Displacement-based calculation method on soil-pile interaction of PHC pipe-piles

Similar documents
Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

Formation level = m. Foundation level = m. Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m

UNIT-I SOIL EXPLORATION

Pushover analysis with ZSOIL taking soil into account. Stéphane Commend GeoMod Ing. SA, Lausanne

Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis for Zhongwei--guiyang Natural Gas Pipeline Endangered by Collapse

Session 1. Pushover Analysis of a Torsionally Eccentric Cellular Abutment. Date 11/03/ PM 4 PM Eastern Time

Non-Linear Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building

Research on Shear Test methods of bonded steel bolts

ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF PIPELINE BUCKLES

Vertical Uplift Capacity of a Group of Equally Spaced Helical Screw Anchors in Sand

TZ WEDGE ANCHOR FOR CRACKED AND UNCRACKED CONCRETE

THE USE OF SPIN FIN PILES IN MASSACHUSETTS

SOIL ANCHORS ETSAB/UPC J.Llorens - ETSAB/UPC PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS

Learn more at

Pole Foundation Design with Spreadsheet

Presented to the International Technical Rescue Symposium, November Abstract

Predicting Failure Modes of Snow Anchors

Ground Failure Mechanism of Micoropiled-raft

For a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions.

Yasuyuki Hirose 1. Abstract

SHEAR PERFORMANCE OF RC FOOTING BEAMS BY CAP-TIE SYSTEM USING WELDED STIRRUPS

Application of pushover analysis in estimating seismic demands for large-span spatial structure

Dynamic response of composite caissonpiles

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D.

APPLICATION OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS ON EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE PREDICATION OF COMPLEX LARGE-SPAN STEEL STRUCTURES

The Use of ILI In Dent Assessments

Offshore Wind Turbine monopile in 50 year storm conditions

computed using Equation 3-18 by setting the 2nd term equal to 0 and K A equal to K o and using the pressure distribution as shown in Figure 3-23.

Design Data 22M. Flotation of Circular Concrete Pipe. w w I = w - x 1000 (3) (SG x 1000)

Bending Vibration Analysis of Pipes and Shafts Arranged in Fluid Filled Tubular Spaces Using FEM

WHAT DETERMINES THE STRENGTH OF A SNOW ANCHOR? HOW STRONG DOES A SNOW ANCHOR SYSTEM HAVE TO BE?

On the Use of Pickets and Flukes as Snow Anchors

FEA case Study: Rubber expansion joint for piping systems

WEDGE-ALL Wedge Anchors

A New Test Setup for Testing Polyethylene Tubes under Constant and Cyclic Internal Pressures

Global Buckling Design for Flexible Flowlines

Pushover Analysis of Water Tank Staging

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

1) INTRODUCTION 2) THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

Calibration and Validation of the Shell Fatigue Model Using AC10 and AC14 Dense Graded Hot Mix Asphalt Fatigue Laboratory Data

THE EFFECT OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH ON BEARING CAPACITY OF STRIP FOOTING IN COHESIVE FRICTIONAL MEDIUM

Item 404 Driving Piling

Analysis of dilatometer test in calibration chamber

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

Submittal / Substitution Request

LYSAGHT W-DEK. Design and Construction Manual. Structural steel decking system

FLEXIBLE AND RELIABLE ANCHORING

IAC-04-IAA DESIGN OF A HIGH-TENSION ELASTICALLY DEFORMING SPACE TETHER DEPLOYER

Special Considerations for Structural design and Fabrication for. tankers or similar vessels with Large Size (150m or more in length) in.

Drop Weight Testing on Sandwich Panels with a Novel Thermoplastic Core Material

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BUBBLE DECK SLAB SYSTEM WITH ELLIPTICAL BALLS

DESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm

Hilti, Inc South 122 nd East Avenue Tulsa, OK

The Relationship between the Depth Embedded Pipe Pile and the Force of Clamping Jaw

A Study on the Eccentric Loading of K Node of Steel Tube Tower

THE STABILITY OF THE PIPELINE LAID ON A PORO-ELASTIC SEABED

TECHNICAL MANUAL. COPRA Anchoring Coupler. For Smart Bolted Connections

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK

Study on the calculation method for hydrodynamic pressure of bridge piers in deep water under earthquakes

PUSH PIER SYSTEMS STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY. Push Pier Systems PN #MBPPT

Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors

Aidin Kazemi Daliri, Sepanta Naimi*

m v = 1.04 x 10-4 m 2 /kn, C v = 1.29 x 10-2 cm 2 /min

Seismic Response of Skewed RC Box-Girder Bridges

The Adequacy of Pushover Analysis to Evaluate Vulnerability of Masonry Infilled Steel Frames Subjected to Bi-Directional Earthquake Loading

Waves. harmonic wave wave equation one dimensional wave equation principle of wave fronts plane waves law of reflection

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

DEVELOPMENT OF A ROBUST PUSH-IN PRESSUREMETER

midas Gen V.741 Enhancements Analysis & Design Part

End stops for mobile cranes & crawler cranes. verope Special Wire Ropes

MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF SUBMARINE CABLE ARMOUR

Edit this text for your title

Influence of Settlement on Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Foundations on Sandy Clays in the Niger Delta, Nigeria

Wave Motion. interference destructive interferecne constructive interference in phase. out of phase standing wave antinodes resonant frequencies

BURIED PIPE RESPONSE SUBJECTED TO TRAFFIC LOAD EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Determining the deformation and strength characteristics of soil by the plate loading test

Abstract. 1 Introduction

Stress and deformation of offshore piles under structural and wave loading

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Spring 2012 updated 1/27/2012

Engineering Practice on Ice Propeller Strength Assessment Based on IACS Polar Ice Rule URI3

Stress Analysis of The West -East gas pipeline with Defects Under Thermal Load

P-04 Stainless Steel Corrugated Hoses and Metal Bellows Expansion Joints

Activities for Measuring Acceleration and Deceleration due to Gravity and Friction. Grade Level: Middle School

Ridwan Hossain Graduate Student Memorial University of Newfoundland

Typical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations

Cc: Bridget Bero, Ph.D., P.E., Wilbert Odem, Ph.D., P.E., and Alarick Reiboldt, EIT, CENE 486 Instructors

DYNAMIC CRUSH TEST ON HYDROGEN PRESSURIZED CYLINDER

The cost-efficient fixing for flexible use in non-cracked concrete VERSIONS. zinc-plated steel stainless steel hot-dip galvanised steel

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

Design Guide MSW from M20 to M70. Original version of the design guide

Ancholt Bolt Design With Tension and Shear Using Anchor Reinforcement

Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design

SOIL IMPROVEMENT BY VACUUM PRELOADING FOR A POWER PLANT PROJECT IN VIETNAM

CIA-EA Technical Data Sheet

Drop-In Internally Threaded Anchor (DIAB) Mechanical Anchors. Key features. Material: Carbon steel. Coating: Zinc plated

Realistic Seismic Behavior of the Main Tower of the New SAS Bay Bridge and Its Base Anchors

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads

Available online at Procedia Engineering 00 2 (2010) (2009)

using Strength Ratios

Transcription:

Seattle, WA Displacement-based calculation method on soil-pile interaction of PHC pipe-piles Dr. Huang Fuyun Fuzhou University 31 st May, 217

Outline Background ing introduction ing results Simple calculation Conclusions

1.Background Deck slab Pavement Approach slab Backfill Abutment Girder Pier Abutment Backfill Pile Approach slab Soil spring Abutment Girder Pier F N M Friction Piles Soil spring Soil spring Soil spring

1.Background Deck slab Pavement Approach slab Backfill Abutment Girder Pier Abutment Backfill Piles sum T E Under temperature and seismic load, displacement of superstructure is absorbed by piles and piles are under cyclic load. To satisfy demand of superstructure deformation, flexible piles are used most frequently. H-steel piles have been widely used under Integral Abutment in North America and Europe, because of good flexural property and ductility.

1.Background Deck slab Pavement Approach slab Backfill Abutment Girder Pier Abutment Backfill Piles Researchers of Iowa State University used PC piles in IJB and did researches on behavior of these piles and field monitoring on IJB using PC piles. 24, researches on behavior of prestressed concrete square piles were conducted by Prof. Edwin from Tennessee University, which proved that PC piles can be used in IJB.

1.Background Deck slab Pavement Approach slab Backfill Abutment Girder Pier Abutment Backfill Piles m method is linear and elastic with a limit 8-1mm in Chinese Code. p-y method is complex or accurate enough for RC piles?

2. ing introduction PHC model piles C8 concrete (has a compressive strength of 82.1 MPa) With a diameter of 155mm,length of 2.75m 7-wires prestressed steel strand with a diameter of 11.1mm Labeled as PHC-1 to PHC-4 t Number Diameter (mm) Pile Length (m) Wall Thickness (mm) Prestressed Degree λ Stirrup Spacing (mm) Deformation Coefficient a Calculate Pile Length(m) PHC-1 5 6 1.697 3.988 PHC-2 5.25 6 1.697 3.988 155 2.75 PHC-3 5 6 1.697 3.988 PHC-4 4 7 6 1.715 4.31

2. ing introduction Soil Container (rigid box) Circular Height of m Diameter of m Wall thickness of 1mm 4 diagonal braces Soil (medium dense sand) Sand from Min River Water Content (%) Density (g/cm 3 ) void ratio Internal friction angle ( ) Average SPT blow count 4.6 1.9 9 35 11

1 245 25 35 35 35 35 35 35 2. ing introduction Sensor arrangement Strain gages Soil surface S1 S8 S2 S9 S3 S4 S5 S1 S11 S12 14 strain gages were installed on piles with an equal spacing of 35mm, labeled as S1 to S14. S6 S13 S7 S14

1 175 2. ing introduction Sensor arrangement Earth pressure cells Soil surface 425 35 35 35 35 35 T1 T2 T3 T4 T7 T8 T9 T1 12 earth pressure cells were installed on piles with an equal spacing of 35mm, labeled as T1 to T12. T5 T6 T11 T12

2. ing introduction Sensor arrangement Displacement meters D1 Soil surface 4 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 35 35 35 35 35 35 25 8 displacement meters were installed, labeled as D1 to D8. 1

2. ing introduction Method of displacement meters placement

2. ing introduction Loading(Displacement loading method) Displacement load (mm) Initial stage: 2 mm, 5mm, 8mm and 1mm. 1mm to 3mm: increase by 5mm. After 3mm: increase by 1 mm, and the test end until the lateral force decreases to 85% of peak value. Load.. speed: mm/s. 3 cycles every load grade 1 8 5 2-2 -5-8 -1..

3. ing Results 3.1 Failure modes PHC-2 PHC-4

3. ing Results 3.2 Displacement soil surface Embedded depth (m) soil surface 2 4 6 8 1 Displacement (mm) Embedded depth (m) 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm 2mm 25mm 3mm 4mm 5mm 6mm 7mm 8mm 9mm 1mm 11mm -2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Displacement (mm) PHC-4

3. ing Results 3.3 Hysteretic curve and skeleton curve Load kn Load kn 2 15 1 5-5 -1-15 -2-15 -1-5 5 1 15 2 15 1 5-5 -1-15 PHC-2 PHC-2 P cr =5.4kN Displacement mm y cr =1mm -P u =-12.4kN -y u =-19.6mm -P cr =-5.5kN -y cr =-9.9mm -2-15 -1-5 5 1 15 Displacement mm P u =1kN y u =11mm Load kn Load kn 2 15 1 5-5 -1-15 -2-15 -1-5 5 1 15 2 15 1 5 PHC-4 Displacement mm P cr =5.3kN Y cr =9.9mm -5 -P u =-16.3kN -1 -Y u =-119.1mm -P cr =-5.1kN -15 -Y cr =-9.2mm -2-15 -1-5 5 1 15 Displacement mm PHC-4 P u =15.9kN Y u =119.4mm

3. ing Results 3.4 Strain distribution and strain history Embedded depth (m) PHC-2 21 PHC-2-1 PHC-2 soil surface 18 theoretic crack strain value 15-75 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm -4-3 -2-1 1 2 strain 1-6 Tensile strain 1-6 12 9 6.35m depth 3.7m depth 5m depth 1.4m depth 5 1 15 2 25 3 Displacement load (mm) Compressive strain 1-6 -5-25.35m depth.7m depth 5m depth 1.4m depth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Displacement load (mm) Embedded depth (m) -1 24 PHC-4 theoretic crack strain value PHC-4 PHC-4 21 soil surface -75 18 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm -4-3 -2-1 1 2 strain 1-6 Tensile strain 1-6 15 12 9 6.35m depth.7m depth 3 5m depth 1.4m depth 5 1 15 2 25 3 Displacement load (mm) Compressive strain 1-6 -5-25.35m depth.7m depth 5m depth 1.4m depth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Displacement load (mm)

Earth Pressure (kpa) Embedded Depth (m) 3. ing Results 12 1 8 6 4 2 3.5 Pile soil pressure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Displacement Loads (mm) PHC-2 PHC-2 Earth Surface T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Earth Pressure (kpa) 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm Earth Pressure (kpa) Embedded Depth (m) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5-5 -5 5 1 15 2 25 Displacement Loads (mm) PHC-4 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6-5 5 1 15 2 25 3 Earth Pressure (kpa) PHC-4 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction 4.1 Soil pressure calculate API P u min ( C z / d C 1 2, ) z C z s 3 s Reese LFP P u z tan sin tan z A sz[ Ks (1 tan tan a) D tan( ) cos a tan( ) D K s z D tan (tan sin tan a) K a ] P Broms 3 u s p K Dz Guo 2 2n n P u ssrk pd ( z a) m P u m z y z

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction Embedded Depth (m) API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 15 3 45 6 Earth Pressure (kpa) Embedded Depth (m) API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 2 4 6 8 Soil pressure Embedded Depth (m) API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 25 5 75 1 Earth Pressure (kpa) Embedded Depth (m) API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 25 5 75 1 125 Soil pressure

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction Earth Pressure (kpa) 6 45 3 15 API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 'm' method PHC-1 PHC-2 PHC-3 Earth Pressure (kpa) 15 12 9 6 3 API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 'm' method PHC-1 PHC-2 PHC-3 3 6 9 12 15 Displacement (mm) Deep in.175m 1 2 3 4 5 6 Displacement (mm) Deep in.875m Earth Pressure (kpa) 16 12 8 4 API 1993 Reese Broms Guo 'm' method PHC-1 PHC-2 PHC-3 P u z tan sin tan z Asz[ Ks (1 tan tan a) D tan( ) cos a tan( ) D z Ks tan (tan sin tan a) Ka] D S K D ( z a ) 2 2n n s r p min (C1 z C 2 D) sz, C3 sz Displacement (mm) Deep in 1.25m

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction 4.2 Bending moment M Strain EI D Bending moment of pile When the pile is elastic M EI D 2 2 EId y / d z Get displacement by quadratic integral of bending curvature Embedded depth (m) soil surface -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bending moment (kn m) PHC-2 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm 2mm 25mm Embedded depth (m) soil surface -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bending moment (kn m) PHC-4 2mm 5mm 8mm 1mm 15mm 2mm 25mm

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction -5 5 1 15 2-1 - -2-4.3 Displacement comparisons Piles 2mm Displacement load -1 - Strain transfer -2 m ing p-y - PHC-4 Piles -5 5 1 15 2 Strain m p-y 5mm Displacement load Piles -5 5 1 15 2 Piles -5 5 1 15 2-1 - -2 - Strain m p-y 1mm Displacement load -1 - -2 - Strain m p-y 2mm Displacement load

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction Embedded Depth (m) 4.2 New displacement method Earth Surface Equation (7) Value 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement (mm) (a)1mm Displacement load PHC-4 Embedded Depth (m) Earth Surface Equation (7) Value 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement (mm) (b)15mm Displacement load Embedded Depth (m) Earth Surface Equation (7) Value Embedded Depth (m) Earth Surface Equation (7) Value 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement (mm) 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement (mm) (c)2mm Displacement load (d)3mm Displacement load

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction 4.3 Simple calculation on pile-soil interaction F T i 6 i1 i T i P Zb i F P i b (.9 y n ) 1.25 D i yu ym y k P=Pm(y/ym) 1 n Pm Pu P k b /6 3b /8 y p i p ( p p y 1/ n i p ( ) m ym u k p k m h y k ) y ( p y y u z D m m y u p u y m )

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction 4.4 Results comparisons 15 15 Force (kn) 15 1 5 simple calculation method 'p-y' curves method 'm' method 3 6 9 12 15 Displacement (mm) (a)phc-1 Force (kn) 2 1 5 simple calculation method 'p-y' curves method 'm' method 3 6 9 12 15 Displacement (mm) (b)phc-2 1 15 Force (kn) 5 simple calculation method 'p-y' curves method 'm' method 3 6 9 12 15 Displacement (mm) (c)phc-3 Force (kn) 1 5 simple calculation method 'p-y' curves method 'm' method 3 6 9 12 15 Displacement (mm) (d)phc-4

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction Buried Depth (m) Calculation Buried Depth(m) 1 2 Calculation 3. 2 4 6 8 1 Displacement (mm) (a) 1mm Displacement Loading Fan(214) 3 5 1 15 2 25 Displacement(mm) (b) 25mm Displacement Loading Buried Depth(m) 1 2 3 Calculation 8 16 24 32 4 Displacement(mm) (c) 4mm Displacement Loading Buried Depth(m) 1 2 3 Calculation 1 2 3 4 5 Displacement(mm) (d) 55mm Displacement Loading

4. Calculation on pile-soil interaction Burial Depth (m) Calculation 3. bending moment (kn m) (a) 5mm Displacement load Burial Depth (m) Fan(214) Calculation 3. bending moment (kn m) (b) 1mm Displacement Load 15 1 Force (kn) 5 simple calculation method 'p-y' curves method 'm' method 15 3 45 6 Displacement (mm)

5. Conclusion Maximal bending moment locates at 5.D to 6.D embedded depth, concrete of pile cracks around this area primarily. Degree of prestress and reinforcement ratio has a significant influence on failure mode of PHC piles. There are four stages for PHC piles: (1) elastic stage when the displacement of pile head below 8mm~1mm. (2) Concrete of tensile zone cracked, which means soil-pile system become elastic-plastic. (3) Reaching 4mm displacement load, concrete of compressive zone are out of work, stiffness of pile decreases gradually. After that, soil-pile separation has a significant influence. (4) failure stage: lateral bearing capacity drops dramatically. The test indicate that the distribution law of soil pressure is that with the change of pile depth, the side earth pressure of pile increased first and then decreased, and reversed in a certain depth.

5. Conclusion PHC piles performs a good plastic property and deformation ability considering soil-pile interaction, which is a suitable type used in IJB. With the increase of displacement loads, the pressure of shallow soil grows faster and its maximum is close to the limit passive earth pressure, while that of the deep soil is relatively slow or even increase reversely. It can be seen that the transformation method and the 'm' method to calculate the horizontal deformation of pile are not accurate for nonlinear elastic and larger deformation. Although the 'p-y' curves method takes the non-linear effects of soil into account, there still exists a large error in calculating the large deformation value. The horizontal displacement calculation method of pile-soil interaction that obtained by tests can calculate precisely and accurately the pile displacement.

THE 3 RD INTERNATIONAL JOINTLESS BRIDGES WORKSHOP Thanks for your attention!