SNAP: SUNNYBROOK NEGLECT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE CONTENTS 1. ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL 2. TEST BOOKLET CONTRIBUTORS: SE BLACK PL EBERT DK MARTIN

Similar documents
FUNCTIONAL SKILLS MATHEMATICS (level 1)

March Madness Basketball Tournament

Student Handout: Summative Activity. Professional Sports

b) (2 pts.) Does the study show that drinking 4 or more cups of coffee a day caused the higher death rate?

Descriptive Statistics Project Is there a home field advantage in major league baseball?

March Madness Basketball Tournament

Year 10 Term 2 Homework

Revision 7/2/02 MEASURING WRAVMA DRAWING DESIGNS WITH SCORING TEMPLATES

12-2 Area of Circles. Find the area of each circle. Round to the nearest tenth. 1. ANSWER: m 2. ANSWER: 12.6 yd 2 ANSWER: 132.

Chapter 0 Pretest = 4

AN-SNAP Class allocation. There are two steps to allocating a SNAP class for each patient

Standard 3.1 The student will plan and conduct investigations in which

Equine Results Interpretation Guide For Cannon Angles May 2013

The Coriolis Effect - Deflect the Arrows!

Stereo Optical Company Vision Tester Slide Package:

STT 315 Section /19/2014

Foundation Skills Assessment

Number Sense Performance Task: Par The Mini-Golf Way! LEVEL 1 Anchor

RANGE AND PASTURE GRASS IDENTIFICATION CONTEST 4-H STATE ROUNDUP & DISTRICT ROUNDUP CONTESTS RS 1 General Contest Rules - see 4-H Roundup Handbook

How are the values related to each other? Are there values that are General Education Statistics

(c) The hospital decided to collect the data from the first 50 patients admitted on July 4, 2010.

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL CARIBBEAN CERTIFICATE OF SECONDARY LEVEL COMPETENCE MATHEMATICS SPECIMEN PAPER MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 75 Minutes

THIS MANUAL HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE MINIMAX GOLF HANDICAPPING SYSTEM.

2012 SCORING MANUAL. Introduction of the VJBL Adjusted FIBA SCORESHEET. Date Issued 21 st February 2011

COMPASS DIRECTION AND BEARINGS

Bouncing Ball A C T I V I T Y 8. Objectives. You ll Need. Name Date

Besides the reported poor performance of the candidates there were a number of mistakes observed on the assessment tool itself outlined as follows:

FUGASHIN SAIGON FOOT MEASUREMENT GUIDE

Lab 5: Descriptive Statistics

Internet Technology Fundamentals. To use a passing score at the percentiles listed below:

Name of product: Gripper of FTV panels for horizontal façades Types: PHF (60, 80, 100, 120, 133, 150, 172,200, 240) INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

Teacher's Manual. First Printing: September Master Books P.O. Box 726 Green Forest, AR Printed in the United States of America

Grade: 8. Author(s): Hope Phillips

Introduction to Measurement Developing Standard and Metric Measuring Skills

COMMON TRAINING PHASE THREE INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 3 EO C CORRECT MARKSMANSHIP ERROR PREPARATION

LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Overview of Lesson. guided practice Teacher: anticipates, monitors, selects, sequences, and connects student work

Measuring Mass and Volume

Pacific Charter Institute Pacing Guide Grade(s): _5 Subject Area: _Math in Focus grade 5 CP: yes _X no

The Daily Record. 42 The National Strategies Secondary Mathematics exemplification: Y7 NUMBER. Place value, ordering and rounding

Proposed Paralympic Classification System for Va a Information for National federations and National Paralympic Committees

2016 School Competition Sprint Round Problems 1 30

General Certificate of Secondary Education Foundation Tier

SECTION 1. READING AND WRITING NUMBERS PLACE VALUE

Answer: Team Name: Time Completed: 1 st min. 2 nd min. 3 rd min. 4 th min. 5 th min.

8. A. 5.62; 5 wholes, 6 tenths, and 2 hundredths B C. 6 D A.* two and three-hundredths. B.* and 2.03

North Point - Advance Placement Statistics Summer Assignment

shower enclosure PlayTime walk-in shower Any queries? Call:

2018 School Competition Sprint Round Problems 1 30

Observing Waves, Their Properties, and Relationships

Diameter in cm. Bubble Number. Bubble Number Diameter in cm

Triage Using Telemedicine: Advancements in Prehospital Stroke Care

Firestop Products and Systems Estimating Guide

RoboHit TM Robofest 2017 Game

Update on Acute Stroke Management

THE 2018 ROSENTHAL PRIZE for Innovation in Math Teaching. Geometry Project: DARTBOARD

Aim: Normal Distribution and Bell Curve

COMMON TRAINING PROFICIENCY LEVEL FOUR INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 3 EO C SCORE AIR RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP TARGETS PREPARATION

2004 Wave Propagation

Exploring Measures of Central Tendency (mean, median and mode) Exploring range as a measure of dispersion

Sum Fun Tournament Meeting (Multiple Topics)

Draw Shot Primer Part VI: Draw Shot Practice Drill

Wednesday 4 November 2015 Morning

VariSource High Dose Rate Afterloader Procedures. For Performing Breast Brachytherapy with. The SAVI TM Applicator

Candidate Number. General Certificate of Secondary Education Higher Tier March 2013

Gap Closing. Representing and Comparing Decimals. Junior / Intermediate Student Book

The Bruins I.C.E. School

Gait Analyser. Description of Walking Performance

Measuring Relative Achievements: Percentile rank and Percentile point

LAST NAME First Name(s) Student Number Practical Group as on student card as on student card Code

Handicap Differential = (Adjusted Gross Score - USGA Course Rating) x 113 / USGA Slope Rating

DO YOU KNOW WHO THE BEST BASEBALL HITTER OF ALL TIMES IS?...YOUR JOB IS TO FIND OUT.

NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE-SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS ACCESS

4x6x10M. 6x8x12M GPM CUBIC METERS PER HOUR. 8x10x20S. 8x8x17. 6x8x17M. 8x10x17S. 10x12x14. 6x8x12XL. 8x10x12L. 4x6x12A. 6x8x12M. 6x8x12S.

CHAPTER 1 ORGANIZATION OF DATA SETS

Cheetah Math Superstars

Math 11 Essentials Final Assessment Part #1

INSTRUCTIONS FOR NAVIGATING TOPDOG

Purpose. Scope. Process flow OPERATING PROCEDURE 07: HAZARD LOG MANAGEMENT

LEVEL 1 FUNCTIONAL SKILLS MATHEMATICS 09865

Introduction to Scientific Notation & Significant Figures. Packet #6

The field of play must be rectangular and marked with lines. These lines belong to the areas of which they are boundaries.

Adding Sculpted Toes to a Cloth Doll Foot

Project: OpenDRIVE Document No. Issue: Title: Style Guide For OpenDRIVE Databases VI C. Date: 05 th March 2014 no.

TECH TIP 14. Minimum Surface Area Measurements with Micromeritics Physisorption Analyzers

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (September 2015)

Candidate Number. General Certificate of Secondary Education Foundation Tier January 2013

Unit 4. Triangle Relationships. Oct 3 8:20 AM. Oct 3 8:21 AM. Oct 3 8:26 AM. Oct 3 8:28 AM. Oct 3 8:27 AM. Oct 3 8:27 AM

Scoreboard Operator s Instructions MPC Control

Bocce Ball. Kendra Alberts, Theresa Staley, Kelsey Timmerman, & Morgan Vitosh HHP 494. May 9, 2013

ANATOMY OF USEF DRESSAGE TEST SHEETS TRAINING THROUGH FOURTH LEVELS by Leslie Raulin

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer 2009

Scoreboard Operator s Instructions MPCW6 Control

Cumulative Test. Name. Score. Show all work on this paper. Please use the Student Reference Guide.

Group walks & events manager: Getting Started for Contributors

GCSE Mathematics Practice Tests: Set 3

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (March 27, 2003)

Draw Shot Primer Part II: aiming

INTERFELS RADIAL AND TANGENTIAL TOTAL PRESSURE CELLS

Box-and-Whisker Plots

Transcription:

: SUNNYBROOK NEGLECT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE CONTENTS 1. ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL 2. TEST BOOKLET CONTRIBUTORS: SE BLACK PL EBERT DK MARTIN FS LEIBOVITCH KL BARBOUR JP SZALAI CORRESPONDENCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: SANDRA E. BLACK, MD, FRCP (C) BRILL PROFESSOR OF NEUROLOGY, DEPT. OF MEDICINE COGNITIVE NEUROLOGY SUNNYBROOK HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE A421 2075 BAYVIEW AVENUE TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M4N 3M5

: SUNNYBROOK NEGLECT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL VERSION 2.2 APRIL 24, 2001 PATRICIA L. EBERT, M.SC. FARRELL S. LEIBOVITCH, M.SC. SANDRA E. BLACK, MD, FRCP(C) KIRA L. BARBOUR, B.SC. Copyright Cognitive Neurology Unit, Sunnybrook & Women s College HSC April 2001 1

: SUNNYBROOK NEGLECT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 Tools Required...3 Order of Administration...3 ADMINISTRATION...4 A1. Drawing Tasks...4 Instructions...4 A2. Copying Tasks...4 Instructions...4 B. Line Cancellation Task...4 Instructions...4 C. Line Bisection Task...4 Instructions...4 D. Shape Cancellation Task...5 Instructions...5 Figure 1: Example of the Shape Cancellation Target...5 SCORING...6 A1&2. Copying and Drawing...6 B. Line Cancellation...9 C. Line Bisection...9 D. Shape Cancellation...10 INTERPRETATION...10 Table 1: Classification of performance on the...10 Table 2: Percent Deviation Calculations for the Line Bisection Task...11 Table 3: Score Calculation for the Line Bisection Task...12 Example of Scoring for a Right Hemisphere-Damaged Patient...13 Score Sheet for...14 2

: SUNNYBROOK NEGLECT ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATION AND SCORING MANUAL INTRODUCTION (Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure) is a simple to use test battery for neglect. It is designed to be administered at the bedside in the acute stage following stroke, and can be used to monitor recovery of neglect at later stages. Tools Required - Sunnybrook Neglect Assessment Procedure package Two blank sheets of paper Pen/pencil Order of Administration Spontaneous drawing of clock and daisy Line cancellation Line bisection Copying of clock and daisy Shape cancellation 3

ADMINISTRATION A1. Drawing Tasks Instructions 1. Place a blank piece of paper in front of the patient, ensuring the page is midline to the patient. 2. Repeat to the patient: I want you to draw a clock face and make sure you put all of the numbers on the clock. 3. With a fresh piece of blank paper, say to the patient: Now, I want you to draw a daisy, a flower with many petals. A2. Copying Tasks Instructions 1. Place the picture of the clock in front of the patient and align the test midline to the patient. 2. Repeat to the patient: I want you to copy this picture the best you can. Do not tell the patient it is a picture of a clock face. 3. Using the picture of a daisy, repeat to the patient: I want you to copy this picture the best you can. Again, do not tell the patient it is a picture of a daisy. B. Line Cancellation Task Instructions 1. Centre the line cancellation task in front and midline to the patient. 2. Repeat: For this task I want you to cross out all of the lines on this page. 3. Demonstrate the task by crossing out the one line in the center of the page. 4. Say to the patient: Let me know when you are finished the task. 5. Mark a T at the top of the page to ensure the test is scored correctly. C. Line Bisection Task Instructions 1. Centre the 15 cm lines at the patient s midline. 2. Repeat: For this task I want you to make a mark on this line so it divides the line into two equal halves. I want you to draw a mark that cuts this line exactly in half. 3. Repeat the procedure using the bottom line. 4. Mark the top of the page to ensure the task is scored correctly. 5. Repeat the entire procedure using the 20 cm lines. 4

D. Shape Cancellation Task Instructions 1. Centre the test at the patient s midline. 2. Draw the target on a piece of paper and say I have just drawn the target. It looks like a sun with a line drawn through it. You have to circle all the targets on this page. Do not circle anything else other than the target. When you are satisfied that you have circled all the targets let me know that you are finished. 3. Begin timing the patient when the first target is circled and stop when the patient states they are finished or puts the pencil down. 4. Change to a different colored pencil crayon after every tenth target circled so that the search pattern can be determined. 5. Mark the top of the page to ensure the task is scored correctly. Figure 1: Example of the Shape Cancellation Target 5

SCORING Scoring of the various sub-tasks is based on omissions made contralateral to the side of brain damage. Therefore, left-sided omissions are scored in patients with right hemispheredamage and right-sided omissions in patients with left hemisphere-damage. Separate scoring sheets are used for patients with right and left hemisphere strokes. A1&2. Copying and Drawing The decision rules with respect to the drawing and copying tasks are based on a blinded study of elderly controls and stroke patients. They may seem arbitrary, at times, but we were guided by the need to balance reliability as well as sensitivity. All copying and drawing tasks are scored the same. Drawings with significant omissions of detail on the contralateral half are scored as having neglect. Omissions include detail missing on the contralateral half, which is present on the ipsilateral half, for example, missing numbers on the clock face or missing petals on the daisy and/or leaves on the stem. Poorly placed numbers or petals that results in gaps are not scored as errors of omissions. See the examples of drawings in Figures 2-5. Drawings that are not recognizable due to lack of hand control or constructional apraxia are scored as unassessable. Figure 2: Examples of Clocks Not Scored as Neglect Figure A1: Copied clock, no omissions noted. Figure A2: Drawn clock with a left-sided gap. The gap is not scored as neglect since all numbers are present and it is likely due to poor planning. Figure A3: Drawn clock with both right and left-sided gaps not scored as neglect since no numbers are missing and the gaps are on both sides. Figure A4: Drawn clock not scored as neglect. Although all the detail is toward the right half, there are no missing numbers and the drawing could be the result of poor planning. 6

Figure Figure 3: Examples of Daisies Not Scored as Neglect Figure B1: Copied daisy. No neglect demonstrated. There are an equal number of petals on each half and a leaf on both sides of the stem. Figure B2: Drawn daisy. Although there is a gap on the bottom right corner, this is not scored as neglect since there are an equal number of petals on the right and left halves. Compare with Figure D1. Figure 4: Examples of Clocks Scored as Neglect Figure C1: Drawn clock with all numbers missing on the left side. Scored as neglect. Figure C2: Drawn clock with missing numbers. Scored as neglect. 7

Figure 5: Examples of Daisies Scored as Neglect Figure D1: Copied daisy with missing petal on right side. Note there is an unequal number of petals on each half. Scored as neglect. Compare with Figure B2. Figure D2: Copied daisy with obvious omissions on left. Scored as neglect. Figure D3: Copied daisy with a missing leaf on the left side of the stem. Scored as neglect. Figure D4: Drawn daisy with omissions of detail on the left, both leaves and petals are less numerous on the left. Figure 6: Example of Drawing and Copying by a right hemisphere-damaged patient Drawing of a Clock Copy of a Clock Drawing of a Daisy Copy of a Daisy Example of a right hemisphere stroke patient s performance on the drawing and copying tasks. In this case, two pictures are scored as having neglect (draw-clock and copy-daisy). 8

B. Line Cancellation Omission of any line on the contralateral half of the page is scored as neglect. There is a maximum of 10 omitted lines per side. Figure 7: Example of a right hemisphere stroke patient s performance on the line cancellation task. Six lines are missed on the contralateral half of the page. C. Line Bisection Line bisection score is based on the mean percent deviation of the patient s mark from the true midpoint. Measure each line from the left and determine the percent deviation from Table 2. Note there are different percent deviation values for the 15 and 20 cm lines. Add up the percent deviations from all four lines and divide by 4 to obtain the mean percent deviation. Figure 8: Example of a right hemisphere stroke patient s performance on the line bisection task. The distance in centimeters along the line that the patient has bisected the line is shown. That distance is used to calculate the percent deviation in Table 1. Example of 20 cm line (not drawn to scale) Formula to calculate percent deviation: [Distance(cm)-10] 10 100 = % deviation Example of 15 cm line (not drawn to scale) Formula to calculate percent deviation: [Distance(cm)-7.5] 7.5 100 = % deviation 9

D. Shape Cancellation All targets omitted on the contralateral half of the page are counted. There are 30 targets on each half of the page. Figure 9: Example of a right hemisphere stroke patient s performance on the shape cancellation task. In this case, all 30 targets were missed on the contralateral half of the page, in addition to some ipsilateral targets being missed. INTERPRETATION Performance on can be classified according to neglect severity and is summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Classification of performance on the Score Classification of Performance 0-5 Normal Performance 6-40 Mild Neglect 41-100 Severe Neglect 10

Table 2: Percent Deviation Calculations for the Line Bisection Task 15 cm Line 20 cm Line Distance % Deviation Distance % Deviation 5.8 cm -23 8.3 cm -17 5.9 cm -21 8.4 cm -16 6.0 cm -20 8.5 cm -15 6.1 cm -19 8.6 cm -14 6.2 cm -17 8.7 cm -13 6.3 cm -16 8.8 cm -12 6.4 cm -15 8.9 cm -11 6.5 cm -13 9.0 cm -10 6.6 cm -12 9.1 cm -9 6.7 cm -11 9.2 cm -8 6.8 cm -9 9.3 cm -7 6.9 cm -8 9.4 cm -6 7.0 cm -7 9.5 cm -5 7.1 cm -5 9.6 cm -4 7.2 cm -4 9.7 cm -3 7.3 cm -3 9.8 cm -2 7.4 cm -1 9.9 cm -1 7.5 cm 0 10.0 cm 0 7.6 cm 1 10.1 cm 1 7.7 cm 3 10.2 cm 2 7.8 cm 4 10.3 cm 3 7.9 cm 5 10.4 cm 4 8.0 cm 7 10.5 cm 5 8.1 cm 8 10.6 cm 6 8.2 cm 9 10.7 cm 7 8.3 cm 11 10.8 cm 8 8.4 cm 12 10.9 cm 9 8.5 cm 13 11.0 cm 10 8.6 cm 15 11.1 cm 11 8.7 cm 16 11.2 cm 12 8.8 cm 17 11.3 cm 13 8.9 cm 19 11.4 cm 14 9.0 cm 20 11.5 cm 15 9.1 cm 21 11.6 cm 16 9.2 cm 23 11.7 cm 17 9.3 cm 24 11.8 cm 18 9.4 cm 25 11.9 cm 19 9.5 cm 27 12.0 cm 20 9.6 cm 28 12.1 cm 21 [Distance(cm)-7.5] 7.5 100 = % deviation [Distance(cm)-10] 10 100 = % deviation 11

Table 3: Score Calculation for the Line Bisection Task Normal Limits SCORE Mean % Deviation for Left Mean % Deviation for Right Hemisphere-Damaged Patients Hemisphere-Damaged Patients 0-3.6 2.8 2 < -3.6 > 2.8 4 < -7.0 > 5.4 6 < -10.1 > 8.5 8 < -13.2 > 11.6 10 < -16.3 > 14.6 Scores for the line bisection task are calculated using the above chart and the average percent deviation. For example, a patient with left hemisphere damage and an average deviation on the four lines of 9.6% would get a score of 4. Similarly, a patient with right hemisphere damage and an average deviation of 25% would get a score of 10. For patients with bilateral hemisphere damage, the cutoff in either direction would be used. For example, a patient with bilateral damage who had a mean deviation of 11% would be given a score of 6, as would the same individual if their mean deviation was 10%. 12

Example of Scoring for a Right Hemisphere-Damaged Patient A. Drawing and Copying Number of Pictures with Neglect Corresponding Score 0 0 1 20 2 30 3 30 4 30 Enter Picture Score _30 B. Line Cancellation Number of lines missed on right side of page (max. 10): 6 x 3 = 18 C. Line Bisection Enter Score Here 18 Line Distance in cm % deviation from Table 1 1. 15 cm 14.0 86.67% 2. 15 cm 8.9 18.67% 3. 20 cm 18.4 84% 4. 20 cm 16.3 63% 5. Total % deviation 252.34% 6. Mean % deviation (divide by 4) 63.09% 7. Score (# of s.d. from normal mean x 2) 10 Enter Score Here D. Shape Cancellation Number of targets missed on contralateral side of page (max. 30): Enter Score Here E. Total Score Add up score from each section for a total score out of 100. Round to the nearest whole number. _ 10 30 _ Total Score 88 /100 Classification: No Neglect Mild Neglect a Severe Neglect 13

Score Sheet for A. Drawing and Copying Number of Pictures with Neglect Corresponding Score 0 0 1 20 2 30 3 30 4 30 Enter Picture Score B. Line Cancellation Number of lines missed on right side of page (max. 10): x 3 = C. Line Bisection Enter Score Here Line Distance in cm % deviation from Table 1 1. 15 cm 2. 15 cm 3. 20 cm 4. 20 cm 5. Total % deviation 6. Mean % deviation (divide by 4) 7. Score (# of s.d. from normal mean x 2) Enter Score Here D. Shape Cancellation Number of targets missed on contralateral side of page (max. 30): Enter Score Here E. Total Score Add up score from each section for a total score out of 100. Round to the nearest whole number. Classification: No Neglect Total Score /100 Mild Neglect Severe Neglect 14