Pavement Management Program

Similar documents
City of Davis Pavement Management Program

Keeping good roads good

Asphalt Recycling and Pavement Preservation in Hillsborough County, Florida

Pavement Management Report. City Council Meeting of May 21, 2013

Southeaster Pavement Preservation Partnership 2010 Update Welcome to Tennessee. Michael J. Doran, P.E. Maintenance Division

Lake Waterford Community Association Meeting. November 15, 2016

Why We do Preventive Maintenance

Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT. February 12, 2015

City of Lakewood. Public Works Transportation. Transportation Division Current and Future Projects Division Manager: Weston Ott, P.E.

New Mexico Transportation Funding Challenges

Tacoma Streets 101. City of Tacoma - Citizen Neighborhood Street Improvement and Safety Task Force

The City of Port Moody 2013 Paved Road Network Condition Assessment

Executive Summary. Introduction

Driving Indiana s Economic Growth

City of Coquitlam. Pavement Management Technology. Profile/GPS/Videolog Vehicle. Pavement Management System. SUBSURFACE PROFILING - Road Radar

City of West Des Moines PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Paving for Progress Municipal Streets Seminar

Smoothing Out the Bumpy Road Ahead

POTHOLES IN EDMONTON. Updated: April 4, 2013

VDOT s Pavement Management Program. Presented by: Tanveer Chowdhury Maintenance Division, VDOT March 05, 2010

DEVELOPMENT OF A PAVEMENT REHABILITATION STRATEGY FOR NATIONAL ROADS IN QUEENSLAND

C ITY OF B EDFORD H EIGHTS

Pavement Management 2011 Status Report

2018 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROGRAM

2017 Pavement Management Services Pavement Condition Report Salt Lake City, UT

Non-State Federal Aid Highways. Pavement Condition Ratings. H e r k i m e r a n d O n e i d a C o u n t i e s

Emerging Concrete Pavement Solutions Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

REAL WORLD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Streets Presentation. Public Works Department. Jill Mercurio, P.E. City Engineer November 19, 2013

TOWN OF SHUTESBURY PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT STUDY SCENARIO 2

Township of Springwater

land transport road assets

Incorporating Sidewalks into Transportation Asset Management. Presentation by Alan S. Kercher, P.E. Kercher Engineering, Inc.

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

YAVAPAI COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

Board of County Commissioners. Regular Meeting Thursday, December 15, :30 P.M. School Board Administrative Complex

SECTION 5: PEER CITY REVIEW

ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way

HIR on Oklahoma Turnpikes

land transport road assets

GDOT GDOT PowerPoint. Title Page

Rigby / Jefferson County Transportation Plan

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY PRESERVATION REPORT

2016 FACT SHEET ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS. Engineering Street Operations net 2016 budget is $5,199,900 WHAT IS ENGINEERING STREET OPERATIONS?

Available online at ScienceDirect. Transportation Research Procedia 14 (2016 )

Low Traffic Volume LR 159 Low Traffic Preservation

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

Performance of Ultra-Thin Bounded Wearing Course (UTBWC) Surface Treatment on US-169 Princeton, Minnesota. Transportation Research

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

Secondary Road Program

Use of Performance Metrics on The Pennsylvania Turnpike. Pamela Hatalowich, Penn Turnpike Commission Paul Wilke, Applied Research Associates, Inc.

City of Kingston Information Report to Rural Advisory Committee Report Number RAC

GDOT Fiscal 2015 Year 2017 GDOT PowerPoint. Title Page

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

I-90 Corridor Performance Corridor Result

On Monday, December 12, 2011, you will be briefed on Pavement Markings. The material is attached for your review.

Pavement Evaluation of the Nairobi Eastern By-Pass Road

OLIVE AVENUE CLASS 2 BIKE LANES HSIP, CIP PROJECT NO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD

ODOT DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM SERVING BUTLER, CLERMONT, CLINTON, GREENE, HAMILTON, PREBLE AND WARREN COUNTIES.

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan. Asset Management Peer Exchange

50 Year Roads: Don't Accept Anything Less

THE EFFECTS OF UTILITY CUT PATCHING ON PAVEMENT LIFE SPAN AND REHABILITATION COSTS

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN LEON COUNTY FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 1 P age

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIDE QUALITY SPECIFICATION AND CASE STUDIES

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (September 2015)

Gerald P. Oliveto, P.E. George Franz NJDOT

- DRAFT - PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR MERCED COUNTY 2009

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (March 27, 2003)

Rennick Yard Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavement

Tabulation of Bids. Counties: ROUTE 202,ALEXAUKEN CREEK ROAD TO RT 179/CR514

Tabulation of Bids. Counties:

Building Great Neighbourhoods LANSDOWNE

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Condition of Texas Pavements

Project Update May 2018

Advantages & Specifications for the Use of Perma-Patch for the Repair of Potholes

OSHTEMO TOWNSHIP COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Utah Department of Transportation Division of Asset Management taking care of what we have

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Pavement Type Selection Not a Black or White Issue. Marvin Traylor

CTH M HIGHWAY PROJECT CTH Q to STH 113

Pavement Preservation Best Practices. Mike Bryant, South Central U.S. Territory Sales Manager

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

AEMA-ARRA-ISSA-PPRA Fall Meeting Recycling, Ayrton Senna Highway Brasil, & USA

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Proposed Road Program. Executive Summary

PASER Road Survey. For Berrien County, Michigan

Building Great Neighbourhoods BONNIE DOON

First Order Mapping of Primary and Secondary Road Network. Road Data - Rwanda. Metadata - Final version

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

Minutes of the Minnesott Beach Town Commissioners' July 12,2011

Building Great Neighbourhoods QUEEN ALEXANDRA

Paving the Way to a Sustainable Future: The City of Russell s

ENGINEERING DRIVER SAFETY INTO PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Transcription:

Pavement Management Program Public Works Department January 5, 2016

Chad Butzow, P.E. Deputy Director Field Operation Services Public Works Department Brian Martineau Pavement Manager Public Works Department

Topics 1. Manatee County Roadway Network 2. Maintenance Plan 3. Future

(1) Manatee County Roadway Network 1266 Center Line Miles of Paved Roads 2620 Lane Miles 883 Center Line Miles of Local Roads 1776 Lane Miles 383 Center Line Miles of Collector Roads 844 Lane Miles

Pavement Condition Survey Ability to determine current condition Ability to determine it s future condition Is Objective and repeatable Pavement Condition Index (PCI)

Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ASTM (D6433) Numerical index, ranging from 0 for a failed pavement to a 100 for a pavement in perfect condition Roads are measured, segmented, and distresses identified PCI are calculated by identifying and measuring distresses per each roadway segment

Measured

Segmented

Distresses Identified

Examples Distresses Alligator Cracking Measured in Square Feet Longitudinal Cracking Measured in Linear Feet Alligator Cracking Longitudinal Cracking

PCI Established

MANATEE COUNTY PCI Collector (PCI) weighted average 80.38* Residential (PCI) weighted average 72.89* * Manatee County PCI data collected by Transmap Corporation, Upper Arlington, OH

PCI Range Categories Excellent (86-100) Very Good (71-85) Good (56-70) Fair (41-55) Poor (26-40) Very Poor (11-25) Failed (0-10) Collector (80.38) PCI Residential (72.89) PCI Network Avg (76.63) PCI

Total Lane Miles of Collectors Total = 844 Miles 400 350 346 Miles 41% 329 Miles 39% Pavement Condition (PCI) Lane Miles 300 250 200 150 100 84 Miles 10% 76 Miles 9% 50 0 9 Miles 1% 100 86 PCI 71 85 PCI 70 60 PCI 59 50 PCI < 50 PCI Pavement Condition Scores Pavement Condition (PCI)

Total Lane Miles of Residential Total = 1776 Miles Pavement Condition (PCI) 700 600 587 Miles 33% Lane Miles 500 400 300 462 Miles 26% 408 Miles 23% 266 Miles 15% 200 100 0 53 Miles 3% 100 86 PCI 71 85 PCI 70 60 PCI 59 50 PCI < 50 PCI Pavement Condition Scores Pavement Condition (PCI)

One of Manatee County s Largest Capital Investments? ROADWAY NETWORK To construct one mile of a two lane undivided road: a conservative estimate would be $350,000 per mile @ $350,000.00* per x 1266 miles = $440 Million Dollars *ftp://ftp.dot.state.fl.us/lts/co/estimates/cpm/summary.pdf (Rural undivided 2 Lane $2,044,323)

2. Maintenance Plan

Goals: Extend our pavements service life Maintain or Improve our PCI Budget and plan an effective strategy to maximize available funds Be proactive in our maintenance methods Communicating our methods accurately to the citizens

Managing vs. Maintained Pavement Management is the systematic method for routinely collecting, storing and retrieving the kind of decision-making information needed to make maximum use of limited dollars.

Pavement Management Program MicroPAVER Developed in the late 1970s to help DOD manage its vast inventory of pavement Recommended by American Public Works Association (APWA) Uses PCI for predicting future Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) needs Ability to run Multiple Budget Analysis Proactive Approach to Pavement Management Based on your Strategies

Current Maintenance Strategies Non-Structural (Preventative & Preservation) Asphalt Rejuvenator $0.94 per S/Y 5-? Years of additional life Chip Seal / Cape Seal $2.77 per S/Y 5-10 Years additional life Micro Surfacing $2.94 per S/Y 8-10 Years additional life Thin Lift Asphalt $4.71 per S/Y 10-15 Years additional life Structural (Rehabilitation & Reconstruction) Hot mix- asphalt (HMA) $6.92 per S/Y 15-20 Years additional life Mill and Fill $10.85 per S/Y 15-20 Years additional life Level and Overlay $9.71 per S/Y 15-20 Years additional life Base Repair & Surface $15.40 per S/Y 15-20 Years additional life Full Depth Reclaim $23.11 per S/Y 15-20 Years additional life

Current Resurfacing Funding Major (Collectors) $2,100,000 Local (Residential) $2,100,000 2015 Spending Strategies Major 98% Structural Local 66% Structural 34% Non-Structural

Network Budget Analysis Using MicroPAVER Major $2,000,000 at Current Funding YEAR WEIGHTED AVERAGE PCI CHANGE IN PCI ACTUAL COST # OF SEGMENTS TOTAL MILES 383 2015 80.38 2016 80.40 + 0.02 $2,150,296 52 16.39 2017 80.22 0.18 $2,003,990 77 13.96 2018 79.94 0.18 $1,975,298 98 12.16 TOTAL 0.44 $6,129,584 227 42.51

Network Budget Analysis PCI Calculated Changes PCI 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 MAJOR COLLECTOR ROADS 80.38 80.4 80.22 79.94 78.7 77.02 75.34 2016 2017 2018 2019 $0.00 Budget $2,000,000 Budget

Network Budget Analysis Using MicroPAVER Residential $2,000,000 at Current Funding YEAR WEIGHTED AVERAGE PCI 2015 72.89 CHANGE IN PCI ACTUAL COST # OF SEGMENTS TOTAL MILES 2016 72.37 0.52 $2,000,751 155 20.29 2017 71.84 0.53 $1,998,519 198 21.02 2018 71.33 0.51 $1,999,285 190 20.99 TOTAL 1.56 $5,998,555 543 62.30

Network Budget Analysis Using MicroPAVER Residential $3,000,000 Funding YEAR WEIGHTED AVERAGE PCI 2015 72.89 CHANGE IN PCI ACTUAL COST # OF SEGMENTS TOTAL MILES 2016 72.76 0.13 $3,015,399 216 26.73 2017 72.62 0.14 $3,012,278 251 26.81 2018 72.52 0.10 $3,061,212 251 27.50 TOTAL 0.37 $9,088,889 718 81.04

Network Budget Analysis PCI Calculated Changes PCI 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 Local Residential Roads 72.89 72.76 72.33 72.62 72.52 71.59 71.84 71.33 70.29 68.99 2016 2017 2018 2019 $0.00 Budget $2,000,000 Budget $3,000,000 Budget

Network Budget Analysis Using MicroPAVER Unconstrained Budget YEAR WEIGHTED AVERAGE PCI CHANGE IN PCI ACTUAL COST 2015 76.63 2016 80.06 +3.43 $41 Million 2017 79.05 1.01 $4 Million 2018 77.91 1.14 $700 K TOTAL +1.28 $46 Million

Summary At current funding levels Collector Roads are stabilized and we can maintain our 80 PCI level. Residential Roads which represent 66% of our total area will require additional funding to stabilize and address deficiencies in the network with a more proactive approach to preventative maintenance. The program is an effective tool, but the human / common sense factor is required. Prices do fluctuate based on many different factors and all analysis are based on current costs.

3. Future

Goals: Extend our pavements service life Maintain or Improve our PCI Budget and plan an effective strategy to maximize available funds Be proactive in our maintenance methods Communicating our methods accurately to the citizens

Proactive Maintenance Methods Worst first approach does not work - Allow roads to age to get maximum value Right Treatment, Right Road, Right Time - Apply preventative maintenance strategies to better rated roads Pavement preservation in new developments - Apply rejuvenator early as a roadway accepted into network

Asphalt Rejuvenator 43 rd Ave Ter West Bradenton (1999) Canal Road Trailer Estates (2012)

Asphalt Rejuvenator 41 st Ave Cir West (1999) Cracks Less Cracks

Asphalt Rejuvenator 104 th Ave E off of Old Tampa Road (2012) Asphalt Rejuvenator not applied.

Micro Surfacing Baystate Road (2015) Hillcrest Drive (2010)

2015 Budget per Lane Mile Manatee County 4.2 million dollars for 2620 lane miles $1603 per lane mile Sarasota County 10 million dollars for 2300 lane miles $4347 per lane mile City of Lakeland 1.5 million for 790 lane miles $1899 per lane mile City of Sarasota 2 million for 232 center line miles Estimated 682 lane miles $2932.55 per lane mile City of Tampa 8 million dollars for 2600 lane miles $3077 per lane mile

Thank you. Questions?

Current Maintenance Strategies Non-Structural (Preventative & Preservation) Asphalt Rejuvenator $0.94 per S/Y Chip Seal / Cape Seal $2.77 per S/Y Micro Surfacing $2.94 per S/Y * Thin Lift Asphalt $4.71 per S/Y $1 million Micro = 340136 SY / 13000 SY per mile = 26 miles Structural (Rehabilitation & Reconstruction) Hot mix- asphalt (HMA) $6.92 per S/Y Mill and Fill $10.85 per S/Y Level and Overlay $9.71 per S/Y Base Repair & Surface $15.40 per S/Y Full Depth Reclaim $23.11 per S/Y $1 million Mill & Fill = 92165 SY / 13000 SY per SY = 7 miles

Soil Cement Asphalt Pavement Block Cracking Concrete Parking Lot Block Cracking