Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Similar documents
PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Pathways to a Healthy Decatur

Speed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13

Pedestrian. Identifying Important Pedestrian Routes. 7 Pedestrian CHAPTER 7

City of Decatur, GA. Speed Limits Study and Proposal

Transit. Transit Ridership in Decatur. 9 Transit CHAPTER 9

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Technical Studies. Overview of Technical Results. 5 Technical Studies C H A P T E R 5

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Decatur Past and Present

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Living Streets Policy

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy


Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

MAYFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Workshop

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

KEARNY MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

SMART 1 Public Meeting #1. February 24, 2016

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

Complete Streets. Complete Streets and other City Initiatives. City & County Initiatives. Honolulu Complete Streets Program

Seattle Transit Master Plan

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

West Capitol Avenue Road Rehabilitation and Safety Enhancement Project

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three

Leaside Traffic Calming Plan Update. Community Meeting 2 November 22, :00 PM

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

Making Phoenix Streets Complete. City of Phoenix Complete Streets Initiative

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

Streets. The Streets are where Decatur shows its true commitment to create a transportation system that promotes health, safety, mobility and access.

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CITY OF DECATUR COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE JULY 2018 DRAFT

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Project Kickoff Meeting February 15, 2018

A copy of the draft plan is available at:

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

The City of Newark Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

Community Transportation Plan

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

City of Bakersfield. Bicycle Transportation Plan. Prepared by: In Partnership with: Prepared for: Alta Planning and Design

Beach Cities Living Streets Design Manual and Aviation Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Plan

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Transportation Assessment

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Vision. Goals and Objectives. Walking

Prioritizing Transportation Policy and Funding for Active Transportation, Safety, Equity and Health

Transcription:

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements The Decatur CTP was developed with participation and guidance from City of Decatur staff, its Resident Boards and Commissions, and numerous residents, business owners, and stakeholders. Thank you to all who helped shape this document and the future of Decatur. Special thanks to the Mayor and City Commissioners for their leadership and support. Decatur City Commission Mayor Bill Floyd Jim Baskett Fred Boykin Kecia Cunningham Mary Alice Kemp Prepared By: Sycamore Consulting, Inc. Kimley-Horn & Associates Georgia Tech Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development July 2007

Table of Contents Chapter 1: Pathways to a Healthy Decatur...1.1 Creating Choices...1.2 Guiding Principles, Vision, Goals and Objectives...1.2 CTP Purpose and Organization...1.5 Next Steps...1.6 Chapter 2: Decatur Past and Present...2.1 History...2.1 Community Characteristics...2.3 History of Transportation Planning...2.8 Conclusion... 2.11 Chapter 3: Decatur s Transportation Network, 2007...3.1 Existing Street Network...3.1 Existing Pedestrian Conditions...3.5 Existing Bicycle Conditions...3.7 Existing Transit Conditions...3.9 Recent Investments in the Transportation System... 3.15 Conclusion... 3.16 Chapter 4: Community Involvement...4.1 Overview...4.1 Public Meetings and Workshops...4.3 Summary of Public Comments...4.8 Phone Survey and Results... 4.14 Public Comments and the CTP... 4.14 Chapter 5: Technical Studies...5.1 Overview of Technical Results...5.1 Latent Demand for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Demand)...5.3 Level of Service by Mode (Supply)... 5.10 Level of Service Results... 5.18 Street Typology (Context)... 5.23 Quality Growth Audit (Context)... 5.28 Conclusion... 5.30 Chapter 6: Streets...6.1 Complete Streets in Decatur...6.2 Intersections...6.3 Corridor Recommendations... 6.22

Chapter 7: Pedestrian...7.1 Identifying Important Pedestrian Routes...7.1 Prioritizing Pedestrian Corridors... 7.10 Strategies for Improving Pedestrian Conditions... 7.13 Recommendations... 7.16 Chapter 8: Bicycle...8.1 Bicycle Network...8.1 Bicycle Parking...8.6 Bicycle Friendly Community Status...8.9 Recommendations...8.9 Chapter 9: Transit...9.1 Transit Ridership in Decatur...9.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access...9.4 Transit Use and Community Health...9.8 Transit Supportive Land Use in Decatur...9.9 Recommendations... 9.10 Chapter 10: Special Issues... 10.1 Parking Management... 10.1 Traffic Calming... 10.8 Rail Road Quiet Zone...10.13 Chapter 11: Implementation... 11.1 CTP Public Marketing and Education Strategies... 11.1 Citizen Priorities... 11.2 Citywide Priorities... 11.4 Funding... 11.6 Other Sources of Funding...11.10 CTP Time Schedules and Costs...11.12 Chapter 12: Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur... 12.1 Overview and Goals of Transportation Marketing... 12.1 Implementing a Marketing Program within Decatur... 12.3 Partnering for Education Programs within Decatur... 12.8 Appendices Appendix A: Traffic Calming Appendix B: Railroad Quiet Zone Appendix C: Parking Appendix D: Phone Survey Analysis Appendix E: Quality Growth Audit Appendix F: Health Impact Assessment

List of Figures Figure 2-1: Distribution of Children within Decatur...2.3 Figure 2-2: Distribution of Senior Citizens within Decatur...2.3 Figure 2-3: Distribution of low income populations within Decatur...2.4 Figure 2-4: Distribution of Carless Households...2.4 Figure 2-5: Distribution of Disabled Residents within Decatur...2.4 Figure 3-1: Decatur Pedestrian and Auto Areas...3.5 Figure 4-1: Decatur CTP Comment Maps...4.3 Figure 4-2: Public Comments by Mode...4.8 Figure 4-3: Public Comments by Issue...4.9 Figure 4-4: Comments Heard from the Public... 4.13 Figure 5-1: LDS Equation...5.3 Figure 5-2: Calculation for Bicycle Level of Service... 5.12 Figure 5-3: Bicycling Levels of Quality... 5.13 Figure 5-4: Calculation for Pedestrian Level of Service... 5.15 Figure 5-5: Walking Levels of Quality... 5.16 Figure 6-1: Commerce Drive and Clairemont Avenue Proposed Recommendations...6.7 Figure 6-2: Commerce Drive and Church Street Proposed Recommendations... 6.11 Figure 6-3: South Candler Street at College Avenue, CSX Railroad Tracks, Howard Avenue and Trinity Place Proposed Recommendations... 6.15 Figure 6-4: McDonough Street at College Avenue, CSX Railroad Tracks, and Howard Avenue Proposed Recommendations... 6.18 Figure 6-5: Atlanta Avenue at College Avenue, CSX Railroad Tracks, Howard Avenue, and Olympic Place... 6.21 Figure 6-6: Church Street Typical Sections... 6.22 Figure 6-7: Clairemont Avenue (North of Commerce) Typical Sections... 6.23 Figure 6-8: College Avenue (West of McDonough) Typical Sections... 6.24 Figure 6-9: Commerce Drive (West Ponce to Clairemont) Typical Sections... 6.25 Figure 6-10: Howard Avenue (West of Decatur High School) Typical Sections... 6.26 Figure 6-11: Scott Boulevard Typical Sections... 6.27 Figure 6-12: South Candler Street Typical Sections... 6.28 Figure 8-1: Proper Bicycle Rack Dimensions...8.7

Figure 9-1: Decatur Transit Ridership by Block Group...9.2 Figure 9-2: Decatur Households With No Vehicle by Block Group...9.3 Figure 9-3: Decatur Low Income Populations by Block Group...9.4 Figure 9-4: Existing Decatur Land Use Near Transit (East)...9.9 Figure 9-5: Existing Decatur Land Use Near Transit (West)... 9.10 Figure 11-1: Survey Question and Response... 11.3 Figure 11-2: Survey Question and Response... 11.3 Figure 11-3: Projects with Biggest Benefit to the City... 11.4 Figure 11-4: Support for Complete Streets Policy... 11.4 Figure 11-5: Desired Intersection Improvements... 11.5 Figure 11-6: Desired Corridor Improvements... 11.5 Figure 11-7: Support for a City-wide Trolley... 11.6 List of Maps Map 2-1: City of Decatur, Georgia...2.2 Map. 2-2: Decatur Topography... 2.7 Map 3-1: State Routes in Decatur...3.4 Map 3-2: Current Sidewalk Network...3.6 Map 3-3: Existing Bicycle Facilities...3.7 Map 3-4: MARTA Transit Routes... 3.10 Map 4-1: Intersection Comments... 4.11 Map 4-2: Corridor Comments... 4.12 Map 5-1: Decatur Trip Attractors by Types...5.5 Map 5-2: Results of Bicycle LDS...5.8 Map 5-3: Results of Pedestrian LDS...5.9 Map 5-4: Bicycle Level of Service... 5.19 Map 5-5: Pedestrian Level of Service... 5.20 Map 5-6: Street Typology Map... 5.26 Map 7-1: Decatur Sidewalk Network...7.3 Map 7-2: Safe Routes to School...7.4 Map 7-3: Preservation Corridor Plan...7.7 Map 7-4: Pedestrian LDS...7.8

Map 7-5: Pedestrian LOS...7.9 Map 7-6: Prioritized Pedestrian Corridors... 7.12 Map 8-1: Recommended Bicycle Network...8.3 List of Tables Table 3-1: Functional Classification System...3.2 Table 3-2: Decatur Sidewalk Network...3.5 Table 3-3: Decatur Bicycle Facilities...3.7 Table 3-4: Decatur MARTA Rail Stations: Average Weekday Boardings... 3.11 Table 3-5: Decatur MARTA Bus Routes: Average Weekday Boardings... 3.14 Table 4-1: Decatur CTP Meeting Schedule...4.2 Table 5-1: Summary of Inputs for Trip Generation 5 Software...5.6 Table 5-2: Probability of Walking and Biking by Land Use and Distance...5.7 Table 5-3: Bicycle Level of Service Categories... 5.11 Table 5-4: Pedestrian Level of Service Categories... 5.14 Table 5-5: Vehicle Level of Service Categories... 5.17 Table 5-6: Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian LOS... 5.18 Table 5-7: Existing 2006 Intersection Levels of Service... 5.22 Table 5-8: Elements of Street Typology... 5.25 Table 6-1: Pedestrian Crossing Distance and Time Clairemont and Commerce...6.6 Table 6-2: Pedestrian Crossing Distance and Time Church and Commerce... 6.10 Table 7-1: Street Typology Summary... 7.14 Table 9-1: Household Income Data for Decatur Residents and MARTA Riders... 9.3 Table 10-1: General Curbspace Management Priorities... 10.3 Table 10-2: Residential Traffic Calming Measures...10.10 Table 10-3: Safety Impacts of Traffic Calming Measures...10.12 Table 11-1: Federal and State Funding Sources... 11.9 Table 11-2: Agencies and Potential Areas of Collaboration...11.12 Table 11-3: Decatur CTP Implementation Plan...11.13