submitted: fall 2009

Similar documents
Background. Kofa NWR historically had large numbers of desert bighorn average about 800 individuals

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Limiting Mountain Lion Predation on Desert Bighorn Sheep on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge

Landscape Genetics of Mountain Lions (Puma concolor) in Southwestern Arizona

RE: Development of an Environmental Assessment for a mountain lion management plan on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona

DRAFT Environmental Assessment for Limiting Mountain Lion Predation on Desert Bighorn Sheep on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge

Bighorn Sheep Research Activity Love Stowell & Ernest_1May2017 Wildlife Genomics & Disease Ecology Lab Updated 04/27/2017 SMLS

Monitoring Amur Leopards in Southwest Primorskii Krai, Russia

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

Continued Genetic Monitoring of the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho White Sturgeon Conservation Aquaculture Program

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. October 1, 2017

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

WILDLIFE HERITAGE TRUST ACCOUNT PROJECT PROPOSAL FORM

Evaluating genetic connectivity and re-colonization dynamics of moose in the Northeast.

North Dakota Mountain Lion Status Report

INLAND MARITIME INITIATIVE: FOREST CARNIVORES. Winter 2011 Update

Colorado Mountain Lion Status Report

Salmon bycatch patterns in the Bering Sea pollock fishery

FIELDTRIP REPORT. The Selati River flowing. 5 th January to 7 th March st WET SEASON. Report by:

Bighorn Sheep, Mule Deer and The Central Arizona Project

REPORT ON THE LYNX MONITORING TRAINING COURSE

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

TAKE A CHANCE PART 2

Society for Wildlife Forensic Science Develop Wildlife Forensic Science into a comprehensive, integrated and mature discipline.

If you would like to receive project updates as they are published please send your address to

P.O. Box 24 Joshua Tree, California July 16, 2015

Revealing the Past and Present of Bison Using Genome Analysis

Employer Name: NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center

The Heber-Reno Domestic Sheep Driveway and Management of Bighorn Sheep in Arizona.

The Lesson of the Kaibab

Study Terrestrial Furbearer Abundance and Habitat Use

Canon Envirothon Wildlife Curriculum Guidelines

Livestock Losses. From Department of Agriculture report 2010 (report also available on this website)

Sierra Nevada Bighorn Sheep Proposal

Characterization of two microsatellite PCR multiplexes for high throughput. genotyping of the Caribbean spiny lobster, Panulirus argus

Eastem Cougar Foundation. Newsletter. Update on ECF Activities:

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L LCCMR Work Plan

Nevada Department of Wildlife Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2018

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE HARVEST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR HUNTING SEASONS

RE: Support for Option 2: Complete statewide ban on commercial trapping of bobcats to implement The Bobcat Protection Act AB 1213.

MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LION DAU L-1

Status and management of large carnivores in. Estonia. Peep Männil Nature Department Estonian Environment Agency. Photo: Toomas Tuul

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

Marker, L. (2005). Aspects of ecology, biology and conservation strategies of Namibian farmland cheetahs. Animal Keeper's Forum 7/8.

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

The Sustainability of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) in South West England

Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Mountain Lions: A Public Survey of Residents Adjacent to Saguaro National Park, Arizona

Early History, Prehistory

Snow leopard (Panthera uncia) Conservation WWF-India Initiative. Aishwarya Maheshwari Species Conservation Programme WWF-India

Crossing Corridors. Objective. Materials. Background Information

Determining Potential Environmental and Social Factors Affecting the Success of the Black Rhinoceros in Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Investigating the Potential Role of Coyotes on Caribou Populations on the Island of Newfoundland. Report to the Harris Centre

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Coyotes. The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides

MOUNTAIN LION FACT SHEET

Status and Distribution of the Bobcat (Lynx rufus) in Illinois

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Biology B / Sanderson!

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Project Updates January 2015

Evolving niche of the coy-wolf in northeastern forests and implications for biodiversity

Assessment of Guide Reporting & Preliminary Results of Lion Monitoring

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

22 Questions from WildEarth Guardians - September 19, 2016

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

Genetic analysis of radio-tagged westslope cutthroat trout from St. Mary s River and Elk River. April 9, 2002

APPENDIX A. Population characteristics, movements, and disease surveillance in the Palisades mountain goat herd, Wyoming 2015.

Draft Nevada Predator Management Plan Fiscal Year 2005 July 1, June 30, 2005

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

MOUNTAIN LION DATA ANALYSIS UNIT L-9 MANAGEMENT PLAN

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LION DAU L-2

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF EAST REGION WILDLIFE RESEARCH PROGRAM

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Trout stocking the science

Caddo Lake Institute s -Hunter Research Team Report Hunting Program Statistics & Observations Longhorn AAP-Caddo Lake NWR February 7, 2004

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Causes of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Population Decline, and Potential Consequences if the Decline Continues

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Aquatic Biological Assessment. Lassen 15 Restoration Project. Modoc National Forest Warner Mountain Ranger District

HOME RANGE AND HABITAT USE OF PLAINS SPOTTED SKUNKS IN THE OZARK MOUNTAINS OF ARKANSAS

FIELDTRIP REPORT. 7 th June to 8 th August 2016 DRY SEASON. Report by: Jessica Comley, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Southwest Alberta Wolves: Prey, Movements, and Habitat

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

UTAH ACTION PLAN. For

Students use wildlife survey study techniques to discover the cause of the drop in a wood duck population.

JULY 2017 SUMMARY BULLETS

Wild Wapiti Wild Wapiti activities are directly tied to the third spread - pages 5 and 6 of Our Wetland Project.

2019 Big Game Tag Application Seminar. Nevada Department of Wildlife

Coyotes (Canis latrans) in Florida: the Good, the Bad, & the Ugly

MOUNTAIN LION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR LION DAU-L17

Transcription:

Cat Project of the Month April 2010 The IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group's website (www.catsg.org) presents each month a different cat conservation project. Members of the Cat Specialist Group are encouraged to submit a short description of interesting projects Minimum number and diet assessment of recently documented pumas at Kofa National Wildlife Refuge in Arizona to address predation management for desert bighorn sheep conservation With the recent decline in desert bighorn sheep numbers on Kofa National Wildlife Refuge (Kofa NWR) in Arizona, predation by pumas has become an increasing concern and there is a critical need for continued information on the abundance and food habits of pumas on the refuge. Nashwin Naidu is a wildlife geneticist interested in applying and improving techniques in conservation genetics and wildlife DNA forensics to aid in management and conservation of wild felids. He has been a member of the Cat SG since 2009. Project title, Study area and Partners US Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Game and Fish Department, School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona. ashwin@email.arizona.edu submitted: fall 2009 Ashwin Naidu collecting puma scats (Photo R.W. Thompson) Background Predation by mountain lions on declining desert bighorn sheep populations has become a major concern to non-government organizations and state and federal wildlife managers in southwestern Arizona, especially on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge (Kofa NWR). The only record of a mountain lion on Kofa NWR, prior to 2003, was of a hunter-killed mountain lion in the Kofa Mountains in 1944, after which mountain lions were thought to be largely transient in southwestern Arizona. However, between 2003 and 2007 direct sightings, detection of tracks and an extensive camera-trap survey revealed the presence of 5 different mountain lions (3 adults and 2 kittens) occupying the Kofa Mountains. This documentation, along with a declining population of desert bighorn sheep, led the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) to implement in 2007 an adaptive, site-specific predator management plan directed at removing any mountain lion that preys on more than 1 bighorn sheep killed during any 6- month period. GPS data from 4 radio-collared mountain lions also indicates that Kofa NWR and 4 nearby mountains ranges are providing habitat to mountain lions with exceptionally large movement ranges. These preliminary findings, and the concern over declining numbers of desert bighorn sheep, prompted further investigation into determining the abundance and diet of mountain lions on the Kofa NWR. Kofa NWR has made significant progress to date in assessing its own mountain lion populations, but little is known about how they are related to mountain lions outside the refuge boundary. This information is necessary to investigate patterns of movement of mountain lions between the Kofa NWR and surrounding mountain complexes in the southwest Arizona region. The results from current studies involving camera trap detection, GPS-collar radio-tracking and scat DNA analysis, have demonstrated the need for expansion of this work to the surrounding areas. There is a critical need for continued information on the abundance of mountain lions and their food habits on the refuge and movements into the refuge to make decisions on mountain lion management within a regional context, since predator management actions have consequences that extend beyond the boundaries of the refuge. Map showing the study region, samples obtained for genetic analyses and future sampling locations for pumas to estimate and assess connectivity and movement patterns.

The results from the ongoing study on Kofa have shown promise for being applied region- and statewide as a non-invasive genetic method to survey and manage a notoriously elusive species and to provide concrete data unobtainable by traditional survey methods. Information obtained from this study will be essential for the new Comprehensive Conservation Plan, scheduled for 2011. This study also contributes to objectives in the 2007 Investigative Report and Recommendations for the Kofa Bighorn Sheep Herd, which are to identify causes and extent of predation on bighorn sheep. The Burro Canyon at Kofa National Wildlife Refuge A puma area (Photo A. Naidu). Agencies will use information from this study to draft and implement management action plans focused towards the benefit of the highly vulnerable desert bighorn sheep and mule deer population on Kofa NWR as well as sheep and mule deer populations in surrounding areas. The results from this project will provide the AGFD and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) with: 1. Estimates of minimum population size of mountain lions in the southwest region of Arizona 2. Information on the source population(s) for mountain lions recently identified on the Kofa NWR and potential mountain lion movement/dispersal corridors 3. Estimates of relatedness of individual mountain lions recently identified on the Kofa NWR to the larger regional mountain lion population(s). 4. Mountain lion diet and estimates of food habits by individual mountain lions identified in the southwest Arizona region mountain complexes. 5. Information on effects of management actions involving removal of mountain lions from project area.

Methods During Phase-I of this project, reference biological (DNA) samples were collected from representative locations in Arizona and are currently in possession by the Conservation Genetics Laboratory in the School of Natural Resources at the University of Arizona, Tucson. These samples were collected in locations that include mountain lion habitat within an approximate 300 mile radius from Kofa NWR. Scat samples from mountain lions have been collected extensively throughout Kofa NWR mountain complexes since Fall 2008. Puma at the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum (Photo A. Naidu). Phase-II: Scat collection has been opportunistic but will be supplemented by a randomized sampling design based on prey reproductive cycles that fall within the planned study period: 2010-2012. Mountain lion scat samples will also be collected from new areas from which we do not have reference DNA samples. These areas include mountain ranges in southern California and to the north and south of the refuge e.g., Black Mountains, Cabeza Prieta NWR, Gila Bend Mountains and Pinacate Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). AGFD wildlife managers and interns have contributed scats from these areas and will continue to do so in support of this project. To maximize our final yield of usable DNA from scat samples and obtain a relatively large sample size, collection efforts will be continuous (year-round). Field Data Collection All scats found suspected to be of mountain lion origin based on morphology will be collected based on a standard field collection protocol for further DNA analysis (see attached). Sampled locations will be recorded using handheld GPS units along with time, date and habitat type details for mapping purposes after DNA analysis. Scat samples collected will be desiccated and frozen as soon as possible, to prevent any further DNA degradation, and transported to the laboratory. Ron W. Thompson examining a puma defecation site (Photo A.Naidu) Laboratory Analysis DNA will be extracted from epithelial cells on the surface of the scat samples. PCR amplification will be done using mitochondrial DNA markers to confirm species identity. Once identified, DNA from mountain lion scat samples will be PCR amplified using microsatellite DNA markers to generate individual genotypes. Using software packages (mentioned below), all genotypes obtained will be analyzed for relatedness, structure, isolation by distance and migration. At the end of the analysis, we hope to map a best estimate of gene flow across the compared sub-populations. We will also perform a rarefaction analysis to obtain a minimum population estimate during each of the three years. DNA will also be extracted from prey remains, such as tissue and bone fragments, found inside the scat samples, for identification of prey species. Scat components identified will be compared to a database divided into biological year periods to estimate any seasonal variation in prey selection by mountain lions. Project locationmountain complexes in the Kofa NWR and surrounding mountain complexes in southwest Arizona and southern California, including the Plomosas, Harquahalas, Black Mountains, Cabeza Prieta NWR, Gila Bend Mountains, and Pinacate Biosphere Reserve (Mexico). Results We collected 105 scat samples suspected to be mountain lion in origin between 2007 and 2009 from the Kofa and Castle Dome Mountains in Kofa NWR. We extracted and PCR-amplified DNA from the surface of the samples and, using a speciesidentification PCR assay, identified 56 scat samples to be from mountain lion, 12 from bobcat (Lynx rufus) and 3 from coyote (Canis latrans).

The remaining 37 scat samples failed to yield PCR-amplifiable DNA. We then analyzed the mountain lion scats (along with 4 male lion tissue reference samples collected during radio-collaring efforts on the Kofa NWR) in a genotyping assay employing 3 microsatellite loci chosen from the domestic cat genetic linkage map. We successfully genotyped 4 tissue reference samples from previously captured mountain lions (all males) and 21 of 56 mountain lion scat samples. Puma feces in the field (Photo A. Naidu). Among the 25 obtained genotypes, we identified 11 unique genotypes (individuals). Then, using a PCRbased assay with the 4 tissue samples as male controls and 1 other female mountain lion control sample (collected by AGFD near Sabino Canyon, Tucson, Arizona), we identified an additional 2 female and 2 male mountain lions. The assay failed to yield PCR products for the remaining 3 unknown individuals. We concluded that a minimum of 11 individual mountain lions used the Kofa NWR between 2007 and 2009, including at least 2 females and 5 males identified from scat samples (see map) and 1 male identified only from the reference tissue samples. We surmise that success in identifying, genotyping and sexing mountain lion scats can be limited by DNA degradation caused by exposure to sunlight and moisture prior to collection. Diet analysis We isolated prey remains (i.e., two morphologically dissimilar bone or connective tissue fragments) from each of the 56 mountain lion scats, pulverized each fragment, and extracted DNA from the powder. We successfully identified prey species from all bone fragments using the species-identification PCR assay described above. We determined that a majority (~ 50 %) of mountain lion diet was composed of mule deer. We also documented 4 other different prey species (see graph). Our high success in identification of prey remains is possibly due to the preservation of DNA in bones complemented with the protection offered by scat material against direct exposure to sunlight and moisture. For wildlife agencies plagued by a lack of robust information on mountain lion populations, genetic techniques provide an effective, non-invasive and potentially less expensive way to sample populations over large areas. Our analysis of mountain lion scats provided data, in conjunction with on-going camera-trap surveys and radio-collaring efforts, on the minimum number and sex of mountain lions. Wildlife managers may exploit such genetic analyses to monitor wild populations of cryptic species with questions not just limited to population parameters, but also individual relatedness and movements at the landscape level. We foresee noninvasive genetics will become increasingly useful to wildlife managers as management agencies are called upon to obtain baseline information in support of management actions. Taking into consideration the low success rate on PCR amplifiable DNA recovery from feces, we wish to extend our fecal sample collection to obtain a large enough sample size that will allow for drawing conclusions on a robust minimum number estimate and construction of a diet profile for the pumas on the Kofa NWR.

Future plan In southwestern Arizona, mountain lion management decisions in the future will require information on how mountain lions in Kofa NWR fit within the larger regional mountain lion population. To address this, we are continuing this project to the next phase and plan to use both microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers to analyze mountain lion DNA samples collected at a regional scale. Based on relatedness estimates from this analysis, we plan to map out a best estimate of gene flow across the compared populations or sub-populations. To initiate this phase of the project, we plan to obtain mountain lion DNA samples from the surrounding mountain ranges in southern California and to the north and south of Kofa NWR, including the Pinacate Biosphere Reserve in Mexico. Our ability to achieve the project s goals would benefit from any collaboration with other researchers via contribution of representative mountain lion DNA samples from areas surrounding Kofa NWR. Anyone who has or can obtain scat or tissue samples from mountain lions should contact the primary author if interested in contributing samples to this project. Project Information Duration: Phase I: June 2008 November 2009, Phase II: Jan 2010-2012 Location (see map): Sponsor(s): Project address Project leader: Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 9300 E 28th St., Yuma, Arizona 85365, USA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Dr. Melanie Culver, Assistant Unit Leader, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Arizona., culver@ag.arizona.edu AGFD PROJECT OFFICER: Ron W. Thompson, Big Game Tag Fund Manager and Large Carnivore Biologist, Arizona Game and Fish Department, RoThompson@azgfd.gov USFWS PROJECT OFFICER: Lindsay Smythe, Wildlife Biologist, Kofa National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service., Lindsay_Smythe@fws.gov Project reference Protocol Lindsay Smythe. 2008. http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2181/1533-6085- 40.2.155?journalCode=jana IN-FIELD SCAT SAMPLE HANDLING, COLLECTION AND STORAGE PROTOCOL PDF