ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT

Similar documents
Measuring the Pedestrian Experience Through Walk Audits

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

8/1/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

Active Neighborhood Checklist: Protocol

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

10/30/2012 VIA

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

3/20/2015 VIA . Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95811

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS

Safety & Convenience for All Users, in All Modes. Barbara McCann NCSL December 3, 2013

Active Transportation Audit

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Richmond Connects Visioning Update

11/28/2016 VIA

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

Use this guide to learn more about walkability and how you can make your community safer to walk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

WELCOME. Traffic & Parking Commission Special Meeting May 30, Iteris, Inc. All rights reserved.

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

Safe Streets. City of Lake Forest Park. March 21, 2017

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

All Season Age Friendly Pedestrian Safety and Walkability Checklist *

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

RE: Park Plaza Walgreens (P12-016)

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

San Jose Transportation Policy

Urban planners have invested a lot of energy in the idea of transit-oriented

What s Health Got to Do With It? Health and Land Use Planning

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

How walk, bike, and transit friendly is your neighbourhood?

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Improving intersections for people that walk in Minneapolis

Washington County SW Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy. & SW Scholls Ferry Rd.

Walkable Community Workshops

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

cyclingincities opinion survey ABOUT THE STUDY WHO DID WE ASK? WHAT DID WE DO?

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Portland, Oregon. Salt Lake City, Utah. April 20, 2016

Pedestrian, Bicycle and Traffic Calming Strategic Implementation Plan. January 18, 2011

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE... 1 MOBILITY ELEMENT TRANSPORTATION REPORT... 2 ROADWAY COMPONENT... 3 OPPORTUNITY AREAS...

Complete Streets Chicago: Data Driven Design. Luann Hamilton Deputy Commissioner

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Traffic Safety. Norman W. Garrick. Wesley Marshall. University of Connecticut. University of Colorado Denver

Orinda Bicycle, Trails and Walkways Master Plan

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Update on Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Trail Planning. Presented to TCC November 21, 2014

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Introduction. Who is WILMAPCO. Why are walkable communities important

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

This page intentionally left blank.

Monterey Road Complete Streets

Presentation Starts at 5:30 PM

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Active Transportation Access to Transit

What Is a Complete Street?

GIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning

WELCOME. Thank you for joining us at the Second Public Workshop for the Carlsbad Pedestrian Master Plan. We look forward to receiving your feedback.

Bicycle + Pedestrian Connectivity Gap Analysis

COASTAL RAIL TRAIL ROSE CREEK BIKEWAY PROJECT COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 AUGUST 15, 2013

Presentation Outline. Project/Study Purpose. Existing Conditions. Future Conditions. Understanding the Streetside. Similar Walkable Environments

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS), Mini Version

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Transcription:

ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT M A Y 2 0 1 3 Jon Morgan WI DHS

ACTIVE COMMUNITY LINE-UP Rationale Why do an audit What s involved in an audit Things to look for and consider Hitting the streets Let s look at the results

WHAT S CHANGED & WHY DOES IT MATTER? Health Neighborhood Design Transportation Options Environmental & Economic Impact

DOESN T EVERYONE DRIVE? 55% of Americans would rather drive less & walk more. Nearly one-third of Americans don t drive: 21% of Americans over 65. Children under 16. Many low income Americans do not have access to automobiles.

2 Examples in Green Bay

CUL-DE-SAC NEIGHBORHOOD 1.4 Miles How many households & destinations are within walking distance?

How many households/destinations are within walking distance?.75 mile radius GRID NEIGHBORHOOD Welcome to Green Bay

NEIGHBORHOODS MATTER % Active % 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 43% 27% One study found that 43% of people with safe places to walk within 10 minutes of home met recommended activity levels; among those without safe places to walk just 27% met the recommendation. 0% Walkable Neighborhood Less Walkable Neighborhood

WHY DO A PEDESTRIAN/ BIKE AUDIT? Identify fixable issues in problem areas Create safe, accessible, and welcoming environments for walkers and bikers Walkability & bikeability = improved health, livability & economic vitality Establish a baseline from which to measure progress It beats working on a nice day

RANGE OF AUDITS Informal: General impression of the current status of the walk / bike environment. Example / Use - Raise awareness of elected officials, media and the general public (Overall 0 10 score ) Semi-formal: Rating of a short, specific list Example / Use - More objective scoring of a variety of criteria on a written scale. Could provide a neighborhood list of possible areas to change. Formal: Rating of a comprehensive criteria list Example / Use Objective scoring of many criteria that can be compared with other audited areas (WI form). Could be used to prioritize across multiple neighborhoods

THE ASSESSMENT TOOL: KEY STEPS Where should I do an audit? Identify priority areas high-traffic areas crash sites new developments citizens complaints school zones neighborhood association Identify geographic area to be assessed intersection + 1-2 blocks in each direction school property + 1 sq mi census block

THE ASSESSMENT What are some things you might need: Walking Audit Checklist Walking Audit Route Map (if multiple sites will be reviewed) Aerial photograph for each Focus Area Clipboards Pens / Highlighter Post-its Camera Measuring tape or wheel Safety vests

Mixed land use Stoplights WHAT DO YOU SEE HERE? Pedestrian signal Retail destination Bus Highlighted crosswalk Curb ramps Painted median Bike lane Photo: Santa Barbara, CA (Dan Burden, 13 Walk and Livable Communities Institute, Inc.)

THE WI AUDIT TOOL

AUDIT TOOL A) Land Use Environment WalkScore, Mixed-use neighborhoods/destinations, Facilities, Features, Ease of access B) Transportation Environment Alternative transportation, Speed, Volume, Connectivity C) Walking Environment Features, Sidewalks, Intersections, Safety, Key issues D) Biking Environment Features, Surfaces, Intersections, Safety, Key issues E) Facilities & Aesthetics Equipment, Amenities, Aesthetics, Safety, Activity

Recording Map X = Ped/Bike Crash site

#1 WALKSCORE & #10 TRAFFIC VOLUME 2 Web Stats to Pull: Q #1 WalkScore Q #10 Traffic Volume Caveat on WalkScore Heavily weighted to # of destinations Take results with a large grain of salt

A) LAND USE ENVIRONMENT 1. WalkScore 2. Residential Mix 3. Commercial/ Public Mix 4. Recreational 5. Natural features www.pedbikeimages.org 6. Barriers

WHY LOCAL PLANNING MATTERS VARIOUS TYPES OF WALKING/BIKING TRIPS Exercise trips Recreational trips Purposeful trips These require destinations to go to

#2 & #3 MIXED-USE NEIGHBORHOODS (RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL)

#4 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Gyms Parks Athletic Fields

#5 & #6 NATURAL FEATURES & EASE OF ACCESS Rivers & Lakes: nice aesthetics, but also potential barriers

B) TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT 7. Alternate modes 8 & 9. Speed limits 10. Traffic volume (online count) 11. Routes

#7 ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION Bikes, Buses, etc

#8 & #9 SPEED LIMITS

C) WALKING ENVIRONMENT 12. Walking features 13. Good sidewalks 14. Safe Intersections 15. Buffers

TRAFFIC CALMING/CONTROL

Roundabouts TRAFFIC CIRCLES

PEDESTRIAN ISLANDS

Other Pedestrian Assists Curb Extension Countdown Timer

#14 (WALKING) & #19 (BIKING) INTERSECTIONS Signals Width Time to cross Crosswalks Islands Speed

D) BIKING ENVIRONMENT - #17 TO #21 17. Features: Bike lanes, signs, no barriers 18. Road surface 19. Safe intersections

KEEP ALL USERS IN MIND (#12 & #20) www.pedbikeimages.org

E) FACILITIES & AESTHETICS (#22 - #28) 22. Recreation 23. Service & comfort 24. Attractive features 25. Comfort features 26. Low pollution 27. Safety 28. And People!

WHAT TO DO WITH THE INFO: PLANNERS AND DECISION-MAKERS Identify items for the following categories: Recommendations that can be implemented immediately Recommendations for prioritizing greatest safety and overall walkability Comparison of walkability opportunities with other similar sites Recommendations for future policies for new development and redevelopment Recommendations for citywide policies, programs, and practices From A Technical Guide for Conducting Pedestrian Safety Assessments for California Cities, University of California at Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies, 2008.

Google: WI Physical Activity OTHER RESOURCES

ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT IN GRANTSBURG M A Y 2 0 1 3 Jon Morgan, WI DHS Brad Cavanagh, ANCHOR

GRANTSBURG Safe Routes distances = 1.25 miles walking 2.5 miles biking ¾ mile Radius ½ mile Radius 2016 Aerial Map

GRANTSBURG AERIAL VIEW Memory Lake Park Downtown Schools Grocery Store Hwy 70

GRANTSBURG KEY LOCATIONS 2. Crex Meadows Wildlife Area (1.25 miles from downtown) 5. Memory Lake Park 6. Downtown Pine & Madison 1. High School/MS 4. Grocery Store 3. Family Dollar

(650) (3200) (590) (2600) (770) (3000) GRANTSBURG TRAFFIC COUNTS (Q 10) (1000 on extension of Pine St/Cty F near Crex) (1600) (1500) (760) (3700) (4500) (3600)

GRANTSBURG WALK SCORES (Q 1) Walkscore Scale 90+ Walker s Paradise 70-89 Very Walkable 50-69 Somewhat Walkable 0-49 Car-Dependent

(3200) (590) (2600) (3000) #1 MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL (1600) (1500) ½ mile radius (4500) (Daily traffic count)

HIGH SCHOOL / MIDDLE SCHOOL

SCHOOL VIEW

(1000) #2 CREX MEADOWS (~1.25 miles to Downtown) (Daily traffic count)

CREX MEADOWS

CREX MEADOWS VIEW

(650) #4 GROCERY STORE (3700) ½ mile radius (Daily traffic count)

GROCERY STORE

GROCERY STORE VIEW

#6 DOWNTOWN N PINE ST & W MADISON AVE

(3000) N PINE ST & W MADISON AVE (1600) (1500) ½ mile radius (Daily traffic count)

PINE AND MADISON

FACTORS TO CONSIDER Most Impactful Key destinations Multiple trips Regular dose One Example: Schools Key destination: YES Multiple trips: 180 school days Regular dose: 2 trips daily x 10 minutes each = 360 doses Physical Activity Adult Recommendation = 30 minutes/day Physical Activity Child Recommendation = 60 minutes/day If 1 dose = 10 minutes, annual goal is ~ 1000 adult, ~2000 child

GRANTSBURG VIRTUAL AUDIT https://www.google.com/maps/@45.7779706,-92.6802447,15.79z Disclaimer: Google Image Capture in Grantsburg was September 2008

QUESTIONS

TRAFFIC CALMING OPTIONS

INEXPENSIVE FIXES 1. Paint 2. Signage / way finding 3. Street furnishings (benches, etc) 4. Curb extensions 5. Bike parking 6. Parklets in 2 parking spaces (can be temp) 7. Transit stops 8. Improve a crosswalk 9. Lane diets 10.Traffic calming 11.Begin paving shoulders 12.Require multi-modal analysis for projects (not just autos)