Collision in restricted visibility

Similar documents
Collision in restricted visibility

Incorrect declaration caused charcoal fire

Rule Conduct of vessels in restricted visibility

Navigation: Navigation In Restricted Visibility. Notice to all Ship Owners, Masters, Skippers, Ships Officers, and Pilots.

INTERNATIONAL Steering and Sailing Rules

E Navigation Data Auditing Report

Incident Report. Close Quarters Pegasus II & Distraction. 26 April 2006 Class B

Appendix HK1 HKSF Prescriptions

Rule 17 - Action by stand-on vessel

Rule 8 - Action to avoid collision

Class B Accident Report. West Bay Water Taxi and Kontiki Collision

Rule 5 - Look-out. 1

Rule 15 - Crossing situation

Injury during mooring operation

Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGs) EXPLANATORY NOTES

National Maritime Center

Fire in heavy weather

Falling into cargo hold

Suez Canal grounding with pilot onboard

National Maritime Center

Rule 35 - Sound signals in restricted visibility

Rules Practice Exam 14

RADAR PLOTTING Ranger Hope 2008

Rules Practice Exam 11

COLLISIONS: HOW TO AVOID THEM

Marine Navigation Navigational Errors and Assessment of Fault By Capt. Francis Lansakara Master Mariner. LLM (London)

National Maritime Center

Marine Accident Inquiry Agency

Rules Practice Exam 7

Accident Report. Onetangi & C Walker. Collision

Rules Practice Exam 12

NavRule Practice Exam, 70 Series Practice April 24, Labeled F (I received a reply from the testing service that all these answers were

Rules Practice Exam 9

Cargo and hull damage while at anchor in heavy weather

Rules Practice Exam 5

Give way to the right

NAEST(M) training Course Structure and Session Objectives. Day Introduction and enrolment

COLREGS A GUIDE TO GOOD PRACTICE

Maritime Traffic Situations in Bornholmsgat

Rule 7 - Risk of collision

Accident Report. Para 1 & Lightning One Collision on Lake Wakatipu on 14 July 2004

Rule 13 - Overtaking

Simplified report of safety investigation

International regulations and guidelines for maritime spatial planning related to safe distances to multiple offshore structures (e.g.

RULING 6 OF 2014 OF THE MARITIME DISCIPLINARY COURT OF THE NETHERLANDS IN CASE NUMBER 2013.V4B - STATENGRACHT

Fatal fall from ladder


Rules of the Road. in Chichester Harbour Avoiding collisions and navigating safely

Accident Report. Collision Rescue Alpha v PWC June 2009

Isle of Man Ship Registry

Accident Report. Close Quarters Manutere & Ocean Monarch. 12 March 2006 Class C

International Regulations for the Prevention of Collision at Sea

Report on Vessel Casualty of Accident (Form Casualty) Instructions:

Incident Report. Close Quarters Situations Challenger, Aratere & Lotus. 21 February 2006

ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTNESS OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF SHIP S SYSTEM (AIS)

Consolidated version Collision Contact. Very serious casualty: collision between a fishing vessel and a passenger ship

U.S. Department Of Homeland Security

MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Maritime Rules. Part 22 Collision Prevention

Rule 18 - Responsibilities between vessels

In order to avoid a collision it has clearly been

COUNSEL: Mr Timothy Brenton, QC for the plaintiffs; Mr Nigel Teare, QC for the defendants.

Unmanned ships and navigation: the regulatory framework

UNMANNED SHIPS: LEGAL ISSUES

Collision Avoidance System using Common Maritime Information Environment.

NAVIGATIONAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SEA-GOING SHIPS NAVDEC

History Collision Regulations

The Determination of a Minimum Critical Distance for Avoiding Action by a Stand-on Vessel as Permitted by Rule 17a) ii)

SEMI FINAL EXAMINATION

Rules of the Road. United States Power Squadrons USPS University

The Owners of the Ship 'Mineral Dampier' v The Owners of the Ship 'Hanjin Madras'

THE INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA 1972

SS&S Chapter 8 Instructor Guide

3 Navigation Rules Rules General

PREVENTION OF COLLISIONS AT SEA REGULATIONS (Section 402 of the National Maritime Act, 1997) REQUIREMENTS FOR PREVENTION OF COLLISIONS AT SEA

LAPWARE, LLC. Since 2002

Isle of Man Ship Registry. Casualty Investigation Report No. CA102. 2nd December 2006

MARINE INVESTIGATION REPORT M14A0348 COLLISION

BEHAVIOR OF SHIP OFFICERS IN MANEUVERING TO PREVENT A COLLISION

Oil Tanker - VLCC. Yosu Inward Transit Monitoring (Entering into the Port of Yosu on a Loaded VLCC) LEG 1: APPROACHING ANCHORAGE AND PILOT STATION

You must stop your. pass with caution on the port side of vessel "B" The vessel moving upstream against the current

August April 18,2008 First Revision

Apportioning liability for collisions at sea: The Dream Star a good start for the Singapore Court

ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTNESS OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF SHIP S SYSTEM (AIS)

A GUIDE TO HELICOPTER OPERATIONS FOR VESSELS EFFECTING PILOT TRANSFERS BY HELICOPTER IN THE

SteerCert Objective. Detailed knowledge of Contents of key selected rules from ColRegs and PLA Byelaws Contents of Tideway Rowing Rules

MARINE INVESTIGATION REPORT M16A0141

NavRule Practice Exam, 70 Series Practice April 18, Labeled C have been copied to collection

The Analysis of Possibilities How the Collision Between m/v 'Gdynia' and m/v 'Fu Shan Hai' Could Have Been Avoided

National Maritime Center

RECORD OF CHANGES DATE EFFECTIVE

Japan Transport Safety Board

Comments on the collision between a tanker and a U.S. Navy ship in the Strait of Singapore

Rule 2 - Responsibility

Which ship to blame?

Isle of Man Ship Registry

P&I Loss Prevention Bulletin

COMDTINST M D MAR

Rule 1. Application. (d) Traffic separation schemes may be adopted by the Organization for the purpose of these Rules.

1. PURPOSE. This instruction forwards International and Inland Navigation Rules and Regulations for use by Coast Guard personnel.

Transcription:

August 2018 Collision in restricted visibility Vessel A, a container vessel, was approaching the pilot station at full speed which was 17 knots and on a course of 280. It was in the afternoon there was restricted visibility due to fog. On the bridge was the 2nd Officer who was the OOW and the Master. Two ARPA radars were being used alternatively between 6M, 3M and 1.5M and both officers were monitoring the vessel s progress on the radar. The Master could see a target on the radar and started to plot it as vessel B. The vessel was on the port bow, 4M away with a CPA of 0.2M and a speed of 6 knots and also maintaining a course of 280. The master was monitoring the vessel on the radar and started the fog signal as well. The master on A decided to open up the course a bit and altered to starboard to 290 to increase the CPA. At this time vessel B was about 0.3M away and suddenly altered course to starboard. The Master on A noticed this and ordered hard to starboard and stopped the engine. It was too late to avoid the collision and A hit B on its starboard side about midships.

Discussion Go to the File menu and select Save as... to save the pdf-file on your computer. You can place the marker below each question to write the answer directly into the file. When discussing this case please consider that the actions taken at the time made sense for all involved. Do not only judge, but also ask why you think these actions were taken and could this happen on your vessel? 1. What were the immediate causes of this accident? 2. Is there a risk that this kind of accident could happen on our vessel? 3. How could this accident have been prevented? 4. What action would you as the OOW or Master have taken after you had plotted vessel B?

5. Is 17 knots a safe speed for a container vessel in restricted visibility? 6. What do you think is an acceptable CPA in this situation? 7. Would you have stopped the engine at the same time as altering hard to starboard? 8. What sections of our SMS would have been breached if any?

9. Does our SMS address these risks? 10. How could we improve our SMS to address these issues? 11. What do you think was the root cause of this accident? 12. Is there any kind of training that we should do that addresses these issues?

August 2018 Issues to consider Discuss the following COLREGS rules and also what other COLREGS rules would apply. Rule 5 Look-out Every vessel shall at all times maintain a proper look-out by sight and hearing, as well as by all available means appropriate in the prevailing circumstances and conditions so as to make a full appraisal of the situation and of the risk of collision. Rule 6 Safe Speed Every vessel shall at all times proceed at a safe speed so that she can take proper and effective action to avoid collision and be stopped within a distance appropriate to the prevailing circumstances and conditions. Rule 19 Conduct of vessels in restricted visibility (b) Every vessel shall proceed at a safe speed adapted to the prevailing circumstances and conditions of restricted visibility. A power-driven vessel shall have her engines ready for immediate manoeuvre. (d) A vessel which detects by radar alone the presence of another vessel shall determine if a close-quarters situation is developing and/or risk of collision exists. If so, she shall take avoiding action in ample time.