GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

Similar documents
2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

City of Bartow Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Health and the Built Environment Presentation to the Childhood Obesity Conference

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

COMPLETE STREETS A STEP FORWARD ITE District 10/FSITE Annual Meeting November 3, 2015

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

SECTION 4 TRANSPORTATION

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

This chapter describes the proposed circulation system and transportation alternatives associated with

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

REMOVE BARRIERS TO, ENCOURAGE CREATION OF AND PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR SAFE ROUTES (ALL DISTRICTS)

Classification Criteria

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

2025 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Temple Terrace Florida. Mobility Element. Adopted by City Council June 30, 2009

Town of Siler City - Unified Development Ordinance ARTICLE XIV - Streets and Sidewalks

Needs Plan Report BAY COUNTY 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Road Diets FDOT Process

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Access Management Regulations and Standards

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Prepared For: DIRECTION 2035 SHAPING OUR FUTURE SUMMARY REPORT JULY Prepared By: Staff to Bay County TPO

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

MOBILITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Overall Goal (EFF. 12/15/11) Goal 1: [M] (EFF. 12/15/11) MOTORIZED, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

Transportation Analysis and Plan

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

CAMPUS MASTER PLAN UPDATE

This page intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

This page intentionally left blank.

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Most Important Part of any Plan

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

Approved August 12, 1991 Amended March 14, 2016

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Chapter 6: Transportation

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Transportation Mobility Element

Transportation. Our Parker community. will develop and sustain. a safe, convenient and. efficient transportation. system incorporating

Martha Coello, Fairfax County DOT Jeffrey Hermann, Fairfax County DOT Abi Lerner, VDOT. May 19, 2014

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Active Transportation Access to Transit

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

Trip Generation Impact Analysis Reporting Form

Corridor Recommendations and Implementation

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

D.13 Transportation and Traffic

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

List of Exhibits...ii

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

9.1 FUNCTIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEMS IN URBANIZED AREAS Principal Arterial Interstate Principal Arterial Non-Interstate

Transportation Element

How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

Living Streets Policy

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Transcription:

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The purpose of this element is to assist in establishing an adequate transportation system within the City and to plan for future motorized and non-motorized traffic circulation systems. GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. Objective 2.1: Implement the City s designation as a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area by July 2011. Policy 2.1.1: Until such time as the City adopts related land use and mobility strategies to implement the City s designation as a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area, the City shall: (a) Use its concurrency management system to assess potential impacts on safe, convenient, and efficient traffic flow, including on-site traffic flow and needed motorized and non-motorized vehicle parking. (b) Use level of service based on peak hour directional conditions to evaluate facility capacity and for issuance of development permits. Facility types shall be based on the FDOT functional classifications in Policy 2.1.2, as defined in Policy 2.4.1, and are depicted on 2.1 and in Table 2.1: (c) Require development to pay its proportionate fair share of impact to the roadway system. (d) Continue to implement concurrency review and the Transportation Fair Share requirements of the City s Land Development Regulations. This area intentionally left blank 2035 Plan Transportation Element November 2010 2-1

Policy 2.1.2: Level of service standards by facility type are as follows: Facility Type Peak Hour Directional Level of Service Principal Arterial US (SR 30) Hathaway Bridge to Beck Avenue Business US (SR 30) Beach Drive to Hamilton Avenue Minor Arterial Collector Local All other principal arterials Maintain E D E E E Policy 2.1.3: Promote urban infill, redevelopment, and new growth through the provision of a range of transportation alternatives to satisfy mobility needs and achieve a healthy, vibrant city. These alternatives may include biking, walking, and the use of transit. Objective 2.2: Adopt an overlay district with supporting strategies for each area of the City subject to a Mobility Plan. Policy 2.2.1: The City shall incorporate into this Plan alternative land use and mobility strategies for each overlay district to serve as mitigation for transportation impacts. Policy 2.2.2: Each proposed Mobility Plan shall be consistent with any adopted Mobility Plan. Policy 2.2.3: The City shall consider including in each Mobility Plan the strategies outlined in Section 4.2.1 Strategies to Support Mobility in the Department of Community Affairs 2007 report entitled A Guide for the Creation and Evaluation of Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas. Policy 2.2.4: The City shall consider land use and transit-oriented design provisions, as well as funding for transportation mobility improvements, in each Mobility Plan. Policy 2.2.6: The City shall implement the Forest Park District Mobility Plan, adopted June 2010. The Forest Park District is indicated on 2.2. The following mobility strategies shall be implemented to support this district: (a) Level of service for all surface transportation modes shall be measured using methods outlined in the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. 2035 Plan Transportation Element November 2010 2-2

(b) Each mode shall have a minimum area-wide score of 1.0 by the year 2030. (c) Mobility throughout the district shall be enhanced through increased connectivity of motorized and non-motorized transportation. (d) All mobility projects described in the Forest Park District shall be implemented by the year 2030. (e) Funding for the projects included in the district plan shall include mobility fees. These fees shall be assessed for all new development within the district. (f) The Forest Park District Mobility Plan shall be updated no less than every three years to include new traffic data, mobility fee assessment, project costs, expected revenues, and mobility projects. (g) The City shall encourage developers within the district to mix uses to promote alternative modes of transportation, such as pedestrian and bicycle modes. (h) The City shall prevent the use of cul-de-sac design roadway networks, unless an overriding environmental issue exists, or exiting development patterns prevent such design considerations. (i) The City shall explore the implementation of a connectivity index for this district. (j) In order to reduce the dependence on vehicular traffic, pedestrian walkways are strongly encouraged separate from vehicular access corridors through the use of inner- and inter-development foot paths. (k) To encourage pedestrian activity, the City shall consider implementing build-to criteria for non-residential development in the Land Development Regulations. Objective 2.3: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing per capita vehicle miles traveled. Policy 2.3.1: The City shall promote compact, multi-use, interconnected developments that provide pedestrian and bicycle modes of transportation. Policy 2.3.2: The City shall require interconnectivity of uses through multi-modal crossaccess within and between uses to reduce travel distances, encourage walking and bicycling, and reduce impact to collector and arterial roadways. Policy 2.3.6: Support the transit system by encouraging ridership, coordinating with the transit operators for an efficient system, and increasing the number of transit shelters. Objective 2.4: Coordinate traffic circulation with land uses shown on the Future Land Use. 2035 Plan Transportation Element November 2010 2-3

Policy 2.4.1: The City shall use designated functional classifications to coordinate land uses to roadway classifications. Such coordination shall include standards for vehicular connections, lane widths, right-of-way widths, building setbacks, land uses, and other similar provisions to be set forth in the Land Development Regulations. These classifications are depicted on 2.1: a) Principal Arterials are generally highest in importance, providing service that is relatively continuous with longer trip lengths. Principal Arterials provide regional movement and access to major public facilities. b) Minor Arterials provide the same service as a Principal Arterial, with less volume. c) Collector roads serve average trip lengths while collecting and distributing traffic between local and arterial roads. Collector roads also help diffuse access to highly concentrated areas. d) Local roads provide service involving shorter trip lengths, minimal through traffic, and frequent access to adjacent properties. These streets serve as site-specific terminal routes, and average speeds and volumes are low. Objective 2.5: The City shall utilize the Bay County Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan adopted by the TPO for identification of areas in need of sidewalks or bicycle facilities. Policy 2.5.1: For projects developed with public roadway frontage, developers shall be required to install sidewalks as part of any new development. Policy 2.5.2: The City will coordinate with the TPO and Bay County for the provision of bicycle paths as specified in the Transportation Planning Organization, Comprehensive Bicycle Plan. Objective 2.6: Establish a procedure to control the connections and access points of driveways and roads to roadways. Policy 2.6.1: The City shall maintain specific and detailed standards in the Land Development Regulations, based on roadway functional classifications and land use types, to regulate vehicular access to roadways in the land development regulations. Policy 2.6.2: The City shall require that developers obtain an FDOT "Connection Permit", or a Notice of Intent to issue such permit, for connections to the State Highway System before granting its approval of a proposed development. Policy 2.6.3: The City shall evaluate the location of driveways and access points as part of its development review process and shall prohibit such connections involving reductions in level of services or threats to public safety. 2035 Plan Transportation Element November 2010 2-4

Objective 2.7: Require that developers provide paved streets as part of any new subdivision development. Policy 2.7.1: Developers shall provide paved streets as part of any new subdivision development. Policy 2.7.2: All streets roads constructed by developers shall conform to design standards as specified in the Land Development Regulations Policy 2.7.3: Local streets and other on-site roadways may be developed in accordance to the International Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traditional Neighborhood Development Street Design Guidelines or Guidelines for Residential Subdivision Street Design standards. Objective 2.8: Annually evaluate changes in FDOT average daily traffic counts relative to peak hour conditions and levels of service. Policy 2.8.1: The City shall use the annual FDOT peak hour level of service counts to evaluate roadway capacities. Policy 2.8.2: Until such time as the City creates a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area(s) and adopts Mobility Plan(s), the City shall consider a level of service deficiency to be occurring when peak hour traffic volumes reach 110% of operating conditions. Objective 2.9: The City shall continue to use the TPO planning process to ensure the provision of a safe, convenient transportation system in an efficient, cost-effective manner. Policy 2.9.1: The City shall work through the TPO to effect roadway improvements on state or county-maintained roads within the City limits. Policy 2.9.2: The City shall promote minor improvements such as signalization, signage, turn-lanes, and three-laning before improvements requiring right-of-way acquisitions. Policy 2.9.3: The City shall use selected roadway improvements to promote other objectives such as redevelopment and revitalization efforts. Policy 2.10.5: The City shall include provisions in its Land Development Regulations to ensure a safe, convenient and efficient transportation system. Such provisions shall include standards for vehicular connections, off-street parking, median cuts, design criteria and other related requirements. 2035 Plan Transportation Element November 2010 2-5

Table 2.1 Functional Classification of Roadways for Arterial and Collector Roads Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Urban Collector Major Collector U.S. 231 (SR 75): City limits to Business U.S. (Sixth Street). East Avenue (SR 389): Business U.S. (SR 30) to city limits. Everitt Avenue: Business U.S. (SR 30) to 11th Street (CR 28). Star Avenue (Hwy 2315). Third Street: Everitt Avenue to Sherman Avenue. Sherman Avenue: Third Street to 11th Street (CR 28). Fourth Street: Watson Bayou to Beach Drive. Cove Boulevard (SR 77): U.S. to city limits. Cove Boulevard (SR 77): Business U.S. (SR 30) to city limits. U.S. (15th Street): Everitt Avenue to 23rd Street (SR 368). middle of Hathaway Bridge. Harrison Avenue: Business U.S. (Sixth Transmitter Road (Hwy 2327). Street) to U.S. (15th Street). St. Andrews Boulevard (SR 390). Cove Boulevard: Business U.S. (SR 30) to Cherry Street. Lisenby Avenue (CR 327): 15th Street Cherry Street/Beach Drive: Cove to 23rd Street. Boulevard to Business U.S. (SR Beck Avenue: 15th Street to 23rd Street. Business U.S. : Everitt Avenue to Beck Avenue. Business U.S. (Beck Avenue to 15th Street). 30). Jenks Avenue: Fourth Street to city limits. Balboa Avenue: Beach Drive to 15th Street. 19th Street: U.S. 231 (SR 75) to U.S. (SR 30A). Lisenby Avenue: Beach Drive to 15th Street. Frankford Avenue: 15th Street north to end of roadway. 15th Street/Michigan Avenue: Beck Avenue to 23rd Street. Baldwin Road: SR 390 to Harrison Avenue. 11th Street (CR 28): City limits to Beck Avenue. Airport Drive (SR 391). Cove Boulevard (SR 77): Business U.S. (SR 30) to US. 2035 Plan Transportation Element November 2010

West Bay North Bay W 23RD ST W HIGHWAY BECK AVE FRANKFORD AVE W 23RD ST W 23RD ST W 23RD ST FRANKFORD AVE W 9TH ST LISENBY AVE AIRPORT RD W 15TH ST W 11TH ST W BEACH DR W HIGHWAY 390 JENKS AVE W 23RD ST E 23RD ST JENKS AVE HARRISON AVE HARRISON AVE HIGHWAY 231 E 15TH ST E 11TH ST E 6TH ST N COVE BLVD E 5TH ST N EAST AVE Grand Lagoon St Andrew Bay Gulf of Mexico Functional Classification of Roadways Source: MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR ARTERIAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL URBAN COLLECTOR 2.1a 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles

HIGHWAY 2321 BAY HEAD RD HIGHWAY 2301 HIGHWAY 231 TITUS RD JOHN PITTS RD STAR AVE STAR AVE N STAR AVE Functional Classification of Roadways Source: MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR ARTERIAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL URBAN COLLECTOR 2.1b 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles

N o r t h B a y Ohio Av 12th St 14th St Tennessee Av Highway 389 Highway 390 Highway 390 Michigan Av Highway Beck Av St Andrews Blvd 9th St Frankford Av Frankford Av Lisenby Av Airport Rd Beach Dr 23rd St Baldwin Rd Jenks Av 15th St Harrison Av 11th St 6th St Highway 77 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd Business Highway Highway 231 Sherman Av 5th St Game Farm Rd Douglas Rd School Av 7th St S t A n d r e w s B a y Cove Blvd 3rd St East Av Delwood Beach Rd Cherry St Forest Park District Source: Forest Park District 2.2 0 0.5 1 Miles

West Bay North Bay TENNESSEE 390 OHIO 389 390 STATE COLLEGIATE PORT MICHIGAN BECK ST ANDREWS 9TH FRANKFORD AIRPORT LISENBY 23RD 11TH BEACH AIRPORT 15TH JENKS HARRISON 6TH 231 MARTIN LUTHER KING 77 BALDWIN 231 SHERMAN 5TH EAST EAST DOUGLAS 15TH 15TH SCHOOL 7TH 3RD Grand Lagoon St Andrew Bay CHERRY Gulf of Mexico Maintenance Responsibility For Roads Source: FDOT Roads Panama City Roads County Roads 2.3a 0 1,550 3,100 6,200 Feet

2321 HIGH POINT 2311 2301 231 231 TITUS JOHN PITTS 390 FIRE TOWER STAR TRAM TRAM Maintenance Responsibility For Roads 2.3b Source: FDOT Roads Panama City Roads County Roads 0 1,550 3,100 6,200 Feet

390 West Bay North Bay OHIO 389 390 77 ST ANDREWS JENKS BALDWIN 231 MICHIGAN BECK 9TH FRANKFORD LISENBY AIRPORT 11TH 23RD HARRISON MARTIN LUTHER KING 15TH 231 SHERMAN 15TH BEACH 6TH 5TH 3RD EAST St Andrew Bay Grand Lagoon Gulf of Mexico Roadway Number of Lanes 2.4a Source: LANES 1 2 3 4 5 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Feet

Roadway Number of Lanes 2.4b Source: LANES 1 2 3 4 5 0 1,400 2,800 5,600 Feet

JAN COOLEY DR West Bay North Bay 1001 W HIGHWAY 390 TENNESSEE AVE OHIO AVE S HIGHWAY 77 E 14TH ST HIGHWAY 389 629 3113 372 DELWOOD BEACH RD 1430 2082 206 MICHIGAN AVE 286 W HIGHWAY 80 2145 435 BECK AVE 103 263 FRANKFORD AVE AIRPORT RD SAINT ANDREWS BLVD 1772 172 315 W 9TH ST 217 435 406 1857 669 183 LISENBY AVE 543 320 320 W 15TH ST St Andrew Bay 1344 W 23RD ST 202 343 515 1744 263 JENKS AVE HARRISON AVE HIGHWAY 231 E 15TH ST W 11TH ST E 11TH ST W BEACH DR 1744 263 263 772 715 663 743 572 486 458 W 6TH ST 315 721 355 1258 801 1772 1258 E 6TH ST 194 HIGHWAY 77 1544 E 23RD ST 1315 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD 9 858 N COVE BLVD 961 1487 509 246 263 1230 E BALDWIN RD SHERMAN AVE 372 109 E 5TH ST E 3RD ST 412 N EAST AVE 137 S EAST AVE 869 149 92 Grand Lagoon Gulf of Mexico Panama City Peak Hour-Peak Direction Traffic Counts Source: Panama City Roads Traffic Counts 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles 2.5a

HIGHWAY 2301 HIGHWAY 231 TITUS RD JOHN PITTS RD STAR AVE 463 Panama City Peak Hour-Peak Direction Traffic Counts Source: Panama City Roads Traffic Counts 0.5 0.25 0 0.5 Miles 2.5b

West Bay North Bay W HIGHWAY 390 S HIGHWAY 77 St Andrew Bay HIGHWAY 77 W 23RD ST W HIGHWAY BECK AVE HIGHWAY 231 W 15TH ST E 15TH ST W 9TH ST W BEACH DR E 6TH ST E 5TH ST St Andrew Bay N COVE BLVD Grand Lagoon Natural Disaster Evacuation Routes Source: FL Division of EM Evacuation Routes 2.6a 0 1,400 2,800 5,600 Feet

HIGHWAY 231 US231 STAR AVE Panama City Natural Disaster Evacuation Routes 2.6b Source: FL Division of EM Evacuation Routes 0 1,400 2,800 5,600 Feet