MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC. Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP)

Similar documents
Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

3.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES

CRC Inlet Management Study. Matt Slagel Shoreline Management Specialist

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

APPENDIX M DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMMP) FINAL INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

North Carolina s Terminal Groins at Oregon Inlet and Fort Macon Descriptions and Discussions

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

Planning Considerations for Nearshore Placement of Mixed Dredged Sediments

Assateague Island National Seashore North End Restoration Project Timeline

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE 8-FOOT CHANNEL OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN KENNEBUNK RIVER KENNEBUNK & KENNEBUNKPORT, ME

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON BROWARD COUNTY SHORE PROTECTION PROJECT SEGMENTS II AND III BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

North Shore of Long Island, Feasibility Study

Grays Harbor O&M and Deepening Dredging

Grays Harbor Federal Project

Regular Workshop October 20, 2014 Agenda Item: Dr. Albert E. Browder, PE; Olsen Associates, Inc.

US Beach Nourishment Experience:

KEYNOTE PRESENTATION FSBPA olsen

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

CORPS ON THE COAST. North Carolina Coastal Conference Coastal Infrastructure Raleigh, NC April 14, Jim Medlock Chief, Programs Management Branch

Building Beaches with Navigation Sand, Just Don t Forget the Dunes!!

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

EVALUATION OF BEACH EROSION UP-DRIFT OF TIDAL INLETS IN SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, USA. Mohamed A. Dabees 1 and Brett D.

Beach Nourishment Impact on Beach Safety and Surfing in the North Reach of Brevard County, Florida

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Absecon Island Shore Protection The planning behind the project

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

Figure 262. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 279

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Tanya M. Beck. Kelly Legault. Research Physical Scientist Coastal & Hydraulics Lab, ERDC Vicksburg, MS

23- Year Sand Volume Changes at Site 132, 15th Street, Brigantine

NAVIGATION STUDY FOR LAKE WORTH INLET, FLORIDA DRAFT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX A ENGINEERING

Coastal Hazards and Management in North Carolina. Braxton Davis April 14, 2015

PHYSICAL MONITORING WILMINGTON HARBOR NAVIGATION PROJECT REPORT 1: August 2000 June 2003

Figure Eight Island Shoreline Management Project EIS. Chapter 3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES. 1. What alternatives are evaluated in this EIS?

Protecting our Beaches

Evaluation of Placement Alternatives for Matagorda Ship Channel Bottleneck Removal

Appendix A. Committee Lists

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory

SACO RIVER AND CAMP ELLIS BEACH SACO, MAINE SECTION 111 SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT APPENDIX F ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT

Southwest Washington Littoral Drift Restoration Project: Design, Construction, and Monitoring

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

100-YEARS OF SHOAL EVOLUTION AT THE MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER: IMPACTS ON CHANNEL, STRUCTURES, AND SHORELINES

Final Waterways Assets and Resources Survey Master Plan for Dredging and Beach Nourishment

Oceanside Carlsbad. Solana Beach

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

The purpose and needs of the Figure Eight Island Inlet and Shoreline Management Project are as follows:

Dredged Material Management Plan Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Port Royal Sound, South Carolina to Cumberland Sound, Georgia November 2015

Comparison of Predicted and Measured Shoaling at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

Beach Renourishment in Jacksonville

Dauphin Island East End Beach and Barrier Island Restoration Project. Beau Buhring South Coast Engineers

Long Term Success and Future Approach of the Captiva and Sanibel Islands Beach Renourishment Program

1-44. SITKA HARBOR, ALASKA (Western Channel, Crescent Bay Basin, Channel Rock Breakwaters) (CWIS NOS , 16840, 10322, 55030, 13787)

CLAM PASS ANNUAL RESTORATION & MANAGEMENT PLAN TIDAL ANALYSIS ELEMENT REPORT NO. 13

Juneau Douglas Harbor

CLAM PASS RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN BATHYMETRIC MONITORING REPORT NO. 7 Including Interior Bay Dredge Cuts and Tidal Data

Figure 1 Example feature overview.

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

Kelly Legault, Ph.D., P.E. USACE SAJ

Follets Island Nearshore Beach Nourishment Project

Sediment Management Plan Rehoboth Bay

STORM RESPONSE SIMULATION

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

Sediment Transport Analysis Village of Asharoken, New York

Intracoastal Waterway and other Federal Shallow Draft Inlets

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

Cat Island Chain Restoration

Dredging Keeping Our Underwater Highways Open

Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, NY Construction Update

Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement. Coastal Storm Damage Reduction SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA.

Delaware Chapter Surfrider Foundation - Indian River Inlet Monitoring

Dare County Nourishment Project Town of Duck

Mayor Holden asked for a moment of silence and then called the meeting to order.

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

BALD HEAD ISLAND, NC SAND SHARING SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT. Erik J. Olsen, P.E. olsen associates, inc.

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

CHAPTER 281 INFLUENCE OF NEARSHORE HARDBOTTOM ON REGIONAL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

BEACH NOURISHMENT BY RAINBOWING FOR THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST BY DCI. Capt. MVR MURTHY ABSTRACT

GenCade Applications Ashley Frey

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY. Contract #2 Construction Scope. April 18th-19th 2018

Q1. What are the primary causes/contributors to coastal erosion at Westshore and the concept of longshore / littoral drift.

NC TERMINAL GROIN STUDY FINAL REPORT

TITLE: North Carolina s Changing Shorelines. KEYWORDS: erosion - shorelines - mapping - sustainability

ST. LOUIS SECTION PROJECT OF THE YEAR AWARD

Holden Beach. Annual Beach Monitoring Report. Prepared For: Town of Holden Beach, North Carolina. October cover.

CHAPTER 134 INTRODUCTION

Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Three-Phase Construction Plan

Cordova Harbor Page 2 of 9

3.3 OCEANOGRAPHY/COASTAL PROCESSES

SHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS ABSTRACT

Beach Nourishment, Static Lines, and Static Line Exceptions

A REVIEW OF THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE SANDY IN THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Navarre Beach & Dune Restoration Project Status Report to be regularly updated June 17, 2016 Report

FY-16 Ongoing Contracts FY-16 Scheduled Contracts

Maltester Channel Dredging. Shoreline Marina Committee. November 18, 2008

Controlling Coastal erosion

DREDGING AT INLETS ON SANDY COASTS

Transcription:

MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Public Meeting/Info Session 15 January 2014 US Army Corps of Engineers

Morehead City Harbor DMMP Presentation Topics Morehead City Harbor Project Area DMMP/EIS Process Coastal & Sediment Analyses Alternatives Analysis Recommended Plan Environmental Considerations DMMP Costs DMMP Schedule

MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC

DMMP Background DMMP is a 20-year disposal plan for dredged material removed during maintenance dredging of the existing authorized channel. It s not a renourishment plan. DMMPs cannot consider changes to the project, such as channel deepening, widening, or terminal groins. DMMP assumes that we ll have adequate funding to dredge the fully authorized channel dimensions each time we dredge. ER 1105-2-100- Federal navigation projects must demonstrate sufficient dredged material disposal capacity for at least 20 years. ER 1105-2-100 & 33 C.F.R. 335.7 (Federal Standard) disposal of dredged material - least costly manner, consistent with sound engineering practices and meeting the environmental standards established by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and meeting ocean dumping criteria. 33 CFR 230 procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the Civil Works Program of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.

THE DMMP/NEPA PROCESS Data Collection Data Analysis NEPA Scoping (Mar 2009) Alternatives Analysis Agency/Public Review Draft DMMP Draft EIS Recommended Plan Finalize DMMP & EIS Agency/Public Review EIS ROD & DMMP Approval (Spring 2015) Where we are today Public Input DMMP Implementation (Fall 2015)

BUILDING STRONG

BUILDING STRONG

Morehead City Harbor DMMP Alternatives Investigated # Beneficial Description Use Status 1 No Action (No DMMP) NA eliminated 2 Proposed DMMP (Measures Considered) a Brandt Island upland disposal site No in use b Place coarse-grained material ( 90% sand) on Bogue Banks Yes in use c Morehead City Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) No in use d Expand nearshore (ebb tide delta) placement area west of Beaufort Inlet Yes proposed e Create nearshore (ebb tide delta) placement area east of Beaufort Inlet Yes proposed f Place Inner Harbor material 80% sand in nearshore possible future Yes placement areas option g Expand and raise Brandt Island dike possible future No option h Raise existing Brandt Island dike (no expansion) No eliminated i Transfer Brandt Island material to ODMDS to regain capacity No eliminated j Recycle Material in Brandt Island through Hydrocyclone Density Separation Yes eliminated k Place coarse-grained material ( 90% sand) on Shackleford Banks Yes proposed l Continue to use existing nearshore placement area (no expansion) Yes eliminated m Modify environmental windows No eliminated n Construct colonial waterbird islands Yes eliminated o Dispose of dredged material on Radio Island No eliminated p Dispose of dredged material on Marsh Island No eliminated q Use dredged material to create wetlands Yes eliminated r Construct new upland disposal site No eliminated s Brandt Island shoreline stabilization Yes eliminated t Construct jetties at Beaufort Inlet No eliminated u Modify existing groin on west side of Beaufort Inlet No eliminated v Realign channels to improve navigation and reduce dredging No eliminated

DMMP Plan Formulation (Example) Outer Harbor (OH) - South Range B, Cutoff, North Range A to sta. 110+00 - sediments 90% sand Disposal or Placement Capacity (1-5) Environmental Acceptability (1-5) Operational Viability (1-5) Beneficial Use (1-5) Measure ID# Dredging Method Disposal/Placement Area Cost (1-5) Excluded Total Score OH-12 18-inch Pipeline Brandt Island 2 1 4 1 X OH-13 Bucket & Barge ODMDS 5 4 2 1 4 16 OH-14 Hopper ODMDS 5 4 5 1 5 20 OH-15 Bucket & Barge Nearshore West-Existing 4 5 2 4 4 X 19 OH-15a Bucket & Barge Nearshore West-expanded 4 5 2 4 4 X 19 OH-15b Bucket & Barge Nearshore West-shallow 4 5 2 5 3 X 19 OH-16 hopper Nearshore West (existing) 4 5 5 4 5 23 OH-16a hopper Nearshore West (expanded) 4 5 5 4 5 23 OH-16b hopper Nearshore West (expanded shallow) 4 5 4 5 5 23 OH-17 Bucket & Barge Nearshore East-shallow 4 4 2 5 3 X 18 OH-17a Bucket & Barge Nearshore East 4 4 2 4 4 X 18 OH-18 Hopper Nearshore East-shallow 4 4 4 5 5 22 OH-18a Hopper Nearshore East 4 5 5 4 5 23 OH-19 30-inch pipeline Ft. Macon / Atlantic Beach 5 5 5 5 4 24 OH-19a 30-inch Pipeline Nearshore West 4 4 5 4 2 19 OH-20 Hopper (pump-out) Ft. Macon / Atlantic Beach 5 5 4 5 1 20 OH-21 30-inch Pipeline Shackleford Banks Beach 5 4 5 5 4 23 OH-21a 30-inch Pipeline Nearshore East 4 4 5 4 2 19 OH-22 Hopper (pump-out) Shackleford Banks Beach 5 4 4 5 1 19 OH-A 30-inch pipeline Brandt Island 2 5 4 1 X OH-B 30-inch pipeline Marsh Island or Radio Island 1 5 2 1 X OH-C varies Modify Environmental Windows NA 1 NA NA X OH-D 30-inch pipeline Construct Waterbird Islands 1 3 4 3 X OH-E 30-inch pipeline Create Wetlands 1 2 3 2 X OH-F varies Construct New Upland Disposal Site 1 4 4 1 X OH-G varies Brandt Island Shoreline Stabilization NA 3 NA 2 X OH-H varies Reduce Channel Dimensions NA 5 1 NA X Measure OH-12, OH-13 and A OH-13, OH-15/ 15a/15b, OH-17/17b OH-14 OH-C OH-B, OH-D, OH-E OH-F OH-G OH-H Reason(s) Measure Eliminated Removes coarse-grained sediments( 90% sand) from littoral system Operationally not viable (mechanical dredge with scow in open ocean) Removes coarse-grained sediments( 90% sand) from littoral system Modifying environmental windows would not benefit long-term management Does not provide enough capacity for a single dredging event No undeveloped uplands exist in the project vicinity An analysis was performed to determine if stabilizing the north shoreline of Brandt Island would decrease shoaling within the Harbor. Due to the limited change observed during this analysis, a shoreline stabilization measure was not evaluated further. Current commercial navigation traffic requires the full channel dimensions

Recommended Plan DMMP Cycle Harbor Section Navigation Range Dredged Dredge Plant Proposed Disposal/Placement Location Quantity Likely to be Dredged (cy) Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Cost (per dredging event) * Years 1, 4, 7, 10 Outer S. Range B, Cutoff, N. Range A to Sta. 110+00 30-inch pipeline Fort Macon State Park/Atlantic Beach & Shackleford Banks 1,200,000 $7.82 $16,791,300 Years 2, 5,8,11 Outer S. Range C-N. Range B hopper Outer S. Range B, Cutoff, N. Range A to Sta. 117+00 hopper Nearshore West & East 346,000 $4.25 $6,457,900 Nearshore West & East 650,000 $4.10 Years 3,6,9,12 Inner Inner Outer Northwest Leg, West Leg 1 & East Leg West Leg 2 & N. Range C S. Range B, Cutoff, N. Range A to Sta. 117+00 18-inch pipeline 18-inch pipeline hopper Brandt Island or ODMDS 362,000 $4.35 Brandt Island or ODMDS 152,000 $4.30 $10,175,600** Nearshore West & East 810,000 $4.10 Outer Entrance Channel S. Range A, Sta. 110+00 out hopper ODMDS 344,000 $3.50 * Costs include monitoring, mob/demob, planning, engineering and design, supervisory and administrative costs and 20% contingency ** When Inner Harbor material is disposed of in the ODMDS (once Brandt Island reaches capacity), costs increase to $12,083,500 per dredging event.

Years 1,4,7,10. Puts the sand back where it came from Sand from Shackleford Banks goes back to Shackleford Banks (43%) Sand from Bogue Banks goes back to Bogue Banks (57%)

2006 - CALO Lighthouse Before Placement During Placement

Years 2,5,8,11.. Puts the sand back where it came from Based on calculated losses, about 22% of the sand will be placed in the Nearshore East About 78% of sand will be placed in the Nearshore West Proposed Nearshore East

Years 3,6,9,12 Sand placed in the nearshore areas based on losses Inner Harbor fine-grained material to Brandt Island Outer Entrance Channel material to the ODMDS

Physical Monitoring Plan Biannual profile surveys of the eastern 53,000 feet of Bogue Banks Annual profile surveys of Shackleford Banks Pre- and Post placement surveys of the nearshore placement areas (minimum 1 annually) Directional wave measurements within the Beaufort Inlet complex Biennial bathymetric surveys of Beaufort Inlet Post placement sediment sampling to monitor evolution within the nearshore placement areas

Key Environmental Considerations Based on Analysis of Coastal (Littoral Zone) Processes - Ebb tide delta has historically lost volume due to removal of material from the system. - DMMP plan to return dredged sediment back to its point of origin in order to reduce future erosion by retaining sand within the Beaufort Inlet complex. - Since the 70 s, Bogue Banks has received over 16 million cubic yards of sand from channel dredging, which has reduced potential shoreline impacts related to the navigation channel; Shackleford Banks has not and has significantly eroded.

Key Environmental Considerations Sediment Compatibility The characteristics of the dredged material dictate where disposal of that material will be permitted. Only beach compatible sediment on beaches beaches recover quickly so impacts are minor. NPS Options Dependent on NPS requirements and Special Use Permit (SUP). Disposal on Shackleford limited to the volumetric losses attributed to navigation dredging & NPS can opt out of receiving sand at any time. Impacts limited to beachfront only. Equipment (dozers, pipeline sections, etc.) must be walked during low tide along the beach strand to the disposal area.

Economic Summary DMMP Implementation = $12.9 million/year Annual MHC budget = $4-$6 million/year DMMP demonstrates that we have capacity for at least the next 20 years for all the material in the channel. Current budget does not allow for dredging of all the shoaled material. DMMP must remain flexible to meet navigation needs DMMP is a plan, not a commitment

Morehead City Harbor DMMP Next Steps/Schedule Task Completion Date Public Review of Draft DMMP/EIS 3 Feb 2014 Finalize DMMP/EIS Summer 2014 Public Review of Final DMMP/EIS Fall 2014 Final DMMP Approved by SAD Spring 2015 Submit comments tonight at info stations or by 3 Feb 2014 to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District ATTN: Mr. Hugh Heine (CESAW-TS-PE) 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Telephone: (910) 251-4070 E-maiI: hugh.heine@usace.army.mil.

For questions or comments, please visit one of the Information Stations after the NPS presentation. Draft DMMP Report: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/missions/navigation/dredging/moreheadcityharbor.aspx