S-102 v2.0 Status Brief

Similar documents
EMPA 2017 How can the S-102 Bathymetric Surface Product improve safety in navigation and pilotage?

Activities of KHOA on creation of S-10X test data sets and S-100 sea trial

Paper for Consideration by HSSC8 Development of an Additional Bathymetry Layer standard based on S-57/S-52

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping

High Precision Hydrography in Canada, the ST. Lawrence River Channel, HD Bathymetry, Production, Distribution and Updating

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY STANDARDS

NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION

S-44 edition 5 The IHO s New Standard For Hydrographic Surveys Chris Howlett Head of Seabed Data Centre United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

DUKC Chart Overlay. Presentation to IHO TWL and DQ Working Groups Wollongong, March 2014

Figure 1 Example feature overview.

Meeting the Challenges of the IHO and LINZ Special Order Object Detection Requirements

Paper for consideration by ENC Working Group. Use of AU6 ENC cells as an option for Bathymetric ENCs (benc)

Advantages of Using Combined Bathymetry and Side Scan Data in Survey Processing T.M. Hiller, L.N. Brisson

Journey of a Sounding: Application of NOAA Soundings and Features to Navigation Products

Vieques Underwater Demonstration Project

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013

GPS-based Vertical Control, Unaided by a Shore Station

Paper for Consideration by NIPWG. Data Quality Indicators for bathymetric data on ECDIS chart display

SAFETY OF NAVIGATION OPERATING ANOMALIES IDENTIFIED WITHIN ECDIS

Where are the Bathymetric Hot-Spots?

Utilizing Vessel Based Mobile LiDAR & Bathymetry Survey Techniques for Survey of Four Southern California Breakwaters

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

The Evolution of an Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel and Software for Hydrographic Survey

ICES Guidelines for Multibeam Echosounder Data (Compiled September 2006)

Crowdsourced Bathymetry Data via Electronic Charting Systems

Reply of Guyana Annex R2

Digital Elevation Models

METHODS PAPER: Downstream Bathymetry and BioBase Analyses of Substrate and Macrophytes

AHO s experience on HD bathymetric ENCs

Performance Analysis of the EdgeTech 6205 Swath Bathymetric Sonar

Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3

Developing a Method to Validate the Navigational Bathymetric Database

Minimum depth, mean depth or something in between?

THE CHALLENGES OF A LARGE-AREA BATHYMETRIC SURVEY

Norwegian Coastal Administration (NCA) HSSC November 2015 Busan - Republic of Korea

Uncertainty Estimates in Satellite Derived Bathymetry

R/V Bat Galim EM302 & EM2040 Multibeam Echosounder System Review January 31 February 4, 2016

Creation of bathymetric maps using satellite imagery

NCSS Statistical Software

HYDROGRAPHIC AND SITE SURVEY REPORT

Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 5: Standards for Nautical Charting Hydrographic Surveys - Public Review Draft

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

Interferometric Swath Bathymetry for Large Scale Shallow Water Hydrographic Surveys

Optimizing Sound Speed Profiling to Meet TPU Requirements using a CAST Gauge

PORTS AUSTRALIA. PRINCIPLES FOR GATHERING AND PROCESSING HYDROGRAPHIC INFORMATION IN AUSTRALIAN PORTS (Version 1.5 November 2012)

LiDAR My favourite tool in the bag 2011 St Kitts & Nevis

Executive Summary Mount Milligan 2004

Pathways Interns: Annika O Dea, Ian Conery, Andrea Albright

THE SWEDISH AND FINNISH WORKING GROUP FOR HARMONIZING DEPTH INFORMATION IN NEIGHBORING ENCs

SEAWAT Viscosity and Pressure Effects. Objectives Learn how to simulate the effects of viscosity and how pressure impacts the fluid density in SEAWAT.

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787

INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC ORGANIZATION

RESOLUTION A.817(19) adopted on 23 November 1995 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ECDIS)

WMB-160F Multi-beam Fishing System

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (February 2004) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for Office of Naval Research Code 322 PO

Assessing the Accuracy of High Spatial Resolution Effort Data

CONTRACTOR DOCUMENT FRONT SHEET NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED H P C - D E V X X R E T

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

V Complying with IHO S-52/S-63/S-64

Reef Fish Amendment 32 Gag and Red Grouper

David Monahan, Canadian Hydrographic Service and Dave Wells, Ocean Mapping Group, Canada

MIKE Release General product news for Marine software products, tools & features. Nov 2018

ANNEX 24 RESOLUTION MSC.232(82) (adopted on 5 December 2006)

1 st Tidal and Water Level Working Group Meeting DHN, Niteroi, Brazil 31/03/09 02/04/09 Vertical Offshore Reference Framework (VORF) Chris Jones

Ocean Waves and Surf Forecasting: Wave Climate and Forecasting

Canadian Championships in Men s & Women s Artistic Gymnastics

A comparison of deltaic structure in forested and deforested watersheds using highresolution

Monetisation of sustainable business models for Satellite Derived Bathymetry

Properties. terc.ucdavis.edu 8

The Role of Hellenic Navy Hydrographic Service in Preparing for the Olympic Games. Contents

INSIDE 16. Hydrographic Soundings, Sensors, and Bots. Dual-head Sonar Mapping. 25 A Case for Big Blue Data. Collaboration in the Air & on the Ground

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC CHART DISPLAY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ECDIS) [IMO Resolutions A.817 (19), MSC.64 (67) and MSC.

Executive Summary Lavoie Lake 2000

Release Performance Notes TN WBMS _R _Release_Presentation.pptx 22 September, 2014

Condition of Improvements 30 December 2014 Wrangell Harbors, Alaska (CWIS No , )

U.S. Response to INT1 subwg paper, "Vacant Entries in INT1" regarding Floating Barriers and Oil Retention Barriers

Total Shallow-Water Survey Through Airborne Hydrography

CVEN Computer Applications in Engineering and Construction. Programming Assignment #4 Analysis of Wave Data Using Root-Finding Methods

The Need for Outside Source Hydrographic Data

Processing Lidar Data for Charting Applications Understanding the Trade-Offs and Challenges

COLLECTOR WIND FARM SHADOW FLICKER ASSESSMENT

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :55 / 1. SHADOW - Main Result

EFFECT OF SONAR BEAMWIDTH AND SLOPING SEA BED ON THE ACCURACY OF BATHYMETRIC SURVEY.

Executive Summary Opatcho Lake 2004

Canadian Hydrographic Service PREFACE

Impact of Dredging the Lower Narrow River on Circulation and Flushing

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION (of UNESCO) Forty-ninth Session of the Executive Council Paris, 7-10 June 2016 SUMMARY REPORT.

Sonar Bathymetry: Waquoit Bay NERR

IHO SP 44 Standards for Hydrographic Surveys and the demands of the new century.

SEISMIC SURVEY GREENLAND 2014 Underwater sound propagation for North East Greenland offshore seismic survey

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

BASELINE SURVEY, VISUAL - SITE SPECIFIC

UNIT 7 PRACTICE PROBLEMS

Rules for Determining Significant Figures. AP Chemistry U01L05

Marine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling

Bathymetry Data Collection for Subaqueous Soil Mapping. Maggie Payne 2 nd National Workshop on Subaqueous Soils Rhode Island August 9-12, 2010

E4014 Construction Surveying. Hydrographic Surveys

Transcription:

S-102 v2.0 Status Brief S-100 TSM6 (SEP 2018) David W Brazier, US Navy Stacy Johnson, US Navy The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.

S-102 v2.0 - IHO Publication Timeline (APR 2018) S-102PT/S-100 WG3 Sessions in Singapore (APR JUN 2018) Roll in changes from Singapore meeting (JUN 2018) Final Project Team prep for HSSC Submission (JUN SEP 2018) Submitted for HSSC approval (SEP 2018) Reconcile HSSC comments (NOV 2018) Submitted for Member State Approval (DEC 2018) Publication of S-102 with S-100 v4.0.0 Version 2.0 Goal: Finalize spec. to support SPAWAR/KHOA S100 test bed ingest and interoperability testing.

S-102 v2.0 Coordinate Reference S-102 V2.0 Product Specification supports the following projections: WGS84 Geographic (EPSG 4326) WGS84 UTM North (EPSG 32601 32660) WGS84 UTM South (EPSG 32701 32760) WGS84 UPS North (EPSG 5041) WGS84 UPS South (EPSG 5042) www.epsg-registry.org Note: All data will be converted to un-projected WGS84 at time of ingest.

S-102 v2.0 - Portrayal Do not display uncertainty at cursor location Depth Zones and Colour Tokens will be set to match those of S-101 Depth Zone Name Description Colour Deep Water (DEPDW): Deeper than the deep contour. White Medium-deep water (DEPMD): Depths between the deep contour and the safety contour. Blue (L) Medium-shallow (DEPMS): Depths between the safety contour and the shallow contour. Blue (M) Very Shallow Water (DEPVS): Depths between the shallow contour and the zero metre contour. Blue (D) Drying Foreshore (DEPIT): Intertidal area. Yellow-Green Transparency values will be set to match those of S-101. Values are defined by an alpha value ranging from 1.0 (opaque) to 0.0 (fully transparent) Name Alpha Depth Zones Used ENC DAY 1.0 DEPIT, DEPVS, DEPMS, DEPMD, DEPDW ENC DUSK 0.4 DEPIT, DEPVS, DEPDW ENC NIGHT 0.2 DEPIT, DEPVS, DEPDW

S-102 v2.0 - Portrayal ENC DAY

S-102 v2.0 Gridding Methods Shoalest Depth Basic Weighted Mean Total Propagated Uncertainty (TPU) Weighted Mean Combined Uncertainty and Bathymetric Estimator (CUBE) Nearest Neighbour Natural Neighbour Polynomial Tendency Spline Kriging * Gridding method is a way to determine best portrayal options

S-102 v2.0 HDF5 Structure NOAA verified compliance with proposed S-100 v4.0 Part 10c. Currently being assessed by SPAWAR and KHOA (i.e. S-100 Test Beds) S102 Grid (S-100_Grid_Coverage) Attribute Allowable Encoding Value Type Multi S102 Elevation Decimal metres with precision not to exceed 0.01 metres Real 1 S102 Uncertainty Decimal metres with precision not to exceed 0.01 metres Real 1 S102 Tracking List (S-100_PointSet) Attribute Allowable Encoding Value Type Multi X Integer expressing a column of the associated 2D S102_Grid dataset Integer 1 Y Integer expressing a row of the associated 2D S102_Grid dataset Integer 1 Original Value Decimal metres with precision not to exceed 0.01 metres Real 1 Track Code List Series Integer expressing a valid enumeration value defining the reason a modification was made at this grid location Integer 1 Integer expressing a value defining the index location in the metadata defining the modification Integer 1

S-102 v2.0 - Converter US Navy completed converter June 2018 NOAA verified compliance with proposed S-100 v4.0 Part 10c Currently being assessed by SPAWAR and KHOA (i.e. S-100 Test Beds) Transforms a BAG to an S-102 file - Currently does not support VR Design - C/C++ for Linux (RHEL/CentOS) and Windows (NOAA) - Dependencies: - OpenNavSurf (BAG) v1.5 or Higher - US Navy developed GFF library (HDF5 wrapper), distributed with the converter

S-102 v2.0 Future Changes Maintain compliance with future S-100 versions Variable resolution - GDAL Compliance Add temporal aspects needed? Evolve Tracking List to record true location of grid overrides There is a need to accommodate the production of enhanced charting products (ex. benc). - Contouring???

Questions?

S-102: Why is Grid Resolution Important? What is the source of modern bathymetry? Modern sonars are high resolution collection systems. Example: SIMRAD EM2040 Beam Width (1 x 0.5 ) - 400 Soundings per ping (single swath / single receiver) Max ping rate (20 Hz) Coverage (5.5 times water depth) At 40 meters the nadir footprint is 0.7m x 0.35m: Rate of collection: 0.7 m 400 soundings X 20 pings/sec = 8000 soundings/sec. 0.35 m

S-102: Why is Grid Resolution Important? 1. A single thirty (30) day survey (12 hour days): 345.6 million soundings collected each day 10.4 billion soundings collected each month 2. Survey coverage at 8kts: 39 km2 / day 1172 km2 / month 3. Hydrographic Offices utilize gridded surfaces to process bathymetry: Typical grid size in 40 meters of water: 1-meter To grid up entire survey area at 1-meter resolution: 554.4 million nodes 4. The final 1-meter grid is the Navigation Surface

S-102 Why is Grid Resolution Important? To produce a 1:22K ENC: 1. Defocus the 1-meter Navigation Surface to 6-meters. 554.4 million nodes (1-meter navigation surface) 92.4 millions nodes (6-meter production grid) 2. Select soundings from the 6-meter grid. ~500 to 1000 soundings make it to a digital chart, or < 1% of the original data. *IEC 60945 specifies that character size in mm be not less than 3.5 x the viewing distance in metres. Hence "readable from 1 metre" requires that characters be not less than 3.5 mm in size." 169 nodal depths underneath a single charted sounding 3.5 mm or 77 m real world