EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE MECHANICAL SOLICITATIONS OF THE GREENHOUSES OF VEGETABLES AND FLOWERS LOCATED ON ROOFTOPS

Similar documents
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON DETERMINATION OF DRAG COEFFICIENT OF THE GREENHOUSES LOCATED ON ROOFS OF BUILDINGS

Subsonic Wind Tunnel 300 mm

AF100. Subsonic Wind Tunnel AERODYNAMICS. Open-circuit subsonic wind tunnel for a wide range of investigations into aerodynamics

Measurement of Pressure. The aerofoil shape used in wing is to. Distribution and Lift for an Aerofoil. generate lift due to the difference

CFD Study of Solid Wind Tunnel Wall Effects on Wing Characteristics

Instruction Manual. Pipe Friction Training Panel

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil

Flow in a shock tube

INTERFERENCE EFFECT AND FLOW PATTERN OF FOUR BIPLANE CONFIGURATIONS USING NACA 0024 PROFILE

Effects of wind incidence angle on wind pressure distribution on square plan tall buildings

Anemometry. Anemometry. Wind Conventions and Characteristics. Anemometry. Wind Variability. Anemometry. Function of an anemometer:

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FLOW OVER SYMMETRICAL AEROFOIL Mayank Pawar 1, Zankhan Sonara 2 1,2

AIRFLOW GENERATION IN A TUNNEL USING A SACCARDO VENTILATION SYSTEM AGAINST THE BUOYANCY EFFECT PRODUCED BY A FIRE

THEORY OF WINGS AND WIND TUNNEL TESTING OF A NACA 2415 AIRFOIL. By Mehrdad Ghods

PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION OF SMALL WIND TURBINE BLADE WITH WINGLETS ON ROTATING CONDITION USING WIND TUNNEL

Subsonic Wind Tunnel 300 mm

Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent

Experimental Investigation Of Flow Past A Rough Surfaced Cylinder

CFD Analysis ofwind Turbine Airfoil at Various Angles of Attack

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 6 (3) (2013) Research Article

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Drag on Spheres

Experiment Instructions. Circulating Pumps Training Panel

The Seventh International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications (BBAA7) Shanghai, China; September 2-6, 2012 Wind tunnel measurements

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WIND PRESSURES ON IRREGULAR- PLAN SHAPE BUILDINGS

ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERCRITICAL AIRFOIL FOR LOW SPEED AIRCRAFT

AF101 to AF109. Subsonic Wind Tunnel Models AERODYNAMICS. A selection of optional models for use with TecQuipment s Subsonic Wind Tunnel (AF100)

Experiment 8: Minor Losses

The effect of back spin on a table tennis ball moving in a viscous fluid.

and its weight (in newtons) when located on a planet with an acceleration of gravity equal to 4.0 ft/s 2.

Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. Pressure Distribution of Fluid Flow through Triangular and Square Cylinders

Applied Fluid Mechanics

CONSIDERATION OF DENSITY VARIATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF A VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR ROAD TUNNELS

Study of Passing Ship Effects along a Bank by Delft3D-FLOW and XBeach1

Long Win s Educational Facilities for Fluid Mechanics

Pressure Measurements

Aerodynamics of Winglet: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study Using Fluent

Parasite Drag. by David F. Rogers Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved.

Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Lift and Drag Performances of NACA 0015 Wind Turbine Airfoil

Assistant Lecturer Anees Kadhum AL Saadi

Applications of Bernoulli s principle. Principle states that areas with faster moving fluids will experience less pressure

SPH 4C Unit 4 Hydraulics and Pneumatic Systems

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF SWEPT ANGLE ON THE BOUNDARY LAYER OF THE 2D WING

Write important assumptions used in derivation of Bernoulli s equation. Apart from an airplane wing, give an example based on Bernoulli s principle

Lab. Manual. Fluid Mechanics. The Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering

Assumptions 1 At specified conditions, air behaves as an ideal gas. 2 The volume of the tire remains constant.

Irrigation &Hydraulics Department lb / ft to kg/lit.

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF WAKE SURVEY OVER A CYLINDER WITH DIFFERENT SURFACE PROFILES

Subsonic wind tunnel models

Wind Flow Model of Area Surrounding the Case Western Reserve University Wind Turbine

Old-Exam.Questions-Ch-14 T072 T071

BAPI Pressure Line of Products - FAQs

Lab # 03: Visualization of Shock Waves by using Schlieren Technique

Wind Tunnel Instrumentation System

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Lift on a Wing

Aerodynamic Analyses of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine By Different Blade Airfoil Using Computer Program

Fluid Machinery Introduction to the laboratory measurements

Operating instructions Pitot Static Tube

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 9 (5) (2016) Research Article. CFD Simulations of Flow Around Octagonal Shaped Structures

Tutorial. BOSfluids. Relief valve

Wind Tunnel Study on the Structural Stability of a Container Crane According to the Boom Shape

AE2610 Introduction to Experimental Methods in Aerospace AERODYNAMIC FORCES ON A WING IN A SUBSONIC WIND TUNNEL

Designing a Model Rocket

ScienceDirect. Aerodynamic body position of the brakeman of a 2-man bobsleigh

AerE 343L: Aerodynamics Laboratory II. Lab Instructions

Effect of Fluid Density and Temperature on Discharge Coefficient of Ogee Spillways Using Physical Models

AFC. SDPROC and AFC Analog Mass Flow Controller ANALOG MASS FLOW CONTROLLERS. Principles of Operation. Design Features

EN DE FR. A look back at the wind tunnel s history. An overview of the wind tunnel

Surrounding buildings and wind pressure distribution on a high rise building

C-1: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 1 C-2: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 2 C-3: Panel Methods C-4: Thin Airfoil Theory

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Proceedings of Offshore Wind 2007 Conference & Exhibition. Publication date: 2007

Evaluation of High Lift System with Oscillatory Blowing in 2.5D Configuration

WIND-INDUCED LOADS OVER DOUBLE CANTILEVER BRIDGES UNDER CONSTRUCTION

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0012 AIRFOIL SECTION AT DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ATTACK

Investigation on Divergent Exit Curvature Effect on Nozzle Pressure Ratio of Supersonic Convergent Divergent Nozzle

Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics Over a NACA0018 Aerofoil and a Test Aerofoil A Comparative Study

When a uniform pressure acts on a flat plate of area A and a force F pushes the plate, then the pressure p is : p = F/A

Vibration isolation system 1VIS10W. User manual

The Discussion of this exercise covers the following points:

PHYS 101 Previous Exam Problems

Mechanical Wind Recorder

Aerodynamic Design, Fabrication and Testing of Wind Turbine Rotor Blades

Design of a Solid Wall Transonic Wind Tunnel

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY. Hong Kong Collection

Power efficiency and aerodynamic forces measurements on the Dettwiler-wind turbine

A STUDY OF THE LOSSES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ONE OR MORE BOW THRUSTERS AND A CATAMARAN HULL

Ventilation of Small Multispan Greenhouse in Relation to the Window Openings Calculated with CFD

EFFECTS OF SIDEWALL OPENINGS ON THE WIND LOADS ON PIPE-FRAMED GREENHOUSES

Performance Analysis of the Flying Wing Airfoils

Squeegee Unit for MRS Multi-Recovery System

Sensor for Air Bubble Detection at Liquid Filled Tubes. SONOCHECK Type ABD06.xx. Operating Manual

RESEARCH MEMORANDUM. WASHINGTON December 3, AERODYNl$MIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A MODEL? OF AN ESCAPE ...,

Lab #1 Pressure: Bubblers and Water Balloons CEE 331 Fall 2003

RocketSat V: AirCore. 4/18/09 Symposium Jessica (JB) Brown Mackenzie Miller Emily Logan Steven Ramm. Colorado Space Grant Consortium RocketSat V 1

Induced Drag Reduction for Modern Aircraft without Increasing the Span of the Wing by Using Winglet

Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast

Effects of seam and surface texture on tennis balls aerodynamics

Third measurement MEASUREMENT OF PRESSURE

3 1 PRESSURE. This is illustrated in Fig. 3 3.

Avai 193 Fall 2016 Laboratory Greensheet

A child places a car of mass 95 g on the track. She adjusts the controller to a power of 4.2 W so the car accelerates from rest for 0.40 s.

Transcription:

6 th International Conference Computational Mechanics and Virtual Engineering COMEC 2015 15-16 October 2015, Braşov, Romania EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE MECHANICAL SOLICITATIONS OF THE GREENHOUSES OF VEGETABLES AND FLOWERS LOCATED ON ROOFTOPS C.E. Badiu 1, M. Lateş 1, Gh. Brătucu 1, D.D Păunescu 1, D. Covaciu 1 1 Transilvania University of Braşov, Braşov, ROMANIA, eb@cebb.net Abstract: This paper presents work algorithm and experimental research results related to the solicitations of the greenhouses for vegetables and flowers placed on rooftops in urban built environment. For research was designed and developed five models of possible forms of greenhouses, which were introduced in HM170 wind tunnel [8]. Air flow speeds to which they were exposed to the front and side surfaces, as well as the roofs of the layouts were 20, 25, 27.5, and 30 m/s. Were measured the pressures in 12-16 points on each of the surfaces specified, the data are necessary to design structures of greenhouses resistance of various shapes [2].All the layouts had the same height and length, but were differentiated by the shapes of roofs and their inclination angles [1]. Keywords: Greenhouses for vegetables and flowers, mechanical solicitations, experimental researches. 1. INTRODUCTION Resisting movement of an object relative to the air is proportional to the air density ρ, the front surface of the body S and the square of the velocity relative to the air v a. Aerodynamic drag force is defined by the formula: 1 2 Fa cx S va (1) 2 where c x is called the coefficient of aerodynamic resistance. Ţhe coefficient of aerodynamic resistance c x represents of the body form influence on the resistance to the force of the air and determined experimentally [3]. This factor is not a constant, but varies depending on the speed, air flow direction, the position and size of the object, density and viscosity of air. Speed, kinematics viscosity and a characteristic length scale of the object are incorporated into non dimensional coefficient called Reynolds number (Re). In compressible mediums is relevant and the speed of sound, and c x depends on also on the Mach number (Ma). To some form of body drag coefficient of only depend on the number Re, Ma number and direction of the current. At low speeds is no longer dependent coefficient of Mach number (Ma) [4]. Also, the variation with Reynolds number is typically small for most areas of interest. For this reason the air current has the same direction relative to the examined body, it is considered to be constant coefficient c x [5]. Aerodynamic drag coefficient determined experimentally for a spherical body is 0.47 [6]. Direction of the airflow in the case of a spherical body is not important, the body profile is the same in any direction. It should be noted that a building with the same floor area as a spherical body, but rectangular form, would have a drag coefficient of about 1, and the exposed surface would also significantly higher, so that the force of the wind presses on such construction would be higher (estimated 4-5 times higher). 2. MATERIALS AND METHOD For experimental research on the influence of wind on roofs type greenhouse buildings from urban areas were built five models of greenhouses, which differ in shapes and angles of roofs (Figure 1).In all frontal and lateral walls as well and the roof surfaces have been made holes with diameters of 3 mm, in which were introduced and 488

were sealed heads gauge hoses connecting with tubes of multitube manometer by the equipment for measuring the pressure exerted at different wind speeds. Figure 1. Greenhouse layouts built for experimental research Wind tunnel HM170 used in experimental research (Figure 2) [7] is the type subsonic (air speed up to Mach 0.1), open circuit, outside air is taken in and expelled all outside, with increased speed. Figure 2. HM 170 Educational Wind Tunnel manufactured by GUNT Gerätebau GmbH, Barsbütte, Germany. www.gunt.de Figure 3. The components of wind tunnel HM170 [8] The model 1, that is experimental investigated is fixed in the measurement section 2 (Figure3). Air is drawn into tunnel through the feeding hopper 5, and laminar flow is ensured by section 4 (possible cross components of the 489

air flow is reduced to zero). The flowing of laminar air is accelerated by approximately 3.3 times in section 3 and in area 6 of the tunnel is made slower air speed that is pushed out through the fan 7. Measurement of forces is achieved by means of the force transducer 8 which is integral with the experimental model 1 (Figure 4.a). This transducer inside the tunnel can perform measurements (after 2 directions - driving and port) on: strength, speed, pressure, aerodynamics coefficient to drive (drag) and lift (elevator). The measurements values of forces can be displayed on the screen the amplifier 9. a b c Figure 4. The measurement system (a), the manometer tube (b) and control panel (c) of the wind tunnel Air speed in section for measurements 2 can be read on the manometer tube inclined 10 (Figure 4.b). The control panel 11 (Figure 4.c) contains a main switch ON / OFF power supply, emergency stop button, a button for adjusting the air speed (frequency converter) and an ON / OFF main switch for fan. Rail 12 allows the translation of wall to the measuring section and access inside section. System is placed within section 13 provided to the frame with rollers. The air speed is measured with a thermal anemometer shown in Figure 5. Figure 5. Thermal anemometer of the wind tunnel structure Thermal anemometer (Figure 5) has the following features: 1 - type strain gauge sensor; 2 - button on; 3 - off button; 4 - light button of the screen; 5 - button for calculating the average measured; 6 - setting the unit of measurement; 7 - button calibration; 8 - Memory button; 9 - button to delete the stored value; 10 - button to display the minimum, maximum, average measured the activation button "on"; 11 - button measured temperature display; 12 - button display wind speed measured; 13 - down scroll button; 14 - scroll up button; 15 - display measured temperature value; 16 - display wind speed measured. To experimental researches made in this paper was measured the pressure with which pushed the wind wich different speeds, using the multitube manometer presented in Figure 6. Multitub manometer (Figure 6) [4] containing the 16 tubes of the type manometer with graduated scale 2, mounted on a hinged panel 1. Each tube is provided at the upper parts with connection nozzle 3. Water supply is achieved by means of tank 4, connected to link tube 5. The multitub manometer offers the possibility of measuring absolute or relative air pressure, static or dynamic pressure of the air in the flowing. The panel can tilt in 3 positions through lever 6, enabling the possibility to measurement of very low pressures. The angle can be 490

read on the indicator panel 7: 1: 2 (63,4 o ), 1: 5 (78,7 o ) 1:10 (84,3 o ). Fixing the vertical direction of the panel is achieved by means of screws 8 taking account of the indicator 10. Panel fixing on stand 11 is achieved by tightening bolts 9. Figure 6. The mmultitub manometer of wind tunnel [4] Multitub manometer (Figure 6) [4] containing the 16 tubes of the type manometer with graduated scale 2, mounted on a hinged panel 1. Each tube is provided at the upper parts with connection nozzle 3. Water supply is achieved by means of tank 4, connected to link tube 5. The multitub manometer offers the possibility of measuring absolute or relative air pressure, static or dynamic pressure of the air in the flowing. The panel can tilt in 3 positions through lever 6, enabling the possibility to measurement of very low pressures. The angle can be read on the indicator panel 7: 1: 2 (63,4 o ), 1: 5 (78,7 o ) 1:10 (84,3 o ). Fixing the vertical direction of the panel is achieved by means of screws 8 taking account of the indicator 10. Panel fixing on stand 11 is achieved by tightening bolts 9. For water supply, the tank is fixed in the middle of manometers tubes and fed with water up to half the height of the tank (Figure 7 a). At water supply, the nozzles upper of the manometers tubes are off, and on the principle of communicating vessels, the water level in the tank is the same in all tubes (Figure 7, b), taking into account atmospheric pressure. a. b. c. Figure 7. Water supply (a), the water level (b) and adjusting the inclination (c) at the multitube manometer For accurate measurements it is possible to adjust the inclination of the panel (Fig. 7 c) to 1: 2 (63,4 o ), 1: 5 (78,7 o ), 1:10 (84,3 o ) by operating the lever 6 ( fig.17.10) and reading the indicator 7. The models of greenhouses have been specially prepared to be subjected to experimental research in wind tunnel. In this respect they were performed on the frontal and lateral surfaces and on the roof the holes with diameters of 3 mm (Figure 8), which are inserted from the model inside the tubes connecting to the multitube manometer for measuring the pressure of the stream of air different speeds. For entering the tubes was performed on the base plates of the models by a 30mm diameter hole. This hole served subsequently and to layouts fixing on the bottom wind tunnel. The motherboards of layouts is detaches to model corps for introducing these tubes and fastening to the floor tunnel, after being mounted around the template, ready for experimental researches. The holes that have not participated in the current samples were coated with adhesive foil (Figure 9). For accurate recording of all results were numbered holes which participated in a particular sample. 491

Figure 8. Preparing the greenhouses models for experimental researches. Figure 9 The numbering to Holes on the layouts surfaces and cover those who do not participate in a particular sample Figure 10. The wind tunnel with a greenhouse model located in a position of the airflow direction Figure 10 is present the wind tunnel prepared for experimental research at a model of greenhouse, fixed by one of the airflow direction. Figure 11 present the entire installation of greenhouse Prepared for an experimental research model and the a sequence of conducting experimental researches 492

Figure 11 Moment of conducting to experimental researches The wind speeds considered for experimental research had values of 20 m/s, 25m/s, 27.5/s and 30/s. For all the models were measured the airflow pressures on greenhouse surfaces where the frontal or lateral surfaces have been on the airflow direction. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The force with the wind acting on greenhouse pending roofs of buildings in this research is assessed by pressures on their surfaces when blowing in different directions and at different speeds. Since lower wind speeds of 20 m/s is considered not dangerous to the stability of these greenhouses were investigated experimentally only the influences of winds with speeds of 20-30 m/s. Wind tunnel used in experimental research can not generate airflow speeds greater than 30m / s. For each greenhouse model were retained the pressures measured in the 12 to 16 holes on different surfaces when airflow direction has been frontal or lateral. The Gradation with the value 30 on the multitub manometer was considered the benchmark, so that higher values recorded for pressures means pushing forces and lower values are depressed forces. In Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4 is illustrated the results of experimental research to model No 1 of greenhouse, where the roof slope was 30 0 from the horizontal The pressure values on the front wall, the front direction of the air flow Table 1 MODEL: 1 FRONTAL LATERAL: WALL: ROOF: 30 m/s 27,5 m/s 25 m/s 20 m/s 3 31,5 31,3 31 30,7 4 30,6 30,5 30,4 30,2 5 30,3 30,2 30,1 30 6 30 30 30 29,9 7 29,9 29,9 30 29,9 8 29,8 29,8 29,9 29,9 9 29,9 29,8 29,9 29,9 10 30,7 30,6 30,6 30,3 11 30,2 30 30 30,1 12 30 29,9 29,9 29,9 13 29,9 29,8 29,8 29,9 14 29,8 29,8 29,8 29,8 15 29,9 29,8 29,8 29,9 493

The pressure values on the lateral wall, the frontal direction of the air flow Table 2 MODEL: 1 FRONTAL LATERAL: WALL ROOF: 30 m/s 27,5 m/s 25 m/s 20 m/s 3 - - - - 4 - - - - 5 30,3 30,4 30,4 30,2 6 30,1 30,2 30,1 30 7 30 30,1 30 30 8 29,9 30 30 30 9 30 30 30 30 10 30,9 30,8 30,8 30,5 11 30,5 30,7 30,5 30,3 12 33 33 32,5 31,5 13 30,4 30,4 30,4 30,2 14 30,7 30,6 30,6 30,4 15 - - - - The pressure values on the roof, the lateral direction of the air flow Table 3 MODEL: 1 FRONTAL LATERAL: WALL: ROOF: 30 m/s 27,5 m/s 25 m/s 20 m/s 3 35,9 35 33,9 32,5 4 33,9 33,5 32,7 31,8 5 33,1 32,9 32,3 31,5 6 34,4 33,8 32,9 31,9 7 36,2 35,3 34,1 32,8 8 35,7 34,8 33,8 32,5 9 32,9 32,6 32 31,4 10 34,7 34,1 33,1 32,2 11 35,8 34,9 33,9 32,5 12 33,6 33,2 32,4 31,6 13 32,9 32,6 32 31,2 14 29 29,2 29,8 29,5 15 - - - - The pressure values on the lateral wall, the lateral direction of the air flow Table 4 MODEL: 1 FRONTAL LATERAL: WALL: ROOF: 30 m/s 27,5 m/s 25 m/s 20 m/s 3 32,2 32 31,7 31 4 33 33 32,5 31,6 5 31 31 31 30,6 6 31 31 30,2 30,5 7 30,8 30,7 30,7 30,4 8 30,1 30,1 30,1 30 9 30 30 29,9 29,9 10 29,8 29,9 29,8 29,9 11 30,8 30,7 30,6 30,4 12 29,7 29,7 29,7 29,8 13 29,9 29,8 29,8 29,9 14 29,8 29,8 29,8 29,9 15 30,3 30,2 30,1 30 Similarly is presented the results of experimental research for the other four models of greenhouses. It highlights that at the same level of greenhouses the exposed surfaces to winds are even greater, as are smaller inclinations of roofs. It also the pressures on researched surfaces increased with the square of velocity of the air stream. 494

4. CONCLUSIONS 1. For the experimental research of the strength of greenhouses located on rooftops have produced five models, which have the same heights, but they differ in angles with that are inclined roofs. In this way, the exposed surfaces of pressing force on wind would be higher or lower depending on these angles. 2. The experimental investigations were conducted in an aerodynamic tunnel type HM170 manufactured by GUNT Educational Wind Tunnel Gerätebau GmbH, Barsbüttel, Germany. Air flow speeds to which they were exposed to the front and side surfaces, as well as the roofs of the models were 20, 25, 27.5, and 30 m / s 3 On the basis of experimental research may be completed formula (1), so as to establish the value of the pressing force of the air flow on an inclined surface with an angle to the direction of the current, respectively. Also these investigations are necessary to validate the simulation modeling software with finite element method for calculation of thrust and lift forces and overturning moment of the greenhouse by air currents. REFERENCES [1]. Badiu, C.E., Brătucu, Gh., 2014. The Effects of Wind on Roof Systems for Building. In Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Vol. 7(56), No 1/2014, Series II, p 67-72, ISSN 2065-2135 (Print) ISSN 2065-2143 (CD-ROM). [2]. Badiu, E.C., Brătucu, Gh., Păunescu, D.D., 2014. Types of Infrastructure Used for Crowing Plants in Greenhouses Located on the Roofs of Buildings. In The 5 th International Conference COMAT2014, Braşov,Vol. 2, p.243-246, ISBN 978-606-19-0411-2. [3]. Kijewski-Correa, T., A. Kareem, and M. Kochly. "Experimental Verification and Full-scale Deployment of Global Positioning Systems to Monitor the Dynamic Response of Tall Buildings. "Journal of Structural Engineering 132.8 (2006): 1242-1253. [4]. Lates, M.T., 2012. Wind Systems. Theory and Practice. Transilvania University of Brasov Publishing House, 2012. ISBN 978-606-19-0089-3. (in romanian). Lovse, J. W., et al. "Dynamic deformation monitoring of tall structure using GPS technology" Journal of Surveying Engineering 121.1 (1995): 35-40. [5] Ogaja, Clement, et al. "Toward the Implementation of On-line Structural Monitoring Using RTK-GPS and Analysis of Results Using the Wavelet Transform. The 10th FIG International Symposium on Deformation Measurements. 2001. [6]. Tamura, Yukio, et al. "Measurement of wind-induced response of buildings using RTK-GPS. "Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 90.12 (2002): 1783-1793. [7]. * * *. www.gunt.de [8] * * * Equipment for Engineering Education. Operating Instructions. HM170 Educational Wind Tunnel. G.U.N.T. Gerätebau GmBH. Barsbüttel, Germany. 495