Superstreet Concepts & Application. Prepared by: PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. October 16, 2012

Similar documents
SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

Best Practices for the Design and Operation of Reduced Conflict Intersections

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

HOWDY! Victor M. Vargas P.E. Assistant Director of Transportation Operations - Austin District Texas Department of Transportation

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

Superstreets. A Tool for Safely and Efficiently Managing Congestion

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Innovative Intersections

Benefits and Limitations of J- Turn Intersections

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

Safety of U-turns at Unsignalized Median Openings

Observations of Pedestrian Behavior and Facilities at Diverging Diamond Interchanges

J-Turn An Intersection Safety Improvement Purdue Road School 2016 Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Brian Malone, INDOT & Josh Cook, HNTB

FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

FM 471 PROJECT. OPEN HOUSE FM 471 (Culebra Road) from SH 211 to Old FM 471 Medina and Bexar Counties. FM 471 Project

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

Modern Roundabouts: a guide for application

Frequently Asked Questions

I-35 COMAL COUNTY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

Innovative Intersections Presented by: Matt Crim P.E., PTOE Stantec Consulting Services Inc. October 29, 2015

Safety of U-Turns at Unsignalized Median Openings on Urban and Suburban Arterials

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

NCHRP Project Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities UNC-CH CH Highway Safety Res

Synchro Studio 8. Overview. By Ioannis Psarros

Work Zone Safety A Look At Best Practices. AASHTO SCOTE June 6, 2016

Multilane Roundabouts

Design Guidance for Intersection Auxiliary Lanes (NCHRP Project Report 780) September 13, 2016

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

PennDOT ICE Policy An Introduction

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Defining Purpose and Need

Alternative Intersection Analysis Using SIDRA INTERSECTION

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL

Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety at Alternative Intersections and Interchanges

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Chapter 7 Intersection Design

Bike Planning: A New Day

Topic No January 2000 Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies Revised July Chapter 8 GAP STUDY

Freeway System Considerations

Alternative Intersection Analysis Using SIDRA INTERSECTION

Bicycle Facilities Planning

Vehicular turning and path of travel with a proposed curb bulb on the southwest corner of Mount Diablo Boulevard and Dewing Avenue.

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

Route 29 Corridor Assessment Update. Development of Possible Solutions

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Driveway Design Criteria

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION SOLUTIONS. Jay Bockisch, PE, PTOE Senior Associate

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Module 3 Developing Timing Plans for Efficient Intersection Operations During Moderate Traffic Volume Conditions

BASIC FREEWAY CAPACITY STUDIES Definitions

Roadway Intersection Design Gregory J. Taylor, P.E.

North Turnaround. Option 3: Best facilitates transfers from local to rapid transit services. High cost

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

BOERNE/KENDALL COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FORUM. March 22, 2018

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

Traffic Academy: IJS & IMS FAQ/RULES OF THUMB

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

WELCOME. FM 2818 (Harvey Mitchell Parkway) Open House. Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Orange County Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Enhancement Program. City of San Juan Capistrano April 17, 2012

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts

FM 471. Open House Public Meeting FM 471

Classification Criteria

HCM Sixth Edition. Plus More. Rahim (Ray) Benekohal University of Illinois at Urban Champaign,

Simulation Analysis of Intersection Treatments for Cycle Tracks

JCE 4600 Transportation Engineering. Traffic Control

The Perceptual requirements of these subtasks differ at roundabouts and traditional intersections.

Roundabout Design Aid PREPARED BY TRAFFIC AND SAFETY

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

RE: 2007 NPA Text (Clean Version)

Access Management Benefits & Techniques. Access Management Workshop June 2, 2006

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

INTERSECTION DESIGN TREATMENTS

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Public Information Meeting. Warren County Pathway Corridor Project September 27, 2018

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Chapter 8 Chapter 8 VEHICLE GAP STUDY PURPOSE VEHICLE GAP STUDY (FIGURE 8-1)

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Roundabouts in Small-Medium Sized Communities: Why Consider Them?

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Young Researchers Seminar 2011

Off-road Trails. Guidance

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Blair/Williamson Intersection Expressed Needs

Offset Single Point Interchange I-25 at Rio Bravo Boulevard Albuquerque, New Mexico

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

Transcription:

Superstreet Concepts & Application Prepared by: PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. October 16, 2012 1

Purpose of a Superstreet Improve Traffic Flow Increased Safety Economical Solution

What is a Superstreet? Innovative intersection improvement Also referred to as a Restricted Crossing U-Turn Intersection (RCUT) Minor street traffic turn right Minor street left-turns and through required to U-turn downstream

Vehicle Movements

Pedestrian Movements

Safety Benefits Reduction in Conflict Points

Operational Benefits of Superstreets Per FHWA: Superstreets can provide up to a 30% increase in throughput (vehicles exiting intersection per hour) Superstreets can provide up to a 40% reduction in network travel time reductions

Capacity Benefits of Superstreets Loop 337, New Braunfles (Simulation Results)

Where Are They Deployed? Michigan - Median U-Turn (Michigan Left) intersections common; one RCUT intersection at Big Beaver Rd in Troy, MI Maryland Deployed primarily as a rural unsignalized safety treatment, called a J-Turn North Carolina: US 17 in Leland US 17 in Pender County SU 15-501 at Erwin/Europa Drive, Chapel Hill US 1 near VASS, Moore County US 74 west of Waynesville, Haywood County Source: Google Maps Source: Google Maps Source: Google Maps

Where Are They Deployed? US 281 North, San Antonio Encino Rio to Marshall Rd Loop 1604 West, San Antonio New Guilbeau to Shaenfield Rd SH 71 at FM 973, Austin (Under Construction

When Are They Appropriate? High Major Street Volume Low Cross Street Through Volume For High Cross Street Volumes a Median U-Turn or (MUT) intersection may be applicable FHWA: Alternative Intersections & Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR) Minor Road Total Volume (MRTV)/Total Intersection Volume (TIV) Ratio RCUT Throughput 15 to 30 percent higher than Conventional when MRTV/TIV Ratio is 0.1 to 0.2 Conventional Throughput 5 to 17 percent higher than RCUT when MRTV/TIV ratio greater than 0.25

Design Parameters Turnaround Location 400 1,200 ft from intersection AASHTO: 400 600 ft spacing for Median U-Turn MDOT: 660 ft as standard spacing NCDOT: 800 ft minimum Considerations in Placement U-turn Queue Storage Signal Timing Driveways Travel Time

Design Parameters Channelization Left-Turn Lanes and Central Islands Triple Right-Turn Lanes

Median U-Turn Intersection: US 281 at Encino Rio Triple left-turn from Encino Rio

Design Parameters Turnarounds Two-Lane Turnaround Design Vehicles P WB-62 Accommodates truck off-tracking

Design Parameters Turnarounds Minimum Median Width: (Including turnaround lanes) 4-Lane: 62 ft 6-Lane: 40 ft Minimum ROW required at Turnarounds for WB-62. 4-Lane: 155 ft (nominal) 6-Lane: 165 ft (nominal)

Design Parameters Turnarounds 110 40 MIN

Signalization Source: Alternative Intersection/Interchange Report 18

Signalization Signal Control One Controller Both major street approaches and turnarounds Two Controllers One for each direction on major street, controls intersection and turnaround for same direction Four Controllers Each direction of major street and turnaround operated by a separate controller Simple Operation

Signalization Vehicle Detection High Speed Major Roadway Advanced Radar Detection Presence Detection Radar Video

Signalization Pedestrian Considerations ADA Path Audible Pedestrian Signals Navigate complex intersection

Signalization Turnarounds Turnarounds treated like left-turn phases Under lower volume conditions, turnarounds could be unsignalized

Need for Additional Through Capacity Approximate Major Street Capacities: 700 to 900 veh per hour per lane (conventional) 1,250 to 1,350 veh per hour per lane (superstreet) Efficient signal phasing leads to increased green time. 1,800 veh per hour per lane uninterrupted flow Throughput at intersections can be increased with Auxiliary Through Lanes (ATL) A four lane road with an ATL in each direction could conceivably carry 3,750 veh per hour (1,250 x 3) in one direction through a superstreet intersection Used on Loop 1604 at Shaenfield ATL utilization can be improved with increased upstream storage length and downstream merge distance (Not supported by NCHRP 707)

Need for Additional Through Capacity Loop 1604 Auxiliary Through Lanes at Shaenfield Rd 1,000 Merge 2,200 1,000 1,400

Questions