Economics of Large (>200 anglers) Fishing Tournaments at Lake Fork, Texas

Similar documents
Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the Matagorda Bay System

The Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing in the San Antonio Bay System

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Recreational Fishing License Sales in Florida:

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

The Economic Benefits of Hunting and Fishing Activities in Alberta in 2008

2017 CRAPPIE TOURNAMENT SUMMARY

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

A Social and Economic Analysis of the Recreational Fisheries in Mississippi Flood Control Reservoirs

Recreational Saltwater Fishing Industry Trends and Economic Impact January 2007

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Fisheries Management Division Ellington Agricultural Center P. O. Box Nashville, TN 37204

2018 CRAPPIE TOURNAMENT SUMMARY

Evidence on the Accuracy of Expenditures Reported in Recreational Surveys

The Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in the Everglades Region

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

2-Day Fishing Derby 2018

2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation National Overview

Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing in the Proposed GRNMS Research Area Updated April,

LAKE ONTARIO FISHING AND FISH CONSUMPTION

Independent Economic Analysis Board. Review of the Estimated Economic Impacts of Salmon Fishing in Idaho. Task Number 99

Chapter 20. Sampling the Recreational Creel

The Mid-Atlantic Recreational Boater Survey

Discussion Paper: Consideration of a Registration for Self-Guided Halibut Rental Boats

The Economics of Atlantic Highly Migratory Species For-Hire Fishing Trips July - November 2013 Clifford Hutt and George Silva

For-hire Data Collection. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Red Snapper For-hire Advisory Panel December 2-3, 2014 Tampa, FL

The Economic Significance of Florida Bay. Dr. Andrew Stainback GEER April Coral Springs, Florida

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

5. purse seines 3 000

MISSISSIPPI BASS TOURNAMENT PROGRAM

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

ROANOKE RAPIDS LAKE CREEL SURVEY,

Population-level Impacts of Largemouth Bass Mortality Associated with Tournaments in a Texas Reservoir

Survey of New Jersey s Recreational Blue Crab Fishery in Delaware Bay

MANAGEMENT ESTABLISHING JURISDICTION LEGAL BASIS DEFINING LOGICAL APPROACHES

Fishing in Indiana Motivations of Indiana Anglers

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015

Economic Value of the Tournament Black Bass Fishery on Lake Guntersville, Alabama. Patrick Lee Snellings

Susquehanna River Walleye Fishery

Rainy Lake Open-water Creel Survey:

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

August 3, Prepared by Rob Cheshire 1 & Joe O Hop 2. Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research Beaufort, NC

Temporal Trends in Voluntary Release of Largemouth Bass

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

CLIFFORD PATTON HUTT

"LI B R_AFLY OF THE UNIVLR.SITY. or ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY.

TABLE ROCK LAKE 2014 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

Eddy s Resort Lake Mille Lacs

A SURVEY OF 1997 COLORADO ANGLERS AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY INCREASED LICENSE FEES

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

THE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY OF SALMON

CHAPTER 10 TOTAL RECREATIONAL FISHING DAMAGES AND CONCLUSIONS

2010 Fishing Opener Prognosis. Central Region

Impacts of Nonresident Sportfishing on the Ketchikan Economy. Prepared for: Ketchikan Visitors Bureau

Largemouth bass fishing has long been

MINNESOTA S LARGEST FISHING, HUNTING, AND OUTDOORS GROUPS URGE STATE LAWMAKERS TO TAKE ACTION BEFORE IT S TOO LATE

Georgia Bass Clubs. Tournament Creel Report

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Wyoming. Bait

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania:

Regulations for Boating and Shore Fishing. Season The Quabbin fishing season runs from the third weekend in April to the third weekend in October

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Game Department. Texas Parks & Wildlife. State Parks Board. Fish and Oyster Commission. What TPWD Can do for You

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

SPORTING HERITAGE. Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION

Previous Stocking Black crappie. Channel catfish. Cutbow. Rainbow trout. Saugeye Black crappie. Channel catfish. Cutbow.

Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 2002

The Economic Impacts of Carolina Beach Inlet Navigability

IMPACTS OF A REDUCTION IN FISH PRODUCTION FROM SERVICE TROUT MITIGATION HATCHERIES IN THE SOUTHEAST

Busse Reservoir South Lateral Pool Population Survey

Initial Mortality of Black Bass in B.A.S.S. Fishing Tournaments

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

Georgia Bass Clubs. Tournament Creel Report

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

Columbia River Salmon Harvest Sport and Commercial Sharing Facts and Relationships

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

Houston Bearing & Supply Co., Inc Cornish St. Houston, Texas Annual Saltwater Fishing Tournament

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

The Economic Importance of Recreational River Use to the City of Calgary

APPENDIX 1 INTRODUCTORY LETTER, SURVEY COVER LETTERS, REMINDER POSTCARD, AND QUESTION & ANSWER SHEET

Hunting, Fishing, and Recreational Activities

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

The Economic Gains from Reallocating Specific Saltwater Fisheries

Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E6. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2019

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Black Seabass Length Frequencies and Condition of Released Fish from At-Sea Headboat Observer Surveys, 2004 to 2010.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE LAKE ZUMBRO AND LOWER ZUMBRO RIVER CREEL SURVEY MAY AUGUST 2007.

The first & second place High School teams will qualify to advance to the B.A.S.S. Nation High School Championship in 2019

Brook Trout Angling in Maine2009 Survey Results

Transcription:

Economics of Large (>200 anglers) Fishing Tournaments at Lake Fork, Texas Dan Bennett*, Kevin Storey, and Todd Driscoll Texas Parks and Wildlife Inland Fisheries Division Dan.Bennett@tpwd.texas.gov

An economic survey of the Lake Fork fishery was done in 1994-1995, and repeated 20 years later in 2014-2015 by the Kevin Hunt (the original investigator, now with Mississippi State University).

Economic Study June 2014 to May 2015 The direct expenditures of Lake Fork anglers was estimated to be just under 18 million dollars. The addition of Consumer s Surplus (the amount of money anglers would be willing to pay on top of what they actually paid rather than not fish Lake Fork) to the direct expenditures placed the economic value at an estimated ~38 million dollars.

The initial survey in 1995 estimated the direct expenditures by recreational anglers to be just over 27 million dollars. When inflated to 2015 dollars, these expenditures should equal almost 43 million if angling activity remained the same as in 1995. However, the actual direct expenditures by Lake Fork anglers was estimated at just under 19 million dollars in 2014/2015.

This 2015 estimate may be lower because of reduced fishing activity due to low lake levels, and the exclusion of many fishing tournaments from the study. Overall, fishing pressure appears to decline substantially during periods of low water level, as well as during periods of high gas prices, etc.

Random Survey Design of the 2014-2015 surveys Benefits: Allows us to subsample (i.e. Total annual fishing effort is extrapolated from surveys conducted on only a portion of days (~10%) during the year.) Only way to estimate non-tournament recreational fishing effort. Drawbacks: Non-random events (i.e. tournaments) result in biased estimates of fishing effort. E.g. Increased effort over 2-3 days results in inflated estimates of fishing effort if extrapolated out to time periods not surveyed. Takeaway: Fishing tournaments and their associated economic impact should be evaluated as discrete, stand-alone events.

Although historical data on the frequency of fishing tournaments is lacking, studies conducted nationwide since 1978 suggest the frequency of these events is increasing. It is believed that the frequency of tournaments at Lake Fork has also significantly increased since the 1995 economic study in spite of the current restrictive 16 to 24 slot length limit.

Tournament fishing effort versus Non-tournament fishing effort has only been estimated during random creel surveys since 2006 at Lake Fork. Trends suggest tournament effort at Lake Fork is increasing. Tournament effort at Lake Fork was estimated at 422,529 hours in 2015/2016, and 55% of all angling effort was by tournament anglers.

2007-2008 Sam Rayburn Study A study at Sam Rayburn Reservoir in 2007/2008 estimated that the direct expenditures of tournament anglers was almost 3 times that of nontournament angling. Tournaments were analyzed as individual, discrete events. 405 tournaments (~8/week) occurred between Nov 2007 and Oct 2008 with 25,396 participants. Estimated total direct expenditures associated with tournaments was $23,674,305. (estimate includes practice trips and tournament entry fees) Estimated total direct expenditures for Non-tournament angling was $8,204,883.

Our 2015/2016 Tournament Study Many tournaments were randomly encountered included during the 2014/2015 economic study. Between 1 and 12 tournaments per month were held at Lake Fork. However, several particularly large tournaments were specifically avoided during the 2014/2015 study to avoid biasing the overall fishing effort used to estimate annual angling expenditures. In 2015 and 2016, we individually surveyed multiple large fishing tournaments held annually at Lake Fork to estimate the annual economic impact of these events.

Tournament Format Tournament Format Days # of Anglers Mad Dog Moore Memorial 5 fish, big fish pot 1 336 Berkley Big Bass hourly big bass 2 1,136 Sealy Big Bass hourly big bass 3 2,367 Bass Champs North Region 5 fish, big fish pot 1 667 Legend of Lake Fork hourly big bass 3 1,227 Skeeter Owner s hourly big bass 2 2,190 LFSA Catfish Classic hourly big catfish 2 194 We surveyed a random number of anglers from 7 tournaments with ~200 anglers or more participants.

Survey Methods Names and addresses were requested from tournament organizers. Surveys were either mailed; or pre-packaged and provided to tournament organizers. If addresses were provided, a reminder/thank you card was sent to non-respondents to increase response rate. Respondents were provided a pre-stamped envelop to return surveys and a web link to complete the survey online if desired.

Response We obtained 554 usable responses; from 2,500 surveys 22% overall response rate Returned surveys included expenditures of 1,122 tournament anglers within surveyed groups.

Response (response rate%) Mad Dog Provided names and addresses; mailed surveys. (34%) Berkley Big Bass Surveys mailed by Bass Champs. (24%) Sealy Big Bass email addresses provided by Sealy Outdoors; Sealy Outdoors mailed additional surveys. (20%) Bass Champs North Region Surveys mailed by Bass Champs. (20%) Legend of Lake Fork Contact info. collected during event. (34%) Skeeter Owners Surveys mailed by Skeeter Boats. (32%) Catfish Classic Surveys mailed by Lake Fork Sportsman s Association. (8%)

2014-2015 Angler Survey (Hunt and Parker) Out-of-state anglers: spent $904 (border states) and $1,308 (other states) per trip. Their trips averaged 3.59 and 5.25 days, respectively. Nonlocal Texans: spent $364 per trip with each trip lasting 2.04 days on average. 2015-2016 Tournament Survey (Bennett, Storey, and Driscoll) Tournament Average $ spent per party Mad Dog Moore $391.88 Sealy Big Bass Splash $1,058.96 Berkley Big Bass $446.14 Bass Champs North $374.23 Legend of Lake Fork $753.27 Skeeter Owner's $731.38 Catfish Classic $572.50 13% of tournament anglers lived locally (within 35 miles). 26% were local in Hunt and Parker s study. Tournament anglers trips lasted an average of 4.0 days.

Characteristics of Tournament Anglers Between 18% and 56% of tournament participants took a SEPARATE practice trip prior to the tournament. Practice trips averaged 3.2 days in duration. Primary trips to fish tournaments averaged 4 days in duration (~1.5 days longer than each tournament). 16% of those traveling to tournaments were NOT participants, (range = 7% to 28%). Participants brought spouses, children, or other family. 22% of those traveling for practice trips did not fish the tournament. This may have been higher than the actual tournaments trips because other anglers traveled along to fish.

Characteristics of Tournament Anglers In 5 fish bag formats, 80-95% of anglers catch legal fish. However, only about 50% of those anglers bring fish to the weigh-in (even among anglers who caught a limit of 5 fish, only 50% of these anglers actually brought those fish to weigh-in) <0.5% of respondents reported a member of their group catching a fish >24 Just 11% of respondents commented that they were displeased with the 16-24 slot limit on Lake Fork. However, these statements were provided within open ended comments. We did not ask this question as part of our survey.

Average Per Day expenditures for tournament anglers tournament trip practice trip Mad Dog Memorial $130.79 $73.02 Berkley Big Bass $96.59 $93.03 Sealy Big Bass Splash $128.07 $126.61 Bass Champs North $125.43 $78.92 Legend $155.61 $82.31 Skeeter Owners $117.02 $90.12 LFSA Catfish Classic $103.31 $29.25 Tournament trips averaged between $96 and $155 per angler/per day Practice trips averaged between $30 and $126 per angler/per day

Total Date Tournament Total Direct Expenditures (primary trip) Expenditures (minus entry fees) Practice Trips Total Direct Expenditures Mad Dog 9/12/2015Moore 132,288.00 86,712.14 35,160.29 121,872.42 Sealy Big Bass 9/18/2015Splash 1,796,526.41 1,366,811.18 358,695.37 1,725,506.56 Berkley Big 10/17/2015Bass 535,982.38 345,540.10 88,570.37 434,110.46 Bass Champs 2/27/2016North 231,795.47 140,120.03 71,612.46 211,732.49 Legend of Lake 5/13/2016Fork 1,256,367.44 924,259.44 74,592.92 998,852.36 Skeeter 6/9/2016Owner's 1,341,861.67 1,073,123.55 434,642.00 1,507,765.55 6/25/2016Catfish Classic 72,901.56 53,178.23 32,865.88 86,044.11 $5,085,883.96 Total direct expenditures was calculated as the estimated amount participants spent During both the primary tournament trip and practice trips minus tournament entry fees.

Trip expenditures of Lake Fork Tournament Anglers fuel other transportation (plane, car rental) lodging 0.4% 2.4% 5.1% 0.3% 19.7% restaurant meals groceries 27.0% 0.3% 18.7% bait and tackle guide fees fishing license 2.3% 1.4% 6.3% 6.5% 9.7% tournament entry fees boat launch/parking fees other expenses exp. outside Texas boat rental Tournament entry fees comprised the largest portion (27%) of overall angler expenditures, followed by fuel and lodging.

Considerations Average direct expenditures per tournament hour was $25.59 422,529 hours of tournament effort in 2015/2016 = $10,563,225 Practice trips would add another ~4 mil ~ 67 large, organized fishing tournaments were identified in 2014/2015 (not including bass club or other small events). While we estimated the expenditures of 7 of the largest tournament events at Lake Fork, the overall economic impact of all events held at Lake Fork annually likely exceeds non-tournament angling.

Considerations Total annual angling effort at Sam Rayburn was 3.0 hours/acre in 2014/2015. Fishing effort at Lake Fork was 32.04 hours/acre in 2015/2016. 52% of anglers indicated that they try to avoid fishing during fishing tournaments at Lake Fork (Hunt and Parker). 4% suggested that too many tournaments occur on Lake Fork in open ended comments.

Sources Hunt, K. M., and C. R. Parker. In Prep. A Social and Economic Study of the Lake Fork Reservoir Recreational Fishery. Human Dimensions and Conservation Law Enforcement Laboratory Technical Report #HDCLEL 155. Forest and Wildlife Research Center. Mississippi State, MS. 50p. Driscoll, Todd, Jeremy Leitz, and Randy Myers. 2010. Annual economic value of tournament and non-tournament angling at Sam Rayburn Reservoir. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division.

Acknowledgements Wood County Industrial Commission Lake Fork Sportsman s Association (Carolyn West) Bass Champs Skeeter Boats Sealy Outdoors Lieutenant J. M. Holmes TPWD s Todd Robinson, Corey Clouse, John Moczygemba, Monte Brown, and Kurt Felix All Survey Respondents