Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan

Similar documents
HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Bass River Watershed. December The Cadmus Group, Inc.

INDIANA REGIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Unnamed Tributary to the Grand River Watershed.

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

Management of headwater streams in the White Mountain National Forest

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011

Fish Passage Culvert Assessment for Cahilty Creek Watershed FIA Project #

Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Annual Report The Nature Conservancy 2013

Kasaan to Goose Creek Road Project Project Description U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit The following table presents the mile point of the culverte

Geomorphic Stream Classification A Classification of Natural Rivers, Rosgen, D.L.

Public Notice. Corps File No. LRE Date: March 19, 2017 Expires: March 18, 2022

Added Introduction: Comparing highway design and stream design

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

Habitat Conditions, Design Strategies,

Illinois State Water Survey

Biological Survey of Allagash Stream

Simulating Streams Through Culverts in Mat-Su, Alaska

Tahquamenon River Assessment

Job 1. Title: Estimate abundance of juvenile trout and salmon.

Joe Rathbun Michigan DEQ Water Resources Division Nonpoint Source Unit * Thanks to The Nature Conservancy

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

E-3: Jurisdictional Determination Supplement Report

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Quantifying Performance of Stream Simulation Culverts in the Chehalis Basin, WA

Understanding the Impacts of Culvert Performance on Stream Health

4.4 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ANADROMOUS FISH HABITAT UPSTREAM OF MERWIN DAM (AQU 4)

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

Presented by Fred Halterman, URS Jennie Agerton, URS

DRAFT. Stonybrook Creek Watershed

Little Traverse Bay Watershed Road/Stream Crossing Inventory

TOP:001.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service TECHNICAL OPERATING PROCEDURE

Stream Assessment Cut-block: For: Island Timberlands Limited Partnership, Cameron Operation

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

Massachusetts Stream Crossing Case Studies

Hydraulic Modeling of Stream Enhancement Methods

Level II Stream Survey for the Timberline Express Proposal

Project Completion Abstract Fish Passage Activity ( Engineering Activities)

Packwood Hydroelectric Project Barrier Analysis December 12, 2006

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

CALIFORNIA SALMONID STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION MANUAL APPENDIX IX-A CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE INTRODUCTION

REC 6 FISHERIES HABITAT EVALUATION

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

Gaviota Creek Fish Passage and Geomorphic Assessment

FISH PASSAGE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ON PENNYPACK CREEK AT VERREE ROAD DAM AND ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD DAM PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

TROUT CREEK WATERSHED (Second Year of Snowline Data)

Study Update Fish Distribution and Species Composition

Summer Steelhead Surveys North Fork Trinity River Trinity County, California

Detailed Model Simulation Results for Proposed Situation

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

Fish Passage at Road Crossings Assessment Boise National Forest FY 2004

SELBY CREEK SILVERADO TRAIL CULVERT FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT

3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.

LONGITUDINAL FIELD METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF TMDL SEDIMENT AND HABITAT IMPAIRMENTS

TABLE 1. Riverscape surveys completed in the upper Chehalis River, Newaukum, and Satsop rivers.

Overview of temperature protocols

Report prepared for: Prepared by: January 2002 BEAK Ref

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

FSOC Upstream Fish Passage Guidance Document

Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

Proposed Reclassification of Muskrat Creek, North Platte River Basin in Goshen County, Wyoming

Chinook Salmon Spawning Study Russian River Fall 2005

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

Newaukum Watershed Culvert Assessment

Ontonagon River Assessment

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Cold Spring Creek.

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No )

Salmon Run G.C. Hole 3: Tributary & Wetland Restoration

Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum

Design Report for Janes Creek Roughened Channel

BC Ministry of Forests. March Fish Stream Crossing Guidebook. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia.

Stream Assessment. Date. Data Collected by. Location. Name of Stream and River Basin. Stream Order. Streambank Materials. Streambank Vegetation

Northwest Michigan Stream Connectivity

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 5, No 2, 2014

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

APPENDIX D: North Fork Nooksack Sub-basin Report

Juvenile Steelhead and Stream Habitat Conditions Steelhead and Coho Salmon Life History Prepared by: DW ALLEY & Associates, Fishery Consultant

Youngs Creek Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P 10359)

Thunder Bay River Assessment

Klickitat County Shoreline Master Program Update. Open House March 15, 2017

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Assessing Ecosystem Impacts from Road Stream Crossings through Community Involvement

Sub-watershed Summaries

Fish Passage Assessment Report Mare Brook Culverts

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

Proposed Reclassification of Cherry Creek, North Platte River Basin, Wyoming. October 25, 2010

Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief. Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa -

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

Transcription:

Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595 Marquette County, Michigan Prepared for: Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company Marquette, Michigan Prepared by: King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc. 2520 Woodmeadow SE Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 www.king-macgregor.com September 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 STUDY AREA...1 METHODS.....1 RESULTS...2 DISCUSSION..3 REFERENCES FIGURES AND TABLES Table 1. Stream Data Stream Assessment for CR 595 September 2011 King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

INTRODUCTION King & MacGregor Environmental Inc. (KME) was contracted by Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company (KEMC) to collect baseline geomorphic information on multiple streams and rivers located along the proposed County Road 595 (CR 595) for use in the design of potential roadstream crossings. The protocol used was developed in consultation with personnel at the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). This protocol is based on methods described in Stream Simulation: An Ecological Approach to Providing Passage for Aquatic Organisms at Road-Stream Crossings (USDA, 2008). Study Area The area of investigation is along the proposed CR 595 route, which is located in west-central Marquette County. The proposed road connects US-41 with Triple A Road and generally is located in portions of the following: Sections 13, 23, 24, 26, and 35, (T50N-R29W) Michigamme Township; Sections 18, (T50N-R28W) Champion Township; Sections 2, 11, 14, 23, 25, 26, and 36, (T49N-R29W) Champion Township; Sections 1, 12, 25, 35 and 36, (T48N-R29W) Champion Township; Sections 7, 18, 19, and 30, (T48N-R28W) Ely Township; Section 2, (T47N- R29W)Humboldt Township. Generally, the streams and rivers within the northern two-thirds of the area of investigation flow into Lake Superior and are part of the Yellow Dog and Dead River watersheds. The streams and rivers within the southern one-third of the area of investigation are part of the Middle Branch Escanaba River that flows into Lake Michigan and is in the Escanaba River watershed. METHODS Prior to field data collection, an in-office review of relevant literature was conducted. Field data was collected from July 2010 through September 2010 and August and September 2011. Twenty-three potential road-stream crossing locations were evaluated. KME staff, assisted by surveyors from Coleman Engineering Company and AECOM, investigated each of the roadstream crossing locations for measurable geomorphic features as described in Chapter 5 of the Steam Simulation methodology (USDA, 2008). The protocol used attempts to document bankfull stream width at three riffle locations near the crossing point. If three riffle locations were not present, two bankfull stream widths were measured. Since a riffle is the most geomorphically stable feature, the bankfull width measurement was obtained by first determining naturally occurring geomorphic bankfull features in riffle locations close to but outside of the proposed road crossings. Bankfull widths were surveyed at riffles (generally two upstream and one downstream, if available). A detailed cross section at each riffle was surveyed and its location marked with a steel survey monument. A longitudinal profile was surveyed in the thalweg (deepest part of the channel) between the upstream and downstream riffles. Stream geomorphologic features were documented and summarized in field data forms. In certain circumstances (ie beaver activity) riffles were not available for measurement. In these instances, bankfull measurements were taken at other stable locations or HEC-RAS modeling was used to characterize the conveyance needed. Stream Assessment for CR 595 September 2011 King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

RESULTS Twenty-three watercourse crossing locations were surveyed. Four categories of streams were observed: 1) streams where a full assembly of geomorphic features was present; 2) large streams where three riffles were not present; 3) streams where flow was insufficient to build geomorphic features; and 4) streams where beaver dams altered the system such that geomorphic stream features were not present. Table 1 indicates the cross sections surveyed and the average bankfull width measured at that location. Data sheets for each of the surveyed crossings are included in the Appendix. Table 1. Stream Data Width in Feet Stream Crossing Cross section Cross Section Cross Section Average Bank full Road Station 1(ft) 2 (ft) 3 (ft) Width (ft) Middle Branch Escanaba 122+50 27.0 35.5 34.0 32.2 Second River 261+00 14.5 11.4 17.7 14.5 Trembath Lake Outlet 311+91 7.0 10.5 10.8 9.4 Unnamed Stream 3023+75 2.7 5.4 6.1 4.7 Kipple Creek 3050+35 9.4 11.6 9.7 10.2 Unnamed Tributary to Kipple Creek 1 3088+36 Unnamed Tributary to Kipple Creek 2 3114+37 3.3 3.3 4.8 3.8 Unnamed Tributary to Dishno Creek 1130+96 3.8 4.8 4.3 Unnamed Tributary to Voelkers Creek 1219+67 5.6 2.8 3.3 3.9 Voelkers Creek 1225+61 4.1 6.7 13.6 8.1 Dead River 1353+00 29.4 26.7 28.1 Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Canyon Creek 1404+15 Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Canyon Creek 1418+67 4.4 3.6 4.0 Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Canyon Creek 1423+13 2.9 3.1 1.8 2.6 Wildcat Canyon Creek 1430+13 4.4 8.6 5.0 6.0 Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 1 1506+70 9.4 7.5 8.0 8.3 Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 2 1513+27 3.7 2.4 3.1 Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 3 1522+93 1.2 3.7 2.5 Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 4 1527+21 0.8 1.2 2.9 1.6 Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 5 1556+82 Mulligan Creek 1566+00 17.9 10.8 14.4 Yellow Dog River 1712+00 26.8 16.2 21.5 East Branch Salmon Trout 29+74 12.0 = Geomorphic feature not present DISCUSSION A wide variety of streams and rivers were encountered and surveyed. Some of the smallest streams were ephemeral (spring flow only) with bankfull widths of only a few feet or less and no flow observed. Other small first order streams had base flow primarily from groundwater discharge (seeps and springs). The larger rivers had significant flows and significant bankfull widths. Contributing watersheds varied from a few acres for the smallest of the streams to many square miles for the Yellow Dog River and the Middle Branch Escanaba River. Bankfull features were generally observable except where active or historic beaver activity has impacted Stream Assessment for CR 595 September 2011 King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

the watershed and heavy siltation had occurred (beaver meadows). Beaver activity was observed at Voelkers Creek, Dead River, Wildcat Canyon Creek (Crossing 1) and Mulligan Creek crossing locations. As documented in the longitudinal profiles, the slope characteristics of the streams/rivers varied from generally low gradient (less than 0.05 percent) to very steep (greater than 10 percent). The steeper gradient streams were primarily associated with bedrock at or near the ground surface and these were generally the smaller streams located within the Mulligan River watershed. REFERENCES Freiburger, C. & Fulcher, J. 2009. Culvert sizing and installation stream simulation. PowerPoint presentation. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, Michigan. Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., and Miller, J. P. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Dover Publications, Inc, New York, 1995 unabridged republication, 522 pp. Leopold, L. B. 1994. A view of the river. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts. Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Wildland Hydrology Books, Fort Collins, Colorado. Rosgen, D. L. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Fort Collins, Colorado, 5-9 pp. Rosgen, D. L. 2006. Watershed assessment of river stability and sediment supply (WARSSS), Ch. 1 & 2. Wildland Hydrology Books, Fort Collins, Colorado. United States Department of Agriculture. 2008. Stream simulation: an ecological approach to providing passage for aquatic organisms at road-crossings. USDA Forest Service, Washington D.C., Ch 5, 3.1 pp. Stream Assessment for CR 595 September 2011 King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

APPENDIX Stream Data Sheets

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Middle Branch Escanaba River Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: CR FY MSP Sampling Date: 8/26/2010 Road Plan Station: 122+51 T/R/S: T47 / R29 / S2 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 32.2 2.7 None None None None Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Longitudinal profile not conducted as clear span bridge is proposed Comments: 1) Bankfull measurements taken on bankfull shelves at cross section locations 2) All cross sections taken in riffles

Middle Branch Escanaba River -- County Road FY Cross Sections Cross Section 1 27.0 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.8 Cross section width measured with tape only Cross Section 2 35.5 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.5 Cross section width measured with tape only Cross Section 3 34 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.7 (Feet) 101 100 99 98 97 96 0 10 20 30 40 50 Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Second River Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/23/2010 Road Plan Station: 261+00 T/R/S: T48 / R29 / S25 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 14.5 2.0 5.5 3 53 0.3% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 97 96 95 94 93 bed water srf bankfull x-section 29.6 409.6 480.9 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles and pools 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Stream survey point at Longitudinal Profile Station 9 is top of beaver dam 5) Culvert under Wolf Lake Road from Longitudinal Profile Station 88 to 140 6) Backwater from beaver dam downstream of cross section at Longitudinal Profile Station 480

Second River Cross Sections Cross Section 1 29 14.5 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.3 99 98 97 96 95 94 0 10 20 30 40 Cross Section 2 409 11.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.2 97.5 97 96.5 96 95.5 95 94.5 94 93.5 0 20 40 60 Cross Section 3 480 17.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.6 98 97 96 95 94 93 0 20 40 60 Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Trib to Second River (a.k.a Trembath Creek) Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/23/2010 Road Plan Station: 311+91 T/R/S: T48 / R28 / S19 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 9.4 1.0 2 2 41 0.2% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile bed water srf bankfull x-section 99 98 97 96 95 94 0.0 291.8 335.8 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 1) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Existing culvert from Longitudinal Profile Station 141 to 183

Tributary to Second River (a.k.a. Trembath Creek) Cross Sections Cross Section 1 0 7.0 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.0 100.5 100 99.5 99 98.5 98 97.5 97 0 10 20 30 40 Cross Section 2 292 10.5 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.0 98.5 98 97.5 97 96.5 96 95.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 Cross Section 3 3+36 10.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.1 Notes: 98 97.5 97 96.5 96 95.5 95 0 10 20 30 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Stream Route: 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 9/272011 Road Plan Station: 3023+75 T/R/S: T/R/S Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 4.7 0.3 1 1 44-0.5% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Elevation 1750 1740 1730 1720 1710 1700 bed water srf bankfull x-section 102 341 360 0 100 200 300 400 500 Channel Profile Stationing Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Existing culvert is from Channel Profile station 461 to 505

Unnamed Stream Cross Sections Cross Section 1 102 2.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.2 Cross Section 2 Elevation 1712.5 1712 1711.5 1711 1710.5 1710 0 5 10 15 341 5.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.2 Elevation 1732.5 1732 1731.5 1731 1730.5 1730 1729.5 0 5 10 15 Cross Section 3 360 6.1 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.4 Notes: Elevation 1733 1732.8 1732.6 1732.4 1732.2 1732 1731.8 1731.6 1731.4 1731.2 1731 0 5 10 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Kipple Creek Route: 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 9/27/2011 Road Plan Station: 3050+35 T/R/S: T/R/S7 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 10.2 1.6 none none none none Site Plan Longitudinal Profile bed water srf bankfull x-section 1669 1668 1667 1666 1665 1664 1663 0.0 208 300 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Channel Profile Stationing Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles

Kipple Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 0 9.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.2 Elevation 1667 1666.5 1666 1665.5 1665 1664.5 1664 0 10 20 30 Cross Section 2 208 11.6 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.8 1668 1667.5 Elevation 1667 1666.5 1666 1665.5 1665 0 10 20 30 40 Cross Section 3 300 9.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.9 1669 Notes: Elevation 1668.5 1668 1667.5 1667 1666.5 1666 0 10 20 30 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Kipple Creek 1 Route: 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 9/27/2011 Road Plan Station: 3088+00 T/R/S: T/R/S11 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet none none none none Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Longitudinal profile not surveyed as there were no stream features in the proposed road crossing location. Comments: 1) Stream is a beaver pond at the proposed road crossing

Unnamed Tributary to Kipple Creek 1 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 Bankfull Depth (feet) No cross sections were surveyed as there were no stream features in the proposed road crossing location. Cross Section 2 Bankfull Depth (feet) No cross sections were surveyed as there were no stream features in the proposed road crossing location. Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) No cross sections were surveyed as there were no stream features in the proposed road crossing location. Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Kipple Creek 2 Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 9/8/2011 Road Plan Station: 3114+37 T/R/S: T/R/S Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 3.8 0.6 none none none none Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Elevation 1713 1712 1711 1710 1709 1708 1707 bed water srf bankfull x-section 23 181 198 0 50 100 150 200 Channel Profile Stationing Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles

Unnamed Tributary to Kipple Creek 2 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 23 3.3 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.5 Elevation 1711 1710.5 1710 1709.5 1709 1708.5 1708 0 5 10 15 20 25 Cross Section 2 181 3.3 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.6 Cross Section 3 Notes: 198 Elevation 1711.6 1711.4 1711.2 1711 1710.8 1710.6 1710.4 1710.2 1710 0 5 10 15 20 25 4.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.7 Elevation 1712.6 1712.4 1712.2 1712 1711.8 1711.6 1711.4 1711.2 1711 1710.8 0 10 20 30 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

Unnamed Tributary to Dishno Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 31 3.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.9 8001 8000.5 8000 7999.5 7999 7998.5 7998 7997.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Cross Section 2 44 4.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.4 7999.5 7999 7998.5 7998 7997.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) View downstream of wetland with no decernable stream channel. All Flow is sub-surface Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Voelkers Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 8/23/2010 Road Plan Station: 1219+67 T/R/S: T49 / R29 / S23 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 3.9 0.4 none none none none Site Plan XS 2 Longitudinal Profile 9010 9008 9006 9004 9002 9000 8998 8996 8994 bed water srf bankfull x-section 0 50 100 150 200 250 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Very low perenninal flow. Appears that flow is from upstream wetland and snow melt.

Unnamed Tributary to Voelkers Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 34.5 5.6 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.5 9005.8 9005.6 9005.4 9005.2 9005 9004.8 9004.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cross Section 2 171 2.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.4 9000.5 9000 8999.5 8999 8998.5 8998-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Width (ft) Cross Section 3 238 3.3 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.3 9000 8999.5 8999 8998.5 8998 8997.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Voelkers Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/24/2010 Road Plan Station: 1225+61 T/R/S: T49 / R29 / S23 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 8.1 0.7 4 4 32-0.4% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 bed water srf bankfull x-section 149.3158.5 202.4 0 50 100 150 200 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Existing culvert from Longitudinal Profile Station 92 to 124 2) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles and pools downstream of existing culvert 3) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 4) Stream bed survey points taken at centerline of stream channel upstream of culvert 5) All cross sections taken in riffles 6) Channel downstream of culvert is braided; single channel downstream of braided section is influenced by beaver dam 7) Survey point at Longitudinal Profile Station 0 is top of beaver dam

Voelkers Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 149 4.1 Bankfull Depth (feet) Bankfull width measured with tape only; no cross section surveyed. Section immediately downstream of culvert and may not be outside of road influence. Cross Section 2 158 6.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.7 97 96.5 96 95.5 95 94.5 94 0 Channel 5braided 10 15 20 25 30 Cross Section 3 202 13.6 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.6 Notes: 97.5 97 96.5 96 95.5 95 Channel braided 0 10 20 30 40 50 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Dead River Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 8/22/2010 Road Plan Station: 1353+00 T/R/S: T49 / R29 / S11 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 28.1 2.1 24 7 10 n/a Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Due to deep water conditions created by beaver activity a longitudinal profile was not possilbe. A bridge exists and is proposed for this location. Comments: 1) Cross section taken in riffle

Dead River Cross Sections Cross Section 1 n/a 29.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.0 Cross Section 2 n/a 10001 10000.5 10000 9999.5 9999 9998.5 9998 9997.5 9997 0 10 20 30 40 50 26.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.2 Width of pool downstream from riffle cross section. Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) View upstream of bridge (old beaver pond) Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Wildcat Canyon Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 8/24/2010 Road Plan Station: 1404+15 T/R/S: T49 / R29 / S2 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet n/a n/a 2 x 3 3 20 0.1% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Due to the proxminity of upstream and downstream beaver dams a longitudinal profile was not conducted at this location. Comments:

Wildcat Canyon Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 Bankfull Depth (feet) Twin 36" CMP exist. Photograph is looking west (upstream) Cross Section 2 Bankfull Depth (feet) Photograph is looking east (downstream) Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Wildcat Canyon Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 2 DS Sampling Date: 8/24/2010 Road Plan Station: 1418+67 T/R/S: T49 / R 29 / S2 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 4.0 1.1 2.5 2.5 20 2.3% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Due to beaver activity no riffles were present. 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves

Wildcat Canyon Creek No.2 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 131 4.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.9 Cross Section 2 160 3.6 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.2 Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Wildcat Canyon Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 3 DS Sampling Date: 8/24/2010 Road Plan Station: 1423+13 T/R/S: T49 / R29 / S2 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 2.6 1.0 2 2 20 1.5% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 11998 11997.5 11997 11996.5 11996 bed water srf bankfull x-section 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Longitudinal Profile Stationing Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles

Wildcat Canyon Creek No. 3 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 41.8 2.9 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.4 11999 11998.5 11998 11997.5 11997 11996.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cross Section 2 117 3.1 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.8 11999 11998.5 11998 11997.5 11997 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cross Section 3 175.4 1.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.8 Notes: 11998.5 11998 11997.5 11997 11996.5 11996 0 1 2 3 4 5 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Canyon Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 8/24/2010 Road Plan Station: 1430+13 T/R/S: T49/R29/S2 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 6.0 1.0 none none none none Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 13010 13005 13000 12995 12990 bed water srf bankfull x-section 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Longitudinal Profile Stationing Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles

Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Canyon Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 64.7 4.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.1 Cross Section 2 13002 13001.5 13001 13000.5 13000 12999.5 12999 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 170.7 8.6 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.9 Cross Section 3 12994 12993.5 12993 12992.5 12992 12991.5 0 5 10 15 20 270.3 5 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.9 Notes: 12993 12992.5 12992 12991.5 12991 0 5 10 15 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 1 Route: Woodland Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/26/10 Road Plan Station: 1506+70 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S35 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 8.3 1.2 2, 3 2, 3 31, 36 0.8%, 2% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 105 100 95 90 85 80 bed water srf bankfull x-section 54 205 310 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles and steps in step-pool stream segments 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Existing culverts from Longitudinal Profile Station 113 to 144 5) Drop downstream of cuverts is bedrock waterfall

Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 1 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 54 9.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.4 Cross Section 2 98.5 98 97.5 97 96.5 96 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 205 7.5 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.2 Cross Section 3 310 90 89.5 89 88.5 88 87.5 87 86.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 8.0 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1.0 Notes: 87 86.5 86 85.5 85 0 5 10 15 20 25 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 2 Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 8/23/2010 Road Plan Station: 1513+27 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S35 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 3.1 0.9 3 3 18 0.0% Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 13999 13998 13997 13996 13995 13994 bed water srf bankfull x-section 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Up stream of existing road is a beaver pond with no stream channel visible. No cross section was surveyed.

Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek No. 2 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 94 3.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.9 13995.8 13995.6 13995.4 13995.2 13995 13994.8 13994.6 13994.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cross Section 2 140 2.4 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.8 13997 13996.8 13996.6 13996.4 13996.2 13996 13995.8 13995.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 3 Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/26/2010 Road Plan Station: 1522+93 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S35 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 2.5 0.8 0.5 0.5 Unknown Unknown Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 15005 15000 14995 14990 14985 14980 14975 bed water srf bankfull x-section 283.7 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at center line of wetland upslope of culvert and at steps or riffles down slope of culvert 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) Cross section taken in riffle; channel width measurements taken in pool segments of step-pool segments 4) Existing culvert from Longitudinal Profile Station 115 to about 140 5) Existing culvert buried on down slope end

Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 3 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 75 Bankfull Depth (feet) Upslope of existing road crossing is wetland seeps with no identifiable stream features to survey Cross Section 2 175 1.2 Bankfull Depth (feet) Measured width of pool in step-pool segment Cross Section 3 283 3.7 Bankfull Depth (feet) 0.8 Notes: 14980 14979.5 14979 14978.5 14978 14977.5 0 2 4 6 8 King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 4 Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/26/2010 Road Plan Station: 1527+21 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S26 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 1.6 1.0 Buried Buried Buried Buried Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 16010 16000 15990 15980 15970 bed water srf bankfull x-section 217.9 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles or steps 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) Cross section taken in riffle 4) Identifiable riffle not found upstream of existing Trail 5 crossing 5) Existing Trail 5 crossing from Longitudinal Profile Station 86 to 123

Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 4 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 36 0.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) Cross Section 2 162 1.2 Bankfull Depth (feet) Cross Section 3 219 2.9 Bankfull Depth (feet) 1 15986.5 15986 15985.5 15985 15984.5 15984 15983.5 15983 0 5 10 15 Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 5 Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/26/2010 Road Plan Station: 1556+82 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S26 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet None None None None Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 18006 18004 18002 18000 17998 17996 17994 bed water srf bankfull x-section 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) No stream channel observed in area of proposed crossing 2) Profile survey points taken at low point of wetland or swale

Unnamed Tributary to Mulligan Creek 5 Cross Sections Cross Section 1 150 Bankfull Depth (feet) Down slope end of proposed crossing; no swale or standing water observed. Cross Section 2 25 Bankfull Depth (feet) Upslope end of proposed crossing; swale with no standing water observed. No stream features observed. Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) Upslope of proposed crossing; swale evident with standing water observed. No stream features observed Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Mulligan Creek Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 MSP Sampling Date: 8/26/2010 Road Plan Station: 1566+00 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S26 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 14.4 2.1 None None None None Site Plan d Longitudinal Profile 17001 17000 16999 16998 16997 16996 16995 bed water srf bankfull x-section 17.4 52.6 130.1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Longitudiinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Proposed road crossing is at approximate Longitudinal Profile Station 52 5) Upstream end of profile is waterfall at beaver dam 6) Downstream end of profile is influenced by backwater from beaver dam

Mulligan Creek Cross Sections Cross Section 1 17 17.9 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.1 Note: bankfull width is sum of primary and secondary channels shown in this section and additional south secondary channel 17002 17001 17000 16999 16998 16997 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Secondary channel from approx. longitudinal profile station 3 to 5 on section is breach of beaver dam. Cross Section 2 130 10.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 2.1 17001 17000 16999 16998 16997 16996 0 5 10 15 20 Note: bankfull width is sum of channel shown in this section and additional south secondary channel South Secondary Channel 1 1.3 Breach of beaver dam has created secondary channel south of primary channel. Measured width of channel is 1.2 feet average Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.

STREAM CROSSING FIELD DATA FORM Stream Name: KME Staff: Yellow Dog River Route: CR 595 Crossing Number: 1 DS Sampling Date: 8/31/2010 Road Plan Station: 1712+00 T/R/S: T50 / R29 / S13 Summary of Findings Average Width at Bankfull: Average Depth at Bankfull Ex. Culvert Width: Ex. Culvert Rise: Ex. Culvert Length: Ex. Culvert Slope: All dimensions in feet 21.5 3.7 Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Site Plan Longitudinal Profile 93 92 91 90 89 bed water srf bankfull x-section 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Longitudinal Profile Station Comments: 1) Stream bed survey points taken at riffles 2) Bankfull survey points taken at observed bankfull shelves 3) All cross sections taken in riffles 4) Only one riffle upstream and one riffle down stream were located.

Yellow Dog River Cross Sections Cross Section 1 61 26.8 Bankfull Depth (feet) 3.6 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 0 10 20 30 40 Cross Section 2 361 16.2 Bankfull Depth (feet) 3.7 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Cross Section 3 Bankfull Depth (feet) Notes: King and MacGregor Environmental, Inc.