America s Diversity Explosion: What it means for Presidential Politics. WILLIAM H. FREY Brookings Institution and University of Michigan

Similar documents
CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Electoral Engagement Among Minority Youth

The American Electorate of the 21st Century. Morley Winograd and Michael D. Hais NDN Fellows and Co-authors of Millennial Makeover

Republican VP Poll 7/8/2016 Newsmax. 605 (weighted)

2016 National Post-Election Study

Purpose. The purpose of our paper is to analyze changes in the American electorate and how they are changing the American party system itself.

UNITED STATES NATIONAL PUBLIC OPINION DECEMBER 2017

The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro, and Michael Sinkinson Web Appendix

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Civic Engagement Among Minority Youth

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE 2018 MIDTERM ELECTION

Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, March 29 at noon

Daron Shaw Department of Government University of Texas at Austin

THE AP-GfK POLL July, 2016

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 15 AT 7:30 AM

The Red & Blue Nation

Demographic Change in North Carolina

More Interest in GOP Platform than Romney s Speech

TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION RATES FOR WILDLIFE-ASSOCIATED RECREATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND GENDER:

Changing Demographics in the U.S. and the Impact on Congress

Media, Polarization, and the 2016 Election. Matthew Gentzkow

The Economic Status of Women in the U.S. What Has Changed in the Last Years

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Sunday, October 14 at 9:00 a.m.

Demographic Characteristics and Trends of Bexar County and San Antonio, TX

The sample also includes 710 interviews among registered voters (plus or minus 3.5 percentage points)

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Monday October 1 at 4:00 p.m.

McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES ANZALONE-LISZT RESEARCH FLORIDA STATEWIDE SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS NOVEMBER 4, 2010 TABLE # TABLE TITLE

History in the Making: The Presidential Election of Andrew Rudalevige Dickinson College Pennsylvania, USA

CIA Interrogation: Torture or Technique?

U.S. VOTERS BELIEVE ANONYMOUS TRUMP CHARGES 2-1, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; VOTERS ARE HIGH ON ECONOMY, SPLIT ON KAVANAUGH

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 28 AT 10 AM

The sample includes 721 interviews among landline respondents and 301 interviews among cell phone respondents.

WHERE ARE ARIZONA DEMOGRAPHICS TAKING US? HOW GROWING SLOWER, OLDER AND MORE DIVERSE AFFECTS REAL ESTATE

TAKING A KNEE IS NOT UNPATRIOTIC, U.S. VOTERS TELL QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL; 48 PERCENT APPROVE OF ABC CANCELLING ROSEANNE

Chapter 2 Displaying and Describing Categorical Data

LATINO VOTE A Fight For Change!

Interviews with 1,027 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on March 9-11, The margin of sampling error for

Three Strikes Analysis:

Legalizing Sports Betting: A Winning Wager

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

U.S. VOTERS DISLIKE TRUMP ALMOST 2-1, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; MEDIA IS IMPORTANT TO DEMOCRACY, 65% OF VOTERS SAY

National Association of REALTORS National Smart Growth Frequencies

National Survey Results 2018 General Election Likely Voters Political Environment, Trends & Analysis

South Africa: Seeds of Electoral Change?

TRUMP GETS OK GRADES FOR NORTH KOREA SUMMIT, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; BUT TWO-THIRDS OF U.S. VOTERS SAY NO NOBEL PRIZE

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES/PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES Study # page 1

FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22 AT 6 AM

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES VIRGINIA 7th CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT - POST ELECTION SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 15, 2014

Paddlesports Kayaking Canoeing. A Partnership Project of:

Americans in Transit A Profile of Public Transit Passengers

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The GRPS Cultural Landscape GRPS Office of Equity and Inclusion

Today. Decline of Parties. Machines New Deal Realignment. In Electorate In Nominations In Government?

NATIONAL: EAGLES ARE AMERICA S SUPER BOWL PICK

NEW YORK CITY VOTERS LIKE CUOMO MORE THAN de BLASIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; VOTERS SAY NO TO HORSE BAN, YES TO CELL PHONES IN SCHOOL

FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22 AT 4 PM

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Who votes is a key question to understanding electoral politics in the United States. Answering

Missing Opportunities: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Twin Cities Metro in 2016

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey U.S. Metro Areas, 2015 July 23, 2015

IEEJ:November 2018 IEEJ2018 American Views on Energy and Trade Bruce Stokes Director, Global Economic Attitudes Tokyo, November 12, 2018

The Great Debates of 2016

What HQ2 Finalist Cities Think about Amazon Moving to Town. Table of Contents

50 by 30 Live, Learn, Earn

BUSH MARGIN WIDENS AGAIN, DESPITE VULNERABILITIES

LATINO VOTE. The Power of the Vote!

Tim Malloy, Assistant Director (203) Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) FOR RELEASE: DECEMBER 19, 2018

Report to the Benjamin Hair-Just Swim For Life Foundation on JACS4 The Jefferson Area Community Survey

Party ID with Leaners vs Long Run Party ID, Registered Voters October 3 7, 2018

The 2018 FIU Cuba Poll: How Cuban-Americans in Miami View U.S. Policies toward Cuba

Program Review. Computer Business Applications. Prepared By GWC Office of Institutional Effectiveness

Introduction to the American Political Process. Political Participation

A Virtual Dead Heat In Campaign s Final Days

Paddlesports. Kayaking Canoeing Rafting Stand up paddling. A Partnership Project of:

Cobb Community Transit

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

2020 K Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC (202)

ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT COLLEGE PROFILE PHARMACY FALL 2017

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

Political Forecast for 2016

Nebraska s Population and Economic Trends

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Jersey Admits New York Giants and Jets Just Happen to Play in Jersey

Habit Formation in Voting: Evidence from Rainy Elections Thomas Fujiwara, Kyle Meng, and Tom Vogl ONLINE APPENDIX

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February 2014, Public Skeptical of Decision to Hold Olympic Games in Russia

Five Ways the 2016 Census Affects Marketers

GROWING INEQUALITY AND ITS IMPACTS: Bulgaria and Romania

84% OF U.S. VOTERS WANT TO SEE MUELLER REPORT, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS; DEMS DIVIDED ON SUPPORT FOR ISRAELIS OR PALESTINIANS

PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES

Other Neither No Braley Ernst (vol.) (vol.) opinion. Likely Voters Oct , % 49% * 3% 1% Sept. 8-10, % 48% 1% 1% 1%

Liberals with steady 10 point lead on Conservatives

Key Findings. National Survey of Hunters and Anglers June/July Lori Weigel Al Quinlan #15254

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

TRCP National Sportsmen s Survey Online/phone survey of 1,000 hunters and anglers throughout the United States

Diversity & Inclusion 9

Outreach Membership 9/14/2016

Stalemate Continues: CONSERVATIVES HOLD SLIGHT ADVANTAGE AMONG EARLY VOTERS

Strengthening Fragile Families

I-20 East Transit Initiative. Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 9, :00-6:00 PM

Transcription:

America s Diversity Explosion: What it means for Presidential Politics r WILLIAM H. FREY Brookings Institution and University of Michigan

Millions 225 U.S. White and Minority Populations, 1970-2050 200 175 150 125 100 75 WHITES MINORITIES 50 25 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Source: Brookings analysis of U.S. Census data

Diversity by generation: From the bottom up 1 2 3 3 By generation: From the bottom up By dispersal: From the melting pots out

Age 85+ Cultural Generation Gap: U.S. Population Compositions by Age and Race, 2015 65 84 50-64 35-49 18-34 5-17 Under 5 Whites Blacks Asians Hispanics 2+ races Other races Source: American Community Survey, 2015

Hispanic Concentration Areas and New Hispanic Destinations Hispanic Concentration modest growth Hispanics comprise at least 16% of 2010 population and population increased by less than 43% between 2000 & 2010 Hispanic Concentration fast growth Hispanics comprise at least 16% of 2010 population and population increased by at least 43% between 2000 & 2010 New Hispanic destinations Hispanics comprise at least 16% of 2010 population and population increased by at least 86% between 2000 & 2010 Source: 2010 U.S. Census

America s Racial Kaleidoscope: Counties where minorities are overrepresented Black Hispanic Asian Other minority Two or more minority groups None Source: 2010 U.S. Census

Minority percentage of population 1980 2016 50+ % 40-49% 30-39% 20-29% 10-19% 0-9%

Melting pot cities and suburbs Reduced neighborhood segregation Multiracial marriage and identity Extending the political battleground

1 Demographics of elections through 2012 2 Demographics of the 2016 election 3 Implications for future presidential elections

Percent 100 80 Eligible Voters by Race, 2004 2016 8% 10% 11% 12% 3% 4% 4% 12% 5% 12% 12% 12% 60 40 75% 75.2 73% 71% 69% 73.4 71.1 68.9 20 0 2004 2008 2012 2016 White Black Asian Latino Other races Source: Current Population Survey, November 2004, 2008, 2012 and 2016 Supplements

Turnout rate 80 Voter turnout by race in the 2004, 2008, 2012 presidential elections 70 60 50 40 67 66 64 60 65 66 47 50 48 44 48 47 30 20 10 0 2004 2008 2012 2004 2008 2012 2004 2008 2012 2004 2008 2012 Source: Current Population Survey, November 2004, 2008, 2012 Supplements WHITES BLACKS HISPANICS ASIANS

Voting margin by race in the 2004, 2008, 2012 presidential elections Margin 100 80 60 40 20 77 91 87 18 36 44 12 27 47 More Democratic 0-20 -40-17 -12-20 2004 2008 2012 2004 2008 2012 2004 2008 2012 2004 2008 2012 WHITES BLACKS HISPANICS ASIANS More Republican Source: National Election Pool media consortium, Edison Research as reported by CNN

Voting margin by age group, 2012 Margin 60 64 63 57 58 45 30 23 More Democratic 15 0-15 -7 7-4 -12 Ages 18-29 Ages 30-44 Ages 45-64 Ages 65+ -30-21 -23-22 WHITES MINORITIES TOTAL More Republican Source: National Election Pool media consortium, Edison Research as reported by CNN

Presidential election results 2004 2008 2012 Source: America s Electoral Future, Brookings/CAP/AEI, February 2016 Democrat win, due to whites and minorities Democrat win, due to minorities but not whites Republican win

1 Demographics of elections through 2012 2 Demographics of the 2016 election 3 Implications for future presidential elections

States won by Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, 2016 Election Clinton (D) win due to whites and minorities Clinton (D) win due to minorities but not whites Trump (R) win Source: National Election Pool media consortium, Edison Research as reported in CNN Election Center (www.cnn.com/election).

Voter Turnout by Race 2012 and 2016 80% 70% 60% 64% 65% 66% 60% 50% 48% 48% 47% 49% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2012 2016 2012 2016 2012 2016 2012 2016 Whites Blacks Hispanics Asians Source: Current Population Survey, November 2012 and 2016 Supplements

Voting margins by race, 2012 and 2016 87 81 44 47 38 38 More Democratic 2012 2016-20 -20 WHITES BLACKS HISPANICS ASIANS More Republican

White vote margins by education, 2004-2016 -4-3 -11-14 -23-18 -26 More Republican 2004 2008 2012 2016-37 White, college White, non-college

Percent of white residents without college degree < 30% 30% < - 40% 30-40 40% - 50-50% 50% - 60-60% > 60 > 60%

White vote margins in Midwestern swing states, 2012 and 2016-3 -11-21 -16-15 -16-11 More Republican 2012 2016-29 Michigan Ohio Pennsylvania Wisconsin

Population Profiles of Counties that Voted for Trump and Clinton* TRUMP COUNTIES Age 85+ Age 75-84 Age 65-74 Age 55-64 Age 45-54 Age 35-44 Age 25-34 Age 15-24 Age <15 CLINTON COUNTIES Age 85+ Age 75-84 Age 65-74 Age 55-64 Age 45-54 Age 35-44 Age 25-34 Age 15-24 Age <15 Whites Minorities 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 (Millions) (Millions) Whites Minorities Source: Author s analysis of David Leip s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections in 2016 and U.S. census population estimates, 2015. *Refers to total population (in millions) residing in counties that voted for Trump or Clinton.

Democratic-over-Republican Margin, by Age Group, 2016 Margin* 70 60 50 58 58 52 46 40 30 20 10 0 19 10 Ages 18-29 Ages 30-44 Ages 45-64 Ages 65+ -10-20 -4-17 -19-8 -7-30 -28 Whites Minorities Total Source: National Election Pool media consortium, Edison Research as reported in CNN Election Center (www.cnn.com/election). *Margin is defined by percent voting for Democratic candidate minus percent voting for Republican candidate.

1 Demographics of elections through 2012 2 Demographics of the 2016 election 3 Implications for future presidential elections

Projections for eligible voters by race 20 Hispanic Percent of Eligible Voters 15 10 African-American Asians and others 5 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 Source: Brookings, Diversity Explosion, 2018

Percent of eligible voters by age (%) 35 30 45-64 Percent of Eligible Voters 65+ 25 30-44 20 18-29 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 Source: Brookings, Diversity Explosion, 2018

Millions 80 70 60 50 40 30 Projected Eligible Voters, by Race and Age, 2016 and 2028 47 49 53 62 78 75 47 68 20 10 0 0 2016 2028 2016 2028 2016 2028 2016 2028 Ages 18-29 Ages 30-44 Ages 45-64 Ages 65+ Whites Blacks Asians Hispanics Other races Source: Current Population Survey, November 2016 Supplement; author s calculations based on U.S. Census Bureau projections.

Minority Eligible Voters (%) 2016 2036 < 30% 30% - 40% 40% - 50% 50% - 60% > 60%

Election results assuming 2016 voting patterns 2020 2024 2028 279-259 306-232 322-216 Source: America s Electoral Future, Center for American Progress, Brookings, PRRI, and Bipartisan Policy Center

Voting Margins by Race 81 81 More Democrat 38 38 40 54 White Black Latino Asian More Republican 20 10 2016 Presidential 2018 House

White Margins by Age More Democrat 13 0 Age 18 29 Age 30 44 More Republican 4 17 19 19 13 Age 45 64 Age 65+ 28 2016 Presidential 2018 House

White Margins by Education and Gender More Democrat 20 7 Non college men More Republican 27 14 34 14 4 Non college women College men College women 48 2016 Presidential 2018 House

Election results assuming Non-college white swing to Republicans (+10 pts) 2020 2024 2028 209-329 214-324 214-324 Source: America s Electoral Future, Center for American Progress, Brookings, PRRI, and Bipartisan Policy Center

America s Diversity Explosion: How New Racial Demographics are Remaking America r WILLIAM H. FREY Brookings Institution and University of Michigan

The Impact of Changing Demographics On American Politics Recent and Future Presidential Elections WILLIAM H. FREY University of Michigan and The Brookings Institution