Road Side Design: When is a Barrier Required?

Similar documents
Roadway Departure Focus State Initiative Roadside Safety Systems Inspection, Maintenance & Designers Mentoring Program

H8 Signs, Supports and Poles

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

7 DESIGN CRITER RIA 7.1 Design Space Requirements

H3 Roadside Design Process

Geometric Design Tables

H3 Roadside Design Process

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

Road Safety Audit training course. Motorways - safety issues of the motorway design

Roadside Safety Proven Countermeasures. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Engineering Your Community Safe

ROADSIDE DELINEATION AND SAFETY SYSTEMS

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Policy Statement. Objective. Context. References and Supporting Documentation

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

References General Definitions

AN INTRODUCTION TO ROADSIDE HAZARD MANAGEMENT

To position power poles a safe distance from the road to minimise the likelihood of being accidentally hit by vehicles.

Pavement Markings to Reduce Lane Departure Crashes. Paul Carlson, PhD, PE Road Infrastructure Inc.

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

Road Safety Assessments. Lt. Bob McCurdy Williamson County Sheriff s s Office Marion, IL.

Recent U.S. Research on Safety Evaluation of Low-Cost Road Engineering Safety Countermeasures Lessons for Canada

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

PLACEMENT OF SIGNS RECOMMENDED PRACTICES SUB-SECTION

APPENDIX D Draft Chapter 10 for AASHTO Roadside Design Guide

Benefits of Slope Flattening

24,801 Roadway Departure Fatalities Nationally. The Safety Edge : Minimizing The Effects of Shoulder Drop-off. 41,059 Highway Fatalities a Year

TABLE OF CONTENTS. General... A. New Construction/Reconstruction (4R)...B. Resurfacing, Restoration and Rehabilitation (3R)...C

There s a Killer on the Road What Can be Done about Roadway Departure Crashes? Rural Road Safety Webinar Series Thursday, November 3, 2011

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Road Safety Facilities Implemented in Japan

Off-Road Facilities Part 1: Shared Use Path Design

Road Safety Audit Course Participant Guidebook. August 22 & 23, Cleveland Avenue Columbus, Ohio

Toward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by

Shared Use Path Design

3-13 UFC - GENERAL PROVISIONS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN FOR ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OPEN

MAY, 2012 MnDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 10-0(1)

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

Cross Section Elements

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

GUARDRAIL NEED FOR EMBANKMENTS AND CULVERTS

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

NCHRP Superelevation Criteria for Sharp Horizontal Curves on Steep Grades. Research Team: MRIGlobal Pennsylvania State University

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

South Carolina Department of Transportation. Engineering Directive

LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

Highway 101 Digby to Weymouth North Road Safety Review

Field Guide for Unpaved Rural Roads

Work Zone Traffic Safety

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan

Access Management Standards

Safety Barrier System Acceptance Conditions SMART Steel Crash Cushion

REDUCING COLLISIONS AT HIGH CRASH LOCATIONS

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Human factors studies were simulator-based studies not transferable Safety impacts were not well understood

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness for Roadway Departure Crashes

Development of the Technical Standard on the Road Safety Facility For the Asian Highway Networks

GDOT Cross Section Elements. Course ID: GDOT PDH Credits

Temporary Traffic Control for Highway Work Zones

Table of Contents. Introduction. Prompt List Arterials and Streets. Prompt List Interchange. Prompt List Intersections. Prompt List Limited Access

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

Roadway Design Manual

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Proven Safety Countermeasures Webinar Series

Figure 1: Graphical definitions of superelevation in terms for a two lane roadway.

Driveway Design Criteria

Washington St. Corridor Study

KY s s RSA Evolution. Jo Anne Tingle, PE Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) AASHTO TIG/FHWA RSA PEER Exchange Little Rock, AR - April 29, 2008

THE COMMON FINDINGS FROM ROAD SAFETY AUDITS AND ROAD SAFETY INSPECTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKAN REGION WION

Road Safety Audit Report: Interstate 516

Michael D. Turpeau Jr. State Safety Program Supervisor Georgia Department of Transportation

Roadway Safety Design

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

APPENDIX A Urban Control Zone Corridor Study Reports

FREEWAY WORK ZONE SPEED MODEL DOCUMENTATION

CHAPTER H ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE

Safety Data Resources. Multi-Discipline Safety Planning Forum March 10 & 11, 2008 Gateway Center

Auckland Transport Code of Practice 2013

SMART STEEL CRASH CUSHION

Toole Design Group is live tweeting this webinar

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

Local Road Safety Plans

Technical Memorandum. Shoulder Width Standards for State Highways. Expiration. Implementation. Introduction. Purpose

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

Roadway Design Manual

SECTION 14: LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION

Section 3A.04 Colors. Section 3B.10 Approach Markings for Obstructions

Design Guidance for Construction Work Zones on High-Speed Highways. Kevin M. Mahoney Penn State University

(This page left intentionally blank)

Transcription:

Road Side Design: When is a Barrier Required? Jennifer Schmidt, Ph.D., P.E. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Department of Civil Engineering Guide Rail Safety Symposium Brampton, ON October 24, 2017

Research organization located at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Teaching students with research Started in the late 1980 s Clients State DOTs FHWA Private industry Department of State Motorsports organizations Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation

Research Capabilities Develop, test, evaluate roadside & motorsports safety hardware & features Component and full-scale vehicle crash tests high-speed, large-mass, high-energy impacts ISO 17025 certified laboratory FHWA & European impact safety standards DOS security barrier standards Non-linear finite element analysis Materials characterization & testing Implementation guidelines

MwRSF Facilities Materials & Simulation Laboratory Vehicle & Fabrication Shop Outdoor Proving Grounds

We are doing good in motorsports Prior to the SAFER Barrier, an average of 1.5 fatalities per year Since the installation of SAFER Barrier, there have been no fatalities due to impacts with the outer wall

SAFER Barrier IRL-20 135.6 mph, 26.4 deg. IRL-24 133.1 mph, 26.9 deg. Up to 76% reduction in forces on the occupant

How about on the roadsides? Vehicle accident fatalities in 2015 35,092 in US 1,858 in Canada Estimated cost have reached well over $50 billion annually tc.gc.ca iihs.org

Vehicle Fatalities in U.S. iihs.org

Vehicle Casualties in Canada tc.gc.ca

Vehicle Casualties in Canada tc.gc.ca

Casualties in Canada tc.gc.ca

Vehicle Crashes Approximately 56% of crashes are Roadway Departure crashes in US Roadway Departure Vehicle leaves traveled way Crosses center line or edge line

safety.fhwa.dot.gov Roadway Departure Crashes

Keep Vehicles on the Roadway Pavement Friction Rumble Strips Horizontal Curve Safety Nighttime Visibility safety.fhwa.dot.gov

Provide for A Safe Recovery SafetyEdge Clear Zones safety.fhwa.dot.gov

Reduce Crash Severity Ideally no vehicles would leave the roadway or would be sufficient clear zones completely free of hazards Vehicles continue to leave roadway Prevent vehicles from interacting with and impacting hazards

Hazards are Everywhere

Hazards are Everywhere

Hazards are Everywhere

Hazards are Everywhere

Hazards are Everywhere

Hazards are Everywhere

Hazards are Everywhere

Types of Roadside Hazards Trees Utility Poles Steep Slopes Signs Drainage Features Lakes, Rivers, Oceans, Etc. Bridges Barriers Everything in a City

Just Remove All the Hazards! You can drive safely on or off the road

What to do with all the hazards? AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, hazards on the roadside should be: Removed Redesigned to be safer Relocated Make it breakaway (and safer) Shield it Delineate it

Sometimes that means Cutting down a tree that gets hit frequently Grading roadsides to make more traversable slopes Designing and evaluating roadside safety hardware to shield hazards

How to Decide If a Hazard Needs Treatment If the safety benefits from a specific safety design or treatment equal or exceed the additional costs for that treatment Benefit/Cost (B/C) Analysis Example Program: RSAP (Roadside Safety Analysis Program)

Benefit/Cost Analysis The estimated benefits to be derived from a specific course of action are compared to the costs of implementing that action Cost with barrier: installation cost, maintenance cost, crash cost (may be more frequent but lower severity) Cost without barrier: crash cost (typically higher severity) AASHTO RDG

Benefit/Cost Analysis Factors: Design speed Traffic volume Evaluate options: Remove or reduce the area of concern so no shielding would be required Install an appropriate barrier Leave the area of concern unshielded AASHTO RDG

Roadside Trees tentree.com

Trees - Background Naturally occurring roadside fixed objects 8% all traffic-related fatal crashes (FARS 1999-2009) 90% tree impact fatalities located on 2- lane roadways (FARS 1999-2009) 30% fatalities occur on low-volume roads (FARS 1999-2009) 26% fixed-object fatal crashes (FARS 2009)

AASHTO RDG Tree Treatment

Tree Treatments Pavement marking Rumble strips Signs Delineators Roadway improvements Tree removal Shielding AASHTO RDG

Low Volume Roads Simulated Do nothing baseline Tree removal Install longitudinal barrier Other Options Delineation Edge treatments

Install Longitudinal Barrier High installation costs $18.16/lf plus terminal $45/lf plus terminal Viable situations Very long sections of close spaced trees Difficult tree removal Regular new tree growth Scenarios evaluated not cost effective

Tree Removal, B/C = 4 ADT 0-99 100-199 200-299 300-399 400-500 No. of Trees 1 2-10 11-25 >25 Tree Diameter, Spacing, and Offset Dependent Remove Tree(s)

Example: Georgia DOT

Killer Trees Urban Non-Collision Fatal Tree Fall Great Falls, VA in 2012

AASHTO RDG Utility Pole Treatment

AASHTO RDG Breakaway Luminaire Poles

Breakaway Signs

Breakaway Sign Supports

Overhead Sign Structures May need a barrier if located in clear zone

Offset From Hazard Based on dynamic deflection from barrier testing Varies for different barriers AASHTO RDG

Foreslope Configurations Recoverable: 1V:4H or flatter Non-recoverable: 1V:3H to 1V:4H Critical: steeper than 1V:3H AASHTO RDG

Midwest Guardrail System - M30 Guide Rail

AASHTO RDG Note Not all barriers are meant to be placed on the slope or at the slope break point

AASHTO RDG

AASHTO RDG

Drainage Features

Culvert Grate

Bridge Rails

Bridge Rails

Test Level MASH Barrier Test Levels Test Vehicle Vehicle Weight (kg) Speed (km/h) Angle (degrees) 1 1100C Small Car 2270P Pickup Truck 1,100 2,270 50 50 25 25 2 1100C Small Car 2270P Pickup Truck 1,100 2,270 70 70 25 25 3 1100C Small Car 2270P Pickup Truck 1,100 2,270 100 100 25 25 4 1100C Small Car 2270P Pickup Truck 10000S Single-Unit Truck 1,100 2,270 10,000 100 100 90 25 25 15 5 1100C Small Car 2270P Pickup Truck 36000V Tractor-Van Trailer 1,100 2,270 36,000 100 100 80 25 25 15 6 1100C Small Car 2270P Pickup Truck 36000T Tractor-Tank Trailer 1,100 2,270 36,000 100 100 80 25 25 15

Barrier Selection Test Level All test levels developed to contain passenger cars and pickup trucks Select test level based on roadway speed and ADT Higher performance levels (TL-4, TL-5, TL-6) may be selected: High percent average daily truck traffic Adverse geometrics Severe consequences of penetration into opposing lanes AASHTO RDG

Barrier Selection Low volume, low commercial vehicle Cable or box beams system High volume with large number of trucks Steel beam or concrete barrier High volume with very large number of trucks in critical areas High performance barrier RSM

Bridge Rails & Concrete Barriers End of bridge rail or concrete barrier can be hazardous if not shielded appropriately

Sloping the end not so good

Transition Adjacent to Rigid Barrier

Transition to Rigid Barrier

Summary Installing barriers is not always the best solution when hazards are near roadway Barrier itself is a hazard (but a safer one) A few fatalities occur with barrier impacts Appropriate barriers do save lives Limited funds exist for installing barriers Need to prioritize locations Accident history Benefit/cost analysis

QUESTIONS? Jennifer Schmidt (402)-472-0870 jennifer.schmidt@unl.edu mwrsf.unl.edu