City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

Similar documents
Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

1. What is the Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project (Project)?

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Conversion of One-Way Couplet Streets to Two-Way

Washington St. Corridor Study

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Philip Schaffner Minnesota Department of Transportation October 22, 2013

42nd Ave N Reconstruction

Hennepin/First Transportation Study

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Recommendations. Central Salem Mobility Study

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project. Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017

VT15 / Allen Martin Drive Intersection Scoping Study

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Traffic Calming Policy

Frequently Asked Questions

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Reference number /VP. Lafayette Downtown Congestion Study - Additional Traffic Analysis

Newport City Thoroughfare Plan

Reams Road RCA Study. Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing

Glebe Neighbourhood Cycling Plan

North Avenue Corridor Study

Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study Public Meeting # 2

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: May 10, 2017 MPO Executive Board: May 17, 2017

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 6: Transportation

Hennepin County Transportation Department

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

PROJECT OBJECTIVES. Improve vehicle capacity for the intersection. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access

Project Overview. Rolling Road Widening Fairfax County. Get Involved. Design Public Hearing. Contact Information

PROPOSED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY Vicinity of Route 123/I-495 Interchange Tysons, Fairfax County, Virginia

Los Altos Hills Town Council - June 18, 2015 Palo Alto City Council June 22, AGENDA ITEM #2.B Presentation

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Abstract. Background. protected/permissive operation. Source: Google Streetview, Fairview/Orchard intersection

RiNo Railroad Crossing Connectivity Analysis. Stakeholder Workshop June 29, 2017

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

I-20 ODESSA-MIDLAND CORRIDOR STUDY. Public Meeting for Schematic Design

Living Streets Policy

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Designing with the Railroad

HYATTSVILLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. City Council Update March 19, 2018

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Simulating Street-Running LRT Terminus Station Options in Dense Urban Environments Shaumik Pal, Rajat Parashar and Michael Meyer

ADVANCED TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND MODELING

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY VISIONING MEETING. August 23 24, 2017

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

Project Update May 2018

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Blair/Williamson Intersection Expressed Needs

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Alexander Ikefuna City of Charlottesville Director of Neighborhood and Development Services

Route 7 Corridor Study

Road Diets FDOT Process

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Colchester/Riverside/Barrett/ Mill Intersection Study. PAC Meeting #3 September 22, 2016

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Environmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations. Public Hearing November 13, 2014

Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Orange County Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Enhancement Program. City of San Juan Capistrano April 17, 2012

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

MEASURE B AND MEASURE BB Annual Program Compliance Report Reporting Fiscal Year AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION

Lincoln Way Multimodal Safety and Operations Study. City and University Summary Presentation

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Transcription:

City of Moorhead Committee of the Whole Meeting

Corridor Study Limits Center Avenue (Red River to 8th Street) TH 10 (Red River to TH 336) TH 75 (20th Ave S to Main Avenue) 2

Study Need: Project Overview Primarily due to congestion, safety, and access issues in and throughout the area Pavement condition: Will require rehabilitation within the next 10 to 15 years along TH 75 and TH 10 Will require reconstruction within the next 10 years along Center Ave Utilities along portions of the corridors need replacement or upsizing 3

Project Overview Study Goal: To identify and define future multimodal improvement needs Coordinate with Main Ave Corridor Study in ND Today s Meeting Goal: Inform City Council of study process and progress, including: Review issues and needs of each corridor Evaluation of previously reviewed alternatives Next steps and Implementation Plan 4

Public Involvement Process 2 Public Input and 2 Focus Group Meetings 4 Study Review Committee Meetings Presentation to EDA Presentation to MnDOT Management Environmental Agency Coordination Project Website and Facebook Site Today s Presentation 5

Development & Evaluation of Alternatives Developed alternatives to mitigate issues; took into account vision and design parameters Used technical evaluation criteria tied to purpose and need principles, as well as other environmental factors (Applied a rating system of 1 to 5) Included other non-technical evaluation factors (i.e., cost, public input, and SRC ranking) Removed some alternatives from future consideration because they did not respond to the purpose/need for the project or were deemed technically not feasible 6

CENTER AVENUE RED RIVER TO 8 TH STREET 7

Center Avenue Corridor Issues Pavement Conditions Overall Condition Index (OCI) is poor to fair Water mains need replacement Poor mobility with railroad operations High Number of Access Points 37 access points per mile; 2 times higher than standards 8

Center Avenue Corridor Issues High Vehicle Crash Locations Intersections exceed critical crash rate and crash severity rate for a 4-lane undivided urban roadway Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety and Mobility System gaps identified at 4 th Street Obstructed sidewalks 9

Loss of Parking Loss of Parking 10

Center Avenue (Red River to 8th Street) Alternative Cost** Public Comments SRC Ranking Does the Alternative Move Forward? No Build Build Alternative A:*** Reduces queues, except at 4th Street; queues will increase eastbound. Enhances bicycle network through onstreet bike lanes on the Center Avenue/NP Avenue Bridge. $0 (construction) None Received 3 $3.2M (construction) Mostly Positive Recommended Yes Yes Build Alternative B:*** Reduces queues. $3.2M (construction) Mostly Positive 2 Yes ** Cost estimates do not include right of way or relocation costs, only estimates of construction costs. *** Each Build Alternative has the following impacts: Improves pavements (full reconstruction) and utilities. Improves safety. Closes 1 access point Removes 40 off-street parking spaces. Includes 5,500 s.f. of ROW acquisition. Upgrades sidewalks and streetscaping. 11

Center Avenue Implementation Can be funded: 100% Local Funds 100% MSA Funds Combination of Local & MSA Funds Mix of Federal STP Funds, MSA Funds, & Local Funds (Environmental Document would be required) Project should be completed no later than 10 years (2023) 12

TH 10 RED RIVER TO TH 336 13

TH 10 Corridor Issues Pavement Conditions MnDOT RQI poor from Red River to CR 9; fair to TH 336 At-grade rail crossing of TH 10 between Center and Main Avenue has a high vehicle/rail exposure Limited Existing ROW Private property may need to be purchased High Number of Access Points Corridor ranges from 1.5 to 4 times higher than standard 14

TH 10 Corridor Issues High Vehicle Crash Locations 8 th St/Main Ave and 8 th St/Center Ave intersections 7 of 15 intersections exceed crash severity rate Congestion and Intersection Geometries At-grade RR crossings and signal preemption Significant delay at 8 th St/Main Ave intersection (existing Level of Service D) Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety and Mobility System gaps 15

TH 10 Alternative Development & Evaluation TH 10 developed and evaluated as five segments (Moorhead includes segments 1, 2 and 3) All Build alternatives and subalternatives include pavement rehabilitation costs 16

17

18

TH 10 Segment 1 (Red River to 8th Street) Alternative Cost** Public Comments No Build $0 (construction) None Received SRC Ranking Not Recommended Does the Alternative Move Forward? Yes Build Alternative A:*** Closes three access points. $2.2M (construction) Mixed Recommended Yes Subalternative 5th Street Counter Flow:*** Closes one more access point than Build Alternative A. Reduces circuitous travel with 5th Street one-way to two-way conversion. Increases vehicle conflicts at TH 10/ 5th Street intersection with the two-way conversion. $0.1M (construction) Mixed/ Mostly Negative Not Recommended No ** Cost estimates do not include right of way or relocation costs. *** Each Build Alternative and Subalternative has the following impacts: Improves pavements. Improves safety. Reduces delay at 8th Street. Includes 4,000 s.f. of ROW acquisition. Reduces queues on TH 10. Upgrades sidewalks and streetscaping. Removes 20 on-street parking spaces. Provides opportunity for property redevelopment. 19

20

21

22

Alternative No Build TH 10 Segment 2 (8th Street to 14th Street) Cost** $0 (rehabilitation) Public Does the Alternative SRC Ranking Move Forward? Comments None Received 4 Yes Build Alternative A:*** Closes 12 access points. Includes 8,500 s.f. of ROW acquisition. Removes six on-street parking spaces. Build Alternative B 11th Street:*** Reduces queues on TH 10. Closes eight access points. Includes 14,000 s.f. of ROW acquisition. Build Alternative C Underpass:*** Reduces queues on TH 10. Closes 31 access points. Includes 306,000 s.f. of ROW acquisition (includes buildings). ** Cost estimates do not include right of way or relocation costs. $1.7M (rehabilitation) $2.6M (rehabilitation) $37.1M (rehabilitation) Mostly Positive Mostly Positive 3 Recommended This alternative will be reevaluated as part Mostly 2 Positive of a future vehicle/rail operation study. *** Each Build Alternative has the following impacts: Improves pavements. Improves safety. Upgrades sidewalks and streetscaping. Provides opportunity for property redevelopment. 23 Enhances ITS on the corridor. Yes Yes

24

25

Alternative TH 10 Segment 3 (14th Street to 34th Street) Cost** Public SRC Ranking Comments Does the Alternative Move Forward? No Build Build Alternative A:*** Closes one access point and modifies one access point to 3/4 access. None Not $0 (construction) Yes Received Recommended $5.6M (construction) Mixed Recommended Yes Subalternative 34th Street:*** Closes one access point and modifies one access point to right- in, right-out access. $0 (construction) Mostly Negative Not Recommended No ** Cost estimates do not include right of way or relocation costs. *** Each Build Alternative and Subalternative has the following impacts: Improves pavements. Enhances ITS on the corridor. Reduces queues at 21st Street and 34th Street. Extends northbound right-turn lane at 21st Street. Enhances streetscape. Includes 500 s.f. of ROW acquisition. Upgrades/add new sidewalks, on-street sharrows, and multiuse trails. Provides opportunity for property redevelopment. 26

Downtown Roadway / Rail System Analysis Conducted an analysis of varying roadway modifications to improve adjacent roadway network in relation to at-grade rail crossings at 8th,11th and 14th Streets 27

Downtown Roadway / Rail System Analysis The alternatives evaluated included: Base Condition ~ CTC preemption and signal timing improvements and flashing yellow arrow (implementation by City of Moorhead) Alternative 1: Base + 11th and 14th Street converted to one-ways Alternative 2: Base + 14th Street one-way NB Alternative 3: Base + convert 8th Street NB curb lane to a right-turn lane Alternative 4: Base + jurisdictional transfer to 11th Street and geometric improvements (closely related to Segment 2 Build Alt. B) Alternative 5: Alternative 4 + grade separation of RR tracks along 11th Street 28

Downtown Roadway / Rail System Analysis 29

TH 10 Implementation Plan 1. Implement the Campbell Technologies Corporation recommended railroad preemption operation improvements (2013) 2. Pilot year of collaborative, corridor-based competitive solicitation process for MnDOT TH projects called the Corridor Investment Management Strategy (CIMS). Moorhead and MnDOT are working together to develop a grant application that would cover Segments 1 and 2 of TH 10. Solicitation deadline for grants is April 30, 2013. Projects selected must be let by June 5, 2015 or earlier. 3. CIMS application includes the following for Segments 1 and 2 of TH 10 ADA improvements Pavement Rehabilitation Intersection geometric improvements ITS 4. TH 10 CIMS project cost is estimated to be $2.2 million. Local system costs = $257,750; TH 10 system costs = $1,937,750 of which 90% will by CIMS grant and 10% will be local cost. Total City cost = $450,000. 30

CIMS Geometric Improvements 31

TH 10 Implementation Plan (continued) 4. MnDOT s long term desire to reduce the atgrade crossing of TH 10 and TH 75 by either grade separating the crossing, re-routing the alignment of the TH s, or a combination of both. Moorhead s long term desire to construct a grade separation in downtown Moorhead. This will result in a future study to determine the best option to reduce vehicle/rail exposures on the TH systems and to improve vehicle/train operations in downtown Moorhead. 32

TH 75 20 TH AVENUE SOUTH TO MAIN AVENUE 33

TH 75 Corridor Issues Pavement Conditions MnDOT RQI is poor High Number of Access Points 58 access points per mile; exceeds standard in Moorhead City Code by 3 times Traffic Operations Queues at 12 th Ave S exceed 250 ft. 34

TH 75 Corridor Issues High Vehicle Crash Locations Critical crash rates high at intersections of 20 th Ave S, 12 th Ave S, and 4 th Ave S Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety and Mobility ADA compliance along sidewalks Bicycle and pedestrian gaps 35

36

TH 75 (20th Avenue S to TH 10) Alternative Cost** Public Comments SRC Ranking Does the Alternative Move Forward? No Build $0 (construction) None Received Not Recommended Yes Build Alternative A Improves pavements and utilities. Reduces queues at 12th Avenue South. Improves safety. Closes four access points. Includes 14,700 s.f. of ROW acquisition. Upgrades sidewalks and streetscapes. $3.5M (rehabilitation) Mostly Positive Recommended Yes ** Cost estimates do not include right of way or relocation costs. 37

Potential TH 75 Reroute Options Six reroute options were evaluated to determine the quantitative and qualitative benefits or impacts of transferring TH 75 Conducted a preliminary screening evaluation based on the following criteria: Jurisdictional mileage changes Origin-Destination patterns of traffic in the area between select locations Travel times between defined termini Potential traffic diversion that may occur Land use compatibility between routes Corridor access comparison Corridor safety comparison Potential operational benefits or concerns Planning level cost estimates 38

39

TH 75 Implementation Plan 1. MnDOT determined that re-routing the alignment of TH 75 outside of downtown Moorhead is not beneficial to them if TH 10 stays as a corridor through the downtown with an at-grade rail crossing. 2. TH 75 would be eligible for future NHPP funding. 3. The TH 75 crossing of the railroad will also result in a future study to determine the best option to reduce vehicle/rail exposures on the TH systems and to improve vehicle/train operations in downtown Moorhead. 40

Next Steps Finalize ROW Costs with MnDOT Staff Get Feedback from the Public on Recommendations Finalize Report Move toward Environmental Documentation Phase Continue development of CIMS application 41

Project Implementation Timeline 2013 MnDOT TH 10/TH 75 Project (Pavement/ADA) Moorhead Signal/Preemption Improvement Project 2014/ 2015 Additional Grade Separation Study for TH 10/75 in Downtown Moorhead Possible TH 10/TH 75 Project (resulting from CIMS) 2020+ TH 75 (20 th Ave S to Main Ave) not part of CIMS Center Avenue Reconstruction 42

Who do I contact for more information? Peggy Harter, P.E. Senior Transportation Planner Metro COG (701) 232-3242 Ext. 33 harter@fmmetrocog.org SRF Consulting Staff: Brian Shorten (763) 249-6713 or bshorten@srfconsulting.com Craig Vaughn (763) 249-6774 or cvaughn@srfconsulting.com Rick Lane (701) 237-0010 or rlane@srfconsulting.com 43