Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Management

Similar documents
[NPS-IMR-GRSA-24169; PPWONRADE2, PMP00EI05.YP0000] Ungulate Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Great

Notice of Availability of the Draft Transportation Plan and Environmental Impact

Sent via:

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Biology B / Sanderson!

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

[FWS R1 ES 2015 N076; FXES FF01E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery Plan for

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex, CO; Availability of Record of

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Plan for the. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact

[FWS R6 ES 2017 N031; FF06E FXES111606C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Enhancement of Survival Permit

Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge and Wallops Island National Wildlife

[Docket No. FWS R6 ES ; FXES C6-178-FF09E42000]

[Docket No. FWS-HQ-ES ; FF09E FXES111609C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Candidate

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

CHECKS AND BALANCES. OVERVIEW Students become managers of a herd of animals in a paper-pencil, discussionbased

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

Living World Review #2

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Summary of discussion

[RR , XXXR0680R1, RR.R0336A1R.7WRMP0032] Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Notice of

Reduction in Biological Diversity Section 4.1 p Section 4.3 p

[FWS HQ MB 2018 N052; FXMB123109WEBB0 167 FF09M25100; OMB. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of

[FWS R5 ES 2015 N021; FXES FF05E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for the Gulf

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Bison Conservation in Canada

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

Wildlife Introduction

Minnesota TREK MINNESOTA TRAIL SELF-GUIDED TOUR 6TH - 8TH GRADE. Minnesota Trek 6 8th grades 1

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Minnesota Deer Population Goals. East Central Uplands Goal Block

Ruffed Grouse Conservation Plan Executive Report

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

James River National Wildlife Refuge, Prince George County, VA; Final. Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Finding of No Significant Impact for

Deer and Bison Artiodactyla

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project Document ARLIS Uniform Cover Page

2018 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Research Project Request Descriptions

UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION [RC0ZCUPCA0, 155R0680R1, RR ]

REBOUND. on the. It was the winter of 2000/2001, and it seemed like the snow

[Docket No. FWS HQ IA ; FXIA FF09A300000] Draft Environmental Assessment; Dallas Zoo Management; Dallas, Texas

[Docket No. FWS R6 ES ; FXES FF09E42000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Greater Yellowstone

Chagrin River TMDL Appendices. Appendix F

DMU 056 Midland County Deer Management Unit

Early History, Prehistory

BRENT N. LONNER, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Fish & Wildlife Division, PO Box 488, Fairfield, MT 59436, USA

Keywords: 7SI/Brown bear/harvest/harvest quota/hunting/malme/management/ mortality/population size/trend/ursus arctos

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Southern White Rhino

Causes of Tiger (Panthera tigris) Population Decline, and Potential Consequences if the Decline Continues

A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

[FWS R4 R 2015 N236]; [FXRS S3 167 FF04R02000] Theodore Roosevelt and Holt Collier National Wildlife Refuges, Mississippi Final

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

1) Increase the deer population to 475,000 (mule, 150,000;

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

The ruffed grouse population cycle. defying the best attempts of wildlife biologists to understand it. rn y grou.<c trnil rum fo< mib on public lmd,

Fifth otter survey of England

FINAL REDUCTION REPORT NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK HERD

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Ocean and Plume Science Management Uncertainties, Questions and Potential Actions (Work Group draft 11/27/13)

[FWS R5 FR 2018 N053; FF05F FXFR ; OMB Control. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management

DMU 006 Arenac County Deer Management Unit

DMU 361 Fremont Deer Management Unit Newaygo, Oceana, N. Muskegon Counties

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

Fisheries Management Zone 10:

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

Minnesota Deer Population Goals

Frequently Asked Questions Reintroduction of Bison to Banff National Park

Name(s) School. a. A farmer in New Zealand uses a sheepdog to herd his sheep, and in exchange the animal receives shelter and food.

Peter Arcese *, FRBC Chair of Applied Conservation Biology Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Re: Comments on 90-Day Finding on Petitions to Delist the Gray Wolf in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and the Western Great Lakes

Medicine Bow Routt National Forest and Thunder Basin National Grassland; Routt. County; Colorado; Steamboat Ski Resort, Steamboat EIS

Press Release New Bilateral Agreement May 22, 2008

[Docket No. FWS R7 NWRS ; FF07R00000 FXRS Obligation

Consideration for Moose Management in Ontario Northern Ontario First Nations Environmental Conference

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Notice of Amended Proposed Withdrawal; Partial Termination of Segregative. Effect; Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah

Case Study: Transportation Plan Environmental Impact Statement. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

Blending Research, Management, Outreach, and Policy to Recover a Federally Listed Species. Megan M. Seymour

General Regulations for Areas Administered by the National Park Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service

Results of the 2015 nontidal Potomac River watershed Smallmouth Bass Young of Year Survey

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Wolf Restoration in New York: The State's Perspective

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

Status and future directions of the Devils Hole Pupfish

Hunting at The Trustees. The Trustees of Reservations Policy on Hunting

Critical Aspects of Mountain Caribou Biology

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2016 U.S. Territorial

Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status. Major threats, status

Transcription:

This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/10/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-16851, and on FDsys.gov 4310-MA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-MWR-CUVA-17694; PPMWMWROW2/PMP00UP05.YP0000] Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Management Plan for Moose, Wolves, and Vegetation, Isle Royale National Park, Michigan AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Intent. SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces that we are preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a plan to determine how to manage the Isle Royale moose population in light of the dynamic changes occurring on the island, in particular the declining wolf population. DATES: The public comment period will begin on the date this Notice of Intent is published in the Federal Register. The comment period will close 30 days after the last scheduled public meeting and all comments must be postmarked or transmitted by this date. ADDRESSES: Information, including a copy of the public scoping brochure, will be available for public review online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/isro. Limited copies of the brochure will also be available at Isle Royale National Park, 800 East Lakeshore Drive, Houghton, Michigan and by request. 1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Phyllis Green, or Chief of Natural Resources Paul Brown, Isle Royale National Park, Wolf-Moose-Vegetation Management Plan, 800 East Lakeshore Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931-1896, or by telephone at (906) 482-0984. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Isle Royale is an island archipelago in the northwestern portion of Lake Superior. Organisms that live on islands have dynamic populations and are subject to immigration and extinction events. Local extirpation is natural and expected, as is establishment and re-establishment of new populations. Wolves were first documented on Isle Royale through identification of tracks in 1949-50 and by 1957 the island supported an estimated 25 wolves. The first systematic research on Isle Royale wolves was conducted in the 1950s and has continued largely unabated. The research on the Wolves of Isle Royale is now world-renowned. Like many mainland wolf populations, the island population has fluctuated widely over this time, though on Isle Royale they have always been protected and never hunted or subjected to control efforts. Population variation on the island is related to inherent dynamic wolf ecology, island biogeography, and presence of disease in the wolf population. Wolves on Isle Royale have recently declined and the primary cause is thought to be genetic inbreeding leading to low productivity. With currently less than 10 individual wolves on the island, scientists differ on what will happen to the population in the short-term (25 years). Many believe that their persistence is doubtful unless new wolves emigrate or are introduced to the island. The moose population on Isle Royale (which arrived on the island in the early 1900s) has fluctuated dramatically (500 to several thousand) over the past century. Moose have 2

important effects on island vegetation including forest cover and wolves are the only moose predator on the island. The park lies within a temperate-boreal forest transition zone where temperate tree species are at or near their northern range limits and boreal trees are near their southern range limits. Recent trends suggest the beginning of a shift from boreal to temperate vegetation. The relatively short-lived boreal paper birch and aspen, which established widely on lands disturbed by European settlement activities, are reaching the end of their natural lifespans and rapid successional changes in favor of more shade-tolerant tree species are underway. Successional trends on the island indicate that recent conditions favored temperate hardwood species, which expanded and replaced boreal trees. Since moose favor some boreal tree species such as balsam fir for food, this succession may alter the available moose forage in the future. The wolf-moose-vegetation food web is tightly coupled. Since the wolf population at Isle Royale is very low and local extirpation of wolves is possible in the near future (e.g. only one gender remains on the island; the pack has been non-reproductive for three to five years; or there are no remaining wolves), the moose population is likely to continue to increase, resulting in impacts to vegetation and forest cover from moose herbivory. A plan is needed to address environmental impacts that could occur to the moose population and vegetation from the potential extirpation of wolves. The purpose of the plan is to provide direction for managing the Isle Royale moose and wolf populations for at least the next 20 years in light of the dynamic changes occurring on the island. 3

In this context, we must determine allowable types of change. Specifically, we need to decide whether to intervene with a declined or extirpated wolf population in order to perpetuate the role wolves play with regard to the moose population through predation and spatial distribution (wolf management actions); whether to directly intervene with an increased moose population (moose management actions); and whether to intervene to manage vegetation to mitigate impacts from moose herbivory as temperate species replace the historical boreal forest (vegetation management actions). For each of these decisions, we must determine the type and extent of intervention appropriate in a designated wilderness given a changing climate. While specific alternatives have not yet been developed, options available include: 1) not actively managing moose, wolves, or vegetation; 2) managing moose abundance and distribution; 3) managing wolf abundance by supplementing the current wolf population or introducing wolves following extirpation; and 4) managing vegetation through the use of fire, direct restoration, or other tools. Interested individuals, organizations, and agencies are encouraged to provide written comments regarding the scope of issues to be addressed in the EIS, alternative approaches to managing wolves, moose, or vegetation on Isle Royale, and other concerns regarding this conservation planning and environmental impact analysis process. Within the comment period, we intend to hold public scoping meetings on the EIS in the vicinity of the park, including Houghton, Michigan. Specific dates, times and locations of the public scoping meetings will be made available via a press release to local media, a public scoping brochure to be mailed or emailed to interested parties and on the NPS s Planning, Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) web site at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/isro. 4

The NPS will provide additional opportunities for the public to offer written comments upon publication and release of the draft plan/eis. If you wish to comment during the public comment period, you may use any one of several methods. The preferred method for submitting comments is at the PEPC website address given above. You may also mail or hand-deliver your comments to the Superintendent or the Chief of Natural Resources at the address given above. Written comments will also be accepted during scheduled public meetings. Comments will not be accepted by fax, e-mail, or any other way than those specified above. Bulk comments in any format (hard copy or electronic) submitted on behalf of others will not be accepted. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment - including your personal identifying information - may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: February 13, 2015. Patricia S. Trap, Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region. This document was received at the Office of the Federal Register on Monday, July 06, 2015. [FR Doc. 2015-16851 Filed: 7/9/2015 08:45 am; Publication Date: 7/10/2015] 5