 8 +11 +31 DEC 93 +23 +23 +26 APR 94 + 5 +16 +17 AU 94 + 9 +13 +19 NOV 94 + 8 +17 +18 DEC 94 +14 +28 MAR 95-5 +11 +13 JUN 95-8 + 8 + 9 OCT 95-14 -20-14 DEC 95-19 - 3 + 3 APR 96-14 - 3 +17 ABC D E RAMOS (cont.) JUN 96 + 4 +12 SEP 96 + 8 + 5 +27 DEC 96 +16-5 + 6 APR 97 +33 +27 +27 JUN 97 +39 +31 +27 SEP 97 + 8 + 3 +14 DEC 97 +27 +20 +17 FEB 98 + 2 + 7 +18 MAR 98 + 3 + 9 +11 SEP 98 + 6 +18 +34 ESTRADA NOV 98 +27 +37 +36 MAR 99 +27 +34 +38 JUN 99 +20 +29 OCT 99 + 5 0 DEC 99-9 - 2 MAR 00 + 4 + 6 + 8 JUL 00 +18 +24 +28 SEP 00-5 +20 DEC 00 + 3 +13 ARROYO MAR 01 +25 +29 JUL 01 +16 +11 +12 *Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. ABC D E ARROYO (cont.) JUN 08-24 -19-25 SEP 08-14 -2-5 DEC 08 0 +2-7 FEB 09-26 -20-16 JUN 09-12 -12-7 SEP 09-35 -21-15 DEC 09-34 -22-17 MAR 10-47 -47-41 B. AQUINO SEP 10 +65 +66 +57 NOV 10 +62 +64 +65 MAR 11 +19 +46 JUN 11 +45 +48 +36 SEP 11 +62 +57 +52 DEC 11 +54 +57 +53 MAR 12 +38 +44 +52 MAY 12 +27 +44 AU 12 +69 +62 +60 DEC 12 +78 +54 +62 MAR 13 +68 +60 JUN 13 +61 +65 +71 SEP 13 +62 +56 +54 DEC 13 +54 +51 ABC D E ARROYO (cont.) SEP 01 0 + 7 +13 NOV 01 +14 +16 MAR 02 +17 +15 + 1 MAY 02-4 -3 +11 SEP 02 + 7 +19 + 6 NOV 02 + 1 +17 + 7 MAR 03-16 0-7 JUN 03 +40 +19 +27 SEP 03 + 5-7 - 8 NOV 03-14 0 +16 MAR 04 +6 +15 +15 AU 04 +22 +15 +14 DEC 04 + 1-3 +19 MAR 05-21 - 5 + 2 MAY 05-15 -18 0 AU 05-2 -11-15 DEC 05-9 -17-12 MAR 06-37 -9-24 JUN 06-1 + 4-3 SEP 06-9 - 1-6 NOV 06-4 - 1 FEB 07 + 4-2 - 6 SEP 07 +20 +8 +9 DEC 07-21 -9-13 MAR 08-18 -19-19 NET* SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 2 of 2) ABC D E B. AQUINO (cont.) MAR 14 +32 +45 +48 JUN 14 +27 +27 +38 SEP 14 +47 +33 +38 DEC 14 +41 +32 +40 MAR 15 +19 +18 +24 JUN 15 +33 +29 +38 SEP 15 +21 +38 +40 DEC 15 +23 +39 +44 APR 16 +17 +32 +46 JUN 16 +24 +51 DUTERTE SEP 16 +58 +68 +62 DEC 16 +55 +61 +62 MAR 17 +61 +66 +69 JUN 17 +55 +64 +68 SEP 17 +60 +60 +46 DEC 17 +62 +71 +66 *Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.
17 January 2018, page 11 of 21 Table 4 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: MAR 2017 TO DEC 2017 (page 1 of 2) Mar 17 Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Dec 17 Total PH 75% 75% 71%79% 16% 13% 16%12% 9% 11% 13% 9% +66 +64 +58 +70 NCR 75 77 70 80 12 13 11 12 13 10 19 8 +62 +67 +51 +71 Bal. Luzon 70 75 66 76 20 13 20 15 10 12 14 9 +60 +63 +52 +67 Visayas 76 70 70 71 15 16 16 13 9 14 13 15 +67 +56 +57 +57 Mindanao 84 80 81 89 11 13 13 8 5 7 6 3 +79 +72 +74 +87 Urban 77 75 73 80 13 15 14 11 11 10 13 8 +66 +65 +60 +72 Rural 73 76 69 78 19 12 18 13 7 12 13 9 +66 +64 +56 +69 ABC 72 62 71 67 16 31 18 28 12 7 11 5 +61 +55 +60 +62 D 75 75 72 79 16 13 15 12 9 11 12 8 +66 +64 +60 +71 E 75 80 62 78 19 8 21 10 6 12 16 11 +69 +68 +46 +66 PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH ENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: MAR 2017 TO DEC 2017 (page 2 of 2) Mar 17 Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Total PH 75% 75% 71%79% 16% 13% 16%12% 9% 11% 13% 9% +66 +64 +58 +70 Men 76 79 68 80 16 11 17 12 8 10 14 8 +68 +68 +54 +73 Women 74 72 73 77 16 16 15 13 10 12 11 9 +64 +60 +62 +68 18-24 74 74 71 73 19 15 18 18 7 11 10 9 +67 +64 +61 +64 25-34 77 74 77 81 15 13 13 9 8 12 10 9 +68 +62 +68 +72 35-44 75 76 70 84 17 13 16 11 8 11 13 5 +67 +65 +56 +79 45-54 75 74 68 78 14 13 18 12 10 12 14 11 +65 +62 +53 +67 55 + 74 77 68 76 17 13 17 15 9 10 14 9 +65 +67 +54 +66 Some Elem 72 78 62 79 20 14 23 13 8 8 14 8 +64 +70 +47 +71 Some HS 74 75 67 77 18 11 18 12 9 14 14 10 +65 +61 +53 +68 Some Voc/Coll 75 73 75 79 15 17 13 12 9 11 11 9 +66 +62 +64 +70 Coll. rad 81 83 73 80 11 7 15 13 8 10 12 6 +74 +72 +60 +74 *% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don t Know and Refused to Answer responses. Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied? Dec 17
17 January 2018, page 12 of 21 Table 5 SAT UND DIS NET Overall performance rating 79% 12% 9% +70 Fighting terrorism 79 10 11 +67 Helping the poor 78 10 12 +66 Building and maintenance of public works 70 18 11 +59 Foreign relations 66 22 11 +55 Providing jobs 67 17 16 Reconciling with Muslim rebels 64 19 17 +48 Telling the truth to the people 62 22 15 +47 Defending the country's territorial rights 61 23 15 +46 Protecting human rights 62 21 17 +45 Reconciling with communist rebels 61 22 17 +43 Fighting crimes 62 19 19 +43 Eradicating graft and corruption 62 18 20 +42 Ensuring an efficient public transportation system 60 22 18 +42 Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry 56 20 24 +33 Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK 54 23 23 Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil prices 51 26 21 Fighting inflation 53 16 30 +24 Resolving the traffic problem 51 20 28 +23 Table 6 SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2017 Excellent Very ood (5) ood (11) Moderate (2) ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, MAR DEC 2017 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Overall performance rating +66 +64 +58 +70 Fighting terrorism +47 +49 +47 +67 Helping the poor +63 +65 +67 +66 Building and maintenance of public works +40 (Dec00) +59 Foreign relations +46 +44 +40 +55 Providing jobs +43 +51 Reconciling with Muslim rebels +33 +32 +38 +48 Telling the truth to the people +15 (Mar15) +47 Defending the country's territorial rights +46 +51 +52 +46 Protecting human rights +23 +55 +46 +45 Reconciling with communist rebels +32 +31 +35 +43 Fighting crimes +41 +43 +43 Eradicating graft and corruption +39 +43 +35 +42 Ensuring an efficient public transportation system +48 (Dec16) +42 Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +22 +32 +29 +33 Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK +37 +34 +22 Ensuring that oil companies do not take advantage of oil prices +5 (Sep15) Fighting inflation +13 +24 +21 +24 Resolving the traffic problem +21 +25 +22 +23 Excellent Very ood (5) ood (11) Moderate (2)
17 January 2018, page 13 of 21 Chart 4 ON FIHTIN TERRORISM: PHILIPPINES, NOV 2002 DEC 2017 +70 ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +67 V 2002 2004 2010 2017 Chart 5 ON HELPIN THE POOR: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 DEC 2017 RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +70 +66 V 1993 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 14 of 21 Chart 6 ON BUILDIN AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC WORKS LIKE ROADS AND BRIDES: PHILIPPINES, MAY 1993 DEC 2017 +70 RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +59 V + + 1993 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Chart 7 ON FOREIN RELATIONS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1992 DEC 2017 RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +55 V 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 15 of 21 Chart 8 NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON PROVIDIN JOBS: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1998 DEC 2017 ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE V 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Chart 9 ON RECONCILIN WITH MUSLIM REBELS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1998 DEC 2017 ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +48 1998 2001 2004 2011 2017
17 January 2018, page 16 of 21 Chart 10 ON TELLIN THE TRUTH TO THE PEOPLE: PHILIPPINES, MAR 1987 DEC 2017 +70 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +47 1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Chart 11 ON DEFENDIN THE COUNTRY S TERRITORIAL RIHTS: PHILIPPINES, MAR 1999 DEC 2017 ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +46 1999 2001 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 17 of 21 Chart 12 ON PROMOTIN/PROTECTIN HUMAN RIHTS: PHILIPPINES, MAR 1987 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +45 1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Chart 13 ON RECONCILIN WITH COMMUNIST REBELS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1998 DEC 2017 ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +43 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 18 of 21 Chart 14 ON FIHTIN CRIMES: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +43 1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Chart 15 ON ERADICATIN RAFT AND CORRUPTION: PHILIPPINES, MAR 1987 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +70 +42 1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 19 of 21 Chart 16 ON ENSURIN AN EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: PHILIPPINES, OCT 1999 DEC 2017 ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +42 1999 1999 2004 2010 2017 Chart 17 ON ENSURIN THAT NO FAMILY WILL BE HUNRY: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2004 DEC 2017 ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +33 2004 2010 2017
17 January 2018, page 20 of 21 Chart 18 ON SOLVIN THE PROBLEM OF EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLINS OR EJK: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2016 DEC 2017 B. AQUINO DUTERTE 2016 2017 Chart 19 ON ENSURIN THAT OIL COMPANIES DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAE OF OIL PRICES: PHILIPPINES, JUN 2011 DEC 2017 B. AQUINO DUTERTE 2011 2017
17 January 2018, page 21 of 21 Chart 20 ON FIHTIN INFLATION: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1991 DEC 2017 C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE +24 M -50 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017 Chart 21 ON RESOLVIN THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM: PHILIPPINES, MAR 2017 TO DEC 2017 B. AQUINO DUTERTE +23 M 2016 2017