Fishery Dependent Data Collection Office of Science and Technology

Similar documents
For-hire Data Collection. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Red Snapper For-hire Advisory Panel December 2-3, 2014 Tampa, FL

Specialized Survey Methods for Recreational Reef Fish Fisheries in Florida

Marine Recreational Information Program Transition to Improved Survey Designs

A New Design for the Access Point Angler Intercept Survey

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

Baseline Assessment of Current Regional Data Collection Programs and Data Needs

Southeast Regional Office:

June NMFS Address 11, 2014 (NOAA): Council Address. Dover, DE 19901

Authors: Luiz Barbieri and Martha Bademan

Georgia Red Snapper Catch & Effort Data Collection During Mini-Seasons, Kathy Knowlton SEDAR41-DW02

Modifications to Charter Vessel and Headboat Reporting Requirements

August 3, Prepared by Rob Cheshire 1 & Joe O Hop 2. Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research Beaufort, NC

Mike Murphy Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission St Petersburg, FL

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Red Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method SEDAR41-DW17 DRAFT

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Red Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method SEDAR 41-DW17

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Vermilion Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method. Ken Brennan SEDAR 55-WP04

Modifications to Charter Vessel and Headboat Reporting Requirements

Summary of Alabama s 2015 Mandatory Red Snapper Reporting Program. AL DCNR/Marine Resources Division

Discards of red grouper (Epinephelus morio) for the headboat fishery in the US Gulf of Mexico SEDAR 42- DW- 17

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Mississippi s Shore Night Fishing Survey. Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey. January 2001 December 2002.

2012 Maryland FMP Report (July 2013) Section 15. Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)

Scoping Presentation for Amendment 43 to the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan of the South Atlantic Region

White Paper on the Potential 2018 Experimental Wave 1 Recreational Black Sea Bass Fishery

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries

Black Seabass Length Frequencies and Condition of Released Fish from At-Sea Headboat Observer Surveys, 2004 to 2010.

NOTICE: This publication is available at:

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South

Overview: Fishery Management Council Process

Summary of Stakeholder Input: Florida Port Meetings March/April 2014

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

Days-at-Sea Pilot Program for Recreational Red Snapper

Public Hearing Summary for Coastal Migratory Pelagics Framework Amendment 4

Fisheries Release Mortality: Knowledge and Research Gaps

2001 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

A Collaborative Approach to Improving Stock Assessments Recreational Meeting Summary

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

SCDNR Charterboat Logbook Program Data, Mike Errigo, Eric Hiltz, and Amy Dukes SEDAR32-DW-08

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Office of Science & Technology

U.S. Virgin Islands Commercial Fishery Data Collection Programs

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

Regulatory Amendment 25 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region

Atlantic Sturgeon Update NER Protected Resources

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Public Hearing Summary

Summary for the Ad Hoc Recreational Data Collection Advisory Panel Tampa, FL May 17, Dick Brame

DECISION DOCUMENT. Framework Adjustment 53. Council Meeting November 17-20, for. to the Northeast Multispecies. Fishery Management Plan (FMP)

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands;

SCDNR Charterboat Logbook Program Data,

MEMORANDUM. Date: February 23, Dr. Chris Moore, Executive Director. Matthew Seeley, Staff. Blueline Tilefish ABCs. Summary

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Atlantic Striped Bass Draft Addendum V. Atlantic Striped Bass Board May 9, 2017

of recreational fishing in France Ifremer

U.S. National Observer Program, Southeast Regional Fishery Observer Programs & Regional Electronic Technology Implementation Plans Jane DiCosimo

Assessing the Accuracy of High Spatial Resolution Effort Data

CURRENT AND FUTURE SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES

Estimation of king mackerel bycatch in the shrimp trawl fishery in the US Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and South Atlantic (SA)

Preliminary catches of smoothhound sharks SEDAR39-DW-03

2000 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BLUEFISH (Pomatomus saltatrix)

Some Steps Towards Climate-Ready Management of U.S. Fisheries

NOAA Fisheries Update:

Framework Adjustment 56. to the. Northeast Multispecies FMP

2002 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WEAKFISH (Cynoscion regalis)

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

IOTC Agreement Article X. Report of Implementation for the year 2016

2007 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. SPOT (Leiostomus xanthurus) 2006 FISHING YEAR

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Evaluation of Alaska Charter Logbook Data for A Report to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, October 2009

Updated landings information for the commercial fisheries in Puerto Rico with emphasis on silk and queen snapper and parrotfish fisheries

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

New England Fishery Management Council

USAID OCEANS AND FISHERIES PARTNERSHIP INTERNATIONAL COASTAL TUNA BUSINESS FORUM MAY 20, 2016

Department of Fish and Game

Unless otherwise noted, images throughout the presentation are by FWC.

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species

Amendment 43 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region. Options Paper

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

2002 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BLUEFISH (Pomatomus saltatrix)

IYS(18)06_EU UK (Northern Ireland) Report on Planned Actions to Implement the International Year of the Salmon (IYS) Initiative

Keeping Gulf Red Snapper on the Road to Recovery

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Management under the Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan

This is a review and discussion of actions and discussions from the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council s (Council) Sept. 30 through Oct.

A Bioeconomic Model of the Recreational Gulf of Maine Cod and Haddock Fishery

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015

Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Recreational Management Measures for the

The Orkney Creel Fishery

Regional Recreational Fisheries Action Agenda. Atlantic Highly Migratory Species

GULF ANGLER FOCUS GROUP INITIATIVE PROCESS OVERVIEW AND PHASES SUMMARY

Procedures Manual: Access Point Angler Intercept Survey. January 2016

Habitat Omnibus Amendment DEIS draft sections relative to recreational fishery DRAFT. Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey

Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission DRAFT ADDENDUM I TO THE BLACK DRUM FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

supporting information on the current use of precision measures by the Councils, Commissions, and states. Dr. John Weidenmann developed a Management

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Transcription:

Fishery Dependent Data Collection Office of Science and Technology MREP Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida April 22, 2014 Gordon Colvin

Summary Overview of Fishery-Dependent Sampling Methods: four basic types of data; census vs. sample Commercial fishery sampling methods Recreational fishery sampling methods MRIP U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 2

What are the four basic kinds of fishery-dependent data that we collect? Trip or Effort data Catch data Bycatch Biological data U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 3

Collect it and Forget it? No. Data Management is a large and frequently overlooked part of the job: Systems to receive and get data into database; Database design and management; QA/QC; Integration of data from different sources; Making data available to customers and stakeholders. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 4

Census Surveys: Count Everything U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 5

Census Surveys: Requirements Collect complete data from all participants resulting in a total count of the measured parameters General requirements: Establish and maintain a complete list of the primary sampling unit (PSU)components; Include all members of the PSU in the fishery; Validate; Enforceable and enforced. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 6

Is a Census Always Complete (and Accurate)? Sen. Chuck Schumer demands investigation into 2010 U.S. Census after fishy New York numbers BY TINA MOORE / DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER SUNDAY, MARCH 27, 2011, 4:00 AM Schumer: NY Census senseless By CYNTHIA R. FAGEN Posted: 12:20 AM, March 27, 2011 New York officials have reached a consensus on the Census: It's a mess. No! So, we may need to employ statistical methods to correct for missing and misreported data. Validation is central to this. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 7

Sample Surveys Sampling public opinion is like sampling soup: One spoonful can reflect the taste of the whole pot if the soup is well-stirred. George Gallup. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 8

Sample Surveys: Requirements Collect data from a sample of the components of a fishery and expand to an estimate of the total. The estimate has two parts: Point estimate and margin of error. In general, the sample must be representative of the entire population (probability-based or PPS). Untested assumptions introduce potential for bias. Assumptions should be tested, bias measured if possible. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 9

Anatomy of an Estimate Point Estimates Precision Removing potential bias affects both the point estimate and its associated measure of precision, expressed either as the Percent Standard Error (PSE) or graphically as the Confidence Interval.

The Effect of BIAS Precise, but inaccurate More accurate; Not precise Precise and accurate

To Improve Precision.. Increase Sample Size: Summer Flounder Landings 2007-2011 Atlantic Coast Annual Total Harvest (A+B1) PSE 3,108,974 6.0 2,362,303 9.1 1,829,579 6.8 1,510,707 7.5 1,847,156 7.7 Total Harvest (A+B1) Virginia Annual PSE 397,041 12.0 260,221 18.1 289,075 18.5 260,050 15.2 317,674 19.0 Total Harvest (A+B1) Virginia May-June PSE 146,492 17.7 128,936 29.7 117,149 33.1 85,991 22.3 149,367 34. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 12

Commercial Fisheries Data Collection On-Board Observers VTR (logbook) VMS Dealer Reports; Dockside Sampling IVR On-Board Electronic Monitoring U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 13

Commercial Fisheries Data Collection Bycatch and Biological data Mainly by sample; bycatch reported in VTR Sea sampling (observers) and port sampling Dockside observers? U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 14

Commercial Fisheries Data Collection Sources of error and uncertainty: Measurement error? Reporting Errors: failure to report; over-orunder reporting; recall errors U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 15

Recreational Fisheries Data Collection Dockside Interviews Angler Diaries Headboat Logbooks and Sampling Biological Sampling Telephone and Mail Surveys U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 16

Recreational Fisheries Data Collection Catch data (including releases): mainly by sample Result is an estimate of average catch per trip: C/T U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 17

Recreational Fisheries Data Collection Trip data: mainly by sample: currently, by telephone But, that will change: Result is total number of trips: T U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 18

Recreational Catch Estimation Basically: C/T (T) = C, or: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 19

Of course, it s a little more complicated Actual estimation formula: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 20 1 1 H h n i b j k hijk hi hij n i h h hi h hij n y hi hi hi X X X X X π π

Recreational Data: Sources of Error and Uncertainty Potential bias uncertainty Actual bias errors; examples? Imprecision uncertainty Reporting errors: (Where were you fishing?) U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 21

What is MRIP? A complete overhaul of the way NOAA Fisheries conducts recreational fishing surveys. A meticulous process engaging data partners and stakeholders in an ongoing cycle of evaluation and improvement. A strategic approach to prioritizing and implementing changes to our surveys: Address Fundamental Design Issues Design, Review, and Certify New Methods Implement Improvements Scale Up to Enhance Precision, Timeliness and Coverage Ultimately, a series of regionally based recreational fishing surveys each using MRIP-certified methods. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 22

Key MRIP Milestones Re-Estimation: 2012 Working with consultants, removed potential sources of bias from previous estimates dating back to 2004. Fundamental improvement and a response to one of the NRC s chief concerns. Recalculated all estimates 2004 to 2011; recalibrated earlier years National Saltwater Angler Registry Successfully launched January 1, 2010. Currently, registry information is collected at the state level for all recreational fishermen except those in HI, PR and USVI. New Catch Survey Design (APAIS) Rolled out in 2013, removes potential sources of design bias. Adjustments being made in 2014 to be responsive to state partner needs. Calibration Workshop this fall U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 23

Current MRIP Priorities Effort Surveys Intention is to abandon the current Coastal Household Telephone Survey: Why? Bias problems! Evaluating the use of mail surveys using a dual frame consisting of National Saltwater Angler Registry and USPS database. For-Hire Reporting Evaluating options for census-based approach, as well as universal electronic reporting. Current GOM & SA Council efforts. Supplemental Surveys Developing strategies to effectively manage pulse/rare event and other fisheries requiring finer data resolution, such as red snapper. West Coast: Reviewing, Improving, and Certifying Survey Methods Expanding both spatial and temporal survey coverage (WA and OR), video monitoring, assessing discards, electronic data collection Working with states to certify current sampling methods, such as the Puget Sound Sampling Program Transition to Implementation Role Regional Implementation MRIP will maintain central role in developing and certifying methods and establishing national standards Regions, through the FINs or equivalent, have responsibility of selecting survey methods and managing data collection Make key decisions on implementation of MRIP-certified methods, and set investment priorities for enhancing coverage, precision and timeliness. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 24

Questions and Discussion U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 25

Supplemental Slides U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 26

Key Features of New APAIS Design Site assignments must be completed entirely. No substitution of alternate modes or alternate sites. Assignments will be in clusters of 1 to 3 locations, depending on the level of activity ( pressure rating ) of the sites. Sites in a cluster must be sampled in a specified order for a specified duration. Site assignments will cover four 6-hour time blocks, assuring coverage at all times of day. As at present, interviewers are instructed to try to sample all eligible trips, regardless of whether the anglers caught anything. In addition, complete counts of all eligible trips must be made, whether or not they were sampled. See MRIP website for more details. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 27

Effort Survey Pilot Project MRIP has been conducting pilot studies of new effort survey methodologies since 2008. In general, we have determined that: Surveys that use only a single sample frame a coastal household telephone directory or state angler registry are subject to undercoverage bias. Telephone surveys generally have become subject to non-response error. Based on what we learned from pilot projects in 2008 2011, we have designed two major pilot projects, the results of which will enable a final decision on effort survey design: Dual frame (postal address and license registry), mixed-mode (mail and telephone) pilot conducted in 2011/2012 in FL, GA, SC, NC; A new Single-phase Address-based Sample pilot using a postal address frame with address matching from state angler registries in MA, NY, NC and FL in 2014. See MRIP website and recent Newscasts for more details. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 28