Policy Number: Effective: 07/11/14 Responsible Division: Planning Date: 07/11/2014 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT POLICY

Similar documents
City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Pennsylvania Highway Statistics

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

Phone: Fax: Project Reference No. (to be filled out by MassHighway):

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Functional Classification of Roads and Streets

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work.

CHAPTER 7 CIRCULATION

Mobility and Congestion

Roadway Classification Review

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

Chapter 6: Transportation

Classification Criteria

Guidelines for Integrating Safety and Cost-Effectiveness into Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

HSIP Project Selection Criteria

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Twin Cities Bicycle Barriers Study Technical Advisory Work Group December 19, 2016

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Highway & Traffic Engineering. Road Classification and Design Standard in Malaysia

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

NEW BRAUNFELS SEGUIN AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DRAFT PLAN NEW BRAUNFELS CITY COUNCIL MEETING

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

CHAPTER 1 GENERAL DESIGN

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Closing Plenary Session

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Official Streets and Highways Plan

Traffic Accident Data Processing

3 Palmer Urban Travel Demand Model Development

7. Roadway System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Evolving Roadway Design Policies for Walking and Bicycling

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK

Planning and Programming Committee Meeting April 14,

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Highway Project Scoring Worksheet Project Name: Ike Brooks Rd/Rives Chapel Church Rd Improvements (SPOT ID: H090571)

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SR-741 & MIAMISBURG-SPRINGBORO/ AUSTIN PIKE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO

Performance-Based Approaches for Geometric Design of Roads. Douglas W. Harwood MRIGlobal 3 November 2014

City of Hanover TRANSPORTATION STUDY

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

Appendix A. Functional Classification

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Welcome to the Public Meeting. Red Hill Business Park South Transportation Master Plan Addendum. December 4, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

FMATS Transportation Improvement Program Project Nomination Form

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF DEFICIENCIES

SECTION V - CIRCULATION PLAN

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL & SAFETY

Reducing Speeding-Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles

ATTACHMENT NO. 18 GMI-C. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

1 2 I N T R O D U C T I O 6 G E N E R A L I N F O R M A T I O N. Across. 6. Knowledge communicated in a brief overview

A5.1 Permitted activities

Appendix A. Road Classification Review of Outstanding Issues and Proposed Classifications (All Wards) Staff Report Road Classification System

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA

Defining Purpose and Need

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC COMMITTEE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

HILLSIDE DISTRICT PLAN White Paper

Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia

Traffic Calming Policy

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

Attachment No. 17 GMI No. 1. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

Phase I-II of the Minnesota Highway Safety Manual Calibration. 1. Scope of Calibration

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

PURPOSE AND POLICY GUIDANCE

Attachment A: Columbus Area Metropolitan Transportation Plan Objectives, Performance Measures, and Targets

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

Transcription:

Policy Number: 2014-025 Effective: 07/11/14 Responsible Division: Planning Date: 07/11/2014 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AMENDMENT POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: The Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency s (NOACA) functional classification policy requires all proposed functional classification revisions to be evaluated thoroughly prior to making a recommendation to the Ohio Department of Transportation. Evaluation is based on guidelines suggested by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) with some criteria refined to reflect local conditions. Criteria evaluated includes: Lane widths Shoulder widths Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Access Speed limit Parallel spacing of routes Area type Percentage of mileage by functional classification (by region, by county) Functional classification density analysis AUTHORITY: Ohio Revised Code, Sections 307 23 U.S.C. 101(a) (2) PURPOSE: Functional Classification is the grouping of roads, streets, and highways in a hierarchy based on the type of highway service they provide. Streets and highways are part of an interconnected network, and each one plays a role in moving traffic throughout the system. Generally, streets and highways provide either traffic mobility or land access and can be ranked in terms of the proportion of service they perform. In addition to mobility and access, there are other factors that can help determine the proper category to which a particular roadway belongs such as trip length, speed limit, volume, and vehicle mix. Planners and engineers use this hierarchy of roadways to properly channel transportation movements through a highway network efficiently and cost effectively.

Functional classifications roadway categories are segregated into seven categories that apply in both urban and rural areas. The classification categories are: 01 Principal Arterial (Interstate) 02 Principal Arterial (Freeway and Expressway) 03 Principal Arterial (Other) 04 Minor Arterial 05 Major Collectors 06 Minor Collectors 07 Local ELIGIBILITY: All public roadways have a functional classification assigned to them. Currently all roadways classified as greater than a local road in urban areas, and roadways classified as greater than minor collector in rural areas are eligible for federal aid. DEFINITIONS: NOACA Board of Directors: NOACA is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and designated areawide water quality management agency for the counties of Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, and Medina in Ohio directed by a 45-member Governing Board, representing all five NOACA counties, plus transit agencies, the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, Ohio EPA, and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). Functional classification: is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into a hierarchy of classes, or systems, according to the character of traffic service that they are intended to provide. Arterial: Include classes of highways emphasizing a high level of mobility for through movement of traffic. Land access is subordinate to this primary function. Generally, travel speeds and distances are greater on these facilities compared to other roadway classes. The highest class of arterials are limited access to allow the free flow of traffic. 1 Collector: Collect traffic from the lower facilities and distribute it to higher classified roadways. Collectors provide both mobility and land access with trip lengths, speeds and volumes being moderate. 2 Local: Primary function is to provide land access. Travel speeds, distance and volumes are generally low and through traffic is discouraged. 3 1 Ohio Roadway Functional Class Background Document. Ohio Department of Transportation. http://www.dot.state.oh.us/divisions/planning/sppm/systemsplanning/pages/roadwayfunctionalclass.aspx. 2 Ibid. 3 Ibid.

Functional Classification Change Procedure Functional Classification is the grouping of roads, streets, and highways in a hierarchy based on the type of highway service they provide. Streets and highways are part of an interconnected network, and each one plays a role in moving traffic throughout the system. Generally, streets and highways provide either traffic mobility or land access and can be ranked in terms of the proportion of service they perform. In June 2014 the NOACA Board of Directors approved Resolution Number 2014-025, which created a NOACA functional classification policy for the review of proposed functional classification revisions. The policy requires all proposed functional classification revisions to be evaluated thoroughly prior to making a recommendation to the Ohio Department of Transportation. Evaluation is based on guidelines suggested by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). A NOACA Functional Classification modification request form was developed so that municipalities interested in changing the functional classification of a roadway within their jurisdiction could provide pertinent information to NOACA staff. The form is posted on NOACA s website. There are three steps in the evaluation process, and all three steps must be met to recommend the functional classification change. The recommendations that result from the evaluation process will proceed through the committee process beginning with the Transportation Subcommittee and ending with the NOACA Board of Directors providing the final approval of all recommendations. After Board concurrence, the information will be forwarded to ODOT and FHWA for further review and action. Step 1: NOACA Functional Classification Modification Request Form and Step 1 review - The information provided by the municipality will be compared to quantitative ranges and qualitative values provided by FHWA and ODOT o Number of lanes o AADT o Lane Widths/shoulder widths o Parallel spacing o Access o Connectivity o Speed Limit - By comparing the provided information to the FHWA and ODOT guidance and NOACA region existing conditions, NOACA staff will be able to determine which functional classification the roadway in question most closely resembles. For a proposed functional classification request to make it to step 2, the following conditions must be met; 1. The speed limit must be greater than 25 mph unless more than 50% of the requested length of the functional classification change is located in a high commercial or CBD 1

designated area type (see map 1). The speed limit requirement will not apply to roadways currently on the federal aid network. 2. No new proposed functional classification will end in a stub. Basic tenets of the functional classification network is connectivity and continuity. Each federal aid route should connect to another federal aid route to create a closed connected network. A roadway of a higher classification should not connect to a single roadway of lower classification. It is permissible for a higher classified road to connect to two or more roads with lower classification which combined provide comparable service. 3. Lane Width must meet the following requirements for the proposed Functional Classification category (see Table 1). 4. The functional classification candidate must meet two out of three of the following requirements (see step 1 NOACA modification request); a. AADT b. Parallel Spacing (see map 1) c. access 2

Map 1 was used to determine area type and parallel spacing of federal-aid routes. Area types were developed for use in NOACA s Travel Demand Modeling process. 3

Step 2: Functional Class Network Share - FHWA provides guidance in terms of the percentage of miles each functional classification should account for in a properly balanced statewide or regional roadway network. These percentage ranges are different for urban and rural areas. - NOACA staff calculated the percentage of miles accounted for by each functional classification in urban and rural areas both on a regional scale and county scale. - Once a modification request is received, NOACA staff will determine if the current functional classification, as well as, the requested functional classification is over or under served by those functional classifications in its region (see table 2). Table 2 Functional Classification Network Share Urban Rural Functional Class Suggested Region Range CUY GEA LAK LOR MED Total Mileage 8338.71 4971.93 311.24 1098.25 1350.79 608.45 1 Mileage 198.11 132.24 0.00 15.41 34.07 16.38 1: Principal Arterial (Interstate) 1%-2% 2.38% 2.66% 0.00% 1.40% 2.52% 2.69% 2 Mileage 59.75 16.82 1.75 23.22 17.94 0.00 2: Principal Arterial (Expressway or Freeway) 0%-2% 0.72% 0.34% 0.56% 2.11% 1.33% 0.00% 3 Mileage 392.36 259.72 21.26 34.16 60.97 16.22 3: Principal Arterial (Other) 4%-5% 4.71% 5.22% 6.83% 3.11% 4.51% 2.67% 4 Mileage 746.78 461.37 17.11 96.34 132.92 39.01 4: Minor Arterial 7%-12% 8.96% 9.28% 5.50% 8.77% 9.84% 6.41% 5/6Mileage 708.67 329.46 41.37 137.58 97.19 103.05 5/6: Major/Minor Collector 7%-13% 8.50% 6.63% 13.29% 12.53% 7.20% 16.94% 7 Mileage 6233.04 3772.32 229.75 791.54 1007.70 433.79 7: Local 67%-76% 74.75% 75.87% 73.82% 72.07% 74.60% 71.29% Total Mileage 2623.04 59.26 894.08 224.94 640.19 804.57 1 Mileage 46.87 0.00 0.00 15.46 2.80 28.58 1: Principal Arterial (Interstate) 1%-2% 1.79% 0.00% 0.00% 6.87% 0.44% 3.55% 2 Mileage 10.80 0.00 4.40 0.00 6.38 0.00 2: Principal Arterial (Expressway or Freeway) 0%-2% 0.41% 0.00% 0.49% 0.00% 1.00% 0.00% 3 Mileage 94.42 2.03 30.98 3.63 26.38 31.35 3: Principal Arterial (Other) 2%-5% 3.60% 3.43% 3.47% 1.61% 4.12% 3.90% 4 Mileage 131.52 5.24 44.50 6.17 48.43 26.31 4: Minor Arterial 3%-7% 5.01% 8.84% 4.98% 2.74% 7.56% 3.27% 5 Mileage 464.64 14.59 159.89 31.01 119.76 136.69 5: Major Collector 10%-17% 17.71% 24.62% 17.88% 13.79% 18.71% 16.99% 6 Mileage 116.99 0.00 8.82 19.42 54.91 33.80 6: Minor Collector 5%-13% 4.46% 0.00% 0.99% 8.63% 8.58% 4.20% 7 Mileage 1757.80 37.40 645.49 149.25 381.53 547.84 7: Local 66%-74% 67.01% 63.11% 72.20% 66.35% 59.60% 68.09% - If a functional classification modification is approved by FHWA, NOACA staff will update table 2 to reflect the new conditions. - No new mileage will be added to any functional classification category either at a county or regional level that is beyond FHWA s network share guidance. The only exception will 4

be for a roadway which is currently on the federal aid system and is being reclassified for continuity purposes. Step 3: Functional Classification Route Density - FHWA guidance states the roadway spacing is one of the most important factors to consider when processing a modification request. Spacing should be different in urban and rural areas, because the two have different transportation needs. - NOACA staff developed a methodology for comparing spacing of roadways with a functional classification of 6 or higher (non-local, federal-aid eligible roadways) in similarly rural and urban areas utilizing GIS tools. The comparison is made at the Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) level. o Step I: TAZ s were ranked by population and employment density. TAZ s were then split into quintiles based upon their density. o Step II: The route density for roadways was calculated at the quintile scale o Step III: The representative density was then used to calculate an estimated allotment of miles of roadway for each individual TAZ within the same quintile 5

Step IV: All TAZ s were evaluated to determine the amount of federal-aid mileage based upon the density calculation. Map 2 shows the results of this analysis. - The functional classification request must pass through at least one traffic analysis zone which suggests there is capacity to add additional federal-aid mileage (see map 2). The only exception will be for a roadway which is currently on the federal-aid system which is being reclassified for continuity purposes. Concluding Notes For a functional classification request to be approved all three steps in the procedure must be met. 6