WĒKIU BUG BASELINE MONITORING

Similar documents
Year Avg. TAC Can Others Totals

Christina J. Slager Director of Animal Care and Exhibits. Aquarium of the Bay Pier 39, Embarcadero at Beach St. San Francisco, CA

Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon February 8, By Greg A.

The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank

Research Background: Name

SARASOTA BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM OYSTER HABITAT MONITORING RESULTS: YEAR 1. Jay R. Leverone

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Best Management Practices for Trapping Weasels in the United States

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Justification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation

Analysis of Highland Lakes Inflows Using Process Behavior Charts Dr. William McNeese, Ph.D. Revised: Sept. 4,

Lye Brook Amphibian Monitoring. Update. For the Vermont Monitoring Cooperative

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

2015 Winnebago System Walleye Report

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Report on Science Center Activities

Larvae Overboard on Shell. Dudley Biddlecomb s experiments using larvae from Mike Congrove

For the purposes of any clarification and legal interpretation the original byelaw should referred to.

Lynx Protection Zone and Trap Restrictions

De Rust Grass Carp Stocking Policy

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Public Involvement ISSUE ANALYSIS. Attachment 1

NATIVE OYSTER RESTORATION AT ELKHORN SLOUGH, CALIFORNIA Summary of Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve and Elkhorn Slough Foundation

Zooplankton Migration Patterns at Scotton Landing: Behavioral Adaptations written by Lauren Zodl, University of Delaware

COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2015 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT PROJECT NUMBER: 160

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

Blue cod 5 (BCO5) pot mesh size review

WFC 10 Wildlife Ecology & Conservation Nov. 29, Restoration Ecology: Rivers & Streams. Lisa Thompson. UC Cooperative Extension

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Managing Burrowing Mammals

ELECTRO-FISHING REPORT 2016 UPPER TWEED

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Analysis of 2015 Trail Usage Patterns along the Great Allegheny Passage

Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

Reducing Risk of Whale Entanglements in Oregon Dungeness Crab Gear

Turquoise Trail Corridor Management Plan Version 1.0

food chain checkers Lesson Plans and Activities for the Classroom

HOME RANGE AND HABITAT USE OF PLAINS SPOTTED SKUNKS IN THE OZARK MOUNTAINS OF ARKANSAS

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TWELFTH REGULAR SESSION. Bali, Indonesia 3-11 August 2016

Survey Techniques For White-tailed Deer. Mickey Hellickson, PhD Orion Wildlife Management

Tautog PID for Amendment 1. Presented to the Tautog Board August 5, 2015

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Cascadia Wild Wolverine Tracking Project Season Report

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

CMM on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area

Deer Management Unit 152

SPECIES FACT SHEET. Common Name: Siuslaw Sand Tiger Beetle or Siuslaw Hairy-necked Tiger Beetle

021 Deer Management Unit

Brook Trout Angling in Maine2009 Survey Results

Annual Progress Report Overwintering Results of Ten Aerated Lakes in the Northwest Boreal Region

Meteorology of Monteverde, Costa Rica 2007

Pacific Water Shrew Salvage on SFPR Advanced Works July to September 2010

Green Crab Control: A removal effort in a shallow central California estuary. Larson, A.A., de Rivera, C.E., Ruiz, G.M., Grosholz, E.D., Sytsma, M.D.

PAC Injection Upgrades: Don t Live with Problem Systems

CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURE TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF FISHING FOR HIGHLY MIGRATORY FISH STOCKS ON SEABIRDS

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: Inland Fisheries - Hatchery Management

/ Advice May 2011

ENTOMOLOGY ENTOMOLOGY MUST Curriculum EXHIBIT GUIDELINES MUST COLLECTION Youth in Grades 3-5

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Assessment of Guide Reporting & Preliminary Results of Lion Monitoring

Burrowing Rodent Management

Redd Dewatering and Juvenile Salmonid Stranding in the Lower Feather River,

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

82 ND MEETING RESOLUTION C RESOLUTION TO MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON SEABIRDS OF FISHING FOR SPECIES COVERED BY THE IATTC

Description of Road Management Objectives, Existing Use, and Proposed Use:

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Clowhom Project Water Use Plan

Review of Site C Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) - Fish and Fish Habitat

Fifth otter survey of England

Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report

Red Salmon Lake Data Report 2011

Low Level Cycle Signals with an early release Appendices

Rural Interstate LED Lane Delineation for Low Visibility Conditions (ITS Planning, Deployment, and Sustainability) Authors: David Ludwig, Lead

Heaphy Track Mountain Bike Trial

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

Bonita Creek Fish Monitoring November 4 6, 2015

MANAGEMENT OF KRILL AS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT ECOSYSTEM

Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project FERC No Appendix C. Derelict Gear Monitoring Plan

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Operation and Maintenance Manual. First Defense and First Defense High Capacity. Vortex Separator for Stormwater Treatment

2017 State of the Tidal Potomac River Largemouth Bass Fishery (Maryland) Joe Love

- Introduction: a) Metallized Paper & Film :The market Outlook The following diagram shows the estimated usage of the main metallized materials

Balance in the Bay. An introduction to ecosystem-based management and the Monterey Bay market squid fishery.

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel)

Dear Volunteer: Sincerely, Anne Coles. President, Alberta Trappers Association. RFMA Log Book- Trapping Season 2017/18 Page 1

Juvenile salmon survivals in 2017 and river conditions

INSTALLATION AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS

Ice Seal Biomonitoring Program Report

Data Report : Russian River Basin Steelhead and Coho Salmon Monitoring Program Pilot Study

Reintroduction of Pacific lamprey in the Umatilla River in Northeast Oregon

Hakes Assessment SARC 51. Whiting NEFMC PDT Meeting February 14, 2011 Milford, MA

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

LIFE CYCLE AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF CADDISFLIES (INSECTA:TRICHOPTERA) IN THE NAVASOTA RIVER, TEXAS.

Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #

Transcription:

WĒKIU BUG BASELINE MONITORING QUARTERLY REPORT 4 th QUARTER 2003 Prepared for The Outrigger Telescopes Project WM Keck Observatory Kamuela, Hawai i Revised April 2004 Pacific Analytics, L.L.C. P.O. Box 219 Albany, Oregon 97321 www.statpros.com

Prepared by: Pacific Analytics, L.L.C. Post Office Box 219 Albany, Oregon 97321 Tel. (541) 926-0117 mail@statpros.com www.statpros.com Gregory Brenner Senior Associate / Project Manager The pictures contained in this report are for the exclusive use by Pacific Analytics, L.L.C and its clients. All photographs are copyrighted by Pacific Analytics, L.L.C. and may not be reproduced or used without the express written permission of Pacific Analytics, L.L.C.

TABLE OF CONTENTS WĒKIU BUG BASELINE MONITORING QUARTERLY REPORT 4 th QUARTER 2003 I. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 III. INTRODUCTION... 4 IV. QUESTIONS OF INTEREST... 6 V. METHODS... 8 VI. RESULTS... 12 VII. DISCUSSION... 27 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Mauna Kea Science Reserve (MKSR) is located on the summit of Mauna Kea, the tallest mountain in Hawai i. Within the reserve are the world s two largest optical telescopes, constituting the W.M. Keck Observatory (WMKO). The slopes of Pu u Hau Oki directly adjacent to and below the WMKO are part of a unique natural environment that supports the Wēkiu bug, a rare insect. Wēkiu bug habitat generally occurs on the upper elevations of Mauna Kea. Populations of Wēkiu bugs also occur on other cinder cones above 11,700 (3,570 m) elevation. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), together with the California Institute of Technology (CalTech)/Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the California Association for Research in Astronomy (CARA) and the University of Hawai i (UH), have proposed to protect and enhance Wēkiu bug habitat on Pu u Hau Oki to mitigate potential disturbance by on-site construction and installation of the Outrigger Telescopes Project. To that end these participants have prepared the Wēkiu Bug Mitigation Plan and Wēkiu Bug Monitoring Plan. They are also the participants in this Plan. Sampling of Wēkiu bug habitat was approved to establish baseline population estimates of the Wēkiu bug in the area surrounding the site of the proposed Outrigger Telescopes Project and at a control site on Pu u Wēkiu. The intended purpose of this activity is to gather reliable scientific information about population trends in both areas that can be used to determine the effectiveness of habitat protection and restoration, and the impacts, if any, due to construction of the Outrigger Telescopes Project. Sampling of Wēkiu bugs is being conducted to answer two main Questions of Interest. They are: 1) How, where and when are the Wēkiu bug populations changing? Locations of interest include current habitat on Pu u Hau Oki crater and undisturbed Wēkiu bug habitat at Pu u Wēkiu (for comparison). 2) Are weather phenomena, human activities, and/or other factors associated with Wēkiu bug and/or other resident arthropod population change? 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nondestructive sampling is one of the best approaches to monitoring rare and sensitive invertebrate species. Special live-traps were developed and tested during the 1997-98 MKSR arthropod assessment and are being deployed during Baseline Monitoring. Ten live-traps are installed at the summit of Mauna Kea at designated locations, five on Pu u Hau Oki and five on Pu u Wēkiu. The 4 th Quarter 2003 three-week sampling session was conducted from November 28, 2003 through December 19, 2003. During this sampling session a total of 29 Wēkiu bugs appeared in or near the live-traps. All were found on Pu u Hau Oki. Trap capture rates ranged from zero to 5.6 Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3 days of sampling. The average trap capture rate on Pu u Hau Oki during the 4 th Quarter 2003 monitoring session was 0.83 Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3 days of sampling. This rate is about one fourth the average capture rate measured on Pu u Hau Oki during the 4 th Quarter 2002 baseline monitoring session. Weather may have played a role in reducing the Wēkiu bug trap capture rate because snow and severe weather occurred throughout the 4 th Quarter 2003 sampling session. The average trap capture rate on Pu u Wēkiu during the 4th Quarter 2003 monitoring session was 0.00 Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3 days of sampling. This rate is biologically equivalent to the average capture rate measured on Pu u Wēkiu during the 4 th Quarter 2002 baseline monitoring session (0.17 Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3 days of sampling). These rates cannot be directly compared because trap locations changed on Pu u Wēkiu in 2003. None of the Wēkiu bugs captured during the 4 th Quarter 2003 monitoring session were juveniles. Evidently juveniles are not active during the winter months or during severe weather conditions. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 3

INTRODUCTION III. INTRODUCTION The Mauna Kea Science Reserve is located on the summit of Mauna Kea, the tallest mountain in Hawai i. Within the reserve are the world s two largest optical telescopes, constituting the W.M. Keck Observatory (WMKO). The slopes of Pu u Hau Oki directly adjacent to and below the WMKO are part of a unique natural environment that supports the Wēkiu bug, a rare insect. Wēkiu bug habitat generally occurs on the upper elevations of Mauna Kea. Populations of Wēkiu bugs also occur on other cinder cones above 11,700 (3,570 m) elevation. Current plans call for adding four to six Outrigger Telescopes on the WMKO site. The Outrigger Telescopes would be placed strategically around the existing Keck Telescopes. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), together with the California Institute of Technology (CalTech)/Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the California Association for Research in Astronomy (CARA) and the University of Hawai i (UH), have proposed to protect and enhance Wēkiu bug habitat on Pu u Hau Oki to mitigate potential disturbance by on-site construction and installation of the Outrigger Telescopes Project. To that end these participants have prepared the Wēkiu Bug Mitigation Plan and Wēkiu Bug Monitoring Plan. They are also the participants in this Plan. Sampling of Wēkiu bug habitat was approved to establish baseline population estimates of the Wēkiu bug in the area surrounding the site of the proposed Outrigger Telescopes Project and at a control site on Pu u Wēkiu. The populations of Wēkiu bugs were last measured at these sites in 1998 during an arthropod assessment which became part of the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the Mauna Kea Science Reserve Master Plan approved in 2000 by the UH Board of Regents. This new monitoring activity will provide current information. The intended purpose of the current activity is to gather reliable scientific information about population trends in both areas that can be used to determine the effectiveness of habitat protection and restoration, and the impacts, if any, due to construction of the Outrigger Telescopes Project. This is the eight Quarterly Report of Baseline Monitoring. The results of 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 4

INTRODUCTION the sampling effort conducted November 28, 2003 through December 19, 2003 are reported. Comparisons to previously collected data will be presented, along with new analysis and interpretations of correlations of changes in Wēkiu bug populations with weather related phenomena. Lenticular clouds near the summit of Mauna Kea on November 28, 2003. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 5

QUESTIONS OF INTEREST IV. QUESTIONS OF INTEREST Important Questions of Interest are those with answers that can be efficiently estimated and that yield the information necessary for management decision-making. The following Questions of Interest were developed in the Baseline Monitoring Plan and are the focus of this report. Question 1 How, where and when are the Wēkiu bug populations changing? Locations of interest include current habitat on Pu u Hau Oki crater and undisturbed Wēkiu bug habitat at Pu u Wēkiu (for comparison). Justification: Baseline monitoring of Wēkiu bugs will yield reliable scientific information about the current status of Wēkiu bugs, and trends in their population. The information will be useful to compare to status and trends during construction of the proposed Outrigger Telescopes. Monitoring goals: 1) To provide historical records of change in Wēkiu bug population attributes, and characteristics, 2) To detect trends, periodicities, cycles, and/or other patterns in those changes, and 3) To associate auxiliary phenomena, attributes, and characteristics with trends and patterns of change in Wēkiu bug population attributes, and characteristics. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 6

QUESTIONS OF INTEREST Question 2 Are weather phenomena, human activities, and/or other factors associated with Wēkiu bug and/or other resident arthropod population change? Justification: Snow, rain, day/night temperatures, and other weather phenomena may be associated with Wēkiu Bug population change. Monitoring these indirect factors will aid in understanding trends in Wēkiu Bug population change. Monitoring goals: To associate environmental phenomena and attributes, and characteristics of human activities with trends and patterns of change in Wēkiu Bug populations. Noctuid moth larva found in Live Trap on Pu u Wēkiu. Actual size is about 1 inches (~23 mm). 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 7

METHODS V. METHODS Live Traps Nondestructive sampling is one of the best approaches to monitoring rare and sensitive invertebrate species. Data on relative abundance can be collected with specially designed livetraps that cause minimal disturbance to species and their habitats. Nondestructive live-traps for Wēkiu bugs were developed and tested during the 1997-98 MKSR arthropod assessment. These live-traps provide Wēkiu bugs with food, moisture, and protection from predators and changing weather conditions, and can sustain captured individuals for several days. Ten live-traps were set on Pu u Hau Oki and Pu u Wēkiu at the same locations where traps were installed during the previous sampling session. Protocol for Setting Live-Traps The sampled habitat was accessed with a minimum of disturbance to the habitat and cinder slopes. Care was taken to avoid creation of new trails or evidence of foot traffic. Traps were previously installed at each sampling station by carefully digging into the cinder, disturbing only the amount of cinder necessary to set up the trap (Step 1). A hardware cloth tube was inserted into the holes so that the top of the tube was slightly below the existing surface (Step 2). The hole around the tube was refilled with the cinder that was removed from the hole and a 4-inch apron of local ash and small-sized cinder was created around each trap (Step 3). The apron allows Wēkiu bugs to easily walk into the traps. Traps were set by placing reservoir cups into the wire tubes and pouring about 15 ml of purified water into the reservoir (Step 4). About a teaspoon of shrimp paste was spread on the coffee filter wick in the trap cups and two to three pieces of re-hydrated shrimp were added to each cup (Step 5). Four to five pieces of native cinder, ½ to 1 in diameter were added and the trap cups were placed into the reservoir cups such that the coffee-filter wicks made contact with the water reservoirs (Step 6). Chum, consisting of pureed premoistened shrimp, was distributed around the traps and a teaspoon of shrimp paste was spread on the bottom of the cap rocks (Step 7). Irrigation flags to mark the locations 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 8

METHODS were wrapped around cap rocks, ten to fifteen inches in diameter. The cap rocks were then placed over each trap such that the entire trap was shaded from sunlight (Step 8). Traps were checked for Wēkiu bugs every three days during the sampling session. During each live-trap check, an area about 20 cm in diameter around the live-trap was checked for the presence of Wēkiu bugs. The cap rock was also inspected for the presence of Wēkiu bugs. The trap cups were then removed and carefully inspected for Wēkiu bugs. Live Wēkiu bugs were counted and released to cinder habitat one to two meters away from the live-trap. Dead bugs were collected in vials filled with alcohol. Live-traps were reset by topping off the water reservoir, and by placing new bait and chum in and around the live-traps. When the 3-week sampling session was complete, both cups were removed, and cap rocks placed over the wire tubes. Small identification tags containing contact information were attached to the flag wires. The same locations will be used for future sampling. Traps were opened for the 2003 4 th Quarter baseline monitoring session on November 28, 2003. The traps were checked every three days and were closed on December 19, 2003. During some of the sampling sessions traps were found filled with ice. Frozen Live-trap flooded with water during the December 1-4 sampling session. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 9

METHODS Setting a Wēkiu Bug Live-Trap Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Dig Trap Hole Install Wire Tube Create Trap Apron Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Fill Reservoir Bait Trap Add Cinder Habitat Step 7 Step 8 Distribute Chum Bait Emplace Cap Rock 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 10

METHODS Weather Data Daily weather data from the UKIRT Observatory on the summit of Mauna Kea is usually downloaded from the Internet/World Wide Web at http://hokukea.soest.hawaii.edu. The UKIRT Observatory is located on Pu u Kea adjacent to the Pu u Wēkiu sampling sites, and is less than onehalf mile away from the Pu u Hau Oki sampling sites. Archive photographs were taken from fixed points on Pu u Hau Oki and on Pu u Wēkiu. Photographs were taken at the beginning of each sampling period to record snow coverage and changes in Wēkiu bug habitats through time. Tracks made in snow in Pu u Hau Oki crater. Photo taken on December 4, 2003. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 11

RESULTS VI. RESULTS SAMPLING INFORMATION During the 2003 4 th Quarter baseline monitoring session there were a total of twenty-one sampling nights, making seven 3-day sampling periods. A total of twenty-nine Wēkiu bugs were captured, all on Pu u Hau Oki. The trap capture rate (number of Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3-days) ranged from zero to 5.6 Wēkiu bugs. The overall trap capture rate during the 3-week sampling session was 0.83 Wēkiu bugs for Pu u Hau Oki, and 0.00 Wēkiu bugs for Pu u Wēkiu (Table 1). For comparison, average trap capture rates from previous baseline monitoring sessions in 2002 and the 1997/98 Arthropod Assessment are provided (Table 2 and Table 3). Overall mortality was 0 (all 29 Wēkiu bugs captured were alive when released). The new live-traps appear to be successful at reducing mortality, even during rain and snow events. TABLE 1. 4 th QUARTER 2003 SAMPLING PERIOD AVERAGE TRAP CAPTURE RATES The average number of Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3-days for each 3-day sampling period for 4 th Quarter 2003 Baseline Monitoring. Location 12/01/2003 12/04/2003 12/07/2003 12/10/2003 12/13/2003 12/16/2003 12/19/2003 AVERAGE Pu u Wēkiu 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.00 Pu u Hau Oki 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 5.6 0.83 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 12

ss RESULTS ss TABLE 2. QUARTERLY BASELINE MONITORING AVERAGE TRAP CAPTURE RATES The average number of Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3-days for each of the Quarterly Baseline Monitoring Sampling Sessions. Yearly average trap capture rates for Baseline Monitoring are in RED. Location 1 st Quarter 2 nd Quarter 3 rd Quarter 4 th Quarter Year Avg. Pu u Wēkiu 2002 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.17 0.12 Pu u Wēkiu 2003 * 2.87 11.5 0.51 0.00 3.73 Pu u Hau Oki 2002 0.99 9.56 4.01 3.97 4.63 Pu u Hau Oki 2003 18.29 90.6 12.37 0.83 30.51 * Different trap locations on Pu u Wēkiu in 2003 TABLE 3. SAMPLING PERIOD AVERAGE TRAP CAPTURE RATES The average number of Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3-days for each sampling period during the 1997/98 Arthropod Assessment. Average trap capture rates for the 1997/98 Arthropod Assessment are in RED. Location Aug. 1997 Jan. 1998 April 1998 July 1998 Avg. 1997/98 Pu u Wēkiu 0.15 0.0 0.07 0.15 0.11 Pu u Hau Oki 0.20 0.0 0.20 1.10 0.38 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 13

RESULTS WEATHER INFORMATION The number of Wēkiu bugs found in traps was plotted with average temperature during the 3-day sampling periods. The pattern reveals that during the 4 th Quarter 2003 sampling session the number of Wēkiu bugs varies with average temperature. In previous Baseline Monitoring sessions, there was a general trend that indicated the number of Wēkiu bugs captured increased as average temperature increased (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, and Figure 8). Number of Wekiu Bugs (Total Number of Wekiu Bugs per Sampling Session) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured 4th Quarter 2003 Wekiu bugs Avg. Temp -5-1.00 12/1/2003 12/4/2003 12/7/2003 12/10/2003 12/13/2003 12/16/2003 12/19/2003 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00-0.50 Sampling Session FIGURE 1. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 4 th Quarter 2003 sampling session. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 14

RESULTS Number of Wekiu Bugs (Total Number of Wekiu Bugs per Sampling Session) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured 3rd Quarter 2003 20 3.50 8/25/2003 8/28/2003 8/31/2003 9/3/2003 9/6/2003 9/9/2003 9/12/2003 9/15/2003 Sampling Session Wekiu bugs Avg. Temp 7.50 7.00 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 Sampling Session Average Temperature (Celsius) FIGURE 2. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 3rd Quarter 2003 sampling session. Number of Wekiu Bugs (Total Number of Wekiu Bugs per Sampling Session) 900 800 700 600 500 400 Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured June 2003 300 3.5 6/15/2003 6/18/2003 6/21/2003 6/24/2003 6/27/2003 6/30/2003 Sampling Session Wekiu bugs Avg. Temp 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 Sampling Session Average Temperature (Celsius) FIGURE 3. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 2 nd Quarter 2003 sampling session. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 15

RESULTS Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured March - 1st Quarter 2003 Wekiu Bugs Captured (Total Number of Wekiu Bugs per Sampling Session) 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 Wekiu bugs Avg. Temp 0 3/24/2003 3/27/2003 3/30/2003 4/2/2003 4/5/2003 4/8/2003 4/11/2003 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 Average Sampling Session Temperature (Celsius) Sampling Session FIGURE 4. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 1 st Quarter 2003 sampling session. Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured November 2002 Wekiu Bugs Captured (Total Number of Wekiu Bugs per Sampling Session) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Wekiu Bugs Average Temperature 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Average Sampling Session Temperature (Celsius) 11-Nov 14-Nov 17-Nov 20-Nov 23-Nov 26-Nov 29-Nov Sampling Session FIGURE 5. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 4 th Quarter 2002 sampling session. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 16

RESULTS Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured August 2002 40 7.0 35 Wekiu bugs 6.0 Wekiu Bugs Captured (Total Number of Wekiu bugs per day) 30 25 20 15 10 Average Temp 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 Average Temperature (Celsius) 5 1.0 0 9-Aug 12-Aug 15-Aug 18-Aug 21-Aug 24-Aug 27-Aug Sampling Session FIGURE 6. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in 3rd Quarter 2002 sampling session. 0.0 Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured May 2002 225 3.5 200 Wekiu bugs 3.0 Wekiu Bugs Captured (Total Number of Wekiu bugs per day) 175 150 125 100 75 50 Average Temp 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Average Temperature (Celsius) 25 0.0 0-0.5 30-Apr 5-May 10-May 15-May 20-May 25-May Sampling Session FIGURE 7. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 2 nd Quarter 2002 sampling session. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 17

RESULTS 14 12 Average Temperature and Number of Wekiu Bugs Captured February 2002 Wekiu Bugs Average Temp 1.5 1.0 Wekiu Bugs Captured (Total Number of Wekiu bugs per day) 10 8 6 4 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5 Average Temperature (Celsius) 2-2.0 0-2.5 4-Feb 7-Feb 10-Feb 13-Feb 16-Feb 19-Feb 22-Feb Sampling Session FIGURE 8. Plot of Average Temperature (Celsius) and Total Number of Wēkiu Bugs Captured for Seven Sampling Periods in the 1 st Quarter 2002 sampling session. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 18

RESULTS Pu u Hau Oki Inner Slope Photographic Archive NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Pu u Hau Oki inner slope Pu u Hau Oki inner slope November 28, 2003 December 01, 2003 Pu u Hau Oki inner slope Pu u Hau Oki inner slope December 04, 2003 December 07, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 19

RESULTS Pu u Hau Oki inner slope Pu u Hau Oki inner slope December 10, 2003 December 13, 2003 Pu u Hau Oki inner slope Pu u Hau Oki inner slope December 16, 2003 December 19, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 20

RESULTS Pu u Hau Oki Outer Slope Photographic Archive NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Pu u Hau Oki outer slope Pu u Hau Oki outer slope November 28 2003 December 01, 2003 Pu u Hau Oki outer slope Pu u Hau Oki outer slope December 04, 2003 December 07, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 21

RESULTS Pu u Hau Oki outer slope Pu u Hau Oki outer slope December 10, 2003 December 13, 2003 Pu u Hau Oki outer slope Pu u Hau Oki outer slope December 16, 2003 December 19, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 22

RESULTS Pu u Wēkiu Photographic Archive NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Pu u Wēkiu inner slope Pu u Wēkiu inner slope November 28, 2003 December 01, 2003 Pu u Wēkiu inner slope Pu u Wēkiu inner slope December 04, 2003 December 07, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 23

RESULTS Picture not Available Due to Severe Weather Conditions Pu u Wēkiu inner slope Pu u Wēkiu inner slope December 10, 2003 December 13, 2003 Pu u Wēkiu inner slope Pu u Wēkiu inner slope December 16, 2003 December 19, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 24

RESULTS Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea Photographic Archive NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea November 28, 2003 December 01, 2003 Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea December 04, 2003 December 07, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 25

RESULTS Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea December 10, 2003 December 13, 2003 Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea Pu u Wēkiu and Hau Kea December 16, 2003 December 19, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 26

DISCUSSION VII. DISCUSSION Trapping Data Permission to begin Baseline Wēkiu bug monitoring was received on January 21, 2002. On January 28, 2002 Pacific Analytics personnel installed 10 live-traps in designated areas, five on the inner slopes of Pu u Hau Oki and five on the slopes of Pu u Wēkiu. Sampling began in February 2002. Pacific Analytics, 2003 Adult Wēkiu bug on cinder near a live-trap. Over the four quarters of monitoring during 2002, 696 Wēkiu bugs were captured in live-traps, and Wēkiu bug trap capture rates averaged 4.63 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period on Pu u Hau Oki, and 0.12 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period on Pu u Wēkiu. During the 1 st Quarter 2003 sampling session a total of seven hundred and twelve Wēkiu bugs appeared in or near the traps. The 1 st Quarter 2003 average trap capture rate was 18.29 Wēkiu bugs per trap per 3 days of sampling on Pu u Hau Oki and 2.87 on Pu u Wēkiu (Table 2). During the 2003 2 nd Quarter sampling session a total of three thousand and sixty-three Wēkiu bugs appeared in or near the traps during the six trapping sessions. Average 2 nd Quarter 2003 trap capture rate was 90.6 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period on Pu u Hau Oki and 11.5 bugs per trap per 3- day trapping period on Pu u Wēkiu (Table 2). During the 2003 3 rd Quarter sampling session a total of four hundred and fifty-one Wēkiu bugs appeared in or near the traps during the seven trapping sessions. Average 3 rd Quarter 2003 trap capture rate was 12.4 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period on Pu u Hau Oki and 0.51 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period on Pu u Wēkiu (Table 2). During the 2003 4 th Quarter sampling session Wēkiu bugs appeared in all five of the traps on Pu u Hau Oki but 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 27

DISCUSSION none appeared in traps on Pu u Wēkiu. A total of twenty-nine Wēkiu bugs appeared in or near the traps during the seven trapping sessions. All live bugs were released back into their habitat. Average 4 th Quarter 2003 trap capture rate on Pu u Hau Oki was 0.83 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period. Average 4 th Quarter 2003 trap capture rate on Pu u Wēkiu was 0.00 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period. During the January 1997 sampling period of the 1997/98 Arthropod Assessment trap capture rates averaged 0.00 on Pu u Hau Oki and 0.00 on Pu u Wēkiu (Table 3). The 4 th Quarter 2003 Wēkiu bug capture rate was about one fourth the capture rate measured in the 4 th Quarter 2002 sampling session. The average trap-capture rate for 2003 is 17.14 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period. That is almost 7 times greater than the rate measured in 2002 (2.48 bugs per trap per 3-day trapping period). No immature Wēkiu bugs were captured in the 4 th Quarter 2003 sampling session. Immature Wēkiu bugs are apparently not active during the cold winter months. They were most active during June and July (the time of highest proportion of immatures). All Wēkiu bugs survived in live-traps to be released. In 2002 sampling, mortality averaged about 16%. In an effort to reduce mortality, a modification was made to the trap and tested during the 1 st Quarter 2003 sampling session. Trap mortality dropped to less than 9% in modified traps during that session. The modified live-traps were used exclusively during the 2 nd Quarter 2003 sampling session and mortality decreased to less than 2%. Mortality remained low in the modified traps during the 3 rd Quarter 2003 sampling session (less than 2%). The modified live-traps are apparently successful at reducing trap mortality and should be considered for all Wēkiu bug sampling. Lycosid spider captured in Live-traps on Pu u Wēkiu on December 07, 2003. Pacific Analytics, 2003 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 28

DISCUSSION Other Observations During the 4 th Quarter 2003 monitoring session the WMKO site was free of loose trash and debris. Observatory vehicles parked near the WMKO were clean and had a small amount of mud from the summit roads. No vehicles had any visible signs of alien arthropods. Summit visitor taking pictures while standing in Wēkiu bug habitat on Pu u Wēkiu. Picture taken on December 04, 2003. Summit visitorsshoveling snow into their pickup near Pu u Hau Oki. Picture taken on December 04, 2003. During the 4 th Quarter 2003 sampling session snow fell on the summit area. As usual, this brought out many visitors for snow play. On several occasions people were observed shoveling snow into the back of pickups. People were also observed walking on snow-covered slopes, building snow forts and having snowball fights. 4 th Quarter 2003 Page 29