ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Similar documents
/ ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Introduction

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Off-road Trails. Guidance

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

BUDGET FOR RESEDA BOULEVARD, STREET RECONSTRUCTION / VISION ZERO PROGRAM, REPORT BACK, COUNCIL FILE

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 16, 2019

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Living Streets Policy

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor

C C C

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

MTP BICYCLE ELEMENT UPDATE. November 2017

Public Workshop #2. September 14, 2016

Color your stress away

Update of the Master Transportation Plan s (MTP) Bicycle Element

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

The Wiggle Route in Context

This page intentionally left blank.

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Appendix B - Street Sections

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Third Street Bridge & Corridor Project

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 20, 2018

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

STREETSCAPE CONCEPTS

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Roadways. Roadways III.

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Roadway Classification Review

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

East Burke Transportation, Safety and Capacity Improvements

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY & PROCEDURES

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Proposed White Flint Separated Bike Lane Network September 2015

Transcription:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 15, 2016 DATE: October 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Adoption of amendments to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) to create a new Pedestrian Priority Street type and modify the definition of Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street type. C. M. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt amendments to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Streets Element to create a new local street type known as Pedestrian Priority Street and to modify the existing description of Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street type. ISSUES: This is a request to amend the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Streets Element to include a new Pedestrian Street type and to revise the definition for the existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street to include streets with a greater range of vehicular traffic volumes and shared street treatments. SUMMARY: The sector plan updates for Rosslyn and Court House that were adopted in 2015 specified the development of local street types that are not currently included in the County s MTP. The proposed MTP amendments (Attachment A) include revisions to the definition for the existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street type and a new Pedestrian Street type. The amendments would allow for more variations of streets including pedestrian-only streets and the shared streets that are planned for the Court House Square area. The MTP amendments would accommodate the streets envisioned in the two sector plans and provide guidance for their potential use in other areas of Arlington. BACKGROUND: During 2015, after considerable public involvement, the County Board adopted two sector plan updates that specified the development of new street types within urban centers. In July 2015, the Board adopted an update to the Rosslyn Sector Plan that calls for eventual development of several new street segments as well as many changes to the existing Rosslyn street network. Amongst the proposed new street segments are nine block-length segments of new street that are designated in the plan to be Pedestrian Street/Way. The new Pedestrian Streets are illustrated in Map 3.7 (page 97) of the plan. Several descriptions of the new Pedestrian Streets are included in the plan. County Manager: ##### County Attorney: ***** 32. Staff: Richard Viola, DES Transportation Planning Bureau

The plan s description for the 18 th Street North Corridor says: this new corridor would replace the remaining skywalk segments, break up north-south blocks and enhance access to the Rosslyn Metro Station. For N. Lynn to N. Oak Street This segment will accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists only, without motor vehicle access. Similarly, in September 2015, the Board adopted an update to the Court House Sector Plan that included proposed modifications to segments of 14 th and 15 th streets that specify special design treatments and operation in order for them to be Shared Streets. The plan provides the following descriptions for the two streets. The character of 15 th Street North should be changed to prioritize transit riders, bicyclists and pedestrians. 15 th Street North should be reconstructed between North Veitch Street and North Courthouse Road to be a low-speed street that prioritizes pedestrians and allows for safe sharing of the space amongst the many users. Distinct paving materials (including the travel lanes), widened sidewalks, ample street trees and curbless paving transitions, except at transit boarding areas should be used. The character of 14 th Street North should be reconstructed between North Veitch Street and North Courthouse Road to be a low-speed street that prioritizes pedestrians and allows for safe sharing of the space amongst the users of the street. From the Promenade to North Courthouse Road section, the section of 14 th Street North should be reconstructed to include a prominent pedestrian crossing for the Promenade with distinctive paving materials (including in the travel lanes), widened sidewalks, ample street trees and curbless paving transitions. The MTP Streets Element, which was adopted in 2011, includes four types of local streets. All of the existing street types anticipate at least some motor vehicle use with none matching the Rosslyn Sector Plan s proposal of Pedestrian Streets such as envisioned for the 18 th Street corridor as being without motor vehicle access. Throughout the world there are many examples of streets that are designed and operated for the exclusive use of pedestrians. Some examples of those streets are illustrated in this report. The MTP s existing definition for Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street anticipates a regular traffic volume of less than 400 vehicles per day. As currently written, the definition is most appropriate for low-to medium-density residential areas where both vehicle use and pedestrian activity is relatively modest. The Courthouse Sector Plan in its description of future treatments for sections of 14 th and 15 th streets, anticipates significantly higher volumes of both vehicular and pedestrian travel than is described in the existing MTP definition for Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Streets. The proposed amended definition is intended to broaden the range of pedestrian priority to include streets in high density/high volume locations, such as anticipated in the Courthouse area, with shared use travel-ways as well as other street treatments with low traffic volumes. - 2 -

DISCUSSION: The MTP Street Element currently provides definitions for four different types of local (non-arterial) streets. Local streets are identified as having as their primary purpose the provision of access to residences and businesses within the immediate community. Local streets also provide internal connectivity within neighborhoods and link neighborhoods within the County. The four types of local streets are: Urban Center Local Street, Neighborhood Minor Street, Neighborhood Principal Street and Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street. Attachment A includes proposed changes to the existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority Street that would better identify the use of shared streets within more urban areas of Arlington. Also proposed for addition to the MTP Streets Element is the definition and description of pedestrian streets which could be created or retrofitted in urban, commercial centers. The new street concepts were presented to the Transportation Commission for discussion at their June 30, 2016 meeting and to the Long Range Planning Committee at their July 21, 2016 meeting. The Transportation Commission also reviewed the Request to Advertise document at its August 31, 2016 meeting and voted 7 to 0 to approve the request. The item was again considered by the Transportation Commission at their September 29, 2016 and by the Planning Commission at their meeting on October 5, 2016. Both commissions expressed concerns the names proposed for the new and modified street types are a bit confusing. However, the commissions fully support the remainder of the MTP amendments. The Transportation and Planning commissions each unanimously voted to revise the proposed street names to Shared Street, instead of Pedestrian and Bicycle Priority or Shared Street, and Pedestrian Priority Street instead of Pedestrian Street. Staff agrees that the recommended changes to the names may reduce confusion and help distinguish the natures of the street types and has revised the proposed MTP amendments accordingly. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed MTP amendments will have no fiscal impacts. - 3 -

An example of a Pedestrian Priority Street in Boulder, Colorado: Some examples of Shared Streets: (top photo) Boston, Massachusetts, (bottom photo) Seattle, Washington - 4 -

- 5 -

Attachment A: Proposed Text Revisions to the Master Transportation Plan Streets Element Proposed amendments to the definition of Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Street type: Shared Streets A shared street is a local shared street where the needs of motor vehicles generally planned to be no more than 400 vehicles per day, are generally secondary to the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists and other roadway users playing children. In some European countries, these streets may be known as Woonerven, living streets, play streets or pedestrian zones. These streets are designed and constructed to discourage travel at more than 15 miles per hour. Vehicular entrance to the street is typically via driveway-style curb ramps and the surface of the street may be of materials, colors and/or textures other than traditional asphalt. Linear curbs, landscaping strips, sidewalks, parking and travel lanes may or may not be provided; instead the various elements may be interspersed within the street area. Motor-vehicle access may be is generally limited to specific hours or and purposes (emergencies, public transit, trash collection, deliveries, etc.) so as to enhance the pedestrian experience. Shared streets allow people to comfortably walk within the roadway and slow traffic speeds through the mixing of travel paths, physical measures and visual cues. Shared streets typically use few traffic signs and markings and have a uniform surface height (limited use of curbs) to permit easier pedestrian and bicyclist travel along and across the street. * * * Proposed new definition for Pedestrian Priority Street type: Pedestrian Priority Street A car-free travel corridor that provides public pedestrian access to adjacent buildings and properties fronting the street and serves as a public meeting place and location for commerce, communication and other community activities. A pedestrian priority street is predominately paved with a hard surface suitable for walking and includes physical measures that prevent regular access by motor vehicles. Pedestrian priority streets are typically located in urban environments with mixed land uses, high population densities and large numbers of pedestrians. Pedestrian priority streets also permit bicycle riding and typically link to other streets that permit motor-vehicle use. Unique paving surface treatments are typically used to help enforce the non-vehicular nature of the street. A pedestrian priority street may also accommodate other public space amenities, such as seating and landscaping provided that a travel corridor and direct visual access between adjacent streets is maintained. - 6 -