SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

Similar documents
APPENDIX A-6 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT STURGEON PROTECTION AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

July 17, Fish and Wildlife Resource Conservation Group Members Saluda Hydro Relicensing Team

APPENDIX A-4 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FRESHWATER MUSSEL ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Saluda Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 516) Study Plan

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

SECTION 2 HYDROLOGY AND FLOW REGIMES

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

REC 6 FISHERIES HABITAT EVALUATION

Lower Saluda Scenic River Advisory Council

TAPOCO PROJECT FERC NO CHEOAH RIVER RECREATION STUDY FINAL REPORT

SCE&G Lake Murray Public Recreation Sites February, 2008

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

Final Bull Trout Redd Monitoring Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project

APPENDIX A-2 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT RECREATION PLAN

Lower Coquitlam River Project Water Use Plan. Temperature Monitoring Lower Coquitlam River Project Year 2 Report

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (FERC NO. 516) STUDY PLAN

Youngs Creek Hydroelectric Project

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP DIVISION FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH. Horsefly River Angling Management Plan

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Gamefish Assessment Report

Packwood Lake Intake Screen Velocity Test Report for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

HENRY M. JACKSON HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT

Pre-Application Document Kaweah Project (FERC Project No. 298)

Presented to Idaho Washington Aquifer Collaborative February 11, Spokane River Project License

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

Chinook Salmon Spawning Study Russian River Fall 2005

Coquitlam/Buntzen Project Water Use Plan

Lower Mekong Basin. John G. Williams. Petrolia, California.

Final Bull Trout Genetics Monitoring Plan for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project. (FERC No. P-308) June 2017

CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM PERTINENT DATA

Alewife Brook, Cape Elizabeth, River Herring Monitoring Summary 2015

Savannah River, Georgia and South Carolina

Aquatic Habitats and Instream Flows at the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project, Upper McKenzie River Basin, Oregon

Patterns of migration and delay observed in Summer Steelhead from the Upper Columbia and Snake River Basins from PIT tag data

Spokane River Fish and Flows Recommendations and Rationale September Hal Beecher Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

ADDENDA B Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) Study Guidance 2019

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Proposed Habitat Suitability Criteria (HSC) Curves For Application in Habitat Flow Modeling For the Sultan River Instream Flow Study RSP 3

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds (FSWs)

Appendix G Whitewater Recreation Flow Study Plan

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

Final Fish Salvage & Temporary Tailrace Barrier Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project Tailrace. (FERC No. P-308) December 18, 2017

Fish Habitat Restoration and Monitoring in Southeast Washington. Andy Hill Eco Logical Research, Inc.

Peace River Water Use Plan. Monitoring Program Terms of Reference. GMSMON-1 Peace River Creel Survey

2012 Susitna River Water Temperature and Meteorological Field Study

Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids

Abundance of Steelhead and Coho Salmon in the Lagunitas Creek Drainage, Marin County, California

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

middle deschutes progress in restoration

Re: Comments on Study Plans and Scoping Document 2 (SD2) for the Black Canyon Hydroelectric Project (FERC P )

Trout Unlimited Comments on the Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for the Constitution Pipeline Project, Docket No. PF12-9

Fraser River. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Jon Ewert - Aquatic Biologist (Hot Sulphur Springs)

Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Fisheries Committee Harrisburg, PA

Annual Meeting June 17, Research Stewardship Education

Overview of temperature protocols

Recreation Resource Conservation Group. Working Documents

STUDY REPORT W&AR-03 RESERVOIR TEMPERATURE MODEL ATTACHMENT B DON PEDRO RESERVOIR BATHYMETRIC STUDY REPORT

Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan

GRAND RAPIDS RESTORATION GRAND RAPIDS REVITALIZATION

SEAFISH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

Clackamas River Hydroelectric Project Flows and whitewater recreation: Updated information about Three Lynx and Bob s Hole boating

107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Rivers and Streams Investigations

Youngs Creek Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P 10359)

Libby Dam 2011 Sluiceway Release Study: Total Dissolved Gas and Temperature Monitoring

Potlatch River Drainage: Salmonid Presence: Largest lower Clearwater River tributary

NUMERICAL AND PHYSICAL MODELING

Cold Small River. A Brief Ecological Description of this Michigan River Type

Illinois State Water Survey

Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2244) Anadromous Salmonid Habitat and Spawner Survey Report

BATTLE CREEK FISHERIES STUDIES TASK 4: SURVEYS OF BARRIERS TO THE UPSTREAM MIGRATION OF ANADROMOUS SALMONIDS

Black Sturgeon Regional Plan

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

Eulachon: State of the Science and Science to Policy Forum

What is a River Basin Restoration Priority? 1. Criteria for Selecting a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 2. Hiwassee River Basin Overview 3

Project 184 Preferred Canal Drainage Structure and Release Point Plan

Final Fish Salvage & Temporary Tailrace Barrier Report for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project Tailrace. (FERC No. P-308) December 20, 2018

2016 Water Quality Report

REVISED DRAFT HABITAT SUITABILITY CURVES and COHO SALMON and STEELHEAD TROUT. Sawmill Creek Alaska

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

LAKE TANEYCOMO ANGLER CREEL SURVEY SUMMARY. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

Study No. 18. Mystic Lake, Montana. PPL Montana 45 Basin Creek Road Butte, Montana 59701

APPENDIX B. Final reports on chinook salmon spawning surveys - Sultan River, Washington Report

Upstream Passage Assessment of American Shad Using 3D Acoustic Telemetry

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORT F STREAM FISHERIES MANAGEMENT WESTERN REGION

C R I TFC. Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission

Tuckasegee Paddling Flow Study Results FERC # s 2686, 2698, /20/02

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Peace River Baseline TGP/Temperature

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

Yale Reservoir Kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) Escapement Report 2016

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Redd Dewatering and Juvenile Salmonid Stranding in the Lower Feather River,

Santa Paula Creek Watershed Planning Project: Steelhead Habitat and Population Assessment

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787

Appendix C Bill Cross Rapids Freshwater Mussel and Fishery Study Plan

Transcription:

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO. 516 DOWNSTREAM TEMPERATURE STUDY DRAFT REPORT MAY 28 Prepared by:

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO. 516 DOWNSTREAM TEMPERATURE STUDY DRAFT REPORT MAY 28 Prepared by:

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO. 516 DOWNSTREAM TEMPERATURE STUDY DRAFT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose... 1-1 2. METHODOLOGY... 2-1 3. RESULTS AND DIS CUSSION......2 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF APPENDICES 8/2/7 CLB 45545.-91-5 C:\Documents and Settings\Bryan Apell\Desktop\Saluda Hydroelectric Project (Temperature Study)\Report1.doc - i -

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO. 516 DOWNSTREAM TEMPERATURE STUDY DRAFT REPORT DRAFT 1. INTRODUCTION The Saluda Hydro Project (Project) is a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) licensed project (FERC No. 516), owned and operated by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G), pursuant to the license issued by the FERC in 1984. The Project is located on the Saluda River within Richland, Lexington, Saluda, and Newberry Counties, South Carolina, and situated within proximity of the towns of Irmo, Chapin, and Lexington and within the metropolitan area of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, which is approximately 1 miles east of the Project (Figure 1). SCE&G is in the process of relicensing the Project as the current operating license expires on August 31, 21. This relicensing process involves cooperation and collaboration with a variety of stakeholders, including state and federal resource agencies, state and local government, non-governmental organizations (NGO), and interested individuals, in order to identify and address any operational, economic, and environmental issues associated with a new operating license for the Project. The Water Quality Technical Working Committee (WQTWC) is comprised of interested stakeholders who are collaborating with SCE&G to identify and make recommendations related to the effects of water releases from the Project on the temperature regime of the lower Saluda River (LSR) and Congaree River. 1.1 Background and Purpose The Saluda River rises on the east slope of the Appalachian Mountains, and flows southwesterly across the Piedmont geomorphic province to its confluence at the fall line with the Broad River in Columbia, South Carolina, where the combined flows form the Congaree River. Between the Lake Murray dam and the confluence, LSR flows for - 1-1 -

approximately ten miles through generally low gradient riverine geomorphology punctuated by occasional shoals and riffle habitat (Figure 2). Flow in this reach is primarily influenced by releases from the Saluda Project powerhouse, although there are some additional contributions from small tributaries such as Rawls, Twelvemile, Kinley, and Stoop creeks and Senn Branch, which collectively contribute approximately 1 square miles of additional drainage area. The average annual flow from the Saluda powerhouse to the LSR is 2,595 cfs with a minimum average daily flow of 285 cfs (Kleinschmidt, 25). An important macrohabitat consideration on the LSR is that the ambient water temperature is influenced by cold water releases from below the thermocline of Lake Murray via the project powerhouse. USGS data suggest that average water temperatures in the LSR below the Project dam range from approximately 9.5 o C in February to 17.5 o C in early-october, and from approximately 1 to 18.5 o C in the vicinity of Riverbanks Zoo 1. Cold water releases from the Saluda Hydro Project have supported a unique put, grow, and take rainbow and brown trout recreational fishery in the LSR since the early 195 s. The objective of this study was to characterize the effects of water releases from the Project on the temperature regime of the LSR and Congaree River, including downstream extent of temperature alteration, timing and duration of temperature alteration, and mixing characteristics. 1 Based on monthly averaged 2 to 26 data as measured at USGS Gage # 216854 (below Murray Dam) and at USGS Gage # 2169 (Columbia). - 1-2 -

Figure 1-1: Map of Lower Saluda River Showing Location of Saluda Hydro Project and Temperature Sensor Deployment Sites - 1-3 -

- 1-4 -

2. METHODOLOGY Paired temperature probes (StowAway TidbiT ) were deployed along the left and right riverbank (looking downstream) at 7 locations downstream of the Project dam in the LSR and Congaree River (Figure 1). A single temperature probe was also deployed adjacent to the USGS gage below Lake Murray Dam (# 216854) to verify data collected by the gage. To allow for comparisons of the Broad River to areas downstream of the Project, an additional probe was placed at the City of Columbia Rowing Facility, located on the Broad River just upstream of the Columbia Diversion Dam and the confluence of the Broad with the LSR. All probes were anchored in the river s main flow by iron dumbbell weights tethered to a tree along the shoreline by a vinyl-coated cable. All probes were set to collect data at 15-minute intervals. Data were downloaded in the field to a PC-based laptop computer equipped with Boxcar software. For quality control purposes, all datafiles were cross-validated with the unit serial numbers and field notes. In addition, all datasets were plotted prior to analysis and examined for erroneous data (i.e. periods when the probe was obviously out of the water due to drought conditions, etc.). T-tests were applied to the paired datasets to determine whether mean temperatures over the sampling period differed between left and right bank. An F-test was first applied to paired datasets, however, to determine the appropriate T-test (i.e., assuming equal variance vs. assuming unequal variance). This method was also used to compare data from the USGS gage downstream of the Saluda Hydro Dam with data from our probe at that site. Because T-tests revealed no significant differences between the two, and because the USGS gage provides a more extensive dataset, the USGS gage data was used for all comparisons contained herein. - 2-1 -

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Water temperatures in the LSR at the USGS gage downstream of the Saluda Hydro Dam (#216854) ranged from approximately 9.5 C to 19 C during the course of the study (Figure 2). For the paired probes deployed adjacent to Riverbanks Zoo (SR2), temperatures ranged from approximately 8.7 C to 24 C. This site experienced warming of approximately 5 o to 7 C during summer months, with periodic excursions to near-dam temperatures during periods of Project operation. As expected, analyses revealed no significant differences between left and right banks for the site. Water temperatures at Congaree River sites generally followed patterns similar to the Broad River, even at upstream sites closer to the confluence (Figures 3 8). At the most upstream Congaree River site (CR1), located near the Gervais St. Bridge just downstream of the confluence of the Broad and Saluda rivers, water temperatures along the Saluda side of the river (right bank looking downstream) were significantly lower than those observed along the Broad River side (Figure 3). This site experienced the most extreme variability during the study, particularly along the Saluda side of the river. In addition to the site s proximity to the confluence and Saluda Hydro, the channel characteristics in this reach likely contributed significantly to periodic extreme variations in temperature observed during the study. Specifically, the Saluda side of the river is dominated by an extensive submerged bedrock outcropping which extends greater than half-way across the river, with the main river channel located along Broad River side. As a result, water depth during normal flow conditions on the Saluda side of the river were typically only 2 4 ft, with the majority of the LSR s volume shifted towards the center and left bank of the river. During extreme drought conditions (i.e., Summer 27) this configuration likely allowed for significant, localized warming during periods of low flow, followed by significant temperature drops during Project operations. It should be noted that Project operations were also detectable on Broad River side of the river at this site, presumably due to the channel characteristics discussed above. Temperature patterns at the second Congaree River site downstream (CR2), located just upstream of the Interstate 77 Bridge, did not differ between the left and right banks on a day-to-day basis and were similar to temperatures observed in the Broad River (Figure 4). Project operations were detectable at this site; however, temperature alterations appeared limited to timescales of hours to days, after which temperature returned to patterns similar to the Broad River. In addition to increased distance from Saluda Hydro, the reduced influence observed at this site is likely attributed to its location just downstream of the abandoned Granby Lock and Dam (located approximately.5 mi upstream of the - 2 -

site). At the Granby Lock and Dam, the majority of the river s flow is forced through the open lock chamber, located along the extreme right bank (Saluda side of river), facilitating mixing in this reach. Temperature patterns at the remaining downstream Congaree River sites (CR3 CR6) were similar to those observed at CR2, with little day-to-day variation between left and right bank and overall temperature regimes resembling the Broad River data (Figures 5 8). Surprisingly, Project operations were periodically detectable at all downstream sites, particularly during Summer 27 when drought conditions significantly reduced the influence of flows from the Broad. Project operations at downstream sites were typically detectable and followed a similar pattern on both sides of the river, presumably due to the mixing occurring at Granby Lock and Dam. These data suggest that coldwater releases from the Project have a significant influence on the thermal regime of the LSR, and in some portions of the upper Congaree River during low flow conditions. Alterations of the temperature regime in the Congaree River are most pronounced upstream of the Granby Lock and Dam, where temperatures on the Saluda River side of the river are significantly cooler than those on the Broad River side. Areas of the Congaree River downstream of Granby Lock and Dam are periodically influenced by operation of the Saluda Hydro Project; however, these reductions in temperature are episodic in natures and typical occur on timescales of several hours to a day. One a day- to the other and to-day basis, temperature regimes at lower sites do not differ from one side of the river follow patterns similar to the Broad River. Temperature alterations in the Congaree River resulting from project operations appeared to be detectable farther downstream and to be of greater magnitude during 27 than in 26, particularly during the summer and fall months. This trend was likely attributed to extremely low flows experienced in the Congaree River due to prevailing drought conditions in the basin during this period, suggesting that the Summer/early-Fall 27 data may not be reflective of temperature patterns during normal water years. - 3 -

4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5-4 - oo (SR1) 26 and 27 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 December-6 January-7 February-7 Temperature (C) March-7 April-7 May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Flow (cfs) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27 Figure 2. Water Temperatures at Lower Saluda River at Riverbanks Z Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow

Figure 3. Water Temperatures at Congaree River Site 1 (CR1) 26 and 27 4 2 35 18 16 3 14 25 2 15 12 1 8 1 5 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 December-6 January-7 February-7 March-7 April-7 May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Flow (cfs) Temperature (C) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27 6 4 2 Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow - 5 -

Figure 4. Water Temperatures at Congaree River Site 2 (CR2) 26 and 27 4 2 35 18 16 3 14 25 2 15 12 1 8 1 5 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 December-6 January-7 February-7 March-7 April-7 May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Temperature (C) Flow (cfs) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27 6 4 2 Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow - 6 -

Figure 5. Water Temperatures at Congaree River Site 3 (CR3) 26 and 27 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 December-6 January-7 February-7 March-7 April-7 Temperature (C) May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Flow (cfs) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27-7 - Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow

Figure 6. Water Temperatures at Congaree River Site 4 (CR4) 26 and 27 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 December-6 January-7 February-7 March-7 April-7 May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Temperature (C) Flow (cfs) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow - 8 -

Figure 7. Water Temperatures at Congaree River Site 5 (CR5) 26 and 27 4 2 35 18 16 3 14 25 2 15 12 1 8 1 5 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 December-6 January-7 February-7 March-7 April-7 May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Temperature (C) Flow (cfs) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27 6 4 2 Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow - 9 -

4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 (CR6) 26 and 27-1 - 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 March-6 April-6 May-6 June-6 July-6 August-6 September-6 October-6 November-6 Temperature (C) December-6 January-7 February-7 March-7 April-7 May-7 June-7 July-7 August-7 September-7 October-7 November-7 Flow (cfs) 3/1/26 3/8/26 3/15/26 3/22/26 3/29/26 4/5/26 4/12/26 4/19/26 4/26/26 5/3/26 5/1/26 5/17/26 5/24/26 5/31/26 6/7/26 6/14/26 6/21/26 6/28/26 7/5/26 7/12/26 7/19/26 7/26/26 8/2/26 8/9/26 8/16/26 8/23/26 8/3/26 9/6/26 9/13/26 9/2/26 9/27/26 1/4/26 1/11/26 1/18/26 1/25/26 11/1/26 11/8/26 11/15/26 11/22/26 11/29/26 12/6/26 12/13/26 12/2/26 12/27/26 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 2/7/27 2/14/27 2/21/27 2/28/27 3/7/27 3/14/27 3/21/27 3/28/27 4/4/27 4/11/27 4/18/27 4/25/27 5/2/27 5/9/27 5/16/27 5/23/27 5/3/27 6/6/27 6/13/27 6/2/27 6/27/27 7/4/27 7/11/27 7/18/27 7/25/27 8/1/27 8/8/27 8/15/27 8/22/27 8/29/27 9/5/27 9/12/27 9/19/27 9/26/27 1/3/27 1/1/27 1/17/27 1/24/27 1/31/27 11/7/27 11/14/27 11/21/27 11/28/27 Figure 8. Water Temperatures at Congaree River Site 6 Left Bank Right Bank Broad River Project Flow