Breeding values for beef sires based on beef dairy crossbred offspring

Similar documents
Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

A Joint Nordic Animal Model for Milk Production Traits in Holsteins and Ayrshires

Aim of breeding work

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

CSA Genetic Evaluation

To VikingGenetics staff and breeding advisors in Denmark, Sweden and Finland

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in table 1 have been published

PRINCIPLES OF DANISH BEEF CATTLE BREEDING

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in Table 1 have been published

CSA Genetic Evaluation

Daughter proven bulls In the tables below, only sires that have breeding values based on daughter information is shown

Simmental the most improved breed over the last 25 years!

Daughter proven bulls In the tables below, only sires that have breeding values based on daughter information is shown

Table of content International breeding values for the traits and breeds shown in table 1 have been published

-- Results and Discussion

CALF PERFORMANCE AND COW WEIGHT AND CONDITION FOR COWS SIRED BY HIGH AND LOW MILK EPD ANGUS AND POLLED HEREFORD BULLS

BELGIAN BLUE, THE CROSSBREEDING SPECIALIST BREED

Field Genetic Evaluation of Beef Cattle in France: From Birth to Slaughterhouse

Value of Black Hereford Registration

Relationships of Hip Height Measurements with Growth and Carcass Traits of Crossbred and Angus Cattle

Value of Black Hereford Registration

Dehorning cattle via genetics

Contemporary Grouping for Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Salers 2015 Sire Summary Definitions

Holsteins in Denmark. Who is doing what? By Keld Christensen, Executive Secretary, Danish Holstein Association

Genetic Improvement for. Auxiliary Traits in Canada

Crossbreeding Beef Cattle Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Planned. Hybrid. Vigour. mated.

In the past cattle were bred for three main reasons:

Bull Buyer s Guide. $3000 Purchase Price of New Bull Salvage Value of Old Bull (1900 lbs. X 1.10/lb.) $ 910 Net Cost of New Bull

Terms to Know.

Selecting the Right Replacement. Robert S. Wells, Ph.D., PAS Livestock Consultant

Expected Progeny Difference (EPD) in Beef Cattle

BEEF DEPARTMENT G - DIVISIONS 10-28, BEEF CATTLE DIVISION

Genetic Trend for Milk. U.S. dairy population and milk yield

USE OF RED BREEDS FOR CROSSBREEDING. Dr. Gary Rogers Geno Global Hamar, Norway

Across-Breed EPD Tables For The Year 2016 Adjusted To Breed Differences For Birth Year Of 2014

Denmark The Board 2017 WAF 2017

Tel (Phil)

MEAN EPDs REPORTED BY DIFFERENT BREEDS

EBVS are LESSONS FROM THE ASBP / 2. EBVs of Bulls Entered in the ASBP have provided a reliable Prediction of the Performance of their Progeny

Selecting Beef Bulls

State and national standardized lactation averages by breed for cows calving in 2013

ATC Agribusiness Roundtable

EXPECTED PROGENY DIFFERENCES

Increasing Profits per Acre with Appropriate Genetics

ACROSS-BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2013 ADJUSTED TO BREED DIFFERENCES FOR BIRTH YEAR OF 2011

AT ONE TIME, cattle were hunted for food. Then, during the Stone Age in Europe and

COMMERCIAL BEEF SIRE SELECTION

Maturity Pattern in Simmentals

Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry

Calving Season & Cow Efficiency

SPECIAL LIVESTOCK SHOW October 6 10 & 17, 2010

JUNIOR BREEDING BEEF

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

Performance Data Reporting and Contemporary Grouping For Beef Cattle Genetic Evaluation

Perfect Breed??? In business to produce Beef. Start with the End in sight. 2 Species of Cattle. What Breeds Should you consider?

JUVENILE GENETIC EVALUATION AND SELECTION FOR DAIRY GOATS

CATTLE SECTION. ENTRIES CLOSE Friday, 27th of July 2018 at 15h00 NO LATE ENTRIES WILL BE ACCEPTED.

DNA Rules & Regulations Excerpt from NALF Rules and Regulations Section II, 1.

DEPARTMENT 33 4-H AND FFA BEEF SUPERINTENDENT: KODYDEE EASTERDAY CONTACT: (509)

Cattle Breeds. Crystal Fincher Putnam County 4-H Agent

The role genetics plays in achieving the perfect MSA Index. Tim Emery - Technical Officer (TBTS)

Mix and match beef to meet market demand

BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNITED SPRING SIRE SUMMARY

Danish Yorkshire (Large White)

aaa: N/A Kappa Casein AA Beta Casein A1A1 ISU daughters 71% Rel. +273M +.12% +37F +.09% +26P +1.0 PL -0.6 SCS

Madison County Beef Cattle Show Madison County Fair Embry Curry Arena Monday July 31, 2017 Beef Cattle Show starts at 6 pm

Background - ABEPD. Larry Kuehn Genetic Prediction Committee Breakout

Unit A: Introduction to Cattle Management. Lesson 2: Exploring the Dairy Industry

Hair Shedding Scores Relating to Maternal Traits and Productivity in Beef Cattle. An Undergraduate Honors Thesis in the. Animal Science Department

Materials and Methods

Use of Young and Proven Sires with Genomic Evaluations for Improving Milk Yield in Thai Multibreed Dairy Cattle

BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNITED WINTER SIRE SUMMARY

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XIX December 6, 7 and 8, 2005, Rapid City, South Dakota CROSSBREEDING THE FORGOTTEN TOOL

BEEFMASTER BREEDERS UNITED SPRING SIRE SUMMARY

Genetic parameters of Visual Image Analysis primal cut carcass traits of commercial prime beef slaughter animals

Florida Cattlemen s Association 22 st Annual Quality Replacement Heifer Sale September 16, :00 PM. Arcadia Stockyard Arcadia, Florida

BREEDS OF BEEF CATTLE

SEMEN DIRECTORY WHITE HAWK RANCH

Estimating breeding value

IOWA 4-H LIVESTOCK JUDGING CONTEST

The subject of breeds intrigues most beef cattle producers.

RED ANGUS SHOW CLASSIFICATIONS OPEN SHOW CLASSES - FEMALES. Red Angus Show year runs from July l to June 30.

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Charolais and Brahman Sired Three-Breed Cross Calves

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XX December 11, 12 and 13, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado

BREEDERS RESOURCE BOOK

Crossbreeding Systems and The Theory Behind Composite Breeds

R.B. THIESSEH and ST. C.S. TAYLOR, U.K.

Improving carcase and beef quality in Bos indicus through crossbreeding

DEPARTMENT B (02) CATTLE. Martha Hayward ( ) Superintendent Brian Wilson (Orwell VT) - Judge GENERAL RULES

Junior Market Open Youth Lamb and Goat Show

Illinois 4-H Livestock (Beef, Sheep & Swine) Judging Contest

Matthew McClure, ICBF Interbull, Verden, Germany 26/02/2015

Maximizing genetic progress in the new age of genomics

2017 MCA Points Program Rules

2019 DEEP SOUTH SALE ORDER

Multibreed evaluation. Multibreed evaluation. Obstacles to full Multibreed. Multibreed Obstacles. Outline

Welcome! Tonya Amen, Ph.D Cattle Genetics Specialist Pfizer Animal Genetics

Transcription:

Breeding values for beef sires based on beef dairy crossbred offspring Synopsis Starting December 2018, NAV routinely estimates breeding values for beef sires, on the basis of data for beef dairy crossbred offspring. Data included in the evaluation were extracted from the national databases September 2018. The evaluation considers for the time being two trait groups: calving traits and carcass growth traits. Breeding values will be estimated four times per year, in conjunction with the NAV routine genetic evaluation for dairy breeds, and published on https://www.nordicebv.info. Introduction The use of beef semen in dairy herds has increased greatly within the last five years. Therefore, the necessity for reliable breeding values for beef breed sires used on dairy cows has also increased. Hence, NAV and its owner organizations developed a NAV genetic evaluation for beef breed sires that solely utilizes data for beef dairy crossbred animals. An important prerequisite for the evaluation was that breeding values should be comparable across beef breeds. This document provides a brief description of the genetic evaluation. Data Data for beef dairy crossbreds born since 2000 are included in the evaluation. More historic data exists in some countries, but those data were not considered to be representative. Crossbred calves born before 2000 may have been kept and raised under different production circumstances. For similar reasons, data were limited to beef dairy crossbreds born at milk producing herds. This edit was implemented by requiring that all beef dairy crossbred have at least five purebred herd-year contemporaries for their record to be included in the evaluation. Crossbred offspring of beef sires from all beef breeds are included, except for breeds with very few (<50) beef dairy crossbreds. Only beef AI sires are considered; this edit is implemented by requiring a beef sire to have beef dairy offspring in at least 10 herds. Table 1 indicates that Danish blue is the largest breed for beef dairy offspring in Denmark. Angus and Blonde d Aquitaine are the largest breeds in Finland, and in Sweden the use of beef breeds is somewhat more spread.

Table 1. Country-wise distribution of beef breed of beef dairy offspring with calving records and born after 2000. Sire breed Abbreviation Denmark Finland Sweden Angus AAN 2.0 17.1 12.3 Blonde BAQ 3.2 30.2 2.2 Danish Blue BBL 72.1 - - Beef Shorthorn BSH 0.1 - - Simmental (beef) BSM 5.2 8.2 27.1 Charolais CHA 4.5 8.0 24.9 Hereford HER 0.6 3.6 18.7 Highland HLA 0.0 0.0 0.2 INRA INR 1.3 - - Limousin LIM 10.7 32.8 14.6 Piemontese PIE 0.2 0.0 - Wagya WAG 0.1 - - Trait definitions Calving traits The evaluation includes three biological traits: calf survival, calving ease and calf size. For each of these, calvings by first parity cows are treated as genetically different traits than calvings by later parity cows, as is done in calving traits evaluation for the dairy breeds. Thus, the model includes six traits in total. Carcass traits The evaluation includes three traits: daily gain, EUROP form score and EUROP fat score. Daily gain for an animal is calculated by subtracting half of tabulated birth weight from the slaughter weight, and divide this by the age at slaughter. Daily gain is subdivided into two traits, depending on the length of the fattening period ( < 550 days or 550 days). For each of the traits, records for males are treated as genetically different traits than records for females. Thus, the model includes eight traits in total. Genetic evaluation model Calving traits A sire model with a random sire effect has been used for all traits. A fixed effect of sire breed is included to accommodate for systematic differences between beef breeds. Maternal genetic effect are important for calving traits, but are in the context of this evaluation only expressed by dairy dams and not by beef sires. Hence, these maternal effects were modelled by a fixed effect of dam breed dam year of birth to adjust for the genetic trend for maternal genetic effects in the dairy population. The model for genetic evaluation includes fixed effects of herd-year of calving, year-month of calving, sex of calf-year of calving, dam age at calving, dam breed dam year of birth and sire breed. Observations are adjusted for heterogeneous variance. Heritabilities for the calving traits are generally low, ranging from 0.01 to 0.11 (Table 2). Genetic correlations between the same trait in first vs later parities were high, around 0.9. Genetic correlations between calf survival and calving ease was estimated to be around 0.6 0.7.

Table 2. Genetic parameters (heritabilities on the diagonal, genetic correlations on the off-diagonal) used in the evaluation of the calving traits. CSu1 CSu2 CE1 CE2 CSi1 CSi2 Calf survival, first parity (CSu1) 0.05 0.88 0.70 0.67-0.80-0.50 Calf survival, later parities (CSu2) 0.01 0.61 0.62-0.53-0.43 Calving ease, first parity (CE1) 0.11 0.97-0.89-0.93 Calving ease, later parities (CE2) 0.05-0.80-0.84 Calf size, first parity (CSi1) 1 0.17 0.83 Calf size, later parities (CSi2) 0.09 1 Calf size is only registered in Denmark Carcass traits A sire model with a random sire effect has been used for all traits. A fixed effect of sire breed is included to accommodate for systematic differences between beef breeds. A fixed effect of dam breed dam year of birth is included to adjust for the genetic trends for these traits in the dairy population. The model for genetic evaluation includes fixed effects of herd-year of birth, year-month of birth, dam age at slaughter, dam breed dam year of birth and sire breed. Observations are adjusted for heterogeneous variance. Heritabilities for carcass traits are moderately high, ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 (Table 3). The genetic correlation between male and female traits ranges between 0.8 0.9, indicating that the traits are genetically not the same. Table 3. Genetic parameters (heritabilities on the diagonal, genetic correlations on the off-diagonal) used in the evaluation of the carcass traits. dgs, dgl, ccs, cfs, dgs, dgl, ccs, cfs, dgs, 0.19 0.97 0.30-0.21 0.83 0.86 0.22-0.27 dgl, 0.21 0.34-0.10 0.85 0.86 0.25-0.21 bcs, 0.32-0.17 0.31 0.24 0.92-0.12 fats, 0.23-0.20-0.13-0.19 0.88 dgs, 0.33 0.97 0.35-0.30 dgl, 0.33 0.25-0.22 bcs, 0.36-0.18 fats, 0.25 dgs: daily carcass gain, short fattening period; dgl = daily carcass gain, long fattening period; ccs = carcass conformation score; cfs = carcass fat score; = bull trait, = heifer trait Breeding values Breeding values are published for seven traits/combination of traits; see Table 4. The four calving trait EBVs are published for beef sires with 50% or higher reliability for calf survival, later parities or if the beef sire has more than 500 beef dairy crossbred offspring. The three combined indexes for carcass traits are published for bulls with 50% or higher reliability for carcass score or more than 500

beef dairy crossbred offspring. Table 4. Calculated and published breeding values for the beef dairy evaluation. Calculated EBV Calf survival, first parity Calf survival, later parities Calving ease, first parity Calving ease, later parity Calf size, first parity Calf size, later parities Daily carcass gain, short fattening period, bulls Daily carcass gain, long fattening period, bulls Daily carcass gain, short fattening period, heifers Daily carcass gain, long fattening period, heifers Published EBV Calf survival, first parity Calf survival, later parities Calving ease, first parity Calving ease, later parity Combined daily carcass gain, 25% weight on all four calculated daily carcass gain EBVs Carcass conformation score, bulls Combined carcass conformation score, 50% Carcass conformation score, heifers weight on both calculated carcass conformation score EBVs Carcass fat score, bulls Carcass fat score, heifers Combined carcass fat score, 50% weight on both calculated carcass fat score EBVs Breeding values are expressed as relative breeding values with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 10. The mean is updated every evaluation run such that crossbreds born 2-5 years prior to the evaluation date have a mean breeding value of 100. Interpretation of the base for the standard deviation is that a group of sires with near perfect reliability would have a standard deviation of breeding values equal to 10. Table 5. Mean (of published) breeding values by sire beef breed. Calving traits 1 Carcass traits 1 N CSu1 CSu2 CE1 CE2 N DG CCS CFS Angus 39 108 105 115 117 66 90 70 137 Simmental 48 100 101 99 98 143 106 77 103 Blonde 31 105 103 100 103 50 100 94 84 Danish Blue 69 91 97 95 97 92 107 120 83 Limousin 71 105 102 100 101 113 94 98 108 Charolais 49 95 97 102 96 81 113 89 105 INRA 1 104 107 131 114 4 84 118 108 Hereford 27 109 104 109 105 43 86 67 141 1 CSu1 = calf survival, first parity; CSu2 = calf survival, later parities; CE1 = calving ease, first parity; CE2 = calving ease, later parities; DG = daily carcass gain; CCS = carcass conformation score; CFS = carcass fat score.

You can get more information about the joint Nordic evaluation: General about Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation: www.nordicebv.info Contact person: Gert Pedersen Aamand, Ph.: +45 87405288 gap@seges.dk. Denmark: https://www.landbrugsinfo.dk Contact person: Ulrik Sander Nielsen, Seges Cattle, Ph. +45 87405289. usn@seges.dk Sweden: www.sweebv.info. www.vxa.se Contact person: Emma Carlén, Växa Sverige, Ph +46 10 4710614. Genetic.Evaluation@vxa.se Finland: www.faba.fi Contact person: Jukka Pösö, Faba co-op, Ph +358-(0)207472071 jukka.poso@faba.fi