[ # [ Excellent [ Fair. Upper Delaware WMA 1. North and South Branch Raritan WMA 8. Holland. Milford FIBI026. Frenchtown. Central Delaware WMA 11

Similar documents
SUMMARY OF RESULTS FIBI098

F I B I ST 519 OP 57. [ Excellent [ Fair. [ Poor. U p p e r D e l a w a r e W M A 1. C e n t r a l D e l a w a r e W M A 1 1.

Preakness Brook - FIBI098

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FIBI054

[ Excellent [ Fair. Millbrook FIBI039. Calno. Upper Delaware WMA 1. Pahaquarry. Stream Order 1st, 2nd & 3rd Order. FIBI Rating.

Va n Saun Mill Brook. FIBI062a !(208!( 4 !( 20. !( FIBI062a !( 7 !( 67 !( 3 !( 5 !( 21 !(120 !(495 !(139 !(440. !( Good. !( Poor.

Beaver Brook - FIBI047 Hope

Pequannock River - FIBI077

Little Flat Brook - FIBI065

Pohatcong Creek - FIBI033

(/ Neshanic River - FIBI023 "! 3 1. ø ø 52 3 ø 57 9 FIBI023

(/ North Branch Raritan River - FIBI031 % FIBI031

La ming t onriver 206 FIBI078 !(183 !( 10 !(182 !( 57. !( Good. !( Poor FIBI078. !( Excellent. Lamington

Conewago Creek Initiative. Fish Survey Report for the Conewago Creek

Conewago Creek Initiative

Herring Highway A Study of a New Fish Passage for River Herring at Rock Creek National Park

Montgomery Parks Biological Monitoring in the Anacostia Watershed of Montgomery County RESOURCE ANALYSIS SECTION

Lake Superior. Ontonagon River Assessment. Ontonagon. Rockland. Victoria Dam. Bergland. Bergland. Dam. Bruce Crossing Agate Falls. Kenton Lower.

Fish faunal changes in Otsego Lake s Shadow Brook watershed following application of best management practices

Using Habitat Guilds to Develop Habitat Suitability Criteria for a Warmwater Stream Fish Assemblage. Jason Persinger, Don Orth,, Tammy Newcomb

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Planning, Office of Environmental Services 1980 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43223

Rehabilitation of Grimes Creek, a Stream Impacted in the Past by Bucket-lined Dredge Gold Mining, Boise River Drainage, July 2008 to August 2011.

BA1 BA2 BA3 BA4 BA5 BA6 CP1 CP2 CP3 CP4 CP5 CP6

APPENDIX A. Stream Electrofishing Survey Data (2015)

PA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS February 16, Coles Creek Basin (405C) Sullivan/Columbia/Luzerne Counties

Fisheries Review with Respect to Stormwater Management for Milton/Navan Road Property

Fish Survey of Arctic Lake (ID # ), Scott County, Minnesota in 2012

Evaluation of Newbury Weirs (Rock Riffles) for Improving Habitat Quality and Biotic Diversity in Illinois Streams.

Bean River. APPENDIX A. Fish Survey Summary by Subwatershed

Trip Report: Eagle Creek, Arizona

Tittabawassee River Assessment. Miles. Gladwin Smallwood Impoundment. Harrison. Clare. Midland. Mt. Pleasant. St. Louis. Saginaw.

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids

PA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS February 16, Bureau Director Action: Division Chief Action:

American Eels in Virginia Mountain Streams

Quillback (Carpoides cyprinus)

Full Project Proposal

Importance of Temperature and Flow for Fish in Connecticut Streams

Distribution. PFBC Northcentral Region Law Enforcement Office, Attention: WCO Kraynak, 1150 Spring Creek Road, Bellefonte, PA 16823

Joe Rathbun Michigan DEQ Water Resources Division Nonpoint Source Unit * Thanks to The Nature Conservancy

HURON RIVER WATERSHED

Target Fish Communities and the MA Water Policy

CREATION AND ASSESSMENT OF AN INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR COLDWATER, SOUTHEASTERN MINNESOTA STREAMS. Jeffrey W. Quinn

WAVE Assessments

feeding - downstream sections of large rivers, lakes, and impoundments

PA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS February 16, WATER: Wapwallopen Creek Basin (405B) Luzerne County

Holderness. The Three Watersheds within the Newfound Lake Drainage Dorchester. Groton Plymouth. Ashland. Hebron. Canaan. Bridgewater.

STREAM Girls field notebook

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Illinois Lake Management Association Conference March 23, 2018 By Trent Thomas Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries

Au Sable River Assessment Appendix

Student Worksheet: River Health and Indicator Species

Fish community assessment in the Harpeth River prior to the removal of the dam at Franklin, TN

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

feeding - clear moderate-sized shallow streams with moderate vegetation spawning - nests in gravel, sand, or hard rock substrate

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Fish monitoring requirements of new FERC licenses: are they adequate?

2012 SOUTH RIVER FISH COMMUNITIES AND PHYSICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT, FRANKLIN COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS

Thunder Bay River Assessment Appendix. Appendix 2

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

Stream Assessment. Date. Data Collected by. Location. Name of Stream and River Basin. Stream Order. Streambank Materials. Streambank Vegetation

Annex B SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. Table of Contents. Scientific Names of Select Plants and Animals. Fish species collected in Curwensville Lake

Fish Migration Barrier Severity and Steelhead Habitat Quality in the Malibu Creek Watershed

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Gamefish Assessment Report

Methods for Evaluating Shallow Water Habitat Restoration in the St. Clair River

Advancing Fish Passage in the Menomonee River Watershed

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

PA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS February 16, Tributaries to the Tioga-Hammond Lake Complex (404A)

Notes from Fish Community Assessments and a Plan to Protect Wild Brook Trout Populations and their Habitats within the Warner River Watershed

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

The Fish Fauna of the Otsego Lake Watershed

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

BASELINE FISH COMMUNITY STUDY REPORT

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

Assessment of Brook Trout Habitat Conditions within the Dwaas Kill Nature Preserve

Volume 1 of 2. March Kim Guadagno, Lt. Governor

Four Mile Run Restoration t Project

Tahquamenon River Assessment Appendix

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

BENSON PARK POND FISH SPECIES

ESA, Proposed Threatened ESA, Threatened New Mexico-WCA, Endangered

Fish Community. Fish Habitat, Streams and Rivers

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.

Furnace Run and Segloch Run 2004

Fishes of Vermont Vermont Natural Heritage Inventory Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department 22 March 2017

Flint River Assessment Appendix

EcoLogic Memorandum. TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07

An Assessment of the Fish Community in Lake Acworth

Native Suckers of the Chuska Mountains and Defiance Plateau GLENN SELBY-FISH BIOLOGIST

2014 Threatened and Endangered Fish Survey of. East Loon Lake and West Loon Lake. Lake County, Illinois

Proposed Reclassification of Cherry Creek, North Platte River Basin, Wyoming. October 25, 2010

Assessment of Nearshore Fish Populations in Lake Ripley, Jefferson County, Wisconsin

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Stony Creek Creel Census

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Transcription:

North and Sou Upper Delaware WMA 1 North and South Branch Raritan WMA 8 Holland # # Milford [ # FIBI026 Frenchtown Central Delaware WMA 11 FIBI Rating [ Excellent [ Fair [ Good [ Poor Stream Order 1st, 2nd & 3rd Order 4th Order & Higher É 0 3 6 Miles

SUMMARY OF RESULTS FIBI026 1. Stream Name: Nishisakawick Creek 2. Sampling Date: 06/20/2011 3. Sampling Location: Recreational Park at Creek Road 4. Municipality Frenchtown 5. County: Hunterdon 6. Watershed Management Area: 11 7. Contributing Drainage Area (Sq. Mi.): 11.2 8. Electrofishing Gear: 2 Backpacks 9. FIBI Score and Rating*: R1 44(Good)*, R2 48(Excellent), R3 44(Good) 10. Habitat Score and Rating: R1 167(Optimal), R2 165(Optimal), R3 140(SubOptimal) 11. Fishable Species Present: Yes 12. Relevant AMNET 1 Station Data: Proximity of FIBI station to AMNET station: 0.04mi. US AN0082 AMNET Rating: 13. Stream Chemistries: Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) n/a Temperature 0 C. n/a ph n/a Conductivity (µmhos/cm) n/a 14. Length of Stream Sampled: 150m 15. Water Clarity: Clear 16. Average Open Forest Canopy: 9% 17. Discharge: 5.55cfs 18. Substrate: 20% Gravel/Sand, 40% Cobble, 8% Boulder, 30% Bedrock, 2% Concrete 19. Habitat: 45% Riffle, 35% Run, 20% Pool 20. Snags: Yes 21. Periphyton: Slight 22. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation: No 23. Outfalls: 24. Number of Fish Species Identified: 15 25. Total Number of Fish Collected: 822 26. Number of Fish With Anomalies: 9 1 AMNET is the acronym for the DEP s ambient benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring network a series of 820 monitoring stations located throughout the state s waterways that collects data on the health of bottom dwelling stream fauna which in turn is used to assess general water quality * Round 1 data was scored prior to the FIBI metric recalibration.

FIBI026 R3 Nishisakawick Ck. Creek Road Frenchtown Boro Hunterdon! ( Frenchtown Boro Park ^ WMA 11! ( Ra ce ± Str ee t ad o R ek e Cr Kin gw o od Av en 0 ue! ( Start! ( Finish 75 150 Meters

FIBI026 Nishisakawick Creek @ Creek Road Excellent Good Fair Poor Date Sampled 6/20/2011 Score # of Fish Species 5 # of Benthic Insectivorous Species (BI) 5 (excluding White Suckers and Bullheads) # of Trout and Centrarchid Species 3 (excluding Green Sunfish and Bluegill) # of Intolerant Species (IS) 5 Proportion of Tolerant Individuals 5 Proportion of Individuals as Generalists 5 Proportion of Individuals as Insectivorous Cyprinids 5 Proportion of Individuals as Trout *whichever gives better score OR Proportion of Individuals as Piscivores (excluding American Eel)* 1 # of Individuals in Sample 5 (excluding Tolerant Species) Proportion of Individuals w/disease/anomalies 5 (excluding blackspot) Total 44 Stream Rating 4550 Excellent 3744 Good 2936 Fair 1028 Poor

HABITAT ASSESSMENT FOR HIGH GRADIENT STREAMS Nishisakawick Ck.(FIBI026) 6/20/2011 Condition Category Optimal Suboptimal Marginal Poor 1. Epifaunal Substrate /Available Cover Greater than 70% of substrate favorable for epifaunal colonization and fish cover; mix of snags, submerged logs, undercut banks, cobble or other stable habitat and at stage to allow full colonization potential (i.e., logs/snags that are not new fall and not transient). 4070% mix of stable habitat; wellsuited for full colonization potential; adequate habitat for maintenance of populations; presence of additional substrate in the form of newfall, but not yet prepared for colonization (may rate at high end of scale). 2040% mix of stable habitat; habitat availability less than desirable; substrate frequently disturbed or removed. Less than 20% stable habitat; lack of habitat is obvious; substrate unstable or lacking. SCORE: 18 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2. Embeddedness Gravel, cobble, and boulder particles are 025% surrounded by fine sediment. Layering of cobble provides diversity of niche space Gravel, cobble, and boulder particles are 2550% surrounded by fine sediment. Gravel, cobble, and boulder particles are 5075% surrounded by fine sediment. Gravel, cobble, and boulder particles are more than 75% surrounded by fine sediment. SCORE: 20 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 3. Velocity/Depth Regimes All 4 velocity/depth regimes present (slowdeep, slowshallow, fastdeep, fastshallow). (slow is <0.3 m/s, deep is >0.5 m) Only 3 of the 4 regimes present (if fastshallow is missing, score lower than if missing other regimes). Only 2 of the 4 habitat regimes present (if fastshallow or slowshallow are missing, score low). Dominated by 1 velocity / depth regime (usually slowdeep). SCORE: 20 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 4. Sediment Deposition Little or no enlargement of islands or point bars and less than 5% (<20% for lowgradient streams) of the bottom affected by sediment deposition. Some new increase in bar formation, mostly from gravel, sand or fine sediment; 530% (2050% for lowgradient) of the bottom affected; slight deposition in pools. Moderate deposition of new gravel, sand or fine sediment on old and new bars; 3050% (50 80% for lowgradient) of the bottom affected; sediment deposits at obstructions, constrictions, and bends; moderate deposition of pools prevalent. Heavy deposits of fine material, increased bar development; more than 50% (80% for lowgradient) of the bottom changing frequently; pools almost absent due to substantial sediment deposition. SCORE: 19 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 5. Channel Flow Status Water reaches base of both lower banks, and minimal amount of channel substrate is exposed. Water fills >75% of the available channel; or <25% of channel substrate is exposed. Water fills 2575% of the available channel, and/or riffle substrates are mostly exposed. Very little water in channel and mostly present as standing pools. SCORE: 9 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 6. Channel Alteration Channelization or dredging absent or minimal; stream with normal pattern. Some channelization present, usually in areas of bridge abutments; evidence of past channelization, i.e., dredging, (greater than past 20 yr) may be present, but recent channelization is not present. Channelization may be extensive; embankments or shoring structures present on both banks; and 40 to 80% of stream reach channelized and disrupted. Banks shored with gabion or cement; over 80% of the stream reach channelized and disrupted. In stream habitat greatly altered or removed entirely. SCORE: 11 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 7. Frequency of Riffles (or bends) Occurrence of riffles relatively frequent; ratio of distance between riffles divided by width of the stream <7:1 (generally 5 to 7); variety of habitat is key. In streams where riffles are continuous, placement of boulders or other large, natural obstruction is important. Occurrence of riffles infrequent; distance between riffles divided by the width of the stream is between 7 to 15. Occasional riffle or bend; bottom contours provide some habitat; distance between riffles divided by the width of the stream is between 15 to 25. Generally all flat water or shallow riffles; poor habitat; distance between riffles divided by the width of the stream is a ratio of >25. SCORE: 19 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 8. Bank Stability (score each bank) Note: determine left or right side by facing downstream. Banks stable; evidence of erosion or bank failure absent or minimal; little potential for future problems. <5% of bank affected. Moderately stable; infrequent, small areas of erosion mostly healed over. 530% of bank in reach has areas of erosion. Moderately unstable; 3060% of bank in reach has areas of erosion; high erosion potential during floods. Unstable; many eroded areas; "raw" areas frequent along straight sections and bends; obvious bank sloughing; 60 100% of bank has erosional scars. SCORE: 6 (LB) Left 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 SCORE: 3 (RB) Right 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9. Bank Vegetative Protection (score each bank) More than 90% of the streambank surfaces and immediate riparian zone covered by native vegetation, including trees, under story shrubs, or nonwoody macrophytes; vegetative disruption through grazing or mowing minimal or not evident; almost all plants allowed to grow naturally. 7090% of the streambank surfaces covered by native vegetation, but one class of plants is not wellrepresented; disruption evident but not affecting full plant growth potential to any great extent; more than onehalf of the potential plant stubble height remaining. 5070% of the streambank surfaces covered by vegetation; disruption obvious; patches of bare soil or closely cropped vegetation common; less than onehalf of the potential plant stubble height remaining. Less than 50% of the streambank surfaces covered by vegetation; disruption of streambank vegetation is very high; vegetation has been removed to 5 centimeters or less in average stubble height. SCORE: 5 (LB) Left 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 SCORE: 5 (RB) Right 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width (score each bank riparian zone) Width of riparian zone >18 meters; human activities (i.e., parking lots, roadbeds, clearcuts, lawns, or crops) have not impacted zone. Width of riparian zone 1218 meters; human activities have impacted zone only minimally. Width of riparian zone 612 meters; human activities have impacted zone a great deal. Width of riparian zone <6 meters: little or no riparian vegetation due to human activities. SCORE: 3 (LB) Left 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 SCORE: 2 (RB) Right 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 HABITAT SCORE 140 HABITAT SCORES VALUE OPTIMAL 160 200 SUBOPTIMAL 110 159 MARGINAL 60 109 POOR < 60

FIBI026R3 Nishisakawick Creek 06/20/2011 Common Name Scientific Name Abundance Size Range (inches) Blacknose Dace Rhinichthys atratulus 475 Longnose Dace Rhinichthys cataractae 91 American Eel Anguilla rostrata 80 Tessellated Darter Etheostoma olmstedi 35 Cutlips Minnow Exoglossum maxillingua 27 Creek Chub Semotilus atromaculatus 25 White Sucker Catostomus commersoni 23 Margined Madtom Noturus insignis 19 Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus 19 Rock Bass Ambloplites rupestris 9 2.6 6.5 Fallfish Semotilus corporalis 8 Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus 5 2.0 8.1 Redbreast Sunfish Lepomis auritus 3 2.9 3.1 Green Sunfish Lepomis cyanellus 2 2.6 2.9 Yellow Bullhead Ameiurus natalis 1 4.0 4.0

FIBI026 Nishisakawick Creek American Eel Anguilla rostrata Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus White Sucker Catostomus commersoni Rockbass Ambloplites rupestris Creek Chub Semotilus atromaculatus Blacknose Dace Rhinicthys atratulus Tessellated Darter Etheostoma olmstedi Longnose Dace Rhinicthys cataractae

FIBI026 Nishisakawick Creek Cutlips Minnow Exoglossum maxillingua Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus Yellow Bullhead Ameiurus natalis Fallfish Semotilus corporalis Redbreast Sunfish Lepomis auritis Margined Madtom Notorus insignis Green Sunfish Lepomis cyanellus