Controlling Predators to Increase Quail Populations

Similar documents
PREDATOR CONTROL AND DEER MANAGEMENT: AN EAST TEXAS PERSPECTIVE

ALABAMA HUNTING SURVEY

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Best Management Practices. for Trapping Badger in the United States

Quality Deer Management and Prescribed Fire Natural Partners in Wildlife and Habitat Conservation

Best Management Practices for Trapping Bobcats in the United States

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

Furbearer Management Newsletter

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

MODULE 2. Conservation needs of cheetah and wild dogs and related threats to their survival. Notes:

A pheasant researcher notebook:

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

NEW BRUNSWICK FURBEARER HARVEST REPORT FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

NEW BRUNSWICK FURBEARER HARVEST REPORT

Agency Determination [150B- 21.3A(c)(1)a] Implements or Conforms to Federal Regulation [150B-21.3A(e)] Necessary with substantive public interest

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

Best Management Practices

Deer Management Unit 255

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Results from the 2012 Quail Action Plan Landowner Survey

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Predator-Prey Interactions: Bean Simulation. Materials

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Best Management Practices for Trapping Weasels in the United States

5 th Grade Science Pre-assessment Organisms & Environments Unit 5 KEY

Best Management Practices

COOKE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

QUAIL CSI USING A SCENT STATION

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

The Basics of Population Dynamics Greg Yarrow, Professor of Wildlife Ecology, Extension Wildlife Specialist

By: Stephanie Ray and Sarah Phipps

Frequently Asked Questions About Revised Critical Habitat and Economic Analysis for the Endangered Arroyo Toad

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Minnetonka Coyote Management. Hazing Works If We Do It Together

DMU 008 Barry County Deer Management Unit

Coyotes in the Cosk: John C. Kilgo, Research Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station

2018 New Hampshire Envirothon: Fish and Wildlife Test. 1. barred owl 13. Canada lynx. 2. bobolink 14. porcupine. 3. spring peeper 15.

Enclosed, please find the 2018 Spotlight Deer Survey Report and Recommendations that we have prepared for your review and records.

Acknowledgements Frank C. Bellrose & Daniel Holm

Attracting what you want. Controlling what you don t.

Best Management Practices. Trapping Red Foxes in the United States

IC Chapter 6. Regulation of Birds and Mammals

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

TERRESTRIAL SOUND Hunter Hike

Attracting what you want. Controlling what you don t.

Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey

TURKEY, QUAIL, AND PREDATORS IN THE ROLLING PLAINS, TEXAS

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Management History of the Edwards Plateau

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 432

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

Deer Management Unit 127

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Students use wildlife survey study techniques to discover the cause of the drop in a wood duck population.

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION. Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing

Management of Canada Geese

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EC. of 2 April on the conservation of the wild birds

Grade 2 Hands on Science Adaptations and Food Chains

Michigan Predator-Prey Project Phase 1 Preliminary Results and Management Recommendations. Study Background

RAFTS STOCKING POLICY

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

Conservation Planning in Vermont

TRAPPING HARVEST STATISTICS. Division of Fish and Wildlife 500 Lafayette Road, Box 20 Saint Paul, MN (651)

2014 Oregon Hunting Survey: An effort to better understand the choices Oregon hunters make regarding ammunition

Best Management Practices for Trapping Opossums in the United States

Long-tailed Weasel. Mustela frenata. Other common names. Introduction. None

DMU 065 Ogemaw County Deer Management Unit

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Predator and Furbearer Management. SPECIES: Predatory and Furbearing Mammals

Impact on Base Population Density and Hunter Performance of Stocking with Pen-Raised Bobwhite

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

DMU 043 Lake County Deer Management Unit

Population Management Practices

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

THE NEW TRAPPER S NOTEBOOK Notebook completion guide

AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PLAN FOR CANADA LYNX AND MINNESOTA S TRAPPING PROGRAM

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Best Management Practices

FINAL REDUCTION REPORT NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK HERD

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

Targeted Wild Pig Feeder by WPF, Inc.

The ruffed grouse population cycle. defying the best attempts of wildlife biologists to understand it. rn y grou.<c trnil rum fo< mib on public lmd,

FOX AND COYOTE TRAPPING SURVEY

and Furbearer Trapping & Hunting Regulations

Managing Encounters Between Humans and Coyotes. Guidelines and Information

DESCRIBE THE HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS THAT AFFECT WILDLIFE SPECIES NATURAL RESOURCE I FISHERY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 5.

DMU 072 Roscommon County Deer Management Unit

Best Management Practices

3rd GRADE MINIMUM CONTENTS UDI 2: FAUNIA. LIVING THINGS (6)

DMU 038 Jackson County

P.O. Box 24 Joshua Tree, California July 16, 2015

LANCU46v2 - SQA Unit Code H2PW 04 Control vertebrate pests and predators using traps

Coyotes. The coyote, considered by many as a symbol of the Old West, now resides

Transcription:

WILDLIFE Controlling Predators to Increase Quail Populations Looking for guidance as to when, where, and how predator management can and should be implemented to increase quail population? Topics include property size, habitat, predator community, reasonable expectations, and social issues. Controlling predators to increase quail populations is a frequent topic of discussion at hunting camps, around the table at your local restaurant, the grocery store, or any other place where a few quail hunters happen to stumble upon one another. Usually, the topic is preceded by a discussion about the lack of quail on one s property, and it finally concludes with predators as the culprit. If you remove what s eating the quail (the predators), you ll have more quail. Indeed, predator management is an accepted wildlife management tool; however, all too often predator control is the first management tool that many people seek without giving proper thought as to whether it is the correct tool to use. Implementation of predator management to increase bobwhite quail populations is a very complex process invol-ving a great deal of time, money, and dedication in order to be successful. The process of predation is much more complex than simply predators consuming prey. Thought must be given to other factors such as weather, abundance of other prey species, competition between and among other predator species, and so forth. It is important to note that predation is a natural, normally occurring process in nature and that bobwhite quail (and their nests) are a common source of food for many animals. Furthermore, bobwhite quail have developed many physiological and morphological adaptations to offset high levels of predation, mainly adaptations in the way they reproduce. For example, bobwhite quail frequently nest multiple times during the breeding season and lay a relatively large clutch (about twelve eggs). Male bobwhite quail will occasionally incubate nests, allowing the female to produce and incubate another nest. And finally, if sufficient resources are present, females may doubleclutch, attempt a second nest after successfully raising the young from the first nest. All of these adaptations enable bobwhite quail populations to survive with relatively high amounts of predation. Bobwhite quail are one of Alabama s most sought after gamebirds. Bobwhite quail have several reproduction adaptations: frequent renesting; male incubation of nests and rearing of young; and female double-clutching to offset high annual mortality. ANR-1369

Quail hunting is a significant part of the southern hunting culture. The intent of this publication is not to discourage or encourage the use of predator control as a wildlife management tool, but rather to provide the reader with some guidance as to when, where, and how predator management can and should be implemented in order to increase quail populations. Determining whether you or your property meets the following criteria (listed in order of importance) will save you a great deal of time, money, and energy that could be put to work more effectively elsewhere. Property Size Predators, especially coyotes, fox, and bobcat, have rela-tively large home ranges, almost always in excess of 1,000 acres. Many of these mammalian predators are territorial, and once an individual is removed another will Coyotes and foxes have large home ranges; a successful predator management program for these populations has to be implemented on a substantial amount of land. 2 Alabama Cooperative Extension System Proper quail habitat must be established throughout the property. No habitat equals no quail no matter how much predator control is accomplished. quickly claim its territory. During a predator removal study conducted on twelve 600-acre farms in North Carolina, researchers removed approximately the same number of mammalian predators each year during a 3-year study. In other words, predators from adjacent, nonremoval areas were continually moving back into the removal areas once the resident predators were removed. Predator management must be targeted toward a significant reduction or complete removal of predator populations, not just a couple of individuals. Therefore, it is recommended that predator management occur on properties with at least 5,000 or 6,000 acres in order to have a population-level effect. Why thousands of acres? Because the goal is to remove the vast majority of predators and their neighbors to buy time before other predators re-colonize the property. A property of this Prescribed fire, along with disking, are two techniques that can be used to create excellent quail habitat.

size or larger will enable the landowner to remove a substantial percentage of the predator population, especially predators with smaller home ranges such as raccoons, opossums, and skunks. It is possible to implement a predator management program on smaller properties (1,000 to 2,500 acres), but the likelihood of success is significantly reduced in most cases. Very few landowners in Alabama own or manage property of this size (5,000 to 6,000 acres); therefore, predator management will likely not be a viable option to increase quail populations for most landowners. However, cooperative agreements with adjacent landowners can be established to increase the total amount of area on which a predator management program can be implemented. Habitat It is mandatory to have high-quality quail habitat throughout most of the property before implementing predator management. Bobwhite quail are habitat specialists, meaning they do best in a very specific type of habitat mainly early succession habitats. Early succession habitats are characterized by annual grasses and forbs such as ragweed, foxtail, goldenrod, and partridge pea that first appear (sprout up) after the soil has been disturbed or the surface substrate (dead plant material) has been removed, exposing the soil to sunlight. Early succession habitats can be created and maintained in open fields or under the canopy of sparsely stocked pine stands. Prescribed fire and light disking are the best methods for creating these habitats. Snakes are predators of quail nests and chicks. Most snakes are protected under state or federal laws. These early succession habitats provide multiple benefits for quail relative to their physiological, morphological, and behavioral adaptations. This is what the bobwhite quail call home, and once that home is created they are able to survive and reproduce. There is no scientific evidence demonstrating that predator management in the absence of adequate bobwhite quail habitat will produce birds. Conversely, there is a wealth of scientific evidence demonstrating that habitat management will significantly increase local quail populations in the absence of predator control. Simply put, no habitat equals no birds no matter the amount of predator management that is accomplished. Habitat is the cake, and predator management is more or less the icing on that cake. If predator management is employed without first creating proper bobwhite quail habitat, the end result will be poor quail habitat with no predators and still no quail. All birds of prey, such as this Cooper s Hawk, are federally protected and cannot be harassed or killed. Predator management quickly becomes hard work when done at the correct intensity. Controlling Predators to Increase Quail Populations 3

Predator Community In most states, including Alabama, the only quail predators that may be controlled legally are mid-sized carnivores like raccoons, foxes, and coyotes. These mammalian predators constitute only one-quarter of the total predator community that prey on bobwhite quail and their nests. Hawks, owls, and other raptors frequently consume adults and juveniles throughout the year. However, these avian species are federally protected and cannot be killed, harassed, or disturbed. Another group of predators that consume quail, more specifically quail nests, chicks, and incubating adults, are snakes. Snake predation may account for up to 30 percent of nest losses in some areas. Again, most snakes are protected under state nongame laws, which prohibit their take. Even if it were legal to control the predators mentioned above (raptors and snakes), it would be very difficult to do so at a level significant enough to impact quail populations, and it would be cost prohibitive. The final portion of the predator community consists of an assortment of other animals that may consume quail nests. These other predators are opportunistic, meaning they ll eat a quail nest when they happen along one. These predators include mice, rats, squirrels, crows, armadillos, opossums, and hogs, to name a few. Using 24-hour video surveillance equipment hidden next to quail nests, even white-tailed deer have been documented consuming eggs from a nest. Clearly, there are many predators that eat quail or their nests. Predator management programs can only remove legally one-quarter of the total predator community (midsized carnivores), leaving many other predators that naturally consume quail and their nests. Intensity of Removal To be successful, predator management should be conducted in a systematic and intense fashion. Oftentimes, the level of trapping intensity required to adequately remove a substantial number of predators on 5,000 to 6,000 acres requires hiring a full-time trapper for several months out of a year. Multiple trappers may be needed if the property is larger. Because of the diversity in the types of mid-sized mammalian predators, trappers need to employ a wide variety of techniques and traps such as cage traps, foothold traps, nylon egg traps, and snares (where legal). Remember, the goal of a predator management program is to remove as much of the predator community as possible. If predator management is not carried out at a sufficient intensity, negative consequences may arise. A research study on predator control conducted in Texas in the 1970s demonstrated that coyotes in areas of high-intensity removal had greater reproductive success (about 7.1 pups per litter) than those in areas with lightintensity predator removal (about 2.3 pups per litter). The coyotes remaining in the high-intensity removal area were reproducing nearly three times as many pups. This high reproductive success was due to the fact that the coyotes that were not removed in the high-intensity removal area had more resources available to them (because coyote density was much lower on high-intensity removal sites), thus these coyotes were able to devote more energy toward reproduction. When it comes to predator control, it is best to take an all-or-nothing approach; either do it thoroughly or not at all. Duration of Removal In order to be successful, predator removal should occur each year, preferably, if legal, just before and during the nesting season. Remember, predators will eventually recolonize a property from adjacent nonremoval areas. Re-colonization may occur in a matter of a few days (as has been documented with bobcats) to a few months. Also, predators missed in the control efforts will be producing offspring each year that must be removed. It is generally agreed among scientists who study quail that predator management must be conducted intensively for the first 3 to 5 years of the program, and then conducted at moderate levels each year thereafter. Predator control is not favored among the vast majority of the voting public, those who will ultimately dictate the future of hunting and trapping. 4 Alabama Cooperative Extension System

Reasonable Expectations Predator management is not a clear-cut science, and neither are the results that can be expected from controlling predators on a property. Several factors come into play that can affect the outcome of a predator management program. Weather conditions during the nesting season will have a significant impact on how well quail reproduce and how well predators will be able to secure prey. The abundance of alternate prey will also affect the amount of predation quail receive. Depending on which predators are removed, competition among predators will influence predation on quail as well. For example, it is well known that coyotes and foxes are competitors, the larger coyotes oftentimes outcompeting the smaller fox. This is beneficial from a predator management standpoint in that fox are presumed to be a more efficient predator of quail nests than coyotes, which are more of an opportunistic predator of quail and quail nests. Given the above factors that may influence the outcome of a predator management program, expectations must be tempered. In some years on some properties a noticeable increase in quail may be observed, while in other years no difference may be experienced. In most cases, predator management will likely dampen natural yearly fluctuations in quail populations. Social Issues Hunters, fishers, and trappers have been the single greatest driving force in America s conservation legacy; however, less than 15 percent of Alabamians participate in hunting- or trapping-related recreation. Furthermore, many Alabamians are one or two generations removed from a rural lifestyle and may not fully appreciate the importance of hunting and trapping to wildlife conservation. Most of this nonhunting public disagrees with the killing of one animal so that humans can harvest another animal for recreation. This is an important consideration given that the nonhunting public will dictate, through voting, whether hunters and trappers will be able to continue pursuing their favorite pastime. Careful consideration must be given to how your actions (removing predators to increase hunting opportunities) will be viewed by the public. Predator management is a legitimate wildlife management tool. However, its use for increasing quail populations is only effective under a limited set of circumstances (those mentioned above). Predator management is a supplemental practice that should only be considered after proper quail habitat has been created over a significant amount of acreage (thousands of acres at a minimum). The landowner must also be willing to devote a substantial amount of time and resources each year toward a predator management program. Given the above criteria, very few landowners will be able to implement a predator management program with a reasonable degree of success. However, if predator manage is for you, remember to always check with your local conservation officer before initiating any type of predator control because laws vary and what may be legal in one state may be illegal in another. Controlling Predators to Increase Quail Populations 5

Mark D. Smith, Extension Specialist and Assistant Professor, Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University For more information, contact your county Extension office. Visit www.aces.edu/directory. The Alabama Cooperative Extension System (Alabama A&M University and Auburn University) is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Everyone is welcome! New Feb 2010, ANR-1369 2017 by the Alabama Cooperative Extension System. All rights reserved. www.aces.edu