Central Iowa Trail Condition Report DRAFT

Similar documents
DES MOINES AREA MPO. Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association. April 6, 2017

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAM

Living Streets Policy

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Safe Routes to School Action Plan Aberdeen, Idaho

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

4. Mobility and Transportation Element. Page Bikes and Pedestrians

BIKE ON ROAD NETWORKS: URBAN & RURAL. Non-motorized Transportation Networks. Madison County Council of Governments

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

This page intentionally left blank.

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description


Purpose and Need. For the. Strava Bicycle Data Project

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Winnipeg Walk Bike Projects Downtown Tire Talk - Summary

This page intentionally left blank.

DUPAGE COUNTY ON-ROAD BICYCLE CONNECTION GUIDELINES

Speed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13

Developing a Bike/Pedestrian Plan Using ArcInfo and Public Participation Rob Shumowsky, Madison County Council of Governments

Bicycle Friendly Niagara Falls

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Classification Criteria

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning in a Historically Car-Centric Culture: A Focus on Connectivity, Safety, & Accessibility

Section 9. Implementation

DRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH

An Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Proposed On Street Bikeways

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018

Upcoming Planning Department Initiatives

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY: SUMMARY REPORT

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Bike San Mateo County San Mateo County Bicycle Plan Recommendations August 30, 2010

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

Favorable factors for bicycling and walking investments & plan implemtation. Road Map for Success

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Engagement Summary: Round 1

Phone: Fax: Project Reference No. (to be filled out by MassHighway):

This page intentionally left blank.

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Cyclists and Bikeways: What s your match? A guide to bikeway options for a variety of cyclists

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

JEFFERSON COUNTY BIKE PLAN 2010: EMPHASIS SUMMARY

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Our vision for Chicago s bike network focuses on three types of routes:

Small Town & Rural Multimodal Networks

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

Off-road Trails. Guidance

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

The study area for this project is the entire County of Oxford including both the urban centres and rural areas.

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

REAL-TIME SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION PROGRAM. Routes of Significance Memphis

2014 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Study Evaluation Tools Leslie A. Meehan, AICP MPO Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting April 1, 2015

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Emergency Response Support Signage on Multi-Use Trails Plan

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Bicycle Friendly Streets

DRAFT. Lecompton. Table of Contents. Background

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Dan Andrews. Expert Advisor to the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture & Sport OPA Ed Conference, Burlington, ON March 1, 2018

Bicycle-Pedestrian Master Plan: Chapters 3 and 4 Distribution

Ajax: The Road to Complete Streets

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Transcription:

Central Iowa Trail Condition 2018 Report

Table of Contents Acknowledgements..x Key Findings.x Introduction...........x Iowa Data Bike........x State of the Trails...........x Trail Roughness.........x Segment-by-Segment Ratings..........x

Acknowledgements We would like to thank Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) and Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation (INHF) for their assistance in making this project possible.

Key Findings Of trail segments collected in 2017, 86 percent are in good condition with smooth or very smooth surface conditions. Level 1 regional trails have limited poor condition segments. Overall, they are preforming with smooth and very smooth surface conditions. Of trail segments collected in 2017, only 3 percent are in rough condition. D R AF T Local connector trails are more likely to be in fair or rough condition.

5 Introduction Central Iowa is home to more than 600 miles of shared use trails connecting urban centers with natural rural landscapes that show the beauty of the heart of Iowa. Trails in Central Iowa continue to be an important quality of life aspect for thousands of residents every year by providing recreational opportunities accessible to all ages. More recently, the trails have been leveraged as a tool to generate additional tourism through events like the BaCoon Ride along the Racoon River Trail. This extensive trail system continues to grow and evolve as missing links in the trail system are constructed by local communities, county conservation boards, or collaborations between local partners. Each year the Des Moines Area MPO provides trail projects with funding through state and federal programs to fill gaps within the trail system. As more Iowans embrace bicycling for both recreation and daily transportation, the Central Iowa trail system will continue to see use throughout the year. While the network of trails expands, the existing trail network is starting to mature and soon spending priorities will require a greater focus on the maintenance of existing trails. Currently, when trail maintenance is required local governments utilize field investigations to determine the condition of trail segments they plan to maintain. The field investigation process can be time consuming as not all trail segments are readily accessible by road. Connection to Mobilizing Tomorrow In 2014, the Des Moines Area MPO completed the update of the long-range transportation plan for the Greater Des Moines Area called Mobilizing Tomorrow. This plan provides the goals for the transportation network to the year 2050. Goal 2 of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to manage and optimize the transportation infrastructure and services within the region. Currently, the MPO utilizes pavement condition data collected for the entire street network to provide a regional review of the investment necessary to maintain the current condition of the roadway network. Photo courtesy of MPO staff.

6 The Des Moines Area MPO seeks to support longrange planning of trail maintenance by providing data to make performance based decisions on prioritizing trail maintenance. The Central Iowa Trail Condition project was created to fill this information gap within the Central Iowa trail system. It intends to: Develop a bike-based data-collection vehicle to improve the efficiency of collecting data on the extensive trail network. Create an inventory of condition data for all paved trails within Central Iowa with a focus on trail roughness and geo-located photos of trail surfaces. Provide data to local agencies, consultants, and the public to inform a long-term maintenance strategy for the Central Iowa trail network. Make the project replicable and promote the project to expand knowledge regarding approaches to collect trail condition data. Central Iowa Trails The beginning of the Central Iowa trails network started with the Bill Riley Trail, now known as the Neal Smith Trail. Since the late 1970 s, local community leaders and organizations have pushed for trails within and connecting their communities. This leadership is still seen today as a majority of trails are managed by local agencies rather than state agencies. In 2004 the Central Iowa Bicycle-Pedestrian Roundtable was formed to further develop bicycle and pedestrian facilities in central Iowa. The Bike- Ped Roundtable encompasses the planning areas of the MPO, the Ames Area MPO, and the Central Iowa Regional Transportation Planning Alliance (CIRTPA). The mission of the Bike-Ped Roundtable is to facilitate the development, maintenance, and promotion of a world-class commuter and recreational trail system in central Iowa. This group assisted the Des Moines MPO staff to created Central Iowa s first bicycle and pedestrian action plan, CONNECT: Central Iowa Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Action Plan 2020. This plan includes projects, programs, and policies on bicycle and pedestrian transportation in upcoming years. Additionally, it includes the breakdown of four Trail Level of Significance Classifications. They are as follows: Level 1: State Significance Must first meet all of the criteria described in Level 2. Must span two or more counties and be recognized by the State of Iowa/Iowa Department of Transportation as a Level 1 Trail. A decisive knowledge of the trail boundaries must exist. Alternatively, must receive approval by the Central Iowa Bicycle-Pedestrian Roundtable. Level 2: Regional Significance Must first meet all of the criteria described in Level 3. Must exist in two or more city or county jurisdictions. Must connect places, streets or trails of significance to the central Iowa region. Alternatively, must receive approval by the Central Iowa Bicycle-Pedestrian Roundtable. Level 3: Jurisdiction Significance Must first meet all of the criteria described in Level 4. Must be a minimum of 8 feet in width. Must connect places, streets, or trails of jurisdictional significance. Alternatively, must receive approval by the Central Iowa Bicycle-Pedestrian Roundtable. Level 4: Local/Neighborhood Significance Must meet the minimum criteria to be designated as a Shared-Use Path, Bicycle Lane, or Bicycle Route, as specified in the Manual on Unified Traffic Control Devices. Today, Iowans and visitors continue to enjoy trails and what they provide for communities. The demand for trails and better connectivity between individual trails persists. As the Central Iowa trail system continues to grow, it will be important to create a reliable procedure to conduct condition assessments in order to maintain a high quality network and locate gaps in the network.

AF T R D 7

8 Iowa Data Bike A primary objective of the Central Iowa Trails Condition project was to develop a bike-based data-collection vehicle to improve the efficiency of collecting data on the extensive trail network. Using an electric-assist bicycle, an iphone, an app designed to detect pavement roughness, and a pair of cameras, the Des Moines Area MPO created a tool to efficiently collect data to evaluate trail condition. The Data Bike, a moniker provided to the bike, was able to provide a consistent speed for data collection regardless of terrain as the electric-assist bicycle provided the rider addtional power while pedaling. The Data Bike uses three main components to collect data. 1) The rruf app on the iphone collected accelerometer data to produce a segmented Class 3 response based roughness condtion rating. 2) A GoPro camera mounted at the rear of the bike provided geo-located photos of the trails. 3) A Samsung Gear 360 mounted above the riders head provided imagery used for Google Street View.

9 State of the Trails During the summer and fall of 2017, the MPO with the assistance of INHF collected approximately 400 miles of smoothness data, over 100,000 photos of the trail surface, and more than 2,700 photos for Google Street View. 1% 2% 11% 30% AF T The data collected to date provides evidence that the regional trail network in Central Iowa is in good condition with 86 percent of trail miles in smooth or very smooth condition. While these trails may have intermittent cracking, maintenance has need completed to keep trail users on a smooth surface. Trail Mileage by Condtion D R The photos collected on the trails provide a snapshot of the experience available to residents and tourists. As previously stated, the trails provide a link between the urban cityscapes and the rolling rural landscapes. Trailheads in towns throughout the region highlight the investment in ammenities that make Central Iowa a cycling destination. 56%

10 Trail Roughness The accelerometer data collected by the Data Bike indicated significant changes in the smoothness of the trail segment. Using the accelerometer data, the trails can be categorized into five roughness categories. The photos to the right illustrate roughness conditions for each of the five levels. Very Smooth AF T Very Smooth Very smooth trails have nearly no cracking or vegetation growing on the trail. Variations in smoothness can be caused at seams between concrete or other material spread across trail. Smooth Smooth trails are typically in good condition, but are beginning to show signs of cracking. Cracking on smooth trails generally does not create discomfort for the rider. Smooth Fair Trails in fair condtion are beginning to show increased wear typically have more cracking. Cracking on trails in fair condition cause minor discomfort for riders. D R Rough Trails in rough condition are showing advanced cracking with vegetation growing through the surface. These cracks are typically wider and deeper than cracks along fair conditioned trails and can cause discomfort for riders. Very Rough Very rough condition trails have cracking similar to trails in rough condition, but also have vertical displacement of the trail surface. Very rough condtions on trails may be avoidable by the rider, but if traversed can cause discomfort. Fair Rough Very Rough

11 Level 1 Regional Trail Condition 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% American Discovery Trail (Miles Collected 18.7) Bill Riley Trail (Miles Collected 2.4) Chichaqua Valley Trail (Miles Collected 14.4) Des Moines River Trail (Miles Collected 2.8) Gay Lea Wilson (Miles Collected 15.5) Great Western Trail (Miles Collected 13.0) High Trestle Trail (Miles Collected 19.6) John Pat Dorrian Trail (Miles Collected 1.9) Kruidenier Trail (Miles Collected 2.1) Levee Trail (Miles Collected 2.7) Mark C. Ackelson Trail (Miles Collected 2.7) Martin Luther King Jr Trail (Miles Collected 2.3) Meredith to Bill Riley Trail (Miles Collected 1.2) Meredith Trail (Miles Collected 3.3) Neal Smith Trail (Miles Collected 5.9) Principal Riverwalk (Miles Collected 1.6) Raccoon River Valley Trail (Miles Collected 80.0) Summerset Trail (Miles Collected 13.6) Walnut Creek Trail (Miles Collected 2.5) Very Smooth Smooth Fair Rough Very Rough Note: Based on percent of milage collected in 2017

12 Downtown Trails & Connector Trails 40.9% Very Smooth 49.1% Smooth 8.5% Fair 0.01% Rough Miles Regional Class Maintenance Jurisdiction Surfae Type Width 1 1 AF T 2 2 R 3 4 D 4 5 5 3 1.5% Very Rough