TAM Update & Transportation Sales Tax Renewal

Similar documents
Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Marin s ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

League of Woman Voters Transportation Authority Of Marin Update. December 5th, 2016

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

League of Women Voters of Santa Cruz County

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

POTENTIAL SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION MEASURE

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Dear City Council Members,

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.


% of Sales Tax (net of Admin) First Year Amount. Metro State of Good Repair 2% $ 17 $ 350 $ 910 $ 1,140 $ 2,400

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

395 Express Lanes Extension

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

There are traffic jams on Highway 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Vision Public Workshop: Findings

13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

North Coast Corridor:

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Service Business Plan

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

Where We Live and Work Today

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Merced County Association of Governments: Voter Survey

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Project Status Update

Congestion Reducing Activities. Toby Carr GDOT Director of Planning April 10, 2014

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO


Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

1736, RIDE

Strategies to keep people and goods moving in and through Seattle

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN SUBMISSION TO THE RAILWAY SAFETY ACT REVIEW PANEL

ATTACHMENT A: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SELF-HELP LOCAL TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT PLAN. Measure J-16

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

INTRODUCTION. The focus of this study is to reduce congestion and improve mobility for all modes of transportation. Figure ES-1 Study Corridor Map

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Introduction.

Proposals in this Element that will help accomplish the above include the following:

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

Vallecito Elementary School. Travel Plan

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection. Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council

City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Walking & Bicycling Questionnaire for Candidates

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Yellow School Bus for Traffic Congestion Relief

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Public Opinion about Transportation Issues in Northern Virginia

Transportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Citizens Oversight Committee

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

San Tomas Expressway

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Transcription:

TAM Update & Transportation Sales Tax Renewal

Mission Statement TAM is dedicated to making the most of Marin County transportation dollars and creating an efficient and effective transportation system that promotes mobility and accessibility by providing a variety of high quality transportation options to all users.

Current TAM Board Membership - June 1 st, 2018 TAM BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Damon Connolly, County of Marin District 1 Katie Rice, County of Marin District 2 Kathrin Sears, County of Marin District 3 Dennis Rodoni, County of Marin District 4 Judy Arnold, County of Marin District 5 Dan Hillmer, City of Larkspur Alice Fredericks, Town of Tiburon David Kunhardt, Town of Corte Madera Eric Lucan, City of Novato Brian Colbert, Town of San Anselmo Gary O. Phillips, City of San Rafael John Reed, Town of Fairfax Ray Withy, City of Sausalito P. Beach Kuhl, Town of Ross Stephanie Moulton-Peters, City of Mill Valley James Campbell, City of Belvedere

Marin is a Self-Help County In 2004, Marin voters approved a ½-cent transportation sales tax. In 2010, Marin voters approve a $10 annual Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) On November 6, a renewal and extension of the existing ½-cent tax will be on the ballot in Marin Measure AA Marin is one of 24 counties statewide who have passed a sales tax for transportation purposes 2/3 voter approval required to pass these measures 8 of the 9 Bay Area counties have similar sales tax income for transportation (Solano does not) Marin currently generates approximately $27 million annually from its ½-cent sales tax and $2.3 million annually from the VRF.

California Self-Help Counties Nearly all of the local countywide sales taxes operate under Expenditure Plans that are set up to address multi-modal needs of a variety of users These local sales taxes support capital projects and the operation of multiple modes of transportation - essential to metropolitan mobility. Typical inclusions: Highways, streets and roads Transit and paratransit Goods movement Bicycle and pedestrian School access support Note: Monterey County added in 2016

TAM Primary Local Transportation Funding Sources ~ $27m/year ~ $2.3m/year ½-cent sales tax $10 VRF/year

Measure A Transportation Sales Tax 11% 26.5% 7.5% 55% Local Bus Transit HOV Gap Closure Local Streets and Roads School Safety and Access

Measure A Transportation Sales Tax Passed in 2004 Generates ~ $25m/year. Expected to generate $500m during the 20 year lifecycle Implementation Strategy % of Funds 1. Develop a seamless local bus transit system 55% 2. Fully fund and ensure the accelerated completion of the Highway 101 Carpool Lane Gap Closure in San Rafael 7.5% 3. Maintain, improve, and manage Marin County s local transportation infrastructure 26.5% 4. Reduce school related congestion and provide safer access to schools. 11%

Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Local Streets and Pathways 25% 35% 40% Improve Transit for Seniors & Disabled Persons Reduce Congestion and Pollution: School Safety, Alternative Fuels and Commute Alternatives

Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Passed in 2010 Generates ~$2.3million/year and does not expire % of Measure B Elements Funds Maintain Local Streets and Pathways - 5% dedicated to bike path maintenance 40% Improve Transit for Seniors and People with Disabilities 35% Reduce Congestion and Pollution: School Safety, Alternative Fuels and Commute Alternatives 25%

Moving Forward with No Tax Increase Why Now- Current plan is nearly 15 years old- categories not included are needed now Adjust expenditure plan to respond to current / future needs Create an ongoing, reliable stream of revenue before it is an emergency; enable long-term reliability. 30 years assures capital project needs are met Public opinion supports renewal

Public Support for ½-cent Renewal Final Test Initial Test 39.7% 47.5% 73.2% 33.5% 30.4% 7.3% 6.9% 14.3% 5.2% 12.3% 2.9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Definitely Yes Probably Yes Probably No Definitely No DK/NA 2017 3/4 Data Final Nov 18 Total Yes 61.5% Total No 32.1% 77.9% In order to: relieve traffic congestion on Highway101 and local roads; fix potholes and maintain local roads; improve interchanges and access on and off of Highway101; expand safe routes to schools, including school bus service, and crossing guards; and, provide local transit, including options for seniors and persons with disabilities; shall Marin County renew the existing half-cent, voter approved sales tax without increasing the current rate, providing $25 million dollars annually for 30 years, with citizens oversight, that the State cannot take away?

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) created the plan 24 members representing a broad range of interests The group met 9 times from June through November. Received education on transportation needs and funding options. All current and potential recipients of sales tax funds had an opportunity to present to the group. Group was educated each meeting on Senate Bill 1 and Regional Measure 3 EPAC agreed unanimously on a Draft Expenditure Plan, agreed No New Tax was best approach, recognized the need to fund a number of new projects and programs as soon as possible

Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Citizens Oversight Committee and additional with community interest groups COC-Northern Planning COC-Central Planning COC-Ross Valley Planning COC-Southern Planning V-Anne Chernock Joy Dahlgren Paul Roye Robert Burton North Bay Leadership Council Chamber of Commerce Novato Chamber of Commerce San Rafael Marin County Office of Education Student- College of Marin Cynthia Murray Coy Smith Joanne Webster Ken Lippi Jon Horinek COC-West Marin Planning Area Scott Tye Transit Rider Lisel Blash COC-Major Marin Employers COC-Environmental Organizations - MCL COC-Bicycle and Pedestrian Group COC-Marin County Paratransit Coordinating Council COC-League of Women Voters COC-Taxpayer Group Peter Pelham Kate Powers Vince O'Brien Allan Bortel Kevin Hagerty Paul Premo Marin Mobility Consortium - Seniors Senior Living Resident/Pedestrian Equity/Marin City Equity/Canal Neighborhood Labor Union/Building Trade Council Bay Wave Rep - Sea Level Rise - Innovation/Resiliance Lynn Von der Werth Sue Beittel Monique Brown Roberto Hernandez Javier Flores Bill Carney Safe Routes to School Representative Debbie Alley

Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan 11.5% Local Bus Transit 26.5% 7.0% 55% Highways and Interchanges Local Streets and Roads School Safety and Access All details of Expenditures are in the Final Plan

How will the sales tax dollars be distributed?

7.0% Highway and Interchange Improvements Highways and Interchanges 26.5% 7.0% 11.5% 55% - Matching Funds for Marin- Sonoma Narrows and the Direct Connector from NB 101 to EB 580 - New Program for Local Interchanges - Provides new dedicated funding for commute alternatives/ trip reduction programs that reduce peak hour highway demand.

7.0% Highway and Interchange Improvements Previous Plan- 7.5% Fully Fund and ensure the completion of the Highway 101 Carpool Lane Gap Closure project through San Rafael New Plan- 7.0% 1.5% Provide local matching funds to accelerate completion of the MSN carpool lane and MUP 2.0% Provide local matching funds to accelerate completion of the Highway 101/ I-580 Direct Connector 3% Improve Highway 101 local interchanges and freeway access routes 0.5% Implement commute alternatives and trip reduction

26.5% Local Streets and Roads 26.5% 11.5% 7.0% 55% Local Streets and Roads Every City and Town will receive significantly more dollars for their transportation priorities. Safe Pathways to Schools funding is included in this strategy Creates new categories for sea level rise and innovation

26.5% Local Streets and Roads Previous Plan- 26.5 % 13.25% for Major Roads and related infrastructure 13.25% for Local Roads for all modes/ Complete Streets (direct to Local Jurisdictions including the County) New Plan- 26.5% 22% for Local Roads for all modes/ Complete Streets (direct to local jurisdictions) 3% Safe Pathways to Schools (moved over from the Safe Routes category) 1% Develop projects to address sea-level rise and resiliency including alternative fuel facilities 0.5% support operational improvements through innovative technology

Local Streets and Roads More Funding, More Flexibility Marin Jurisdictions receive ~$3.2 million annually for Local Streets and Roads with the existing measure. Funding will be expanded to ~$5.3 million annually under the renewed measure LSR funds will be eligible for a variety of needs as determined by the local jurisdiction, including flood management & infrastructure congestion relief in local road corridors, including yellow school bus service alternative fuel infrastructure including EV s. Municipal fleet costs Bicycle and pedestrian facilities, per city approved Complete Streets NOTE: Under Senate Bill 1, Marin s share of Local Streets & Roads funding from state gas tax grows from ~$8 million to ~$16 million

11.5 % Safe Routes to Schools School Safety and Access 26.5% 7.0% 11.5% 55% - Increase funding for Education and Encouragement - Increase funding for Crossing Guards to prevent cutting 28 Guards - Increase funding for Safe Pathways funding New funding for small quick fix safety related projects near schools

11.5 % Safe Routes to Schools Previous Plan- 11.0% 3.3 % Education and Encouragement 4.2 % Crossing Guards 3.5% Safe Pathways New Plan- 11.5% 3.5% Education and Encouragement 7.0% Crossing Guards 1.0% Small Quick Fix Safe Pathways Projects Plus 3.0% is in Category 2, Local Transportation Infrastructure, for major safe pathway projects,

Highlights of Plan Safe Routes to Schools Maintains robust commitment to education program. Restores crossing guards that will otherwise be cut in spring 2019. Creates new program for school related quick fix safety projects.

Safe Routes to School Green Trips 25

Safe Routes to Schools 88 Crossing Guards throughout the Countycrossing 5200 children daily 62 Schools Active in the program, serving 24,000 students 26

55% to Transit Rural, Local, School, Seniors and Persons with Disabilities 26.5% 11.5% 7.0% 55% Local Bus Transit - Increases funding for transit for seniors, persons with disabilities including those with low income - Provides dedicated funding for school services - Expands access to regional transit and ferries - Funding percentages for fixed route transit and facilities are reduced - alternative funding options and cost efficiencies will be pursued

55% to Transit Rural, Local, School, Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Previous Plan 55% 37% Maintain and Expand Local Bus Transit Service 3% Maintain and Expand the Rural Bus Transit System 9% Maintain and Expand Services for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities 6% Invest in Bus Transit Facilities New Plan- 55% 33% Maintain and Improve existing levels of Transit Service 3% Maintain and Expand Rural and Recreational Services 9.5% Maintain and Expand Services for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities 5% Provide Transit Services to Schools to Reduce Local Congestion 4% Invest in Bus Transit Facilities 0.5% Expand Access to Ferries and Regional Transit managed by Golden Gate

2018/19 Operations Budget Revenue

Countywide Transit Improvements Doubled service levels since 2004 3.3 million passenger trips per year New programs for seniors and disabled persons Expanded school transportation Expanded service to West Marin 31

Marin Transit Fixed Route Service Local Fixed-Route 14 bus routes 8,600 average weekday passengers West Marin Stagecoach Routes 61 and 68 Dial-A-Ride services

Student Transportation Service Supplemental Routes 1,023 avg. daily riders Youth Pass 4,038 passes distributed College of Marin 4,500 passes issued Yellow Bus 2,645 one way passes sold

Marin Transit Service to Seniors Disabled Over 8,000 residents registered as Marin Access customers 124,764 passenger trips on paratransit 16,000+ passenger trips on Catch A Ride (taxi subsidy program) 16,000+ volunteer driver trips supported by STAR/TRIP

Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee Passed in 2010 Generates ~$2.3million/year and does not expire % of Measure B Elements Funds Maintain Local Streets and Pathways - 5% dedicated to bike path maintenance 40% Improve Transit for Seniors and People with Disabilities 35% Reduce Congestion and Pollution: School Safety, Alternative Fuels and Commute Alternatives 25%

2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee 35% of $10 annual fee is for transportation for older adults and people with disabilities Volunteer Driver Program Catch-A-Ride, Marin Transit Connect Low-income scholarship program Incubator program Expanded paratransit service area Mobility Management and Travel Navigator staffing

Improved Transit for Seniors and People with Disabilities 35% Primary Contractor 37

Improved Transit for Seniors and People with Disabilities 35% ~ $780,000 Annually ~ 14% of Marin Access Budget (Measure A ~ 28%) Funding Allocated to Marin Transit Responsive to 2010 Senior Mobility Action and Implementation Plan 38

Key Policy Elements in the Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan Current 5% for administration and management of the sales tax program will be retained Consistent with the current plan What is not funded in this plan, and prohibited as future amendment Extend or operate SMART Support of parks/open space Fund the planning, construction or renovation of housing The TAM Board cannot amend the plan to include any of the prohibited categories noted above Comprehensive review at Year 6- Strict amendment process requiring city/town/county approvals at Councils/ BOS. Plus broad public input process.

Timeline --Present EPAC findings to TAM board --Approval to circulate plan to stakeholders for comment --TAM vote on Expenditure Plan with adjustments from outreach incorporated Final approval for ballot by TAM, --Board of Supervisors places measure on the ballot Vote Dec. Apr. May July 10 Aug. 2018 11 Dec. 2017 26 Apr. July 31 6 Nov. 2018 --Conduct Poling -Meet with All Cities and Towns to Receive Input -- Draft Expenditure Plan --Continue public education --Votes of all 11 cities and Board of Supervisors --Education effort continues --Expenditure plan and ballot argument (75 words) deadline for submission to registrar for November 18 ballot

Revenue measures work together TAM s sales tax renewal and VRF primarily addresses needs not funded by SB1 and RM3 Senate Bill 1 will primarily address Local Streets and Roads needs, along with State Highways Regional Measure 3 provides funds for 4 Major Projects in Marin

Regional Measure 3 As requested by MTC, all nine counties have placed a ballot measure on the June 2018 ballot, to increase tolls on the Seven State owned toll bridges in the Bay Area ( not the Golden Gate Bridge) $1 increase in 2019, additional $1 in 2022, additional $1 in 2025 Received 53.9% approval on June 5 th 2018 Projects funded by the toll revenue show a nexus a benefit to the toll bridge users who pay the fee.

Regional Measure 3 Marin County funds several large critical capital projects that would otherwise not easily be funded The Downtown San Rafael Transit Center Relocation- $30m NB Highway 101 to EB I-580 Direct Connector $135m ($210m for overall Richmond-San Rafael approaches) Marin-Sonoma Narrows - $120m State Route 37 Improvements $100m 43

Regional Measure 3 Marin County -additional revenue that will benefit Marin San Francisco Bay Trail Improvements / Safe Routes to Transit - $150 million SMART Extension - $40 million North Bay Transit Access Improvements $100 million 44

SB1 Annual Distribution Formula: 37%- $1.9 Billion for State Highway System 30%- $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads 13%- $750 Million for Transit and Rail Competitive: $300 Million for Trade Corridor Enhancement $250 Million for Solutions for Congested Corridors $200 Million for Local Partnership Program $100 Million for Active Transportation $25 Million for Local Planning Grants

Senate Bill 1 ~ $ 8 million to Marin County jurisdictions for road maintenance (~ double the current amount received from the state) ~$ 5 million for transit

Questions and Answers