Copies: Dave Favero Deputy Cleanup Manager Michigan RACER Trust. Rhonda Klann, MDEQ Amanda Armbruster, MDEQ John McCabe, MDEQ

Similar documents
Daily Dust Measurements

Daily Dust Measurements

Daily Dust Measurements Contractor suspends work, identifies source and addresses issue.

Revised Corrective Action Plan Part B

D.B. Wilson Station CCR Landfill

APPENDIX F GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS

CCR CLOSURE PLAN Sibley Slag Settling Impoundment Sibley Generating Station East Johnson Rd Sibley, Missouri

Statistical Method Certification, Coal Combustion Residuals Landfill, Reid Gardner Generating Station

An Improved Understanding of LNAPL Behavior in the Subsurface LNAPL - Part 1

Explosive gas migration monitoring for a sanitary landfill facility.

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

CCR Closure Plan. CCR Certification: Written Closure Plan (b) & (c) for the. Landfill Sedimentation Pond. A. B. Brown Generating Station

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Bass River Watershed. December The Cadmus Group, Inc.

ANNUAL EVALUATION OF 2016 WATER-LEVEL MONITORING DATA FROM THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES WATER SUPPLY WELLS, NEW MEXICO

ANNUAL EVALUATION OF 2015 WATER LEVEL MONITORING DATA FROM THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES WATER SUPPLY WELLS, NEW MEXICO

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

Amended Written Closure Plan

Northern Indiana Public Service Company Michigan City Generating Station Primary Settling Pond Number Annual RCRA CCR Unit Inspection Report

Figure Chromium VI Concentrations in Groundwater and Pore Water Chromium Transport Study Dundalk Marine Terminal Baltimore, Maryland

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Beach Point, Cape Cod, Massachusetts

Grading Plan - Drawing No. C-2 - Project Revision 1 dated January 30, 2018.

NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION

Annual Inspection Report of CCR Impoundment and CCR Landfill Wenck Project # B

Two types of physical and biological standards are used to judge the performance of the Wheeler North Reef 1) Absolute standards are measured against

SLOP RECEPTION AND PROCESSING FACILITIES

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Three Mile Creek 2011

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Annual CCR Landfill Inspection. Lansing Landfill. Interstate Power and Light Company. Prepared for:

APPENDIX D-2. Sea Level Rise Technical Memo

MBMG Butte Mine Flooding Monthly Report BMFOU Consent Decree BU-SEH Remedial Action Monitoring Program Contract No TO-35 September 2013

ANNUAL EVALUATION OF 2017 WATER LEVEL MONITORING DATA FROM THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES WATER SUPPLY WELLS, NEW MEXICO

Juneau Aurora Harbor

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Kennedy Bridge - Summary of Pier 6 Movement Records

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

Closure Plan for CCR Surface Impoundments

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

Well PGE-6 Decommissioning Evaluation PG&E Topock Compressor Station

APPENDIX H. Risk-Based Disposal Application. Revised EE/CA. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area

Written Closure Plan. Cherokee Station - Active CCR Impoundments Public Service Company of Colorado Denver, Colorado.

Final Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock

DESIGN REPORT RANNEY NO. 5 WELL CLEANING PROJECT

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

847 NE 19 th Avenue, #250, Portland, OR Phone: (503) Fax: (503) us at

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF AQUIFER SEPARATION DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

CPT and MiHpt Programs Bayou Corne 8 AUG 2013

MEMORANDUM. NFPA Technical Committee on Lightning Protection Systems. NFPA 780 Supplement ROC TC FINAL Ballot Results (F2012Cycle)

BROWNFIELD ASSESSMENT, REDEVELOPMENT & REMEDIATION

CCR Landfill 2017 Annual Inspection Report NC1 Ash Disposal Area

2016 Annual Inspection Report

TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING 310 CMR CMR (3) DETERMINING HIGH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Unnamed Tributary to the Grand River Watershed.

Results of a Suspended Solids Survey at the Whites Point Quarry, Little River, Digby County, Nova Scotia

Holding Pond Annual Inspection Report

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

The date, Site name, report author, report recipient, and report number are presented above.

AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO OPTIMIZE REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

+)) Lower Churchill Project RIPRAP DESIGN FOR WIND-GENERATED WAVES SNC LAVALIN. SLI Document No HER

Memorandum. Dr. Wilbert Odem, Dr. Paul Trotta, and Mr. Justin Ramsey. From: Timothy Mahon, Patrick Belsheim, and Ali Alrayyes.

FEMA Region V. Great Lakes Coastal Flood Study. Pilot Study Webinar. Berrien County, Michigan. February 26, 2014

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

Sizing of extraction ventilation system and air leakage calculations for SR99 tunnel fire scenarios

SURFACE CASING SELECTION FOR COLLAPSE, BURST AND AXIAL DESIGN FACTOR LOADS EXERCISE

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

Design Assessment Checklist: Infiltration / Detention Basin

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

Analysis A1 and B2 Methods of Hydrostatic Testing Applied at Gas Pipeline; Cause Study A1-Method

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

SUMMARY MEMBERSHIP ANALYSIS FOR THE STATE OF. New Hampshire. Trends of first-time 4 to 8 year-old male ice hockey players to

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

November 2012: The following Traffic and Safety Notes were revised:

Regional Analysis of Extremal Wave Height Variability Oregon Coast, USA. Heidi P. Moritz and Hans R. Moritz

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

CCR Landfill 2015 Annual Inspection Report NC1 Ash Disposal Area

Change in Groundwater Storage for the San Bernardino Basin Area Calendar Years 1934 to 2009

CHAPTER 6 EXTREME WAVE CONDITIONS IN BRITISH AND ADJACENT WATERS

Evaluation of the Wisconsin DOT Walking Profiler

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Holding Pond Annual Inspection Report

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street, Mail Drop San Antonio, Texas Project No

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports

SWI NAPL Recovery. Cemcor Environmental Services. represented by. Contact: Craig Marlow Phone Cell

3 Groundwater Monitoring

Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) Stone Farm, Arundel Sample Collection - Data Report Summary Report Date: June 15, 2017

Air Eliminators and Combination Air Eliminators Strainers

First Annual RCRA CCR Unit Inspection Report January 2016 RESTRICTED WASTE TYPE I LANDFILL OPERATING PERMIT NUMBER 37-01

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Hamilton Public Health Services 2015 Beach Monitoring Report

SITE TESTING STANDARDS FOR METHANE

Reconciling disparate 20th Century Indo-Pacific ocean temperature trends in the instrumental record and in CMIP5

October 16, GRDA CCR Landfill Compliance Report Grand River Dam Energy Center 8142 Hwy 412B PO Box 609 Chouteau, OK Dear Mr.

The FTC Gas Model For Balancing Landfill Gas Extraction

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

INTERMEDIATE CASING SELECTION FOR COLLAPSE, BURST AND AXIAL DESIGN FACTOR LOADS EXERCISE

Transcription:

MEMO To: Sue Kaelber-Matlock MDEQ-Remediation and Redevelopment Division From: Scott Clearwater Certified Project Manager Arcadis Copies: Dave Favero Deputy Cleanup Manager Michigan RACER Trust Rhonda Klann, MDEQ Amanda Armbruster, MDEQ John McCabe, MDEQ Arcadis of Michigan, LLC 28550 Cabot Drive Suite 500 Novi Michigan 48377 Tel 248 994 2240 Fax 248 994 2241 Date: Arcadis Project No.: April 14, 2016 B0064434.2016 Subject: RACER Saginaw Malleable Industrial Land Mixing Zone Five Year Review On behalf of Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Response (RACER), Arcadis has prepared this review of the groundwater-surface water interface (GSI) mixing zone arsenic criteria determined for the Saginaw Malleable Iron (SMI) Plant Property and the adjacent Green Point Landfill (GPL), located in Saginaw, Michigan. The original mixing zone approved by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) in 2009, and provided a mixing zone limit for arsenic of 680 micrograms per liter (µg/l). Arcadis reviewed the GSI data collected since the mixing zone was granted, as well as the current site hydrogeology, in order to understand if the mixing zone requires any updates. There are three key findings for the mixing zone summarized in this technical memorandum: The site has stayed in compliance with the mixing zone criteria for arsenic. Since the mixing zone was established, concentrations at the GSI compliance wells have always been less than 50% of the mixing zone criteria. Arsenic trends are not increasing and no activities at the site are contributing increased arsenic to the groundwater. The groundwater discharge rate from the site to the Saginaw River is lower than at the time of the original mixing zone in 2009. The mixing zone does not require re-calculation, because the reduced groundwater discharge from the site would lead to an increased mixing zone criteria for arsenic, and the mixing zone criteria is already at the maximum allowable concentration for arsenic (the Final Acute Value of 680 µg/l). G:\COMMON\RACER Saginaw\64434 - SMI (10030) Main Location\10 Final Reports & Presentation\2016 Mixing Zone Memo\RACER Saginaw Mixing Zone Memo 6.14.16.docx Page: 1/5

MEMO Arsenic Trends: 2009-2016 No manufacturing or other operations have taken place on the SMI or GPL property since the mixing zone was granted in 2009. Plant operations ceased in 2007, the SMI Plant was demolished in 2010, and GPL was capped and closed in 2000. Therefore, no changes have occurred that would contribute to additional arsenic impacts. Groundwater samples were collected for arsenic beginning in 2010 along the Saginaw River from the following wells that are located within 100 feet of the Saginaw River: SMI: MW-149WT, MW-114WT, MW-107WT GPL: X-4D, X-9D, X-4CAUGR, X-9AR, X-9BR, X-9CAUG, MW-183WT The locations of the wells above are provided on Figure 1 and analytical results for arsenic are summarized in Table 1. Exceedances of the MDEQ GSI cleanup criteria of 10 µg/l are currently observed in two wells: MW-107WT: 11 µg/l sampled on 10/1/2015 MW-149WT: Concentrations since 2010 have ranged from 60 to 190 µg/l. The maximum arsenic concentration observed in the wells sampled for arsenic since the submittal of the 2009 RAP is 190 µg/l in MW-149WT. Arsenic trends since 2009 for the two wells in the area of the mixing zone are presented below. arcadis.com G:\COMMON\RACER Saginaw\64434 - SMI (10030) Main Location\10 Final Reports & Presentation\2016 Mixing Zone Memo\RACER Saginaw Mixing Zone Memo 6.14.16.docx Page: 2/5

MEMO MW-107WT As shown on the graph above, arsenic concentrations at monitoring well MW-107WT have remained low with a maximum concentration of 11 µg/l. arcadis.com G:\COMMON\RACER Saginaw\64434 - SMI (10030) Main Location\10 Final Reports & Presentation\2016 Mixing Zone Memo\RACER Saginaw Mixing Zone Memo 6.14.16.docx Page: 3/5

MEMO MW-149WT As shown on the graph above, arsenic concentrations at monitoring well MW-149WT are higher than MW- 107WT; however, concentrations are still well below the mixing zone level of 680 µg/l. Comparison of Current and Historical Hydrogeology The groundwater discharge rate was updated using the same approach as the original mixing zone application: a calculation based on hydraulic conductivity (K), hydraulic gradient, and the cross-sectional area of groundwater flow. The updated groundwater discharge calculation used the same two wells as the original mixing zone application (MW-107WT and MW-149WT). Hydraulic conductivity values were not revised from those reported in 2008. The geometric mean of the K values for the fill, silt, and upper sand units yielded a value of 4.18 feet per day (see Appendix I of the RAP). Hydraulic gradient was updated based on the current water elevations. Hydraulic gradients in the area of the arsenic mixing zone decreased from approximately 0.035 feet per foot to approximately 0.013 feet per foot (see Figure 2). arcadis.com G:\COMMON\RACER Saginaw\64434 - SMI (10030) Main Location\10 Final Reports & Presentation\2016 Mixing Zone Memo\RACER Saginaw Mixing Zone Memo 6.14.16.docx Page: 4/5

MEMO Cross-sectional area of the arsenic mixing zone area was also updated based on the current water elevations. The area was based on the product of the saturated thickness (from the top of the water table to base of the upper sand unit) and the horizontal distance to the nearest monitoring well with concentrations below GSI criteria. The horizontal extent of the arsenic mixing zone area remained the same compared to 2008, but the saturated thickness increased to account for slightly higher groundwater elevations at MW-107WT and MW-149WT (see Table 1). The changes in the mixing zone parameters are provided below. Calculation Period Cross- Sectional Area (ft 2 ) Hydraulic Gradient (ft/ft) Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day) Approximate Groundwater Flow Rate (ft 3 /d) Original mixing zone 3,185 0.035 4.18 466 Current conditions 3,600 0.013 4.18 196 Summary As presented in this technical memorandum, the following conclusions are made for the status of the arsenic mixing zone: The site has stayed in compliance with the mixing zone criteria for arsenic. Since the mixing zone was established, concentrations at the GSI compliance wells have always been less than 50% of the mixing zone criteria. Arsenic trends are not increasing and no activities at the site are contributing increased arsenic to the groundwater. Overall, groundwater discharge from the site to the Saginaw River has decreased. The mixing zone does not require re-calculation, because the reduced groundwater discharge from the site would lead to an increased mixing zone criteria for arsenic, and the mixing zone criteria is already at the maximum allowable concentration for arsenic (the Final Acute Value of 680 µg/l). Annual monitoring will continue for arsenic in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan set forth in the RAP until the MDEQ approves discontinuing sampling. Attachments: Table 1 Arsenic Groundwater Analytical Data Figure 1 Site Map Figure 2 Water Table Elevation Contour Map September 2015 arcadis.com G:\COMMON\RACER Saginaw\64434 - SMI (10030) Main Location\10 Final Reports & Presentation\2016 Mixing Zone Memo\RACER Saginaw Mixing Zone Memo 6.14.16.docx Page: 5/5

Tables

Table 1 Arsenic Groundwater Analytical Data RACER Trust, Green Point Landfill 3300 Salt Road Saginaw, Michigan Sample ID: Sample Depth (feet): Date Collected: Arsenic MDEQ GSI Criteria 680* X-4D 40-45 01/09/08 5.0 U X-4D 40-45 04/03/08 5.0 U X-4D 40-45 09/28/10 5.0 U X-4D 40-45 09/26/11 1.1 X-4D 40-45 09/14/12 1.1 X-4D 40-45 09/24/13 0.91 J, B X-4D 40-45 09/23/14 0.49 J, B X-4D 40-45 09/30/15 1.2 J X-9D 42.5-47.5 01/08/08 5.0 U X-9D 42.5-47.5 03/11/08 5.0 U X-9D 42.5-47.5 09/28/10 5.0 U X-9D 42.5-47.5 09/23/11 0.64 X-9D 42.5-47.5 09/12/12 0.67 J X-9D 42.5-47.5 09/25/13 21 X-9D 42.5-47.5 09/22/14 15 X-9D 42.5-47.5 09/30/15 9.5 X-4CAUGR 14-19 01/09/08 5.0 U X-4CAUGR 14-19 03/12/08 5.0 U X-4CAUGR 14-19 09/28/10 5.0 U X-4CAUGR 14-19 09/26/11 0.74 X-4CAUGR 14-19 09/14/12 0.42 J X-4CAUGR 14-19 09/24/13 1.9 B X-4CAUGR 14-19 09/23/14 2.3 B X-4CAUGR 14-19 09/30/15 2 X-9AR 3-13 01/10/08 5.0 U X-9AR 3-13 03/11/08 5.0 U X-9AR 3-13 09/29/10 5.0 U X-9AR 3-13 09/23/11 0.4 X-9AR 3-13 09/12/12 0.43 J X-9AR 3-13 09/25/13 6.0 X-9AR 3-13 09/22/14 1.2 J X-9AR 3-13 10/01/15 0.63 J X-9BR 26-31 01/08/08 5.0 U X-9BR 26-31 03/11/08 5.0 U X-9BR 26-31 09/28/10 5.0 U X-9BR 26-31 09/23/11 0.65 X-9BR 26-31 09/12/12 0.94 J X-9BR 26-31 09/25/13 6.2 X-9BR 26-31 09/22/14 2.0 X-9BR 26-31 10/01/15 1.6 J Page 1 of 2

Table 1 Arsenic Groundwater Analytical Data RACER Trust, Green Point Landfill 3300 Salt Road Saginaw, Michigan Sample ID: Sample Depth (feet): Date Collected: Arsenic MDEQ GSI Criteria 680* X-9CAUG 20-25 01/08/08 5.0 U X-9CAUG 20-25 03/11/08 5.0 U X-9CAUG 20-25 09/28/10 5.0 U X-9CAUG 20-25 09/23/11 1.5 X-9CAUG 20-25 09/12/12 1.9 J X-9CAUG 20-25 09/25/13 1.8 J X-9CAUG 20-25 09/22/14 1.1 J, B X-9CAUG 20-25 09/30/15 1.3 J MW-183WT 6-16 01/09/08 5.0 U MW-183WT 6-16 03/12/08 5.0 U MW-183WT 6-16 09/28/10 5.0 U MW-183WT 6-16 09/28/11 1.9 MW-183WT 6-16 09/14/12 1.0 MW-183WT 6-16 09/24/13 3.9 B MW-183WT 6-16 09/23/14 1.8 J, B MW-183WT 6-16 10/01/15 1.5 J MW-107WT 4-9 4/3/2008 0.95 J MW-107WT 4-9 9/18/2012 1.1 MW-107WT 4-9 9/24/2014 4.2 MW-107WT 4-9 10/1/2015 11 MW-114WT 3.5-8.5 09/23/14 5.3 MW-149WT 7-17 04/03/08 93.6 MW-149WT 7-17 09/30/10 126 MW-149WT 7-17 09/28/11 190 MW-149WT 7-17 09/18/12 160 MW-149WT 7-17 09/25/13 140 B MW-149WT 7-17 09/24/14 75 B MW-149WT 7-17 10/01/15 60 Notes: Gray shaded cells represent constituent concentrations that exceed Groundwater/Surface Water (GSI) Michigan Part 201 Criteria updated December 30, 2013. U = The constituent was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is the constituent quantitation limit. J = The compound/constituent was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value is an estimated concentration only. B = Inorganics: the detected analyte is an estimated value between the instrument detection limit (IDL) and the reporting limit (RL). * Venting groundwater discharge concentrations were recommended by MDEQ in a letter dated November 26, 2008 followed by a Mixing Zone Determination Request. Page 2 of 2

Figures

CITY: LANSING, MI (MILWAUKEE, WI) DIV/GROUP: 141 DB: GMS LD: GMS PM: SC LYR:ON=*;OFF=*REF G:\ENVCAD\Lansing-MI\ACT\B0064434\2016\27608W06.DWG LAYOUT: 1 SAVED: 6/13/2016 8:42 AM ACADVER: 19.1S (LMS TECH) PAGESETUP: PDF-PD PLOTSTYLETABLE: PLTFULL.CTB PLOTTED: 6/13/2016 8:42 AM BY: AKENS, DAVID XREFS: 27608X01 IMAGES: PROJECTNAME: ---- SAGINAW MALLEABLE INDUSTRIAL LAND GREEN POINT LANDFILL SAGINAW, MICHIGAN SITE LAYOUT MAP FIGURE 1