Beachgoers of Maine Who are they and what do they think about water quality

Similar documents
Community perceptions of the sustainability of the fishing industry in Australia

Rip Currents: A Survey of Beach Users

Public Opinion. Assistant Professor Department of Life Sciences Communication UW-Madison. & Environmental Communication Specialist

Surfrider s Recreational Use Survey and Marine Spatial Planning in Washington State. Gus Gates- WA Policy Manager

Beach Survey Data Report

Welcome to Scotland's Marine Tourism and Recreation Survey

Ebenezer O. Ogunyinka David R. Lavergne

Methodology and Response Group Size and Age of Survey Respondents Summary of Passenger Comments and Suggestions Residency and Overnight Lodging

Current Living Conditions

Brook Trout Angling in Maine2009 Survey Results

WATCH muskegon Perceptions Research. Presentation to the WATCH muskegon Committee

blog You Want Adventure? You ll Find It at These 5 Beach Towns

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Appendix A (Survey Results) Scroll Down

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

U.S. Bicycling Participation Study

COASTAL MANAGER PERCEPTIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA BEACH VISITOR EXPERIENCES. Chris Ellis, Coastal Resources Management, East Carolina University

Cycling Tourism Growth Opportunities in Nova Scotia. Rum Runners Trail Team April 18, 2017

RIVER ACCESS STRATEGY RIVER USAGE AND ATTITUDES BASELINE ONLINE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

2005 Arkansas Nongame Wildlife Conservation Survey

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Tasmanian Salmonid Growers Association Community Research Executive Summary Report

Monitoring Surfing Quality below the Jordan River Generating Station (Year 2)

Appendix 22 Sea angling from a private or chartered boat

2014 PA Resident Survey

Valuing Beach Closures: An Application to the Texas Gulf Coast

Surfing Tourism Destination Feasibility Study, Kincardine, Ontario

Re: Algae/Cyanobacteria Bloom in St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach and Lee Counties.

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Kennebec & Moose River Valley

Parks Canada + Boating = A Beautiful Thing! Darlene Upton Parks Canada

Issues facing this region include the status of the Sluice Creek tide gates, various tidal wetlands, and locations of public access:

METHODS FINDINGS Q & A

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois

Ontario Cycling Events & Tourism Impact Project - Cross Event Report -

Survey of Wave Riders at Trestles (continued from 1st survey page)

Monitoring Surfing Quality Below the Jordan River Generating Station (Year 3)

Jut (ar-icbcr/eagleton POLL

Read the text and then answer the questions.

Baseline Survey of New Zealanders' Attitudes and Behaviours towards Cycling in Urban Settings

Jordan River Project Water Use Plan

LAKE ONTARIO FISHING AND FISH CONSUMPTION

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES. COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS RESEARCH May 2013

2007 Quad Cities Community Vitality Scan

Survey of New Jersey s Recreational Blue Crab Fishery in Delaware Bay

WYDOT Customer Satisfaction Survey 2016

Appendix 21 Sea angling from the shore

Seattle Department of Transportation. Web Panel Survey February 2018

Attitude towards Walk/Bike Environments and its Influence on Students Travel Behavior: Evidence from NHTS, 2009

Cobb Community Transit

The Impact of TennCare: A Survey of Recipients 2009

TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION RATES FOR WILDLIFE-ASSOCIATED RECREATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND GENDER:

The Impact of TennCare: A Survey of Recipients 2006

EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE

Surf AWARE 1. Dear Parents

The Who and What: Bus Rapid Transit Riders and Systems in the U.S.

How familiar are you with BRT?

4 th Quarter 2014 Report OC MPA Watch Program Orange County Coastkeeper

Shark alert! Warnings high- and low-tech seek to protect (Update) 30 May 2016, by Philip Marcelo And Bruce Smith

Marine fishing tourism in Norway. Structure and economic effects

FLETCHER AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST BEHAVIOR CHANGE FORMATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT

Summary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity

Oregon 2011 Regional Visitor Report Mt. Hood Columbia River Gorge

The Social and Economic Impact of the Removal of the Gold Ray Dam: Establishing 2010 Baseline Data. Southern Oregon University Research Center

Route User Intercept Survey Report

Evaluation of San Diego's First CicloSDias Open Streets Event

Town of Wrightsville Beach Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment Survey WB RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS

The Transit Last-Mile Problem

2017 Catalog Updated July 27th

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey

Northwest Parkland-Prairie Deer Goal Setting Block G7 Landowner and Hunter Survey Results

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

FINAL REPORT December 2015

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

WHY QUIKSILVER? Established in Many Grew Up with the brand. Global Recognition. Trusted Brand. Worn with Pride

Appendix 9 SCUBA diving in the sea

Horseshoe Crab Monitoring & Tagging Training Session. Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island

Kissimmee Visitor Profile

2014 Ontario Works Transit Survey: Final Results

2017 North Texas Regional Bicycle Opinion Survey

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Health Impact Analysis for Integrated Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan

RESEARCH Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey. Project Summary

AN EXAMINATION OF PREPAREDNESS OF COMMIUINITY FOR COMMUNITY BASED TOURISM SRI LANKA A CASE STUDY OF KALPITIYA TOURISM AREA

Bowling Green, KY Technical Appendices

Master Transportation Plan Bicycle Element Survey

golfguide MEDIA KIT 2016 GOLFGUIDE - A DIVISION OF SYNERGY MEDIA, LLC. 884 SECOND STREET SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA GOLFGUIDE.

SACRAMENTO AREA TRAVEL SURVEY: BEFORE BIKE SHARE

Oregon State Lottery Behavior & Attitude Tracking Study

Irish Water Safety Consumer Research Survey. March 2017

MARKET STUDY FOR BOATING ON THE MINNESOTA WATERS OF LAKE SUPERIOR

Eastern Shore Islands Area of Interest Community Newsletter

North Kitsap Trails Association: String of Pearls Trails Survey Results July 13, 2010

Valuing Beach Closures in Damage Assessment: An Application to the Texas Gulf Coast

February Funded by NIEHS Grant #P50ES RAND Center for Population Health and Health Disparities

WILDLIFE WATCHING U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS*

The Case for New Trends in Travel

Montauk Beach Restoration Project. Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013

Transcription:

Beachgoers of Maine Who are they and what do they think about water quality Ross Anthony 1a, Charles Colgan 1b, Caroline Noblet a, Kathleen Bell a 1 Presenting author, a University of Maine, b University of Southern Maine

Why do we care? ME and NH context Inform policy and management Promote public health Contribute to communication of water quality of beaches Health context (Hlavsa et al., 2011) (Dorevitch et al., 2012) (Fleisher & Kay, 2006) Disclosure context (Loewenstein et al., 2014) (Weil et al., 2006) Ogunquit beach, Ogunquit Photograph: Carl D. Walsh/Aurora Photos/Corbis Hampton Beach, Hampton Photograph: Gail Frederick/flickr

What did we do? Who is our sample? NEST Safe Beaches and Shellfish Project (Fox et al., 2016) 2015 mail survey to Maine and New Hampshire coastal residents N=1,176 (33% response rate) Beach version: N=598 (51% of total sample) Demographics 58% male/42% female Average age: 59 Average income in Maine: $85k; New Hampshire: $100k Some college education or higher: 81% Primary residence: 98% Lived in Maine: 40.1 years; New Hampshire: 34.3 NEST Beach Intercept Survey 2014: NH Beaches, Wells-Ogunquit, Saco Bay (N=3,182) 2015: York Beaches (N=875) 2016: Portland Harbor Beaches (N=554) Focus in this presentation on 2015-2016 samples Demographics Portland: 71%F/29%M Some College +: 91.7% Median Age: 37 Resident 76% Visitor: 24% York: 64%F/36%M Some College Median Age 50 Resident 43% Visitor 57

Coastal Resident Mail Survey Results

HIDDEN What activates does our sample typically do at the beach? 65% Activities typically done at the beach Multiple choice Green = direct water contact 43% 38% 38% 32% 25% 16% 16% 11% 1 5% Walking Reading/Relaxing Sight Seeing Swimming Eating at Local Restaurants Sunbathing Glass and Shell Collecting Photography Beach Games and Sports Boating Sea Kayaking Shopping Surfing

Awareness of disclosures does not affect perception of risk of a beach under an advisory. 26.3% of respondents have seen or heard of a coastal beach advisory Perception of health risk at a beach under advisory: If a beach has an advisory recommending that people not to enter the water, and a person like yourself enters the water, in your opinion how likely is it that this person gets sick? Average: 44.9% chance of becoming ill No significant difference in perception by: State Actively seeking safety information Advisory awareness Images from: NH: https://www.des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/beaches/signs.htm ME: Photo credit to Abigail Kaminski

News media, family, and friends are the primary sources of those who seek safety information. 62% Sources among those who sought safety information about water quality (WQ) at coastal beaches Multiple choice 64% 43% 35% 26% 26% 24% 18% 25% 18% 14% 7% News media Family and friends Department of Marine Resources Department of Environmental Protection Local beach manager Maine Healthy Beaches News media Family and friends Department of Environmental Services Fish and Game University of New Hampshire Local beach manager ME residents who seek safety info: 19.4% NH residents who seek safety info: 18.4%

ME and NH have highest perceived WQ in coastal Northeastern US among total sample. 5 (Excellent) 4 3 2 1 (Poor) 4% 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% 5% 11% 6% 5% 7% 27% 3 3 41% 34% 34% 38% 44% 47% 51% 39% 43% 44% 43% 24% 18% 14% 15% 13% 8% 1 3 2% 2% Nova Scotia New Brunswick Maine New Hampshire Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut Average: 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.6

Perceptions of WQ differed by ME and NH respondents. NH rated average WQ perception higher for both states. Test for difference in average rating and distribution by state Distribution of ME WQ by state P=0.0611 Distribution of NH WQ by state P=0.0000 6 6 1 (Poor) 2 3 4 5 (Excellent) 1 (Poor) 2 3 4 5 (Excellent) ME NH ME NH Average ME WQ by state Average NH WQ by state ME NH ME NH ME WQ 3.72 3.86 P=0.0052 NH WQ 3.33 3.68 P=0.0000

Between 29-48% of sample have incorrect perceptions of what changes WQ. 1 (Makes water worse) 2 3 4 5 (Makes water better) 44% 41% 42% 51% 48% 45% 27% 19% 24% 18% 25% 12% 3% 1% 5% 7% 3% 2% 1 3% 13% 12% 5% A large number of swimmers at the beach Wind and high waves Large number of birds or other animals (including dogs) Recent heavy rainfall Rivers flowing into the sea 2.4 3.0 2.1 2.3 2.5

Back to risk perception What influences it? Communication? Past experiences? Personal/public perceptions? Demographics? Let s take a look at the full distribution Recall: average was 44.9%

Risk perception of beach under advisory 35% 3 25% % of sample 15% 1 5% 0-5% 6-1 11-15% 16-21-25% 26-3 31-35% 36-41-45% 46-49% 5 51-55% 56-6 61-65% 66-7 71-75% 76-8 81-85% 86-9 91-95% 96-10 Risk perception (% chance of becoming ill) Low risk perception High risk perception

Risk perception of beach under advisory 35% 3 25% % of sample 15% 1 5% 0-5% 6-1 11-15% 16-21-25% 26-3 31-35% 36-41-45% 46-49% 5 51-55% 56-6 61-65% 66-7 71-75% 76-8 81-85% 86-9 91-95% 96-10 Risk perception (% chance of becoming ill) Low risk perception High risk perception

Ordered logit Dependent variable: Risk perception of beaches under advisory N=314 Communication Past experiences Personal perceptions Public perceptions Demographics Significance levels * 1, ** 5%, *** 1% Risk perception Low Uncertain High Seeking information about water quality + Scientists provide reliable information + Coastal beach advisory awareness + Past sickness after swimming + Risk aversion *** +** +*** Home state water quality perception + Issue Public health = 1; Marine environment = 0 + Gov t responsible + Male +** * ** Education + Income + Age + Age 2 + +

Portland and York Intercept Survey Results

Basic questions 1. What factors are associated with people noticing and responding to water quality warnings at the each beach? Signs Flags Reported Behavior Water contact Visitor Characteristics Beach Characteristics 2. What kinds of information strategies might improve awareness of water quality issues?

HIDDEN Water quality at time of interview was good overall but better at York beaches. 10 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 16% 84% Portland 8% 92% York Blue Orange P=<.001

Only a quarter of respondents check on-beach info, but more urban beaches are a little more likely to be checked Did you check the sign/flag today? 35% 3 25% 24. 32.4% 28.6% 24.5% 26.1% 30.4% 15% 1 10.3% 15.2% 5% All Respondents East End Willard Beach Long Sands North Long Sands South Short Sands Cape Neddick York Harbor P=<.001

When you go to the beach do you check the on-beach information about water quality? 0.8 74.1% 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 18.5% 0.1 0 0.8% 1.3% 5.3% Every time Frequently Usually, but not always Rarely Never

Water contact today? Not going in water, 17% Gender of Respondent Education Level Male, 33 Resident, 17% % Going in the Water, 83% Female, 67% Visitor, 83% 1 10 8 6 Water Contact and Check Water Quality 21.6% 24.8% 78.4% 75.2% Not going in Water Going in the Water Checked WQ-NO Checked WQ-Yes P=.295 1 10 8 6 Gender and Check Water Quality 24. 25. 76. 75. Male Checked WQ-NO Female Checked WQ-Yes P=..823 1 10 8 6 Education and Check Water Quality 22.6% 25. 77.4% 75. No College Degree Checked WQ-NO College Degree Checked WQ-Yes P=.425

HIDDEN What were those who checked the warning sign doing in the water? Activities of those who checked warning sign (Multiple Choice) 6 5 52% 3 31% 13% 1 3% 2% Swimming Wading Surfing Kayaking/Boating Paddleboard

10 8 6 Children in Party 45. 10. Portland York 10 8 6 Residents and Visitors Visitors, 23. Resdents, 76.8% Portland Visitors, 57. Resdents, 43. York 10 8 6 College Degree 78.3% 77.8% Portland York 1 10 8 Children and Check Water Quality 29.3% 26.7% 1 10 8 Residents/Visitors and Check Water Quality 46. 43. 1 10 8 College Degree and Check Water Quality 22.6% 25. 6 6 6 70.7% 73.3% 54. 57. 77.4% 75. No Children With Children Checked WQ-NO Checked WQ-Yes No College Degree College Degree Checked WQ-NO Checked WQ-Yes P=.365 Resident Visitor P=..634 Checked WQ-NO Checked WQ-Yes P=.820

For those times when you encountered a water quality advisory would you say you Went to another beach 33% Stayed at beach but out of water 57% Went in water anyway 1

Prior to coming to the beach do you check? Percent choosing (Multiple Choice) 5 45% 35% 3 25% 15% 1 5% 45.2% 37.2% 7.6% 9. 1. Tides Weather Surf Conditions Maine Healthy Beaches Water Temp

What sources do you check? 8 7 66.9% 6 5 3 1 15.2% 5.1% 5.6% 5.3% 1.9% TV Radio Web Newspapers Local Buinesses Friends/Relatives

Would you be interested in signing up for internetbased beach information delivered to you? 1 10 8 6 Yes, 43.3% Maybe, 9.5% No, 47.2% Yes, 30.4% Maybe, 7. No, 62.5% Resident Visitor

Desired information 3 26.4% 25% 22.8% 15% 17.3% 16.9% 16. 1 5% Tides Weather Water Temp Surf Conditions Bacteria Conditions

Desired mode 6 5 52.3% 52.8% 3 19.8% 19.9% 17.9% 18.6% 1 10. 11.1% Email Text Social Media App All Respondents Bacteria Info Wanted

Desired mode for residents/visitors 6 5 50.8% 54.8% 3 1 18.8% 21.9% 10.4% 9.3% 20.1% 14. Email Text Social Media App Residents Visitors

Characteristics of those indicating interest in bacteria conditions information Residence Education Visitor 35% No College Degree 18% Gender Resident 65% College Degree 82% Children Male 29% Without Children 24% Female 71% With Children 76%

Different beach systems have different visitor accommodation profiles, requiring different contact strategies Friends/Rela tives 11% New Hampshire Friends/Rela tives 7% Saco Bay Vacation Home (Own) 11% Hotel 18% Vacation Home (Own) 25% Friends/Rela tives 6% Wells Ogunquit Hotel 36% Vacation Home (Rent) 25% Campground 7% Friends/Rela tives 7% York Vacation Home (Rent) 39% Hotel 26% Campground 16% Vacation Home (Own) 26% Vacation Home (Rent) 26% Campground 21% Portland Vacation Home (Own) 6% Hotel 25% Vacation Home (Own) 29% Friends/Rela tives 3 Vacation Home (Rent) 24% Campground 6% Vacation Home (Rent) 33% Hotel 32% Campground 8%

Conclusions Statewide Coastal Resident Mail Survey 74% of sample have not seen or heard of a coastal beach advisory News media, family, and friends are primary sources of information about water quality More than half of sample understands what makes water quality worse 71% of sample has low to uncertain risk perception of water at a beach under advisory There is no difference in average or distribution of risk perception by advisory awareness Actively seeking safety information and advisory awareness has no effect on risk perception Intercept Survey in Portland Harbor and York Only a quarter of respondents check the sign though more urban beaches do a little better No clear distinguishing characteristics of those who do check on beach information A significant portion of respondents indicate when the encounter an advisory they take action to avoid the water People do check info before going to the beach, mostly weather and tides from the web. There is interest in internet info, preferably by email, including bacteria conditions Special efforts needed for visitors in places like York

HIDDEN What can be done? Call for policy and practices Pushing work forward on communication Public education events Continued collaboration with NEST (UMaine, USM, and UNH) Capacity building with social media presence Future work Risk perception Sensitivity to recreation demand

Thank you! This project is a part of the New England Sustainability Consortium (NEST) Safe Beaches and Shellfish Project and is funded by the National Science Foundation Award 11A-1330691 to Maine EPSCoR at the University of Maine. The authors also gratefully acknowledge funding from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture under Hatch projects ME021510 (Maine Agriculture and Forest Experiment Station). Contact jordan.anthony@maine.edu caroline.noblet@maine.edu colgan@maine.edu