Table 1. Sequence of bubble and dredging tests with prevailing tide stage and number of bucket cycles recorded for each test.

Similar documents
TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

New York District Briefing Template

Dredging Engineering Short Course Texas A&M University January 2016

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Appendix 5: Currents in Minas Basin. (Oceans Ltd. 2009)

Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3

N. Robinson and A. Pyne

A FINAL REPORT BY PARTRAC LIMITED: MAY 2006

Figure 1 Location of the ANDRILL SMS 2006 mooring site labeled ADCP1 above.

3. Answer the following questions with your group. How high do you think he was at the top of the stairs? How did you estimate that elevation?

ACCURACY, PERFORMANCE, AND HANDLING OF OIL-FILLED DIGIQUARTZ PRESSURE INSTRUMENTATION

Wave Load Pattern Definition

ME 449/549 Lab Assignment 2 Spring 2006 due 25 April Background. 2 Apparatus

Deep SOLO. Nathalie Zilberman, Dean Roemmich, and SIO float lab. 1. Deep SOLO float characteristics. 2. Deep SOLO float Deployment

SHOALING PREVENTION: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DREDGING

Scanning Sonar and ROV Operations. For Underwater SAR Imaging Applications

Figure 1 Example feature overview.

Scissor Mechanisms. Figure 1 Torero Cabin Service Truck. Scissor Mechanism was chassis mounted and lifted the cabin to service aircraft

STUDY REPORT W&AR-03 RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODEL ATTACHMENT B DON PEDRO RESERVOIR BATHYMETRIC STUDY REPORT

MILE POINT TRAINING WALL JACKSONVILLE, FL. Geotextile Tube Installation

Disposal Area Monitoring System DAMOS

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

The Distress Socket Signal Firing Station Locations Aboard Titanic

Comparison of Predicted and Measured Shoaling at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

OUS31. Technical Information

SAND BOTTOM EROSION AND CHANGES OF AN ACTIVE LAYER THICKNESS IN THE SURF ZONE OF THE NORDERNEY ISLAND

Columbia River Plume 2006 OSU Ocean Mixing Nash, Kilcher, Moum et al. CR05 Cruise Report (RISE Pt. Sur, May )

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013

GEOL 106: Earthquake Country Activity 08: Discharge Measurements. Name: Date:

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait

Mass Split of Two-Phase-Flow

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

3. Answer the following questions with your group. How high do you think he was at the top of the stairs? How did you estimate that elevation?

FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A. Physical Description of the Shubenacadie River

WAVE IMPACTS DUE TO STEEP FRONTED WAVES

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Revisions to the Regulations for Agility Trials

Digiquartz Water-Balanced Pressure Sensors for AUV, ROV, and other Moving Underwater Applications

Structure and discharge test cases

CHAPTER 91 TRACKED VEHICLE FOR CONTINUOUS NEARSHORE PROFILES. Richard J. Seymour* Alan L. Higgins** David P. Bothman***

Applications of ELCIRC at LNEC

NCDOT S EXPERIENCE USING HYDRAULIC SETTLEMENT GAUGES. David L. Teague,P.E. NCDOT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING UNIT

DIVE PLAN Leg 1 Dive 11 Recover Wally 1

Calculate the horizontal component of the baseball's velocity at an earlier time calculated in part (a).

Request Number IR1-12: Flow Passage. Information Request

CHAPTER 4: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

Learn more at

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

Kennedy Bridge - Summary of Pier 6 Movement Records

The purpose of this training is to give field technicians awareness training and guidelines on potential hazards they may encounter in the field.

Survey design and acquisition of a 4-C ocean-bottom seismometer survey over the White Rose oilfield, offshore Newfoundland

WHOTS Mooring Subsurface Instrumentation

CONSTRUCTION OF LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL ON THE SAINT LAWRENCE TIDAL CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE LEVIS AREA

Wave research at Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai i

Location: Cascadia Basin (formerly known as ODP 1027) Date: May 22, :00 Constraints: none ROV Dive #1693

Comparisons of Physical and Numerical Model Wave Predictions with Prototype Data at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

Long-Term Performance of an AWAC Wave Gage, Chesapeake Bay, VA

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

LEVEL FOUR AVIATION EVALUATION PRACTICE TEST

Module 2, Add on Lesson Depth Sensor. Teacher. 90 minutes

Viva TPS. TS11/15 Total Stations Check and Adjust Procedure. October Summary

Correcting the Ice Draft Data from the SCICEX '98 Cruise

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation

AUTOMATIC DREDGING PROFILE AND CONTOUR CONTROL

Activity P07: Acceleration of a Cart (Acceleration Sensor, Motion Sensor)

Impact of Dredging the Lower Narrow River on Circulation and Flushing

Coastal Sediment Transport Modeling Ocean Beach & San Francisco Bight, CA

Boost Your Skills with On-Site Courses Tailored to Your Needs

Wave-Current Interaction in Coastal Inlets and River Mouths

Final Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock

Chs. 16 and 17 Mechanical Waves

Appendix 3. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies

Sensor Platform Project Marine Trials Bidders Conference. Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy fundyforce.ca

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

WHEELCHAIR SKILLS PROGRAM (WSP) 4.1 OBSTACLE COURSE GUIDELINES

S-Tec System 55 Autopilot

NG4access ODF Platform Patch Cord Routing Guide

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

1 A Mangonel is a type of catapult used to launch projectiles such as rocks. A student made a working model of a Mangonel. crossbar. bucket.

How Do I Install My Garden Master Bucket Garden?

Preliminary design of a high-altitude kite. A flexible membrane kite section at various wind speeds

Experiment P18: Buoyant Force (Force Sensor)

Rowing Terminology. The person at the starting dock who aligns the boats evenly for a fair start.

COMPARISON OF CONTEMPORANEOUS WAVE MEASUREMENTS WITH A SAAB WAVERADAR REX AND A DATAWELL DIRECTIONAL WAVERIDER BUOY

Overview. Identify fall hazardous areas Describing potential fall hazards How appropriate portable and extension ladders are used

Current measurements in Lakes Rotorua and Rotoehu 2010 and 2011

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Draft of OKMC Cruise Plan (R/V Revelle June 1-14, 2012 RR1205)

Utilizing Vessel Based Mobile LiDAR & Bathymetry Survey Techniques for Survey of Four Southern California Breakwaters

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

a. 27 inches or 0.69 m above the surface of the compressed seat;

The Military CYPRES Quick Guide For Operators

DATA MINING SAMPLE RESEARCH: ACTIVITY RECOGNITION CLASSIFICATION IN ACTION

MOTUS Wave Buoys. Powered By the Aanderaa MOTUS Directional Wave Sensor

Water circulation in Dabob Bay, Washington: Focus on the exchange flows during the diurnal tide transitions

An IOOS Operational Wave Observation Plan Supported by NOAA IOOS Program & USACE

MBMG Butte Mine Flooding Monthly Report BMFOU Consent Decree BU-SEH Remedial Action Monitoring Program Contract No TO-35 September 2013

PHASE 1 WIND STUDIES REPORT

Transcription:

Table 1. Sequence of bubble and dredging tests with prevailing tide stage and number of bucket cycles recorded for each test. Test Tide Dredge Orientation 1 Date Time # Bucket Cycles Bubble 1 Flood North Jan 29 945-145 23 Bubble 2 Slack (high) North Jan 29 13-133 16 Bubble 3 Ebb North Jan 29 153-1615 2 Short Term 1 Flood North Jan 29 1115-1215 24 Short Term 2 Slack (high) North Jan 29 14-145 26 Short Term 3 Ebb North Jan 29 163-17 15 Long Term 1 Long Term 2 Long Term 3 Flood to Slack (high) to Ebb Slack (low) to Flood then Slack (high) to Ebb Slack (low) to Flood South Jan 3 815-163 145 South Jan 31 8-163 125 South Feb 1 745-1615 194 Instruments Used Bucket = OBS (s/n 36) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 29) Bucket = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket = OBS (s/n 29) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket (inboard) = OBS (s/n 29) Bucket (Outboard) = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) Bucket (inboard) = OBS (s/n 29) Bucket (Outboard) = OBS (s/n 38) Platform = OBS Surf (s/n 71) OBS Mid (s/n 37) OBS Bottom (s/n 36) 1 Dredge orientation refers to the approximate direction that the bow of the dredge platform and bucket were facing. 44

Table 2. Summary of bucket descent and ascent speeds during the long-term dredging tests. Bucket Speed Descent Ascent (feet/second) Mean (Range) Mean (Range) Long-Term Test #1 4.15 (2.2 5.4) 2.13 (1.85 2.24) Long-Term Test #2 4.44 (1.71 5.43) 2.17 (2.3 2.25) Inboard Long-Term Test #2 4.32 (2.45 5.15) 2.15 (2.9 2.2) Outboard Long-Term Test #3 4.36 (2.3 5.3) 2.13 (1.53 2.19) 45

a) Basic Option 9 Outer Side Slope B3 B2 Option 1 B1 Option 11 Option 12 C A2 Outer Side Slope D A1 b) Figure 1. a) Option areas of the S-NB-1 Contract area of the NY/NJ Harbor Deepening Project and b) bathymetry of S-NB-1 dredge contract area during the Pilot Study. 46

Figure 2. Cable Arm bucket in the open position. Note that the lowest row of vents has been closed by welding metal strips across the flaps. 47

Figure 3. Cable Arm bucket in the closed position. 48

Figure 4. Bucket impact position for a typical series of four arcs conducted between advances of the dredge. A sequence of 2 bucket cycles is shown as numbered green dots. The example progression is based on an actual DGPS record of bucket impact points during a long-term test on January 3, 28. The color coded rectangles centered on each dot represent the approximate plan-view dimensions of the bucket in the open position as it would come in contact with the bottom. 49

Figure 5. Plan-view distribution of bucket impact points on the bottom in relation to orientation of the receiving scow. Each numbered green dot represents a single bucket impact location based on DGPS offset data derived from a known reference point on the derrick. The scow is not drawn to scale. The numbered red dots represent non-digging bucket cycles used to collect water to wash the deck of the scow. Data from long-term dredging test on January 3, 28. 5

Figure 6. Instrumentation as mounted on the bucket. Upper orange canister contains an accelerometer array. Lower white and black unit is a battery-powered optical backscatter sensor (OBS-3A) with the sensor facing laterally outward from the central bucket support rib and outboard in relation to the bucket s internal axis. When the bucket was closed the instruments were oriented horizontally. When the bucket was open the instruments were oriented at an approximately 45 degree angle from the vertical. 51

Figure 7. Sensor location. The orange accelerometer canister and white OBS housing are visible atached to the bucket s central support rib. This sensor array is on the inboard side of the bucket, which always faces the derrick and operator s cab. 52

Figure 8. Location of sensors deployed from the dredge platform. The vertical tube supports the ADCP transducer asembly just below the water s surface. A string of three OBS units was deployed outboard from the ADCP mount. 53

15. Surface MidWater Bottom 1. 5.. 8:: 8:5: 8:1: 8:15: 8:2: 8:25: 8:3: 8:35: 8:4: 8:45: Time of Day, EST Figure 9. Example of ambient turbidity data collected by platform OBS units on January 31, 28. 54

Figure 1. ADCP backscatter signal during the ebb tide bubble test on January 29, 28. 55

Figure 11. ADCP backscatter signal during the slack tide bubble test on January 29, 28. 56

Figure 12. ADCP backscatter signal during the flood tide bubble test on January 29, 28. 57

1. 9. 8. 7. Surface MidWater Bottom Closure 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 9:45: 1:: 1:15: 1:3: Time (EST) Figure 13. Turbidity measurements obtained by OBS instruments deployed from the dredge platform during the first bubble test, which occurred on a flooding tide on January 29, 28. 58

1. 9. 8. 7. Surface MidWater Bottom Closure 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 12:45: 13:: 13:15: 13:3: 13:45: Time (EST) Figure 14. Turbidity measurements obtained by OBS instruments deployed from the dredge platform during the second bubble test, which occurred during slack tide on January 29, 28. 59

1. 9. 8. 7. Surface MidWater Bottom Closure 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 15:3: 15:45: 16:: 16:15: Time (EST) Figure 15. Turbidity measurements obtained by OBS instruments deployed from the dredge platform during the third bubble test, which occurred on an ebbing tide on January 29, 28. 6

-2-4 Depth (m) -6-8 -1-12 -14 1 1 1 1 Figure 16. Turbidity data plotted against depth for bucket-mounted OBS instrument for all bubble tests. Note logarithmic scale of X-axis. 61

1. 9. 8. Avg 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 Depth Bin Figure 17. Average turbidity measurements by depth strata for a bucket-mounted OBS instrument during all bubble tests. 62

1 1 1 1 13:12: 13:13: 13:14: 13:15: 13:16: 13:17: 13:18: TIME (EST) Figure 18. A typical series of turbidity measurements from a bucket-mounted OBS instrument during a bubble test. Yellow triangles represent synchronized bucket closure times. The gap between successive bucket cycles result from deletion of measurements made while the bucket was above the surface of the water. 63

8 7 6 5 4 OBS 38 Closure 3 2 1 11:: AM 11:1: AM 11:2: AM 11:3: AM 11:4: AM 11:5: AM 12:: PM 12:1: PM Time (EST) Figure 19. Turbidity measurements obtained from the bucket mounted OBS Unit during the first short-term duration dredging test (flood tide) on January 29, 28. 64

8 7 6 5 4 OBS 38 Closure 3 2 1 1:5: PM 2:: PM 2:1: PM 2:2: PM 2:3: PM 2:4: PM 2:5: PM 3:: PM Time (EST) Figure 2. Turbidity measurements obtained from the bucket mounted OBS Unit during the second short-term duration dredging test (high slack tide) on January 29, 28. 65

12 1 8 6 OBS 38 Closure 4 2 4:2: PM 4:3: PM 4:4: PM 4:5: PM 5:: PM 5:1: PM Time (EST) Figure 21. Turbidity measurements obtained from the bucket mounted OBS Unit during the third short-term duration dredging test (ebb tide) on January 29, 28. 66

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Depth (m) Figure 22. Turbidity measurements plotted versus depth and obtained from the bucket mounted OBS Unit during the first short-term duration dredging test (flood tide) on January 29, 28. 67

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Depth (m) Figure 23. Turbidity measurements plotted versus depth and obtained from the bucket mounted OBS Unit during the second short-term duration dredging test (high slack tide) on January 29, 28. 68

12 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Depth (m) Figure 24. Turbidity measurements plotted versus depth and obtained from the bucket mounted OBS Unit during the third shortterm duration dredging test (ebb tide) on January 29, 28. 69

1 4 9 8 7 6 5 4 FLOOD HIGH SLACK EBB LOW SLACK FLOOD HIGH SLACK EBB 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 ELEVATION (FT) 3 2 1 1.5 8:: 9:: 1:: 11:: 12:: 13:: 14:: 15:: 16:: 17:: TIME (EST) Figure 25. Turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor during the first long-term dredging test on January 3, 28. 7

1 9 8 7 Descending Ascending Digging Moving 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 26. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor during the first long-term dredging test on January 3, 28. 71

1 9 8 Descending Ascending Digging 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 27. Bucket-mounted turbidities during the first long-term dredging test on January 3, 28; descent, ascent and dredging data only. 72

1 Descending 9 8 7 y = -16.977x + 328.25 R 2 =.142 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 28. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor during the descent component of the bucket cycle during the first long-term dredging test on January 3, 28. 73

1 9 Ascending Linear 8 7 y = 13.79x + 137.67 R 2 =.1462 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 29. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor during the ascent component of the bucket cycle during the first long-term dredging test on January 3, 28. 74

1 9 HIGH SLACK 4 3.5 8 7 6 5 4 FLOOD EBB 3 2.5 2 1.5 ELEVATION (FT) 3 2 1 1.5 8:: 9:: 1:: 11:: 12:: 13:: 14:: 15:: 16:: 17:: TIME (EST) Figure 3. Turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. Note two sensors were mounted on opposite sides of bucket: inboard sensor (blue) & outboard sensor (purple). 75

Figure 31. Location of OBS instrument on the outboard side of the bucket. 76

1 9 8 7 Descending Ascending Digging Moving 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 32. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (inboard side) during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 77

1 9 8 7 Descending Ascending Digging 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 33. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (inboard side) during the second long-term dredging test after removal of all data for dredge advances on January 31, 28. 78

1 9 Descending Linear 8 7 y = -9.165x + 314.64 R 2 =.536 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 34. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (inboard side) during the descent component of the bucket cycle during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 79

1 9 8 y = 13.131x + 196.39 R 2 =.1357 Ascending Linear 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 35. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (inboard side) during the ascent component of the bucket cycle during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 8

1 9 8 7 Descending Ascending Digging Moving 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 36. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 81

1 9 8 7 Descending Ascending Digging 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 37. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the second long-term dredging test after removal of all data for dredge advances on January 31, 28. 82

1 9 Descending 8 7 y = -1.144x + 353.3 R 2 =.541 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 38. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the descent component of the bucket cycle during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 83

1 9 Ascending Linear 8 7 y = 11.277x + 273.18 R 2 =.794 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 39. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the ascent component of the bucket cycle during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 84

1 6 9 8 5 7 6 5 4 3 4 3 2 ELEVATION (FT) 2 1 1 8:: 9:: 1:: 11:: 12:: 13:: 14:: 15:: 16:: 17:: TIME (EST) Figure 4. Turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor during the third long-term dredging test on February 1, 28. 85

1 9 8 7 Descending Ascending Digging Moving 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 41. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the third long-term dredging test on February 1, 28. 86

1 9 8 Descending Ascending Digging 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 42. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the third long-term dredging test after removal of data associated with dredge advances on February 1, 28. 87

1 9 Descending Linear 8 7 y = -4.54x + 241.15 R 2 =.129 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 43. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the descent component of the bucket cycle during the third long-term dredging test on February 1, 28. 88

1 9 Ascending Linear 8 7 y = 6.7463x + 185.23 R 2 =.327 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Depth (m) Figure 44. All turbidity measurements obtained by a bucket-mounted sensor (outboard side) during the ascent component of the bucket cycle during the third long-term dredging test on February 1, 28. 89

35 Surface 4 3 HIGH SLACK MidWater Bottom 3.5 Closure 25 2 15 FLOOD EBB FLOOD LOW SLACK HIGH SLACK Tide EBB 3 2.5 2 1.5 ELEVATION (FT) 1 1 5.5 8:: 9:: 1:: 11:: 12:: 13:: 14:: 15:: 16:: 17:: TIME (EST) Figure 45. Turbidity measurements from dredge platform OBS instruments during the first long-term dredging test January 3, 28. 9

5 45 4 35 Surface MidWater Bottom Closure Tide HIGH SLACK EBB 4 3.5 3 3 25 2 FLOOD 2.5 2 1.5 ELEVATION (FT) 15 1 LOW SLACK 1 5.5 7:: 8:: 9:: 1:: 11:: 12:: 13:: 14:: 15:: 16:: 17:: TIME (EST) Figure 46. Turbidity measurements from dredge platform OBS instruments during the second long-term dredging test January 31, 28. 91

5 Surface 6 45 4 MidWater Bottom Closure HIGH SLACK 5 35 Tide FLOOD 4 3 25 2 LOW SLACK 3 ELEVATION (FT) 15 2 1 1 5 7:: 8:: 9:: 1:: 11:: 12:: 13:: 14:: 15:: 16:: 17:: TIME (EST) Figure 47. Turbidity measurements from dredge platform OBS instruments during the third long-term dredging test February 1, 28. 92

35. 33. 31. 29. Descending Ascending Linear (Descending) Linear (Ascending) y = 1.435x + 177.27 R 2 =.9788 27. 25. 23. 21. 19. 17. y = -9.95x + 299.53 R 2 =.759 15. -1m 1-2m 2-3m 3-4m 4-5m 5-6m 6-7m 7-8m 8-9m 9-1m 1-11m Depth Bin 11-12m 12-13m Figure 48. A comparison of trends observed in the descent and ascent components of the bucket cycle based on all turbidity measurements obtained by bucket-mounted sensors during the three long-term dredging tests. 93

45. 4. 35. 3. y = -6.5569x + 323.6 R 2 =.983 Descending - Inboard Descending - Outboard Linear (Descending - Inboard) Linear (Descending - Outboard) 25. 2. 15. y = -9.9114x + 333.91 R 2 =.2496 1. -1m 1-2m 2-3m 3-4m 4-5m 5-6m 6-7m 7-8m 8-9m 9-1m 1-11m Depth Bin 11-12m 12-13m Figure 49. A comparison of synoptic turbidity measurements taken by sensors located on opposite sides of the bucket during the descent component of the bucket cycle during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 94

55. 5. 45. 4. Ascending - Inboard Ascending - Outboard Linear (Ascending - Inboard) Linear (Ascending - Outboard) y = 12.7x + 263.11 R 2 =.5799 35. 3. 25. y = 15.864x + 184.48 R 2 =.855 2. 15. 1. -1m 1-2m 2-3m 3-4m 4-5m 5-6m 6-7m 7-8m 8-9m 9-1m 1-11m Depth Bin 11-12m 12-13m Figure 5. A comparison of synoptic turbidity measurements taken by sensors located on opposite sides of the bucket during the ascent component of the bucket cycle during the second long-term dredging test on January 31, 28. 95

Figure 51. Identification of dredging process events that occur in tandem with bucket cycles that account for large-scale patterns in the long-term dredging test turbidity data on January 3, 28. 96

Figure 52. Bucket-mounted turbidity sensor turbidity measurements for a 2 bucket cycle sequence that comprised a single dredge advance. Figure based on the same bucket cycle sequence shown in Figure 4 from the long-term test on January 3, 28. 97

1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 Force (g) Shock - Sum Shock - X Shock - Y Shock - Z 15:19: 15:2: 15:21: 15:22: 15:23: 15:24: 15:25: 15:26: Time (EST) Closure Figure 53. Accelerometer data recorded during long-duration testing on January 31, 28. 98

1 8 6 4 Force (g) 2 1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 97 15 113 121 129 137 145 153 161 169 177 185 193 # Shock - X Axis (g) # # Shock - Y Axis (g) # # Shock - Z Axis (g) # # Shock - Vector Sum (g) # -2-4 -6-8 Chronological Sequence (One unit =.125 seconds) Figure 54. Accelerometer data recorded during long-duration testing on February 1, 28 showing maximum impact forces observed. 99

Lab 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 y =.4341x - 6.1977 R 2 =.9277 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 TSS Concentration (mg/l) Figure 55. Relationship between turbidity and suspended sediment concentration determined from gravimetric analysis of water samples collected at the study site. Water samples were collected during active dregding on February 8, 28 and February 13, 28. 1

% Total measurements 1.% 95.% 9.% 85.% 8.% 75.% 7.% 65.% 6.% 55.% 5.% 45.% 4.% 35.% 3.% 25.% 2.% 15.% 1.% 5.%.% Digging Moving Descending Ascending 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1 Figure 56. Cumulative percent plots of bucket-mounted turbidity measurements during components of the bucket cycle. 11