Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

Similar documents
Updated December CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE FAQs

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE

CWD 102 for Managers. Chronic Wasting Disease - the beginnings Colorado Univ. of Wyoming

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE

Chronic Wasting Disease Response Plan 2013

cwd chronic wasting disease management and regulations for hunters

EXHIBIT C. Chronic Wasting Disease

Review of Chronic Wasting Disease Management Policies and Programs in Colorado

Published by Whitetails Unlimited, Inc /02

2015 Delaware Envirothon Training

Food Safety for Deer Hunters

AFWA Best Management Practices for Prevention, Surveillance, and Management of Chronic Wasting Disease

Mammal Management and Diseases In Delaware

Report date: August 22, 2013 Update (August 30, 2013): This document has been updated to correct information in the notes on slide #7 and make

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

TABLE C: STATE MANDATES AND FUNDING LEVELS

CHRONIC JACK BALLARD ISSUE 2 OUTDOOR AMERICA THE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA

Chronic Wasting Disease in Southeast Minnesota. Drs. Michelle Carstensen and Lou Cornicelli Preston Public Meeting December 18, 2018

Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Georgia Surveillance and Response Strategies for Chronic Wasting Disease of Free-Ranging and Captive Cervids

HANDICAP ACTIVE AND INACTIVE SEASON SCHEDULE

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

CHAPTER 6. APPENDICES

Top of the Windmill News Winter 2015

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE MANAGEMENT IN NEBRASKA

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE AND THE HOLDING OF DEER IN CAPTIVITY

Notice of Availability of Proposed Changes to the Chronic Wasting Disease Herd Certification

WYOMING GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE MANAGEMENT PLAN February 17, 2006

TAHC Certified CWD Postmortem Sample Collection Recertification. Presenter/Title

A Guide to Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in Texas Cervids

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE IN WYOMING CERVIDAE

Preventive Measures and Existing Regulations for Chronic Wasting Disease in the U.S.

SCWDS BRIEFS: Volume 18, Number 1 (April 2002) -- Special CWD Issue

State Fish and Wildlife Agency SURVEY. & Best Management Practices

State Regulation of Sunday Hunting Washington New Hampshire Montana North Dakota Minnesota Vermont Maine Oregon Massachusetts Idaho South Dakota Wisco

Review: Version 23 of Chronic Wasting Disease Program Standards Better than Version 22, but still Burdensome to Industry

Pr oject Summar y. Principal Investigators: Walter Cook, Elizabeth Williams, Fred Lindzey, and Ron Grogan. University of Wyoming

Black Homicide Victimization in the Great Lakes States

Yukon Mandatory Cervid Chronic Wasting Disease Surveillance Program

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

RYAN WALKER, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, P. O. Box 1145, Raton, NM 87740, (575) ,

Expert Scientific Panel on Chronic Wasting Disease

Emergency Rule Filing Form

ALBERTA MANDATORY CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

Catena Media analysis of how we expect sports betting to roll out across the United States of America.

Catena Media analysis of how we expect sports betting to roll out across the United States of America.

Purpose of the Efficiency Program Industry By State and Region Appendices and Limitations of Data

Transmittance of Chronic Wasting Disease in White-Tailed Deer through the Courtship Ritual

insertion of semen into the doe s reproductive

Ch. 137 WILDLIFE CHAPTER 137. WILDLIFE

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE

The Domestic Game Farm Animal Regulations

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Legislative Report on Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) January 14, 2003

Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE) D. Heim

Occupant Protection Laws

Occupant Protection Laws

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2017

STUN GUN LAWS/ REQUIREMENTS DATED

A PROPOSED ZONING APPROACH FOR THE CONTROL OF CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE IN CANADA

Together, we are creating a world that works better.

Official Match Program

Chronic Wasting Disease

Education Committee Economic Background and Issue Review

Surveillance and Monitoring of White-Tailed Deer for Chronic Wasting Disease in the Northeastern United States

Occupant Protection Laws

Wild Game Meats and Fish. Provided by Barbara Brown, Ph.D., R.D./L.D Food Specialist

Wisconsin s Chronic Wasting Disease Response Plan:

Pennsylvania Animal Diagnostic Laboratory System. pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

THE FUTURE OF SALES TAX REVENUE

Occupant Protection Laws

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF HEALTH RISK PERCEPTION ON

The 2019 Economic Outlook Forum The Outlook for MS

Legal Heat: 50 State Guide to Firearm Laws and Regulations

Field Care of Harvested Big Game

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

TRIBAL DISEASE AND INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT AREAS Aakoziwin miinawaa Bakaan Ingoji Ga-Ondaadag Endanakamagak

A Risk-based Audit of the Captive/Privatelyowned Cervid Industry in Michigan

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2016

MEDICAID EXPENDITURES FOR LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS: 2011 UPDATE

The impact of chronic wasting disease on the geographic distribution of the US captive cervid industry

Farm Wildlife Management and Food Plots

Submitted by. Katie M. Lyon. Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources. In partial fulfillment of the requirements

Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)

SAC/2017/03/02 SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE PAPER. Chronic Wasting Disease in Deer

Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois

Regulatory Impact Analysis and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Final Rule Docket No

Knowledge About CWD. Current Scientific. April EDITED BY: Donald S. Davis, PhD Kenneth Waldrup, DVM, PhD Greg Stewart, DVM, PhD James Kroll, PhD

UNIFIED SPORTSMEN OF PENNSYLVANIA S CWD SPONSORED RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP AND NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

Import Requirements for North American Jurisdictions

Land Protection Partners P.O. Box 24020, Los Angeles, California Telephone: (310)

Helping Families Hunt Together Opening Doors with Families Afield Barriers to Hunting 2 Families Afield

Arizona X X X 2013

States. Postal Abbreviations LEARN THE. AND. by Joy A. Miller

Traffic Safety Facts 2007 Data

March 28, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Attn: CWD Plan 3030 Energy Lane Casper, WY To the Wyoming Game and Fish Department:

Transcription:

June 2003 LWDR 03-04 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1172 http://dare.colostate.edu/pubs CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE OVERVIEW: HUNTER INFORMATION Andrew Seidl, * Stephen R. Koontz, Lee Elder and Megan Bruch 2 Introduction Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) is a Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) that affects white tail deer, black tail deer, elk, and mule deer (cervidae). Presently, it appears that these cervidae are the only species affected, although other species, including humans, can be infected with other TSEs. CWD is fatal to the infected animal and the agent responsible for the disease is not completely understood to date. The leading scientific theory suggests that the cause is a rogue protein, called a prion (a small proteinaceous infectious particle which is resistant to inactivation by most procedures that modify nucleic acids. (Prusiner,1982)), in the brain. While the origins and treatment of CWD and the other TSEs are clearly important, many people are most concerned about their transmission from infected species to humans. Some TSEs have been transmitted between species, including from animals to humans. Although no transmission relationship has been established between CWD and other TSEs, many states are recommending that hunters take certain precautions when hunting in areas where CWD has been detected. Hunters need to be familiar with the specifics of the disease, where it is located, and what regulations specific states have in place to combat the spread of the disease. Hunters also play a role in broader understanding of CWD by following reporting and testing recommendations implemented in a number of states. Insight to these topics will give hunters a more informed position on deer and elk hunting. Disease Specifics and Research The transmission of CWD between white tail, black tail, elk and mule deer is believed to occur from the exchange of saliva, feces, and/or urine. Transmission of CWD to these species is also believed to occur from living in environments highly contaminated with the infectious agent. The principal clinical symptoms of CWD are loss of body condition, abnormal behavior, repetitive movement, drooping head and ears, consumption of lower than normal amounts of food, excessive drinking and urinating, drooling, tremors, and an abnormally wide stance. Infected animals typically become symptomatic 12 to 14 months from infection and die within a few weeks of the first clinical signs of the disease. As a result, infected animals may not display the common symptoms of the disease and may appear to be healthy. * Contact author. T:970-491-7071. E: Andrew.Seidl@colostate.edu. F: 970-491-2067. 1 Associate Professors, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics (DARE), Colorado State University (CSU-DARE) and Research Assistants, CSU-DARE. Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. June 2003 Livestock and Wildlife Disease Report, No. 4 Page 1

Research conducted on Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis (BSE), another in the family of TSEs, has shown that the consumption of BSE infected spinal, lymphatic, and cranial material has probably led to the development of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jacobs Disease (nvcjd) in humans (Bruce et al, 1997). As a result, there is concern about whether the consumption of CWD infected meat or other cervid products will affect humans. Although no connection between CWD to the infection of a TSE in humans has been established, to date, many authorities recommend preventive measures to avoid the consumption of spinal, lymphatic, and cranial material from deer, elk, and mule deer. Areas affected by Chronic Wasting Disease CWD was first observed at a Colorado research facility in 1967 and is now thought to be a naturally occurring (endemic) disease in northeastern Colorado, southeastern Wyoming and a small portion of Nebraska. For approximately 35 years the disease has been confined to these areas. However, through the inter-state trade of live animals for cervid farming and game ranches, the disease has entered populations of previously healthy herds in other locations (Knight, 2002). Concerns of an epidemic are sufficient to cause all 50 states to impose restrictions on live cervidae importation up to and including outlawing importation completely in some cases (CWDA, 2003). Infection among captive herds has now been observed in eight states (i.e., Colorado, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin) and two Canadian providences (i.e., Alberta and Saskatchewan). CWD outbreaks for wild ranging cervidae have been documented in Colorado, Illinois, Nebraska, New Mexico, South Dakota, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. The spread of CWD has been due to three different sorts of outbreaks: 1. Naturally occurring outbreaks among animals in the endemic areas of Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska. 2. Outbreaks within herds on cervid farms that have received infected animals from the endemic areas. 3. Outbreaks in wild deer and elk populations resulting from interaction with infected cervid farms. These outbreaks create new foci of infection other than the original endemic areas (Thorne, 2002). (Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance, 2003) Animal infection rates are extremely low even in areas that have had CWD for more than three decades. Mandatory testing in Colorado and Wyoming reveals that 5%-6% of deer and 1% of elk are infected with CWD. Disease prevalence in deer herds tested in Colorado has ranged from 1 to 13% (CWDA, 2003). Feeding and Baiting High concentrations of animals increase amount of interaction among animals and the rate of infection within affected populations. High concentrations of cervidae can occur where animals live naturally, from farming practices, and from the practice of feeding and baiting to attract animals for hunting. To combat the spread of CWD to the wild, every farmed cervid herd that was the site of an outbreak of CWD has been exterminated with the exception of three herds (New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife, 2002). Nine states do not allow the feeding of cervidae (Alaska, California, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Montana, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin), three states have restrictions (Alabama, Pennsylvania, and Virginia) and five states are discussing a ban of feeding. Eighteen states (Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming) and one Canadian province (Manitoba) do not allow the bating of cervidae (CWDA, 2003). June 2003 Livestock and Wildlife Disease Report, No. 4 Page 2

Preventive measures for field dressing and processing The first and most important preventive measure is not to shoot, handle or consume an animal that appears to be sick. Hunters should contact the local state wildlife office if a cervid is showing any of the clinical signs of CWD. State officials should be contacted since they have received training on the appropriate method of collection that provides the best samples for CWD testing (Colorado Division of Wildlife, 2003). Hunters should avoid shooting the head or the backbone, because this may contaminate the meat (Nevada Division of Wildlife, 2003). Hunters should wear rubber or latex gloves and avoid the handling of brain, spinal cord, lymph nodes and eyes when field dressing a downed animal. People should never consume any of these tissues. After completing the procedure hunters should make sure to wash and clean hands along with instruments used in the process. The infectious agent is extremely hard to neutralize, but at this time it is advised that hunters soak knifes for an hour in a 50-50-bleach solution (Indiana Board of Animal Health, 2003). The knife used for the removal of the head should only be used for that particular purpose and for no other, and household knives should never be used in the preparation of cervid carcasses. Normal field dressing coupled with boning out of the carcass will remove most of the body parts known to house the infectious agent, while the removal of the fatty tissue will remove the lymph nodes. Also, sawing through bone should be avoided and sections of the carcass should be separated by the joints, rather than with a saw. It is unknown whether the remains of a CWD infected animal can spread the disease to other wildlife. Therefore, all remains of the animal should be double bagged in plastic sacks and disposed of at a landfill (CWDA, 2003). If a commercial processor is used, the meat should be boned out and individually processed and meat from different animals should not be mixed. The rogue protein that causes CWD has not been found in the muscle tissue of infected animals. Therefore, no evidence to tie the consumption of generally acceptable cuts of meat to TSEs exist. However, the guidelines provided serve well as preventive measures until more definitive information is available (Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, 2003). Mandatory/Voluntary testing of animals The USDA has approved 13 laboratories for CWD testing. Forty-seven states have some CWD testing program for cervidae. Some CWD endemic areas in Colorado require that hunter-harvested cervidae get tested, while the other forty-six states rely on random and voluntary sampling. When cervid hunting takes place in an area where CWD has not yet been documented, the ability to test deer or elk for the disease may be quite limited. If CWD testing is desired for deer or elk, hunters should contact their state wildlife agency and see if a protocol for hunter-harvested testing has been established. The amount of monitoring by state wildlife agencies has increased dramatically; practically every state wildlife agency is now planning increased surveillance to detect CWD. Consumption of cervid meat The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) agree that there is currently no evidence that humans can contract CWD from the consumption of infected meat. The CDC cautions, however, there is no evidence that proves that the consumption of infected meat does not cause CWD transmission to humans (Indiana Board of Animal Health, 2003). The WHO recommends that humans or animals should consume no part of a deer that tests positive for CWD (World Health Organization, 2002). States differ in their views on the consumption of cervid meat prior to its testing for CWD. In accordance to the statement made by WHO, it is accepted by all state departments of wildlife that CWD positive meat should not be consumed. However testing requires an examination of the brain. CWD testing is not possible in many states that have not detected CWD. In Colorado, waiting for test results does not appear to be an issue since turn around time for results are reportedly 10-14 days. Maine suggests waiting for CWD test results for deer hunted from out of state prior to consuming it (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 2002). Wisconsin also suggests waiting for CWD test results prior to consumption, but makes no stipulation on deer from outside the state. Vermont suggests that the only truly safe way to not consume CWD positive meat is not to eat deer or elk harvested from areas where CWD has been documented (Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2003). However, an Indiana Department of Natural Resources biologist issued a statement claming that hunters need not wait for results of CWD test prior to consumption (IBOAH, 2003). June 2003 Livestock and Wildlife Disease Report, No. 4 Page 3

Inter-state transport of hunter-harvested cervidae and cervid parts Multiple states and a Canadian province have implemented regulations that prevent the importation of hunter-harvested cervid parts including; California, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, North Dakota, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, and Manitoba. Six states are considering the same types of restrictions on the importation of hunter-harvested cervidae including Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania. The bans allow the importation of meat that is boned out, while the hides must not have the heads attached. The skull plates and antlers cannot have any meat or tissue attached and heads and canines (buglers) can be brought back into the states. Some states have slight modifications to the above baseline rules. Illinois and California are similar by allowing the importation of hunter harvested carcasses as long as they are taken to a licensed processor within 72 hours of entering the state, while all other rules outlined above apply for these states. Michigan suggests that hunters dispose of carcasses and parts from deer in a landfill, never in the woods or field, but no other rules on importation of hunter-harvested cervidae exist at this time. New York has enacted more specific rules on the importation of hunter-harvested cervidae from CWD infected states, requiring that any cervid parts be labeled with species, origin of animal, name and address of person that took the animal along with the final destination of the meat. Vermont has similar regulations on the labeling of meat, but requires that packaged meat be labeled with hunting license information. A general breakdown of state regulations is available at http://www.cwd-info.org/pdf/ CWDRegstable011403.pdf. Specific information on separate state s regulations is available from each respective state wildlife division. Links for most state wildlife divisions can be accessed through Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance http://www.cwd-info.org/index.php/fuseaction/ links.main. Hunters are responsible to make themselves knowledgeable of the regulations wherever they intend to hunt. Conclusions A great deal of important information about the causes, transmission, effects and potential treatment for CWD remains to be found. Since CWD is related to BSE and since BSE probably created nvcjd in humans, it is quite appropriate to be concerned about possible transmission of CWD to people who handle and consume deer and elk products. Research results to date should mitigate this concern since there are no confirmed cases of transmission of CWD from deer or elk to humans. By practicing recommended preventive measures and avoiding the same tissues that are suspect of transferring BSE to humans, hunters should feel safe from contracting CWD. Out of the uncertainty surrounding CWD, many states have enacted new legislation and regulations in order to combat the spread of CWD. Legislation and regulation are in a very fluid state at this point and changes are inevitable as understanding of the disease increases. Hunters will be well served to contact the state department of wildlife wherever they plan to hunt in order to maintain currency in recommended and mandatory practices within that jurisdiction. The Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance website also provides excellent current information. Acknowledgments Without implication, the authors would like to thank Cleon Kimberling and John Balliette for their reviews of an earlier version of this document. References and resources Bruce ME, Will RG, Ironside JW, McConnell I, Drummond D, Suttle A, McCardle L, Chree A, Hope J, Birkett C, Cousens S, Fraser H, Bostock, CJ. Transmissions to mice indicate that new variant CJD is caused by BSE agent, Nature, 1997; 389, 498-501 Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance. Chronic Wasting Disease and Cervidae Regulations by State and Province. Jan. 14, 2003. Website accessed April 29, 2003. http://www.cwd-info.org/pdf/ CWDRegstable011403.pdf Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance. Recommendations for Hunters. Website accessed April 29, 2003. http://www.cwd-info.org/index.php/fuseaction/ recommendations.main Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance. Recommendations for Hunters, Other Questions. Website accessed April 30, 2003. http://www.cwd-info.org/index.php/ fuseaction/recommendations.questions June 2003 Livestock and Wildlife Disease Report, No. 4 Page 4

Colorado Division of Wildlife. Chronic Wasting Disease. March 26, 2003. Website accessed May 1, 2003. http://wildlife.state.co.us/cwd/index.asp Indiana Board of Animal Health and Department of Natural Resources. Chronic Wasting Disease. Website accessed May 3, 2003. http://www.in.gov/dnr/deerhealth/cautions.htm Knight, J. Ranches Blamed over Spread of Mad Deer, April 11, 2002. Website accessed April 28, 2003. http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/dynapage.taf?file=/ nature/journal/v416/n6881/full/416569a_r.html Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. Chronic Wasting Disease Fact Sheet. Oct. 4, 2002. Website accessed May 4, 2003. http://www.state.me.us/ifw/wildlife/cwd.htm Nevada Division of Wildlife. Chronic Wasting Disease FAQs. Website accessed May 3, 2003. http://ndow.org/hunt/cwd/faqs.shtm New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife. Chronic Wasting Disease of Deer and Elk, By Douglas E. Roscoe. November 2002. Website accessed May 3, 2003. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/fgw/pdf/2002/cwdqanda.pdf Prusiner, SB. 1982. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science, 1982, April 9; 216(4542): 136-44. Seidl, A, Koontz, SR, Bruch, M, and L Elder. 2003. Chronic Wasting Disease: Government and Private Sector Action. Agricultural and Resource Policy Report, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, June 2003, APR03-06.. 2003. Chronic Wasting Disease and Theories of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy Transmission. Agricultural and Resource Policy Report, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, June 2003, APR03-05.. 2003. Economic implications of Chronic Wasting Disease. Agricultural and Resource Policy Report, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, June 2003, APR03-07. Thorne, ET. Written Testimony to the Committee on Resources United States House of Representatives. May 16, 2002. Website accessed May 2, 2003. http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/107cong/ forests/2002may16/thorne.htm World Health Organization. 2002. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. Nov. 2002. Website accessed May 4, 2003. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs113/en/ Wisconsin Department of Agriculture. Common Sense Precautions for Handling and Processing Deer. Website accessed May 1, 2003. http://datcp.state.wi.us/ah/agriculture/animals/disease/ chronic/pdf/venison_safety_2side.pdf Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife. Questions and Answers on Chronic Wasting Disease. Website accessed May 4, 2003. http://www.anr.state.vt.us/fw/ fwhome/html/faq-cwd.htm June 2003 Livestock and Wildlife Disease Report, No. 4 Page 5